Re: Bug#753781: Heads up: transition: xserver 1.16
On 10/07/14 09:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That package is not marked as auto-buildable, which means it doesn't build on the Debian buildds and thus it can't be binNMUed. So you'll have to upload it manually, or ask the wanna-build team to make it auto-buildable. Strange, I thought someone had previously requested this... the latest build is 1:2.1.20-2+b1 which looks like it was binNMUd once before? Anyway I'll try to request this; it should be a valid candidate because it is freely-licensed, just nobody could understand it... Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53be7b1b.9030...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#753781: Heads up: transition: xserver 1.16
On 2014-07-10 12:38, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 10/07/14 09:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That package is not marked as auto-buildable, which means it doesn't build on the Debian buildds and thus it can't be binNMUed. So you'll have to upload it manually, or ask the wanna-build team to make it auto-buildable. Strange, I thought someone had previously requested this... the latest build is 1:2.1.20-2+b1 which looks like it was binNMUd once before? Not on the buildds: projectb= select distinct u.name from changes c inner join fingerprint fpr on c.fingerprint=fpr.fingerprint inner join uid u on u.id=fpr.uid where changesname like 'xserver-xorg-video-nv%' and version = '1:2.1.20-2+b1'; name --- Robert Millan (1 row) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/f4ad95f1ab738beb29d7877a6b676...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#753781: Heads up: transition: xserver 1.16
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-07-10): On 2014-07-10 12:38, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 10/07/14 09:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That package is not marked as auto-buildable, which means it doesn't build on the Debian buildds and thus it can't be binNMUed. So you'll have to upload it manually, or ask the wanna-build team to make it auto-buildable. Strange, I thought someone had previously requested this... the latest build is 1:2.1.20-2+b1 which looks like it was binNMUd once before? Not on the buildds: projectb= select distinct u.name from changes c inner join fingerprint fpr on c.fingerprint=fpr.fingerprint inner join uid u on u.id=fpr.uid where changesname like 'xserver-xorg-video-nv%' and version = '1:2.1.20-2+b1'; name --- Robert Millan (1 row) Mails for upload+accept are on this list, see e.g. https://lists.debian.org/e1wdybw-7l...@franck.debian.org https://lists.debian.org/e1wdyby-7x...@franck.debian.org Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#753781: Heads up: transition: xserver 1.16
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-07-10): Not on the buildds: projectb= select distinct u.name from changes c inner join fingerprint fpr on c.fingerprint=fpr.fingerprint inner join uid u on u.id=fpr.uid where changesname like 'xserver-xorg-video-nv%' and version = '1:2.1.20-2+b1'; name --- Robert Millan (1 row) On 10/07/14 13:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Mails for upload+accept are on this list, see e.g. https://lists.debian.org/e1wdybw-7l...@franck.debian.org https://lists.debian.org/e1wdyby-7x...@franck.debian.org Thank you both, I didn't know it had been handled that way. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Clustering.
Hi Steven, 2014-07-09 23:03 GMT+02:00 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org: Hi Thomas, On 08/07/14 13:58, Thomas Martin wrote: Is there any way to use heartbeat/pacemaker on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD ? I tried to compile it unsuccessfully (because of this dependencies which I'm not able to compile; for example: cluster-glue). It looked viable to get heartbeat working, but the chain of reverse-deps would need to be ported one-by-one. First of all, glad to hear this! There is hope :) I know I could use CARP but with it it's possible to have active resources on nodeA and on ondeB at the same time even with preempt enable... I must avoid that situation at all price. During the switchover, yes I think there's a chance of this. Or if the CARP nodes are temporarily unable to communicate with each other they may both try to go active at once. Actually this is more than that. Let's say I have a cluster of two nodes managing 4 CARP interfaces (all in the same group with preempt enable). If em0 and em1 gets down on serverB and em3 get down on serverA: em3 will be active on serverB while all the others will still remains on serverA. I want to avoid that and heartbeat seems to be a good solution. NB: output of cluster-glue's compilation (I delete iproute and iputils-ping from build-depends): ipcsocket.c: In function 'socket_verify_auth': ipcsocket.c:2569:3: error: #error No credential type found! Yes I saw the same thing. We don't have FreeBSD's getpeereid because that's implemented in their libc. We do have ucred capabilities though, which have been used in the past, see http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/kbsd-peercred.diff A similar approach might work here, but will require a bit of someone's time and skill. After that I don't know how much more porting work would be still needed or if we hit a more difficult problem later. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org I have to admit that this is really over my C's knowledge. But I will take a look at this and try to debug a little more. Thanks. Regards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cao1ixz+m__k-z5_adakchim9vmhblachdli+9n6+4mxr1gd...@mail.gmail.com
