Re: Upcoming Squeeze point release 6.0.2
[I'm not subscribed to -bsd; please Cc me on any replies originating
from there, if relevant]
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 00:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
the second Squeeze point release (6.0.2) is now scheduled for
Saturday, June 25th.
The archive side of the point release has now finished. The next
scheduled archive update begins in a couple of hours time, after which
updated packages will start appearing on mirrors.
Unfortunately, during the generation of the CD images, a problem was
discovered which meant that the kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} Packages file
contained the wrong information for a particular package.
That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being
re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package
content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from
versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1309083451.2622.46.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Upcoming Squeeze point release 6.0.2
Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt wrote: That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files. Then, shouldn't that be 6.0.2a just like which occurred previously to result in 6.0.1a to replace 6.0.1 -- Kind Regards AndrewM Andrew McGlashan Broadband Solutions now including VoIP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e0734db.1050...@affinityvision.com.au
Re: Upcoming Squeeze point release 6.0.2
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:32 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote: That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files. Then, shouldn't that be 6.0.2a just like which occurred previously to result in 6.0.1a to replace 6.0.1 The a suffix has previously been used to indicate CD-only rebuilds - i.e. where no changes were made on the archive side (with one exception during etch's stable lifetime). As this involved a change to the archive (albeit a minor one) we decided to use a version which distinguished it from a CD-only change. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1309099577.2622.53.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
