Bug#889991: marked as done (lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch)

2018-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2018 06:51:25 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#889991: fixed in lintian 2.5.86
has caused the Debian Bug report #889991,
regarding lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
889991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.65
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

The recent "Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped" has
highlighted the fact that the epoch is not included in the names of the various
package files (source and binary) and that this can potentially cause problems
in various situations (both within Debian and for our downstreams).

Due to the filenames we are already implicitly requiring that all versions used
in a source package name's history are unique even once the epochs are stripped
off (e.g. a given $upstream-$debianrev must be unique and not differ only in
the epoch).

Perhaps lintian could check for this by comparing the current version with the
historical ones in debian/changelog.

Raphael notes in [1]:

> Note however that such a lintian check should not consider changelog
> entries indicating another source package name.

Which seems wise.

Thanks,
Ian.

[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/02/msg00102.html
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/02/msg00144.html


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf, armel, arm64

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils  2.29.1-12
ii  bzip2 1.0.6-8.1
ii  diffstat  1.61-1+b1
ii  dpkg  1.19.0.4
ii  file  1:5.32-1
ii  gettext   0.19.8.1-4
ii  intltool-debian   0.35.0+20060710.4
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.33
ii  libarchive-zip-perl   1.60-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl0.51-1
ii  libclone-perl 0.39-1
ii  libdpkg-perl  1.19.0.4
ii  libemail-valid-perl   1.202-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl  0.07-1
ii  libipc-run-perl   0.96-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl0.416-1+b3
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-12
ii  libperl5.26 [libdigest-sha-perl]  5.26.1-3
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl  0.13-1
ii  libtimedate-perl  2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl   1.72-2
ii  libxml-simple-perl2.24-1
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl  0.63-2+b2
ii  man-db2.7.6.1-4
ii  patchutils0.3.4-2
ii  perl  5.26.1-3
ii  t1utils   1.41-2
ii  xz-utils  5.2.2-1.3

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl  0.19-1+b4

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch 2.29.1-12
ii  dpkg-dev   1.19.0.4
ii  libhtml-parser-perl3.72-3+b2
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.47-1

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.86

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 889...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb  (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 22:09:58 -0700
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.86
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Linti

Bug#889991: marked as done (lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch)

2018-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:19:40 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#889991: fixed in lintian 2.5.75
has caused the Debian Bug report #889991,
regarding lintian: Please warn if versions differ only in the epoch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
889991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.65
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

The recent "Debian part of a version number when epoch is bumped" has
highlighted the fact that the epoch is not included in the names of the various
package files (source and binary) and that this can potentially cause problems
in various situations (both within Debian and for our downstreams).

Due to the filenames we are already implicitly requiring that all versions used
in a source package name's history are unique even once the epochs are stripped
off (e.g. a given $upstream-$debianrev must be unique and not differ only in
the epoch).

Perhaps lintian could check for this by comparing the current version with the
historical ones in debian/changelog.

Raphael notes in [1]:

> Note however that such a lintian check should not consider changelog
> entries indicating another source package name.

Which seems wise.

Thanks,
Ian.

[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/02/msg00102.html
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/02/msg00144.html


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf, armel, arm64

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils  2.29.1-12
ii  bzip2 1.0.6-8.1
ii  diffstat  1.61-1+b1
ii  dpkg  1.19.0.4
ii  file  1:5.32-1
ii  gettext   0.19.8.1-4
ii  intltool-debian   0.35.0+20060710.4
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.33
ii  libarchive-zip-perl   1.60-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl0.51-1
ii  libclone-perl 0.39-1
ii  libdpkg-perl  1.19.0.4
ii  libemail-valid-perl   1.202-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl  0.07-1
ii  libipc-run-perl   0.96-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl0.416-1+b3
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-12
ii  libperl5.26 [libdigest-sha-perl]  5.26.1-3
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl  0.13-1
ii  libtimedate-perl  2.3000-2
ii  liburi-perl   1.72-2
ii  libxml-simple-perl2.24-1
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl  0.63-2+b2
ii  man-db2.7.6.1-4
ii  patchutils0.3.4-2
ii  perl  5.26.1-3
ii  t1utils   1.41-2
ii  xz-utils  5.2.2-1.3

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl  0.19-1+b4

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch 2.29.1-12
ii  dpkg-dev   1.19.0.4
ii  libhtml-parser-perl3.72-3+b2
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.47-1

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.5.75

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 889...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb  (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:24:49 +
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.75
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Linti