Re: New version of libedit in experimental: tests welcome
Hello, The release in experimental of libedit received some good feedbacks (btw, thanks to Guillem Jover). I am planning to upload it soon in the archive. So, if you haven't tested libedit yet, please go ahead! Thanks! Cheers, Sylvestre On 02/08/2013 19:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Hello, You are receiving this email because you maintain one (or more) package using libedit. I just uploaded in experimental a new upstream version of libedit published here: http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ It would be nice if you could test if your packages still behave the same. I am not really worried but since it is an important package, I would like confirmations. Thanks, Sylvestre Here is the list: $ build-rdeps --print-maintainer libedit-dev Reverse Build-depends in contrib: - No reverse build-depends found for libedit-dev. Reverse Build-depends in main: -- boxbackup (Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de) heimdal (Brian May b...@debian.org) varnish (Varnish Package Maintainers pkg-varnish-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org) repmgr (Marco Nenciarini mnen...@debian.org) ocropus (Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com) mapserver (Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org) gnuplot (Debian Science Team debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) llvm-toolchain-snapshot (LLVM Packaging Team pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org) php5 (Debian PHP Maintainers pkg-php-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org) ufsutils (GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org) ntp (Debian NTP Team pkg-ntp-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) ceph (Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu) haskell-editline (Debian Haskell Group pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) llvm-toolchain-3.3 (LLVM Packaging Team pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org) postgresql-9.1 (Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers pkg-postgresql-pub...@lists.alioth.debian.org) chrony (Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org) firebird2.5 (Debian Firebird Group pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org) freebsd-utils (GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org) openssh (Debian OpenSSH Maintainers debian-...@lists.debian.org) uim (HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) d...@debian.org) llvm-toolchain-3.2 (LLVM Packaging Team pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org) libreadline-java (Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) prerex (Ryan Kavanagh r...@debian.org) postgres-xc (Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com) Found a total of 24 reverse build-depend(s) for libedit-dev. Reverse Build-depends in non-free: -- ngspice (Debian Science Team debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) Found a total of 1 reverse build-depend(s) for libedit-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/520c8aaa.2080...@debian.org
New version of libedit in experimental: tests welcome
Hello, You are receiving this email because you maintain one (or more) package using libedit. I just uploaded in experimental a new upstream version of libedit published here: http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ It would be nice if you could test if your packages still behave the same. I am not really worried but since it is an important package, I would like confirmations. Thanks, Sylvestre Here is the list: $ build-rdeps --print-maintainer libedit-dev Reverse Build-depends in contrib: - No reverse build-depends found for libedit-dev. Reverse Build-depends in main: -- boxbackup (Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de) heimdal (Brian May b...@debian.org) varnish (Varnish Package Maintainers pkg-varnish-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org) repmgr (Marco Nenciarini mnen...@debian.org) ocropus (Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com) mapserver (Debian GIS Project pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org) gnuplot (Debian Science Team debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) llvm-toolchain-snapshot (LLVM Packaging Team pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org) php5 (Debian PHP Maintainers pkg-php-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org) ufsutils (GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org) ntp (Debian NTP Team pkg-ntp-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) ceph (Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu) haskell-editline (Debian Haskell Group pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) llvm-toolchain-3.3 (LLVM Packaging Team pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org) postgresql-9.1 (Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers pkg-postgresql-pub...@lists.alioth.debian.org) chrony (Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org) firebird2.5 (Debian Firebird Group pkg-firebird-gene...@lists.alioth.debian.org) freebsd-utils (GNU/kFreeBSD Maintainers debian-bsd@lists.debian.org) openssh (Debian OpenSSH Maintainers debian-...@lists.debian.org) uim (HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) d...@debian.org) llvm-toolchain-3.2 (LLVM Packaging Team pkg-llvm-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org) libreadline-java (Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) prerex (Ryan Kavanagh r...@debian.org) postgres-xc (Vladimir Stavrinov vstavri...@gmail.com) Found a total of 24 reverse build-depend(s) for libedit-dev. Reverse Build-depends in non-free: -- ngspice (Debian Science Team debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) Found a total of 1 reverse build-depend(s) for libedit-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51fbed89.8070...@debian.org
Re: New version of libedit in experimental: tests welcome
Hi! On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 19:34:01 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: I just uploaded in experimental a new upstream version of libedit published here: http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ It would be nice if you could test if your packages still behave the same. I am not really worried but since it is an important package, I would like confirmations. I had just noticed that the version in experimental dropped the libbsd usage and started using its embedded function copies, with the consequence of exporting them as part of the shared library. I'll try to send a patch, in case this does not get fixed in the meantime. Most probably adding to LDFLAGS the output of «pkg-config --libs libbsd-overlay» and to CFLAGS the output of «pkg-config --clags libbsd-overlay», and passing these to ./configure might be enough. The fix_gcc_warnings.diff patch should probably be dropped then too. Plus updating the symbols file. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130802203213.ga22...@gaara.hadrons.org
