xfe: new Debian version 1.37-4 with kfreebsd package
Hello! Finally I have found solutions to compile xfe for kfreebsd without errors. Please check the new version 1.37-4 (in sid) whether it works as you want, especially using the terminal. And please give me also feedback, if you are happy with this new version. see https://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xfe.html --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processing of freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_amd64.changes
freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_all.deb freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.dsc freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1.orig.tar.xz freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xao3j-0001q6...@franck.debian.org
freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 13:44:16 +0200 Source: freebsd-manpages Binary: freebsd-manpages Architecture: source all Version: 10.1~RC1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Axel Beckert a...@debian.org Description: freebsd-manpages - Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system Changes: freebsd-manpages (10.1~RC1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release candidate * Update watch file to handle release candidates, mangle upstream version to replace dash with tilde. Checksums-Sha1: bef2b171dabce67979dfbe28349100b7fd4eeafb 1410 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.dsc fde7e90e946b2557b656de17c2a17f5b44f38deb 6726444 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1.orig.tar.xz 05cba1ff4d34436add770a9d2bb108ec9e7a9089 4316 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz afc2b7dd189ce0a0df395ae063ac6962ddada6e0 2906322 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 673987873524d533e948f8fe8985e414459adb039661fcf9a9d7bd2205a8e77a 1410 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.dsc c9b45ffcb185a3438a1512d6aa5a35fa0c168b388fa25115a542f5e5a11b02b3 6726444 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1.orig.tar.xz d0b9f34ccd27caf9ae7463302c88d982642244ad5a8628e378cca28b390121cb 4316 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz 088e20d1c0324b5a3ace73a2bedec77c284912349984596a68bc538d1913e31b 2906322 freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_all.deb Files: 8da58a53256f853d03b3bdefc81b8976 2906322 doc optional freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1_all.deb 7051e69e5a290abc29426f8694ba1a49 1410 doc optional freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.dsc f2edd6d4d6d4d3e8fe69aabbd5442d4b 6726444 doc optional freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1.orig.tar.xz 7a376a00c16ad2502ef632945e1f757c 4316 doc optional freebsd-manpages_10.1~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQv3fUACgkQwJ4diZWTDt79PQCfccEkiXtTQhZl/7/uwQoQscbU I+cAn2rtbivHw2rKWzvL1u/XN7vtP7jO =wCri -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xao4a-0001cb...@franck.debian.org
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian: . patches
Hi Petr, How did you strip the revision tag here? On 08:24, ps-gu...@alioth.debian.org wrote: --- branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian/patches/userland.diff 2014-09-28 23:41:28 UTC (rev 5574) +++ branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian/patches/userland.diff 2014-10-04 08:24:10 UTC (rev 5575) @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ --- a/sys/sys/queue.h +++ b/sys/sys/queue.h @@ -30,8 +30,12 @@ - * $FreeBSD: stable/10/sys/sys/queue.h 251887 2013-06-18 02:57:56Z lstewart $ + * $FreeBSD$ */ -#ifndef _SYS_QUEUE_H_ Currently if I get-orig-source then the patches don't cleanly apply. Refreshing them would only change it to $FreeBSD: releng/10.1/... etc. Did you shorten it to $FreeBSD$ by hand? It might be nice to do this automatically in the get-orig-source step. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004122459.ga17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in^M^J branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian: . patches
Hi. How did you strip the revision tag here? - * $FreeBSD: stable/10/sys/sys/queue.h 251887 2013-06-18 02:57:56Z lstewart $ + * $FreeBSD$ Currently if I get-orig-source then the patches don't cleanly apply. Refreshing them would only change it to $FreeBSD: releng/10.1/... etc. Did you shorten it to $FreeBSD$ by hand? No, I just applied get-orig-source. Probably the expanding depends on version of svn used to checkout. Or some setting of svn:keywords. BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1410041434160.7...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in^M^J branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian:^M^J . patches
Did you shorten it to $FreeBSD$ by hand? It might be nice to do this automatically in the get-orig-source step. After some testing: The keywords are not expanded for old svn: $ svn --version svn, version 1.6.17 (r1128011) compiled Jun 7 2013, 08:51:48 $ svn export https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1/sys/sys/queue.h They are expanded with current svn $ svn --version svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264) compiled Sep 25 2014, 06:15:56 on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu And they are not expanded with current svn, when exported using $ svn --ignore-keywords export https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1/sys/sys/queue.h Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1410041450590.7...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in^M^J branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian: . patches
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes: BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing. Speaking of which .. can we go to usntable there? Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87eguoorub@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in^M^J branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian: . patches
BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing. Speaking of which .. can we go to usntable there? IMHO, we should wait before beta2 d-i is officially released and announced. Otherwise, I do not see any other blockers for kernel upload into sid. For kfreebsd-kernel-headers, I would like to again verify at least build of glibc. It is now inside testsuite ... Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1410041603230.7...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in^M^J branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian: . patches
On 16:02, Christoph Egger wrote: Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz writes: BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing. Speaking of which .. can we go to usntable there? We can do this today, I think! The d-i Beta 2 builds are finished, but just waiting for an official announcement in case anything needs to be rebuilt last-minute. As soon as kfreebsd 10.1 is built+installed in sid, I'll need to commit the minor version change in debian-installer so that sid d-i builds still work. This is pretty good for testing, because the d-i page will have: * d-i Beta 2 images with 10.0 and all the fixes since Beta 1 * sid d-i images with 10.1 kernel+userland making it easy to test if things have regressed/progressed between. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004145825.ga17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5582 - in trunk/freebsd-libs/debian: . patches
Hi Petr, On 16:47, ps-gu...@alioth.debian.org wrote: trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/02_libcam.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/04_libkvm.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/05_libipx.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/08_libdevstat.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/12_usb.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/13_jail.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/14_alias.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/assume_default_login_class.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/cdefs_macros.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/dwarf.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/elf.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/kvm_size_t_kludge.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/libbsd_nlist.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/libdwarf_off64_t.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/libusb_backward.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/libusb_pthread_condattr_setclock.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/makefiles.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/pty_decls.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/rlimit.diff trunk/freebsd-libs/debian/patches/sysconf_cpuset_size.diff A lot of those patches didn't need to be refreshed, we have a lot of noise caused only by: -@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ +@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ SRCS=camlib.c scsi_cmdparse.c scsi_all -@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ +@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ SRCS=devstat.c -@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ +@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ MLINKS+=devstat.3 buildmatch.3 This is mostly not useful to have in the patches. And reviewing the diff-of-diffs to see what changed is made more difficult by this. Do you know how to turn that off? I don't seem to get that, with quilt 0.60-10 when I do: $ quilt refresh -pab --no-index --no-timestamp I'm glad we have cleaned up these patches to use a/ and b/ paths. Sometimes the directory name contains an upstream version and it changes needlessly when refreshed: freebsd-libs.orig/lib/libipx/Makefile -+++ freebsd-libs/lib/libipx/Makefile +--- a/lib/libipx/Makefile b/lib/libipx/Makefile I've also added --ignore-keywords to get-orig-source, so that this shouldn't change any more in future: - # $FreeBSD: stable/10/lib/libipx/Makefile 201381 2010-01-02 09:58:07Z ed $ + # $FreeBSD$ Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004185622.ga17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5575 - in^M^J branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian: . patches
On 14:47, Petr Salinger wrote: BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing. Thanks for you help! It is the first time I've updated the userland to newer upstream, happily it seems to have worked okay with a test-rebuild of glibc and some essential and toolchain packages. I managed to find and fix some things that were already broken due to the 9.2-10.0 change. IIRC there were maybe a couple of things that would be nice to have updated in glibc headers but I managed to work around for now. ntptimeval3 can indeed go away as I think only eglibc (no longer in sid) ever used it, and newer glibc does not. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004190501.gb17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5582 - in trunk/freebsd-libs/debian: .^M^J patches
-@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ +@@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ SRCS= camlib.c scsi_cmdparse.c scsi_all This is mostly not useful to have in the patches. And reviewing the diff-of-diffs to see what changed is made more difficult by this. Do you know how to turn that off? I don't seem to get that, with quilt 0.60-10 when I do: $ quilt refresh -pab --no-index --no-timestamp I refreshed inside current sid, with same options. I do not know what is should be. I played with it now, when I add empty ~/.quiltrc, the extra SRCS=...scsi_all is not included anymore. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1410042127370.7...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
Re: Pre-Depends changed for dpkg on GNU/kFreeBSD
Hi! On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 04:45:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: After checking the s-s-d and libkvm code again now, it seems it does not require any kvm_read(3) at all, so /dev/mem should not be needed either, could you try the attached patch on a jail? (I need to recover my damaged GNU/kFreeBSD system, as now I only have access to porter boxes. :/ ) I just reinstalled my GNU/kFreeBSD system and I tested it outside a jail, and ktrace tells me it does not access /dev/mem anymore. I've also fixed an issue when kvm_getprocs(3) does not find any pid, which might have also been involved in the errors you where seeing. On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 22:03:37 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: No problem. Does that mean you'd happily revert to using linprocfs? If there's no better option, yes. Right now I'm thinking to merge the attached patch for 1.17.14 as a hotfix, and then switch to a pure sysctl(2) implementation for 1.17.15, so that we can get rid of the libkvm dependency. Otherwise revert to linprocfs. Does that sound good? Something else I just realized now is that libkvm pulls in libbsd and libfreebsd-glue into the pseudo-essential set on GNU/kFreeBSD, which makes the situation a bit worse. So as stated above I'll be switching to sysctl(2) later on, but I'm open to a revert if this is deemed problematic too. Thanks for input Steven! Regards, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004215925.ga18...@gaara.hadrons.org
Uploading kfreebsd-10 (10.1~svn272463-1)
Hi, As I've mentioned before on -boot@ and -release@, we intend to upload a new kfreebsd-10 package with the kernel of FreeBSD 10.1-RC1. This will be accompanied by updated userland packages worked on my Christoph, Petr and myself. (Axel already updated the freebsd-manpages in sid.) Until now they have been staged in experimental, pending the release of d-i Beta 2, because they will update udebs. We will also need to update the minor version in debian-installer Git for daily d-i builds to still work. @KiBi: are we at the point where we can make these changes now? Potentially-affected reverse build-dependencies are limited to the kfreebsd-* architectures. No binNMUs are needed. A test-rebuild of core and toolchain packages only found regressions that actually date back to the 9.2-10.0 userland update already in sid/jessie, so those have been filed/fixed along with other bugs closed by these packages: RC bugs: #751316, #753773, #756786, #762372, #752194, #762199 Important bugs: #754799, #755739, #750836, #756553, #653929 Once it migrates to jessie, we'll be removing kfreebsd-9 from sid/jessie, thus closing RC bugs: #750493, #730004 (issues not affecting stable, or already fixed by wheezy-sec upload) I think that leaves us with only three unpatched RC bugs affecting jessie: #740509, #734451, #761418 Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141004234937.gd17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: Uploading kfreebsd-10 (10.1~svn272463-1)
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-05): Until now they have been staged in experimental, pending the release of d-i Beta 2, because they will update udebs. We will also need to update the minor version in debian-installer Git for daily d-i builds to still work. @KiBi: are we at the point where we can make these changes now? We have images, but testing is still happening. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#756794: vsftpd: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Hi, With your upload of 3.0.2-16, vsftpd is built now on kfreebsd, but please could you also enable the vsftpd-dbg package? This commit made vsftpd package Arch: any but vsftpd is still Arch: linux-any... http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vsftpd.git/commit/?id=93a9e1e222df823f37d7d537b45df3723b2d23f0 Thanks! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5430974c.4020...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#756794: vsftpd: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Steven Chamberlain wrote: This commit made vsftpd package Arch: any but vsftpd is still Arch: linux-any... ^^ Sorry, I meant vsftpd-dbg here. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/vsftpd.git/commit/?id=93a9e1e222df823f37d7d537b45df3723b2d23f0 Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141005005853.gf17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Processed: Re: Bug#764017: closure-compiler: java.lang.RuntimeException when run on architectures with gcj instead of openjdk (hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any, sparc)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: usertags 764017 + kfreebsd User is debian-bsd@lists.debian.org There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: kfreebsd. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 764017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.141246975925958.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
D-I Jessie Beta 2 on its way; udeb freeze lifted
Hi, Jessie Beta 2 images have been built and look good to me, so I've therefore lifted the udeb freeze. The release announce should be published somewhen this sunday. debian-cd people: as mentioned on IRC, feel free to sign and put images into place. systemd/dbus people: your packages should be considered candidates starting with the next (10:00) britney run. bsd people: feel free to move to 10.1, which of course includes updating the configuration in debian-installer.git's master. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: xfe: new Debian version 1.37-4 with kfreebsd package
Hi, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Finally I have found solutions to compile xfe for kfreebsd without errors. Please check the new version 1.37-4 (in sid) I've never tried it before, seems wonderful! All basic functionality seems to be working on kfreebsd-amd64 (see screenshot). Thanks for your work! whether it works as you want, especially using the terminal. I'm not sure what you mean by using the terminal? There's a button / Ctrl-T shortcut that launches xterm...? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
Re: [Glibc-bsd-commits] r5595 - branches/experimental/kfreebsd-10/debian
Steven Chamberlain wrote: You can begin building this now if you like, and then upload to unstable (source-only), as soon as you see the d-i Beta 2 announcement: On 20:57, stevenc-gu...@alioth.debian.org wrote: New Revision: 5595 [...] -kfreebsd-10 (10.1~svn272463-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium +kfreebsd-10 (10.1~svn272463-1) unstable; urgency=low As KiBi points out, the udeb freeze is lifted. Please upload whenever you're ready! Then install these locally: kfreebsd-headers-10-amd64_10.1~svn272463-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-headers-10.1-0_10.1~svn272463-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-headers-10.1-0-amd64_10.1~svn272463-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb kfreebsd-source-10.1_10.1~svn272463-1_all.deb and use those to build kfreebsd-kernel-headers 10.1~4 from SVN trunk. Also install it: kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~4_kfreebsd-amd64.deb then build freebsd-libs 10.1~svn272464-1 from SVN trunk, and install: libutil-freebsd-dev_10.1~svn272464-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libutil-freebsd-9_10.1~svn272464-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom-dev_10.1~svn272464-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1_10.1~svn272464-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb then build zfsutils 10.1~svn272500-1 from SVN trunk. Those are the first things that need to be uploaded. I'm still checking the others (freebsd-utils, freebsd-smbfs, ufsutils). I'll update d-i sometime before the next daily build, IIRC at 22:00 UTC. Thanks a lot, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141005021737.gg17...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: xfe: new Debian version 1.37-4 with kfreebsd package
Hello Steven, thank you very much for testing. Steven Chamberlain wrote on 2014-10-05 02:57: I'm not sure what you mean by using the terminal? There's a button / Ctrl-T shortcut that launches xterm...? It was unclear spoken. Inside of xfe there is a xvt terminal which is only need for root authentication before starting a new instance of xfe (for user 'root'). --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
