On April 30, 2015 5:53:02 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/30/2015 01:58 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Hi,
On 30 April 2015 at 07:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/29/2015 02:01 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
2012-09-21 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR target/48904
* config.gcc (x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu): Add
i386/knetbsd-gnu64.h.
* config/i386/knetbsd-gnu64.h: New file
OK. Please install on the trunk.
hmz, according to https://www.debian.org/ports/netbsd/ the debian
knetbsd port is abandoned since about 2002.
If this is true (please confirm) then we should probably remove
knetbsd from
- upstream config repo
- GCC
- binutils-gdb
instead of the above patchlet.
This would work equally well for me WRT config-list.mk builds..
[I should have checked this earlier, sorry..]
Given what Guillem indicated, I'd support removal.
It's often the case that we mark it as deprecated and issue an explicit
error if someone tries to build the port. That seems wise here.
I will apply the abovementioned patch ASAP and let somebody else with
janitorial spare cleanup cycles propose removal of
*-knetbsd-* then.
Given previous discussion in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00582.html someone may also be in
a position to remove *-openbsd3-* support, FWIW.
I personally cannot take care of these due to limited (essentially non-existing
;) spare time.
Same, BTW for Ultrix support which was officially removed from GCC last cycle,
IIRC -- unless config entries are meant to be sticky from a GNU tool chain
support POV per design/decision?
Either way, cannot clean these up properly ATM and not familiar with those
policies, so punting for now..
Cheers,
jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/9ed04423-add6-43c7-be40-144832b4d...@gmail.com
