Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
2012/6/28 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org: So is there going to be a freebsd-glue 0.0.4, or was that a mistake in the build deps? My bad. Looks like I prepared the upload but forgot to dput it :-( -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnbvyf_zd9obzgykkyct_7od8jrpz61zpttbbvcaew...@mail.gmail.com
Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On 23:12, Guillem Jover wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 12:33:32 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Was that a mistake, or is there going to be an upload of that too? In the latter case, an urgency=low upload of freebsd-glue would now need a freeze unblock. I don't see why, the freeze is supposed to let any package in sid at the time migrate automatically to testing. There's now a different problem. Release Team put a lock on changes to udebs, and with freebsd-utils still unbuilt on kfreebsd-amd64 it would need an exception before it could migrate now (and the new FTBFS fixing). So is there going to be a freebsd-glue 0.0.4, or was that a mistake in the build deps? The version in testing FTBFS too, so I'll open an RC bug for this if it isn't fixed before freeze. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120628160130.gb2...@loongson.pyro.eu.org
Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On 21/06/12 19:47, Debian FTP Masters wrote: freebsd-utils (9.0+ds1-6) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fix FTBFS (missing libutil.h). * Remove handling of kbdcontrol.conf, now obsoleted by /etc/init.d/keyboard-setup. (Closes: #677915) Hmmm this build-depends on a newer version of freebsd-glue than exists in the archive or VCS? https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=freebsd-utilssuite=sid Was that a mistake, or is there going to be an upload of that too? In the latter case, an urgency=low upload of freebsd-glue would now need a freeze unblock. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe4580c.4040...@pyro.eu.org
Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 12:33:32 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Was that a mistake, or is there going to be an upload of that too? In the latter case, an urgency=low upload of freebsd-glue would now need a freeze unblock. I don't see why, the freeze is supposed to let any package in sid at the time migrate automatically to testing. thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120622211209.gb3...@gaara.hadrons.org
Re: freebsd-utils_9.0+ds1-6_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On 22/06/12 22:12, Guillem Jover wrote: [...] the freeze is supposed to let any package in sid at the time migrate automatically to testing. Ahhh okay, I didn't notice this in the d-d-a: Any packages in unstable before the 19:52 dinstall begins on that day will be given automatic freeze exceptions Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe4e122@pyro.eu.org
