Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:18 -0400, Adam Holland wrote: > Hi, sorry I'm not a skilled programmer, I just have a historic SGI O2 to > play around with a bit. If the hardware dies, I won't really have any > reaspn to stay involved with this port. Still cool that you have one though! -- Kip Warner -- Software Engineer OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred http://www.thevertigo.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hi, sorry I'm not a skilled programmer, I just have a historic SGI O2 to play around with a bit. If the hardware dies, I won't really have any reaspn to stay involved with this port. -Adam On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of > that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which > port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an > overview of which of the porters are (still) active for each > port. Once the results from the role-call are in, we will request > other information about the status of the ports. In the meantime, feel > free to update and collect info about the ports in the Debian wiki[WIKI]. > > If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of > jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in > the port to the Release Team before > 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of your involvement in > the port. > > Feel free to use the following template as your reply: > > """ > Hi, > > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend > to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: > > For , I > - test (most|all) packages on this architecture > - fix toolchain issues > - triage arch-specific bugs > - fix arch-related bugs > - maintain buildds > - ... > > > > > """ > > Niels, on behalf of the release team > > [LAST-BITS] > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg6.html > > [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSIu2TAAoJEAVLu599gGRC86EP/j/7FEZ9pxpTEHrBI41GTu6r > nENS5kAZAuxFQHfYLtKexBcgneGd6cgdmr3cIoh1ZL9lJgXq74X8FL5IbWNqUw9S > o9UQWpZJiwIIlH4fqSgFVLIphI0DQr7dXI7xcDIm4kl6Fdruo1tGxX8xqL23jzdP > nQb3jrXv3bj5943MfWeCbODILv2N6qev9VtWeQ6Wmh8PvxRUl7VqgdQaeHtlMsUp > TQT5fz0cw8gc2amlwlOZxaGDV2C8mHboJIKMEsu79BK4SlFSED9rXn4juFPUnAgG > uADsMdBBqEIgSMN42cPHQju+KLfJe/+xScmlzzDS/d7aWWs02TibcQ1ZnPi+bcgp > bd/Wa0lms+Fc2OpcuFle9Lwo+2B+ka1Dd3itm+D0SbmrxoGi6CuMMwydLcQbSJ73 > hHw9HJEIQr2x/ZItNPJrSvvj50rwYXcmFbxtVAwv2pFXfQ37iukYgAaaMvnwpNNJ > 6dM1coCF9skNkXLO8rkZ+5aupGgjpS9BdKKAEQrPy/aoaW9KNCZrLQeA4C3QySBU > OcCNBv7taSjVAVNszKtRIQpu2gzFGAV0u9Gj41qW1JzDHYrmAvMyGxrndOxTmaFr > p05QWgcMsPhNvdHjd6sWLyzJ5NYUKksCPMRgCc0BEd6moIyrt7UFsp2+guJZPBJ0 > pffEJGK2iGtrWmJfElof > =TUeZ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mips-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130901073351.a92862...@thykier.net > >
kfreebsd-9_9.0-10+deb70.3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new, proposed-updates
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:13:16 +0100 Source: kfreebsd-9 Binary: kfreebsd-source-9.0 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-image-9-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64 kernel-image-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di serial-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ppp-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di cdrom-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-extra-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di plip-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di floppy-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di loop-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ipv6-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nls-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ext2-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di isofs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ntfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di reiserfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di xfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di fat-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nullfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di md-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di parport-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sata-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di acpi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di i2c-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sound-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zlib-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-image-9-486 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-headers-9-486 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-image-9-686 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-headers-9-686 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-xen kfreebsd-image-9-xen kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-xen kfreebsd-headers-9-xen kernel-image-9.0-2-486-di nic-modules-9.0-2-486-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-486-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-486-di serial-modules-9.0-2-486-di ppp-modules-9.0-2-486-di cdrom-modules-9.0-2-486-di scsi-core-modules-9.0-2-486-di scsi-modules-9.0-2-486-di scsi-extra-modules-9.0-2-486-di plip-modules-9.0-2-486-di floppy-modules-9.0-2-486-di loop-modules-9.0-2-486-di ipv6-modules-9.0-2-486-di nls-core-modules-9.0-2-486-di ext2-modules-9.0-2-486-di isofs-modules-9.0-2-486-di ntfs-modules-9.0-2-486-di reiserfs-modules-9.0-2-486-di xfs-modules-9.0-2-486-di fat-modules-9.0-2-486-di zfs-modules-9.0-2-486-di nfs-modules-9.0-2-486-di nullfs-modules-9.0-2-486-di md-modules-9.0-2-486-di parport-modules-9.0-2-486-di sata-modules-9.0-2-486-di acpi-modules-9.0-2-486-di i2c-modules-9.0-2-486-di crypto-modules-9.0-2-486-di crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-486-di mmc-core-modules-9.0-2-486-di mmc-modules-9.0-2-486-di sound-modules-9.0-2-486-di zlib-modules-9.0-2-486-di kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-malta kfreebsd-image-9-malta kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-malta kfreebsd-headers-9-malta Architecture: source all kfreebsd-amd64 Version: 9.0-10+deb70.3 Distribution: wheezy-security Urgency: high Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers Changed-By: Steven Chamberlain Description: acpi-modules-9.0-2-486-di - ACPI support modules (udeb) acpi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - ACPI support modules (udeb) cdrom-modules-9.0-2-486-di - Esoteric CDROM drivers (udeb) cdrom-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - Esoteric CDROM drivers (udeb) crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-486-di - devicemapper crypto module (udeb) crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - devicemapper crypto module (udeb) crypto-modules-9.0-2-486-di - crypto modules (udeb) crypto-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - crypto modules (udeb) ext2-modules-9.0-2-486-di - EXT2 filesystem support (udeb) ext2-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - EXT2 filesystem support (udeb) fat-modules-9.0-2-486-di - FAT filesystem support (udeb) fat-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - FAT filesystem support (udeb) floppy-modules-9.0-2-486-di - Floppy driver (udeb) floppy-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - Floppy driver (udeb) i2c-modules-9.0-2-486-di - i2c support modules (udeb) i2c-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - i2c support modules (udeb) ipv6-modules-9.0-2-486-di - IPv6 driver (udeb) ipv6-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - IPv6 driver (udeb) isofs-modules-9.0-2-486-di - ISOFS filesystem support (udeb) isofs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di - ISOFS filesystem support (udeb) kernel-image-9.0-2-486-di - FreeBSD kernel binary image for the Debian installer (udeb) kernel-image-9.0-2-amd64-di - FreeBSD kernel binary image for the Debian installer (udeb) kfreebsd-headers-9-486 - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 (meta-package) kfreebsd-headers-9-686 - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 (meta-package) kfreebsd-headers-9-686-smp - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 (transitional package) kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64 - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 (meta-package) kfreebsd-headers-9-malta - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 (meta-package) kfreebsd-headers-9-xen - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 (meta-package) kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2 - Common architecture-specific header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-486 - header files for kernel of FreeBSD 9.0 k
Bug#717958: marked as done (kfreebsd-9: CVE-2013-4851: nfsserver applies wrong credentials)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2013 21:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#717958: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0-10+deb70.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #717958, regarding kfreebsd-9: CVE-2013-4851: nfsserver applies wrong credentials to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 717958: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717958 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:kfreebsd-9 Version: 9.0-10+deb70.2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Control: found -1 kfreebsd-9/9.0~svn223109-0.1 The FreeBSD NFS server implementation applies the wrong group credentials (supplied by the client) to an authenticated NFS session in specific configurations (exports defined using -mapall or -maproot with -network or -host). http://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:08.nfsserver.asc This was fixed in kfreebsd-10 since r244226, but the security implications for kfreebsd-9 and kfreebsd-8 have just been realised. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm depends on: ii devd 9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1 ii freebsd-utils 9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1 ii kbdcontrol 9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1 ii kldutils 9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm recommends no packages. kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: kfreebsd-9 Source-Version: 9.0-10+deb70.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kfreebsd-9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 717...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steven Chamberlain (supplier of updated kfreebsd-9 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:13:16 +0100 Source: kfreebsd-9 Binary: kfreebsd-source-9.0 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-image-9-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64 kernel-image-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di serial-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ppp-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di cdrom-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-extra-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di plip-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di floppy-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di loop-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ipv6-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nls-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ext2-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di isofs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ntfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di reiserfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di xfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di fat-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nullfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di md-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di parport-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sata-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di acpi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di i2c-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sound-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zlib-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-image-9-486 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-headers-9-486 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-image-9-686 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-headers-9-686 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-xen kfreebsd-image-9-xen kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-xen kfreebsd-headers-9-xen kernel-image-9.0-2-486-di nic-modules-9.0-2-486-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-486-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-486-di serial-modules-9.0-2-486-di ppp-modules-9.0-2-486-di cdrom-modules-9.0-2-486-di scsi-core-modules-9.0-2-486-di scsi-modules-9.0-2-486-di scsi-extra-modules-9.0-2-486-di plip-modules-9.0-2-486-di floppy-modules-9.0-2-486-di loop-modules-9.0-2-486-di ipv6-modules-9.0-2-486-di
Bug#720468: marked as done (kfreebsd-9: CVE-2013-3077: local ip_multicast buffer overflow)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2013 21:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#720468: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0-10+deb70.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #720468, regarding kfreebsd-9: CVE-2013-3077: local ip_multicast buffer overflow to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 720468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720468 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:kfreebsd-9 Version: 9.0-10+deb70.2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream http://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:09.ip_multicast.asc > integer overflow in IP_MSFILTER > An integer overflow in computing the size of a temporary buffer can > result in a buffer which is too small for the requested operation. > An unprivileged process can read or write pages of memory which > belong to the kernel. These may lead to exposure of sensitive > information or allow privilege escalation. kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9 in wheezy will need the patch from r254629 kfreebsd-9 in jessie/sid will need updating to r254630 or later kfreebsd-10 in experimental will need updating to r254629 or later kfreebsd-8 8.1 in oldstable looks to be affected too (likely introduced in r189592 or earlier). The same patch should be suitable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm depends on: ii devd 9.0-10+deb70.2 ii freebsd-utils 9.0-10+deb70.2 ii kbdcontrol 9.0-10+deb70.2 ii kldutils 9.0-10+deb70.2 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm recommends no packages. kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: kfreebsd-9 Source-Version: 9.0-10+deb70.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kfreebsd-9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 720...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steven Chamberlain (supplier of updated kfreebsd-9 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:13:16 +0100 Source: kfreebsd-9 Binary: kfreebsd-source-9.0 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-image-9-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64 kernel-image-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di serial-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ppp-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di cdrom-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-extra-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di plip-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di floppy-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di loop-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ipv6-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nls-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ext2-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di isofs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ntfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di reiserfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di xfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di fat-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nullfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di md-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di parport-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sata-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di acpi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di i2c-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sound-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zlib-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-image-9-486 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-headers-9-486 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-image-9-686 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-headers-9-686 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-xen kfreebsd-image-9-xen kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-xen kfreebsd-headers-9-xen kernel-image-9.0-2-486-di nic-modules-9.0-2-486-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-486-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-486-di serial
Bug#720475: marked as done (kfreebsd-9: CVE-2013-5209: sctp kernel memory disclosure)
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2013 21:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#720475: fixed in kfreebsd-9 9.0-10+deb70.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #720475, regarding kfreebsd-9: CVE-2013-5209: sctp kernel memory disclosure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 720475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720475 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:kfreebsd-9 Version: 9.0-10+deb70.2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Control: found -1 kfreebsd-9/9.0~svn223109-0.1 http://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:10.sctp.asc > When initializing the SCTP state cookie being sent in INIT-ACK chunks, > a buffer allocated from the kernel stack is not completely initialized. > Fragments of kernel memory may be included in SCTP packets and > transmitted over the network. For each SCTP session, there are two > separate instances in which a 4-byte fragment may be transmitted. The commit suggests that one of these leaks may be platform specific, depending on padding of struct timeval. But the identification[] member seems to allow for leakage on any platform. kfreebsd-8 and kfreebsd-9 in wheezy will need the patch from r254338 kfreebsd-9 in jessie/sid will need updating to r254355 or later kfreebsd-10 in experimental will need updating to r254338 or later kfreebsd-8 8.1 in oldstable looks to be affected too (likely introduced in r169378 or earlier). The same patch should be suitable. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm depends on: ii devd 9.0-10+deb70.2 ii freebsd-utils 9.0-10+deb70.2 ii kbdcontrol 9.0-10+deb70.2 ii kldutils 9.0-10+deb70.2 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm recommends no packages. kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64-xenhvm suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: kfreebsd-9 Source-Version: 9.0-10+deb70.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kfreebsd-9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 720...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steven Chamberlain (supplier of updated kfreebsd-9 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:13:16 +0100 Source: kfreebsd-9 Binary: kfreebsd-source-9.0 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686-smp kfreebsd-headers-9-686-smp kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-image-9-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64 kernel-image-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-wireless-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nic-shared-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di serial-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ppp-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di cdrom-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di scsi-extra-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di plip-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di floppy-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di loop-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ipv6-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nls-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ext2-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di isofs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di ntfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di reiserfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di xfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di fat-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di nullfs-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di md-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di parport-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sata-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di acpi-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di i2c-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di crypto-dm-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-core-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di mmc-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di sound-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di zlib-modules-9.0-2-amd64-di kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-image-9-486 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-486 kfreebsd-headers-9-486 kfreebsd-image-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-image-9-686 kfreebsd-headers-9.0-2-686 kfreebsd-headers-9-686
Re: Bug#721540: RM: kfreebsd-8 -- ROM; obsoleted by kfreebsd-9
On 01/09/13 20:14, Robert Millan wrote: > Please remove kfreebsd-8 from unstable as discussed in debian-bsd: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/08/msg00175.html Another reason for its removal, is that the 8.x kernel series will not have upstream security support for the jessie timeframe. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5223958b.7000...@pyro.eu.org
Re: grub -18 *may* break your system
Steven Chamberlain: > On 01/09/13 18:04, Robert Millan wrote: >> [...] maybe we should move the modules to /boot like >> upstream does? And make /lib/modules a symlink or something. > > Yes I think so. It already works with grub2 (it resolves the symlink > for paths used in grub.cfg), and it seems justified by the FHS too: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#BOOTSTATICFILESOFTHEBOOTLOADER >> /boot : Static files of the boot loader >> Purpose: >> This directory contains everything required for the boot process >> [...] before the kernel begins executing user-mode programs. > > whereas on Linux the required kernel modules would be already copied to > /boot/initrd.img > > The FHS docs also imply that /lib/modules may be a symlink: > >> The following directories, or symbolic links to directories, must be in >> /lib, if the corresponding subsystem is installed: >> >> DirectoryDescription >> modules Loadable kernel modules (optional) Thanks for the research. I've just made a patch for this, and partially tested it on kfreebsd-10. If there is no opposition I'll commit it after kernel-wedge is updated (it required a fix to handle symlinks). -- Robert Millan Index: debian/control.in === --- debian/control.in (revision 4929) +++ debian/control.in (working copy) @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ @cc_pkg@, libdb-dev, libbsd-dev (>= 0.3.0), pkg-config, libsbuf-dev (>= 9.0+ds1-2), - kernel-wedge (>= 2.79) [kfreebsd-any], + kernel-wedge (>= 2.88) [kfreebsd-any], Standards-Version: 3.9.2 Package: kfreebsd-source-@version@ Index: debian/rules === --- debian/rules (revision 4930) +++ debian/rules (working copy) @@ -157,8 +157,8 @@ # Change ident to the kernel version sed -i -e 's/^i=.*/i="Debian $* ($(full_version))"/g' $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/conf/newvers.sh - # Set /lib/modules/${RELEASE} as module dir - sed -i -e 's,^KODIR?=.*,KODIR="/lib/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*",g' $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk + # Override module dir + sed -i -e 's,^KODIR?=.*,KODIR="/boot/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*",g' $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/conf/kern.pre.mk # Always set explicit link target to match with ld's implicit target (needed # to build on non-kFreeBSD) @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ dh_testroot dh_clean -k -pkfreebsd-image-$(version)-$(abiname)-$* - mkdir -p $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/{boot,lib/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*} + mkdir -p $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$* # make the install target happy install -o root -g root -m 644 \ @@ -233,12 +233,12 @@ # now install the kernel $(MAKE) CC=$(cc_cmd) -C $(FLAVOR_DIR)-$*/sys/$(kfreebsd_cpu)/compile/$(configfile) DESTDIR=$(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$* install - mv $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/lib/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*/kernel $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/kfreebsd-$(version)-$(abiname)-$* + mv $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*/kernel $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/kfreebsd-$(version)-$(abiname)-$* chmod 644 $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/kfreebsd-$(version)-$(abiname)-$* gzip -9 $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/kfreebsd-$(version)-$(abiname)-$* # fix broken perms in module dir - -chmod 644 $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/lib/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*/* + -chmod 644 $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$*/* # remove loader.conf (part of kfreebsd-loader) rm -f $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/loader.conf @@ -247,6 +247,13 @@ # remove device.hints (built into kernel) rm -f $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/boot/device.hints + # compatibility symlink + mkdir -p $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/lib/modules + ln -s \ + ../../boot/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$* \ + $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/lib/modules/$(version)-$(abiname)-$* + + # README file mkdir -p $(IMAGE_PACKAGE)-$*/usr/share/doc/kfreebsd-image-$(version)-$(abiname)-$* install -p -o root -g root -m 644 \ @@ -333,12 +340,12 @@ dh_installdocs -s dh_installchangelogs -s dh_link -s - dh_strip -s -X/boot -X/lib/modules + dh_strip -s -X/boot dh_compress -s dh_fixperms -s dh_makeshlibs -s dh_installdeb -s - dh_shlibdeps -s -X/boot -X/lib/modules + dh_shlibdeps -s -X/boot dh_gencontrol -s dh_md5sums -s dh_builddeb -s -- -Zxz
Re: kfreebsd-8
Steven Chamberlain: > On 01/09/13 18:09, Robert Millan wrote: >> Okay, so let's just remove kfreebsd-8 for now, and make D-I kfreebsd-9 only? > > Yes that's what I'd suggest for now. Request just filed. As for D-I, I made it kfreebsd-9 only, but also added (optional) targets for kfreebsd-10. They may come useful some day. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5223926c.3060...@debian.org
RM: kfreebsd-8 -- ROM; obsoleted by kfreebsd-9
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello FTP team, Please remove kfreebsd-8 from unstable as discussed in debian-bsd: https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/08/msg00175.html Thanks! -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5223920e.5000...@debian.org
Re: kfreebsd-8
On 01/09/13 18:09, Robert Millan wrote: > Okay, so let's just remove kfreebsd-8 for now, and make D-I kfreebsd-9 only? Yes that's what I'd suggest for now. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52237780.8040...@pyro.eu.org
Re: grub -18 *may* break your system
On 01/09/13 18:04, Robert Millan wrote: > [...] maybe we should move the modules to /boot like > upstream does? And make /lib/modules a symlink or something. Yes I think so. It already works with grub2 (it resolves the symlink for paths used in grub.cfg), and it seems justified by the FHS too: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#BOOTSTATICFILESOFTHEBOOTLOADER > /boot : Static files of the boot loader > Purpose: > This directory contains everything required for the boot process > [...] before the kernel begins executing user-mode programs. whereas on Linux the required kernel modules would be already copied to /boot/initrd.img The FHS docs also imply that /lib/modules may be a symlink: > The following directories, or symbolic links to directories, must be in /lib, > if the corresponding subsystem is installed: > > Directory Description > modules Loadable kernel modules (optional) Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5223769c.2000...@pyro.eu.org
Re: kfreebsd-8
Steven Chamberlain: > Hi, > > On 29/08/13 13:58, Robert Millan wrote: >> Again, if I don't hear anyone against this, I'll go ahead and: >> >> - Upload kfreebsd-10 (with abiname=0) to sid. >> - Make D-I a kfreebsd-9 / kfreebsd-10 dual boot. >> - Request removal of kfreebsd-8. > > BTW I'm okay with removal of kfreebsd-8, I was just unsure when that > should happen. I'm also unsure if kfreebsd-10 should go into sid yet. > Whatever you and others think is best. Okay, so let's just remove kfreebsd-8 for now, and make D-I kfreebsd-9 only? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/522374b3.3070...@debian.org
Re: grub -18 *may* break your system
Steven Chamberlain: > A few times I've had GRUB unable to boot from ZFS for various reasons. > Now I prefer to make /boot a separate partition, and also move > /lib/modules into /boot/, making it a symlink to there. That way > everything needed to boot the kernel is on plain UFS, but everything > else still ZFS. Sounds sensible... maybe we should move the modules to /boot like upstream does? And make /lib/modules a symlink or something. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/522373b5.1000...@debian.org
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For kfreebsd-*, I - test packages on this architecture This includes running a Desktop (Notebook) System on testing and am therefore testing the relevant stack every day - triage arch-specific bugs I've been working on regressions for some time and plan to continue there (in the past I've worked e.g. on libxcb, emacs and the kernel + lots of build failures) - fix arch-related bugs - maintain buildds I am a DD Christoph pgpRxFq23Evwb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#721504: booting from zfs fails with "checksum verification failed"
Package: grub-pc Version: 2.00-18 Severity: grave Upgrading grub from -15 to -18 causes a immediate boot failure. Grub gets into rescue mode with "checksum verification failed" and `insmod normal` fails with the same message. Booting into a live system the zfs imports just fine and after downgrading grub everything's back to normal. Christoph -- Package-specific info: *** BEGIN /proc/mounts /dev/da0s1 /mnt/passport ext2fs rw 0 0 *** END /proc/mounts *** BEGIN /boot/grub/device.map *** END /boot/grub/device.map *** BEGIN /boot/grub/grub.cfg # # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE # # It is automatically generated by grub-mkconfig using templates # from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub # ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ### if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then load_env fi set default="0" if [ x"${feature_menuentry_id}" = xy ]; then menuentry_id_option="--id" else menuentry_id_option="" fi export menuentry_id_option if [ "${prev_saved_entry}" ]; then set saved_entry="${prev_saved_entry}" save_env saved_entry set prev_saved_entry= save_env prev_saved_entry set boot_once=true fi function savedefault { if [ -z "${boot_once}" ]; then saved_entry="${chosen}" save_env saved_entry fi } function load_video { if [ x$feature_all_video_module = xy ]; then insmod all_video else insmod efi_gop insmod efi_uga insmod ieee1275_fb insmod vbe insmod vga insmod video_bochs insmod video_cirrus fi } if [ x$feature_default_font_path = xy ] ; then font=unicode else insmod part_msdos insmod zfs if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 fi font="/root/@/usr/share/grub/unicode.pf2" fi if loadfont $font ; then set gfxmode=auto load_video insmod gfxterm set locale_dir=$prefix/locale set lang=en_US insmod gettext fi terminal_output gfxterm set timeout=5 ### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### set menu_color_normal=cyan/blue set menu_color_highlight=white/blue ### END /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme ### ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_kfreebsd ### menuentry 'Debian GNU/kFreeBSD' --class debian --class gnu-kfreebsd --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'kfreebsd-simple-d610af6cf49f9371' { insmod part_msdos insmod zfs if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 fi echo'Loading kernel of FreeBSD 10.0-0-amd64 ...' kfreebsd/root/@/boot/kfreebsd-10.0-0-amd64.gz kfreebsd_loadenv/root/@/boot/device.hints insmod part_msdos insmod zfs if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 fi kfreebsd_module_elf /root/@/lib/modules/10.0-0-amd64/opensolaris.ko insmod part_msdos insmod zfs if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 fi kfreebsd_module /root/@/boot/zfs/zpool.cache type=/boot/zfs/zpool.cache insmod part_msdos insmod zfs if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 fi kfreebsd_module_elf /root/@/lib/modules/10.0-0-amd64/zfs.ko set kFreeBSD.vfs.root.mountfrom=zfs:base/root set kFreeBSD.vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw set kFreeBSD.vfs.zfs.trim_disable=0 set kFreeBSD.kern.hz=100 set kFreeBSD.hint.atrtc.0.clock=0 set kFreeBSD.hint.p4tcc.0.disabled=1 set kFreeBSD.hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled=1 set kFreeBSD.hint.apic.0.clock=0 } submenu 'Advanced options for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD' $menuentry_id_option 'kfreebsd-advanced-d610af6cf49f9371' { menuentry 'Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, with kFreeBSD 10.0-0-amd64' --class debian --class gnu-kfreebsd --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option 'kfreebsd-10.0-0-amd64-advanced-d610af6cf49f9371' { insmod part_msdos insmod zfs if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root d610af6cf49f9371 fi echo'Loading kernel of
Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an overview of which of the porters are (still) active for each port. Once the results from the role-call are in, we will request other information about the status of the ports. In the meantime, feel free to update and collect info about the ports in the Debian wiki[WIKI]. If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in the port to the Release Team before 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of your involvement in the port. Feel free to use the following template as your reply: """ Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For , I - test (most|all) packages on this architecture - fix toolchain issues - triage arch-specific bugs - fix arch-related bugs - maintain buildds - ... """ Niels, on behalf of the release team [LAST-BITS] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg6.html [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSIu2TAAoJEAVLu599gGRC86EP/j/7FEZ9pxpTEHrBI41GTu6r nENS5kAZAuxFQHfYLtKexBcgneGd6cgdmr3cIoh1ZL9lJgXq74X8FL5IbWNqUw9S o9UQWpZJiwIIlH4fqSgFVLIphI0DQr7dXI7xcDIm4kl6Fdruo1tGxX8xqL23jzdP nQb3jrXv3bj5943MfWeCbODILv2N6qev9VtWeQ6Wmh8PvxRUl7VqgdQaeHtlMsUp TQT5fz0cw8gc2amlwlOZxaGDV2C8mHboJIKMEsu79BK4SlFSED9rXn4juFPUnAgG uADsMdBBqEIgSMN42cPHQju+KLfJe/+xScmlzzDS/d7aWWs02TibcQ1ZnPi+bcgp bd/Wa0lms+Fc2OpcuFle9Lwo+2B+ka1Dd3itm+D0SbmrxoGi6CuMMwydLcQbSJ73 hHw9HJEIQr2x/ZItNPJrSvvj50rwYXcmFbxtVAwv2pFXfQ37iukYgAaaMvnwpNNJ 6dM1coCF9skNkXLO8rkZ+5aupGgjpS9BdKKAEQrPy/aoaW9KNCZrLQeA4C3QySBU OcCNBv7taSjVAVNszKtRIQpu2gzFGAV0u9Gj41qW1JzDHYrmAvMyGxrndOxTmaFr p05QWgcMsPhNvdHjd6sWLyzJ5NYUKksCPMRgCc0BEd6moIyrt7UFsp2+guJZPBJ0 pffEJGK2iGtrWmJfElof =TUeZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130901073351.a92862...@thykier.net