Bug#719951: general: Autoremove Wants to remove Entire system
Package: general Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I was uninstalling Iceweasel cause I wanted the actual firefox. I found the actual firefox way to install. It said remove iceweasel, i did, i installed firefox. It works, I went back to trying to installing wine unstable, well as I was getting usual errors, suddenly it says that 295 items are nolonger needed and need removed. I look at the list, its the whole base system... Had this happen once before, and had to restart fresh. I would like someone to get debian to ignore this before someone else litterally looses a system with out thinking twice. The autoremove needs reconfigured. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#719888: developers-reference: Says next stable release will be called wheezy
Le Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:55:22PM +0200, Fabien Givors a écrit : I suggest to rephrase this paragraph so that it avoids this fixed point problem. E.g.: At the time this document is written, it is aimed to belong to Debian jessie which will be numbered 8.0 when officially released. Dear Fabien, would you like to convert your suggestion into a patch ? You can download the source of the Developers reference with apt-get source developers-reference or debcheckout developers-reference. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#668394: debian-policy: Spurious virtual packages mp3-encoder/mp3-decoder
Le Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 09:36:24AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : Would there be an objection to remove mp3-decoder from the Policy's list of virtual packages ? I went ahead and removed the mp3-decoder virtual package as well. The changelog now reads as follows. * virtual-package-names-list: removed mp3-decoder and mp3-encoder. Seconded: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com Seconded: Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be Seconded: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org Closes: #668394 Jonathan, Kurt, is that good for you ? Have a nice week-end, Charles -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#719952: numactl: Fix FTBFS when DSO linking
Package: src:numactl Version: 2.0.8-3 Tags: patch Attached patch fixes the FTBFS when using DSO linking. Thanks, Eleanor -- It is the time you have spent for your rose that makes your rose so important. numactl-dso.diff Description: Binary data
Bug#550231: fisicalab.app: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 550231 RFP: fisicalab.app -- Educational Physics application for GNUstep noowner 550231 tag 550231 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fisicalab.app. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fisicalab.app back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging fisicalab.app, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 550231 ITP: fisicalab.app -- Educational Physics application for GNUstep owner 550231 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 550...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#651093: libyui: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 651093 RFP: libyui -- Qt, GTK+ and ncurses UI-Engine noowner 651093 tag 651093 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libyui. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libyui back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libyui, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 651093 ITP: libyui -- Qt, GTK+ and ncurses UI-Engine owner 651093 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#597857: sumwars: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 597857 RFP: sumwars -- Summoning Wars is a network based noowner 597857 tag 597857 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging sumwars. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of sumwars back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging sumwars, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 597857 ITP: sumwars -- Summoning Wars is a network based owner 597857 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 597...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#579020: mytourbook: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 579020 RFP: mytourbook -- GPS visualizer and analyzer noowner 579020 tag 579020 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mytourbook. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mytourbook back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging mytourbook, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 579020 ITP: mytourbook -- GPS visualizer and analyzer owner 579020 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 579...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652717: install-debian: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 652717 RFP: install-debian -- This command line utility installs Debian system non-interactively noowner 652717 tag 652717 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging install-debian. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of install-debian back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging install-debian, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 652717 ITP: install-debian -- This command line utility installs Debian system non-interactively owner 652717 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 652...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#719953: numactl: add MIPS64 related archs and multi-arch
Package: src:numactl Version: 2.0.8-3 Tags: patch Attached patch to debian/control added mipsn32, mipsn32el, mips64, and mips64el to the supported architecture list, and marked the package as Multiarch capable. Thanks, Eleanor -- It is the time you have spent for your rose that makes your rose so important. d-control.diff Description: Binary data
Bug#548070: libxcurses: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 548070 RFP: libxcurses -- X/Open curses library with an X11 and SDL interface noowner 548070 tag 548070 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libxcurses. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libxcurses back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libxcurses, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 548070 ITP: libxcurses -- X/Open curses library with an X11 and SDL interface owner 548070 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 548...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#611660: tomb: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 611660 RFP: tomb -- crypto undertaker noowner 611660 tag 611660 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tomb. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of tomb back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging tomb, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 611660 ITP: tomb -- crypto undertaker owner 611660 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 611...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672484: gedit-classbrowser3g: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 672484 RFP: gedit-classbrowser3g -- Class Browser for gedit noowner 672484 tag 672484 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gedit-classbrowser3g. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gedit-classbrowser3g back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging gedit-classbrowser3g, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 672484 ITP: gedit-classbrowser3g -- Class Browser for gedit owner 672484 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 672...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677894: gnetic: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 677894 RFP: gnetic -- A tool to clone and make backups of GNU/Linux systems noowner 677894 tag 677894 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gnetic. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gnetic back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging gnetic, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 677894 ITP: gnetic -- A tool to clone and make backups of GNU/Linux systems owner 677894 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 677...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672145: gnome-session-shutdown: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 672145 RFP: gnome-session-shutdown -- A Shutdown command for the GNOME desktop environment. noowner 672145 tag 672145 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gnome-session-shutdown. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gnome-session-shutdown back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging gnome-session-shutdown, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 672145 ITP: gnome-session-shutdown -- A Shutdown command for the GNOME desktop environment. owner 672145 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 672...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660164: innotop: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 660164 RFP: innotop -- monitor MySQL in real time noowner 660164 tag 660164 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging innotop. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of innotop back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging innotop, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 660164 ITP: innotop -- monitor MySQL in real time owner 660164 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#668656: plotter: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 668656 RFP: plotter -- Simple Qt-based mathematical function plotter noowner 668656 tag 668656 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging plotter. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of plotter back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging plotter, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 668656 ITP: plotter -- Simple Qt-based mathematical function plotter owner 668656 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 668...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#667462: nautilus-sound-converter: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 667462 RFP: nautilus-sound-converter -- Nautilus extension to convert audio files to a different format, using the GStreamer framework. noowner 667462 tag 667462 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging nautilus-sound-converter. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of nautilus-sound-converter back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging nautilus-sound-converter, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 667462 ITP: nautilus-sound-converter -- Nautilus extension to convert audio files to a different format, using the GStreamer framework. owner 667462 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 667...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660925: mlpack: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 660925 RFP: mlpack -- Fast and scalable C++ machine learning library noowner 660925 tag 660925 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mlpack. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mlpack back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging mlpack, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 660925 ITP: mlpack -- Fast and scalable C++ machine learning library owner 660925 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677835: r-crane-slidify: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 677835 RFP: r-crane-slidify -- Generate reproducible html5 slides from R markdown noowner 677835 tag 677835 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging r-crane-slidify. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of r-crane-slidify back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging r-crane-slidify, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 677835 ITP: r-crane-slidify -- Generate reproducible html5 slides from R markdown owner 677835 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 677...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678338: konoha: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678338 RFP: konoha -- interpreter of statically-typed scripting language Konoha noowner 678338 tag 678338 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging konoha. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of konoha back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging konoha, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678338 ITP: konoha -- interpreter of statically-typed scripting language Konoha owner 678338 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679982: mmdb: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679982 RFP: mmdb -- Macromolecular coordinate library noowner 679982 tag 679982 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mmdb. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mmdb back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging mmdb, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679982 ITP: mmdb -- Macromolecular coordinate library owner 679982 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#674269: libforester-java: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 674269 RFP: libforester-java -- library for phylogenomics and evolutionary biology research noowner 674269 tag 674269 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libforester-java. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libforester-java back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libforester-java, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 674269 ITP: libforester-java -- library for phylogenomics and evolutionary biology research owner 674269 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 674...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#669893: fractgen: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 669893 RFP: fractgen -- Fractal image generator noowner 669893 tag 669893 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fractgen. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fractgen back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging fractgen, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 669893 ITP: fractgen -- Fractal image generator owner 669893 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 669...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680188: pgsphere: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680188 RFP: pgsphere -- extension for PostgreSQL adding spherical data types noowner 680188 tag 680188 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pgsphere. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pgsphere back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging pgsphere, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680188 ITP: pgsphere -- extension for PostgreSQL adding spherical data types owner 680188 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#668394: debian-policy: Spurious virtual packages mp3-encoder/mp3-decoder
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 03:51:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 09:36:24AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : Would there be an objection to remove mp3-decoder from the Policy's list of virtual packages ? I went ahead and removed the mp3-decoder virtual package as well. The changelog now reads as follows. * virtual-package-names-list: removed mp3-decoder and mp3-encoder. Seconded: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com Seconded: Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be Seconded: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org Closes: #668394 Jonathan, Kurt, is that good for you ? Yes. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679990: clipper: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679990 RFP: clipper -- object oriented development kit for crystallographic computing noowner 679990 tag 679990 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging clipper. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of clipper back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging clipper, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679990 ITP: clipper -- object oriented development kit for crystallographic computing owner 679990 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680071: libplack-middleware-csrfblock-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680071 RFP: libplack-middleware-csrfblock-perl -- Plack middleware to block CSRF (cross-site request forgery) noowner 680071 tag 680071 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libplack-middleware-csrfblock-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libplack-middleware-csrfblock-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libplack-middleware-csrfblock-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680071 ITP: libplack-middleware-csrfblock-perl -- Plack middleware to block CSRF (cross-site request forgery) owner 680071 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679223: tonicdns: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679223 RFP: tonicdns -- RESTful API for PowerDNS noowner 679223 tag 679223 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tonicdns. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of tonicdns back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging tonicdns, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679223 ITP: tonicdns -- RESTful API for PowerDNS owner 679223 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678003: credns: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678003 RFP: credns -- DNS(SEC) verification proxy noowner 678003 tag 678003 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging credns. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of credns back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging credns, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678003 ITP: credns -- DNS(SEC) verification proxy owner 678003 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675962: dbuskit: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 675962 RFP: dbuskit -- GNUstep framework that interfaces Objective-C applications with D-Bus noowner 675962 tag 675962 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dbuskit. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of dbuskit back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging dbuskit, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 675962 ITP: dbuskit -- GNUstep framework that interfaces Objective-C applications with D-Bus owner 675962 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 675...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677740: urbi: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 677740 RFP: urbi -- Urbi operating system to control robots noowner 677740 tag 677740 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging urbi. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of urbi back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging urbi, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 677740 ITP: urbi -- Urbi operating system to control robots owner 677740 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 677...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#684711: nagibot: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 684711 RFP: nagibot -- Jabber bot to talk to Icinga / Nagios noowner 684711 tag 684711 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging nagibot. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of nagibot back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging nagibot, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 684711 ITP: nagibot -- Jabber bot to talk to Icinga / Nagios owner 684711 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 684...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682500: cream-melange-widgets: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682500 RFP: cream-melange-widgets -- Melange widget collection for the Cream Desktop Environment noowner 682500 tag 682500 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cream-melange-widgets. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cream-melange-widgets back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging cream-melange-widgets, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682500 ITP: cream-melange-widgets -- Melange widget collection for the Cream Desktop Environment owner 682500 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682505: cream-pim: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682505 RFP: cream-pim -- Personal Information Manager for the Cream Desktop Environment noowner 682505 tag 682505 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cream-pim. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cream-pim back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging cream-pim, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682505 ITP: cream-pim -- Personal Information Manager for the Cream Desktop Environment owner 682505 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682502: cream-terminal: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682502 RFP: cream-terminal -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment noowner 682502 tag 682502 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cream-terminal. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cream-terminal back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging cream-terminal, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682502 ITP: cream-terminal -- Terminal application for the Cream Desktop Environment owner 682502 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680477: rmilite: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680477 RFP: rmilite -- Java implementation of the Remote Method Invocation protocol noowner 680477 tag 680477 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging rmilite. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of rmilite back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging rmilite, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680477 ITP: rmilite -- Java implementation of the Remote Method Invocation protocol owner 680477 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682747: gosa-plugin-netgroups: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682747 RFP: gosa-plugin-netgroups -- NIS Netgroups Plugin for GOsa² noowner 682747 tag 682747 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gosa-plugin-netgroups. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gosa-plugin-netgroups back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging gosa-plugin-netgroups, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682747 ITP: gosa-plugin-netgroups -- NIS Netgroups Plugin for GOsa² owner 682747 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682190: ohnetlib: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682190 RFP: ohnetlib -- OpenHome UPnP Networking Stack noowner 682190 tag 682190 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ohnetlib. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ohnetlib back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging ohnetlib, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682190 ITP: ohnetlib -- OpenHome UPnP Networking Stack owner 682190 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682487: python-javascriptcore: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682487 RFP: python-javascriptcore -- Python API for WebKit noowner 682487 tag 682487 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-javascriptcore. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-javascriptcore back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-javascriptcore, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682487 ITP: python-javascriptcore -- Python API for WebKit owner 682487 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682503: cream-hotkey-manager: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 682503 RFP: cream-hotkey-manager -- Managing global hotkeys with the Cream Desktop Environment noowner 682503 tag 682503 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cream-hotkey-manager. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cream-hotkey-manager back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging cream-hotkey-manager, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 682503 ITP: cream-hotkey-manager -- Managing global hotkeys with the Cream Desktop Environment owner 682503 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 682...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680382: django-saml2-idp: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680382 RFP: django-saml2-idp -- SAML 2.0 IdP for Django noowner 680382 tag 680382 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging django-saml2-idp. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of django-saml2-idp back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging django-saml2-idp, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680382 ITP: django-saml2-idp -- SAML 2.0 IdP for Django owner 680382 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#681058: v3c-storyboard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 681058 RFP: v3c-storyboard -- Tell a story noowner 681058 tag 681058 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging v3c-storyboard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of v3c-storyboard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging v3c-storyboard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 681058 ITP: v3c-storyboard -- Tell a story owner 681058 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 681...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683173: mysqlreport: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 683173 RFP: mysqlreport -- friendly report of important MySQL status values noowner 683173 tag 683173 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mysqlreport. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mysqlreport back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging mysqlreport, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 683173 ITP: mysqlreport -- friendly report of important MySQL status values owner 683173 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 683...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#580247: openvibe: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 580247 RFP: openvibe -- software platform for BCI noowner 580247 tag 580247 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging openvibe. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of openvibe back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging openvibe, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 580247 ITP: openvibe -- software platform for BCI owner 580247 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 580...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#473213: grails: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 473213 RFP: grails -- An open-source web application framework that leverages the Groovy language noowner 473213 tag 473213 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging grails. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of grails back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging grails, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 473213 ITP: grails -- An open-source web application framework that leverages the Groovy language owner 473213 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 473...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#453471: libradeox-java: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 453471 RFP: libradeox-java -- wiki render engine for Java noowner 453471 tag 453471 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libradeox-java. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libradeox-java back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libradeox-java, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 453471 ITP: libradeox-java -- wiki render engine for Java owner 453471 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 453...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637471: taskjuggler: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 637471 RFP: taskjuggler -- Project management tool with resource-constraint solving and plain-text input noowner 637471 tag 637471 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging taskjuggler. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of taskjuggler back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging taskjuggler, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 637471 ITP: taskjuggler -- Project management tool with resource-constraint solving and plain-text input owner 637471 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 637...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#617820: biosdevname: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 617820 RFP: biosdevname -- takes a kernel device name as an argument, and returns the BIOS-given name. noowner 617820 tag 617820 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging biosdevname. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of biosdevname back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging biosdevname, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 617820 ITP: biosdevname -- takes a kernel device name as an argument, and returns the BIOS-given name. owner 617820 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 617...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#620272: dwarftherapist: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 620272 RFP: dwarftherapist -- Helper tool for Dwarf Fortress game noowner 620272 tag 620272 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dwarftherapist. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of dwarftherapist back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging dwarftherapist, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 620272 ITP: dwarftherapist -- Helper tool for Dwarf Fortress game owner 620272 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 620...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644726: kpdftool: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 644726 RFP: kpdftool -- GUI interface for managing PDFs with GhostView and ImageMagick noowner 644726 tag 644726 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging kpdftool. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of kpdftool back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging kpdftool, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 644726 ITP: kpdftool -- GUI interface for managing PDFs with GhostView and ImageMagick owner 644726 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 644...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#627983: bmake: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 627983 RFP: bmake -- Portable version of NetBSD's make noowner 627983 tag 627983 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging bmake. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of bmake back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging bmake, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 627983 ITP: bmake -- Portable version of NetBSD's make owner 627983 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 627...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#605133: muon: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 605133 RFP: muon -- package manager based on QApt noowner 605133 tag 605133 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging muon. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of muon back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging muon, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 605133 ITP: muon -- package manager based on QApt owner 605133 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 605...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560244: mysql-cluster: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 560244 RFP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support noowner 560244 tag 560244 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mysql-cluster. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mysql-cluster back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging mysql-cluster, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 560244 ITP: mysql-cluster -- MySQL database server with cluster support owner 560244 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 560...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623053: fusiondirectory: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 623053 RFP: fusiondirectory -- FusionDirectory is a combination of noowner 623053 tag 623053 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fusiondirectory. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fusiondirectory back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging fusiondirectory, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 623053 ITP: fusiondirectory -- FusionDirectory is a combination of owner 623053 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 623...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#642319: fcitx-handwrite: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 642319 RFP: fcitx-handwrite -- an GTK+ frontend, zinnia based handwrite input method for fcitx noowner 642319 tag 642319 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fcitx-handwrite. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fcitx-handwrite back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging fcitx-handwrite, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 642319 ITP: fcitx-handwrite -- an GTK+ frontend, zinnia based handwrite input method for fcitx owner 642319 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 642...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641973: ruby-juicer: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 641973 RFP: ruby-juicer -- CSS and JavaScript packaging tool noowner 641973 tag 641973 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-juicer. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-juicer back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging ruby-juicer, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 641973 ITP: ruby-juicer -- CSS and JavaScript packaging tool owner 641973 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 641...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662736: maxwell: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 662736 RFP: maxwell -- entropy-gathering daemon noowner 662736 tag 662736 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging maxwell. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of maxwell back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging maxwell, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 662736 ITP: maxwell -- entropy-gathering daemon owner 662736 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 662...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#664803: spro: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 664803 RFP: spro -- Speech signal processing toolkit for feature extraction noowner 664803 tag 664803 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging spro. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of spro back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging spro, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 664803 ITP: spro -- Speech signal processing toolkit for feature extraction owner 664803 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 664...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#655359: ltsp-cluster-agent-weblive: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 655359 RFP: ltsp-cluster-agent-weblive -- WebLive plugin for ltsp-cluster-agent noowner 655359 tag 655359 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ltsp-cluster-agent-weblive. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ltsp-cluster-agent-weblive back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging ltsp-cluster-agent-weblive, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 655359 ITP: ltsp-cluster-agent-weblive -- WebLive plugin for ltsp-cluster-agent owner 655359 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 655...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#655358: ltsp-cluster-agent: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 655358 RFP: ltsp-cluster-agent -- Generic python daemon for LTSP (core package) noowner 655358 tag 655358 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ltsp-cluster-agent. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ltsp-cluster-agent back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging ltsp-cluster-agent, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 655358 ITP: ltsp-cluster-agent -- Generic python daemon for LTSP (core package) owner 655358 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 655...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648040: jailkit: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 648040 RFP: jailkit -- chroot jail utilities noowner 648040 tag 648040 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging jailkit. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of jailkit back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging jailkit, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 648040 ITP: jailkit -- chroot jail utilities owner 648040 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 648...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675355: qtermwidget: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 675355 RFP: qtermwidget -- unicode-enabled, embeddable QT4 terminal noowner 675355 tag 675355 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qtermwidget. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qtermwidget back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging qtermwidget, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 675355 ITP: qtermwidget -- unicode-enabled, embeddable QT4 terminal owner 675355 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 675...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672868: intel-opencl-sdk: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 672868 RFP: intel-opencl-sdk -- Intel(R) OpenCL SDK noowner 672868 tag 672868 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging intel-opencl-sdk. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of intel-opencl-sdk back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging intel-opencl-sdk, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 672868 ITP: intel-opencl-sdk -- Intel(R) OpenCL SDK owner 672868 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 672...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670214: libkaz: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 670214 RFP: libkaz -- Kazlib's reusable data structure modules noowner 670214 tag 670214 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libkaz. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libkaz back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libkaz, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 670214 ITP: libkaz -- Kazlib's reusable data structure modules owner 670214 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 670...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#672549: libballoontip-java: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 672549 RFP: libballoontip-java -- Balloon Tips for Java noowner 672549 tag 672549 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libballoontip-java. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libballoontip-java back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libballoontip-java, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 672549 ITP: libballoontip-java -- Balloon Tips for Java owner 672549 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 672...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#657974: olena: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 657974 RFP: olena -- C++ Image Processing Platform noowner 657974 tag 657974 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging olena. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of olena back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging olena, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 657974 ITP: olena -- C++ Image Processing Platform owner 657974 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671862: openbox-menu: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 671862 RFP: openbox-menu -- Openbox pipe-menu to display entries in *.desktop files. noowner 671862 tag 671862 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging openbox-menu. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of openbox-menu back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging openbox-menu, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 671862 ITP: openbox-menu -- Openbox pipe-menu to display entries in *.desktop files. owner 671862 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 671...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671595: the-powder-toy: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 671595 RFP: the-powder-toy -- A physics sandbox game similar to the classic, Falling Sand noowner 671595 tag 671595 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging the-powder-toy. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of the-powder-toy back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging the-powder-toy, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 671595 ITP: the-powder-toy -- A physics sandbox game similar to the classic, Falling Sand owner 671595 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 671...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#666744: fbcmd: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 666744 RFP: fbcmd -- command line interface (CLI) for facebook noowner 666744 tag 666744 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fbcmd. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fbcmd back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging fbcmd, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 666744 ITP: fbcmd -- command line interface (CLI) for facebook owner 666744 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 666...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675467: bilibop: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 675467 RFP: bilibop -- run Debian from external media noowner 675467 tag 675467 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging bilibop. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of bilibop back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging bilibop, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 675467 ITP: bilibop -- run Debian from external media owner 675467 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 675...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#670984: libphidget21: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 670984 RFP: libphidget21 -- Phidgets runtime library noowner 670984 tag 670984 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libphidget21. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libphidget21 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libphidget21, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 670984 ITP: libphidget21 -- Phidgets runtime library owner 670984 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 670...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648610: freefilesync: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 648610 RFP: freefilesync -- folder comparison and synchronization tool. noowner 648610 tag 648610 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging freefilesync. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of freefilesync back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging freefilesync, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 648610 ITP: freefilesync -- folder comparison and synchronization tool. owner 648610 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 648...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671296: sstp-client: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 671296 RFP: sstp-client -- Connect to a Microsoft Windows 2008 server using SSTP VPN noowner 671296 tag 671296 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging sstp-client. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of sstp-client back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging sstp-client, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 671296 ITP: sstp-client -- Connect to a Microsoft Windows 2008 server using SSTP VPN owner 671296 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 671...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#671385: omphalos: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 671385 RFP: omphalos -- Network enumeration and domination noowner 671385 tag 671385 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging omphalos. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of omphalos back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging omphalos, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 671385 ITP: omphalos -- Network enumeration and domination owner 671385 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 671...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652720: updeb: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 652720 RFP: updeb -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system noowner 652720 tag 652720 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging updeb. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of updeb back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging updeb, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 652720 ITP: updeb -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system owner 652720 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 652...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678190: dbvisualizer: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678190 RFP: dbvisualizer -- multi-database management tool noowner 678190 tag 678190 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dbvisualizer. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of dbvisualizer back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging dbvisualizer, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678190 ITP: dbvisualizer -- multi-database management tool owner 678190 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678815: wmfs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678815 RFP: wmfs -- Window Manager From Scratch noowner 678815 tag 678815 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging wmfs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of wmfs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging wmfs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678815 ITP: wmfs -- Window Manager From Scratch owner 678815 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680475: jsamp: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680475 RFP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol noowner 680475 tag 680475 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging jsamp. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of jsamp back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging jsamp, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680475 ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol owner 680475 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679988: gpp4: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679988 RFP: gpp4 -- A standalone, drop-in replacement for the CCP4 library noowner 679988 tag 679988 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gpp4. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gpp4 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging gpp4, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679988 ITP: gpp4 -- A standalone, drop-in replacement for the CCP4 library owner 679988 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677845: r-crane-devtools: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 677845 RFP: r-crane-devtools -- Tools to make developing R code easier noowner 677845 tag 677845 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging r-crane-devtools. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of r-crane-devtools back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging r-crane-devtools, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 677845 ITP: r-crane-devtools -- Tools to make developing R code easier owner 677845 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 677...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678870: strace+: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678870 RFP: strace+ -- An improved version of strace that collects stack traces noowner 678870 tag 678870 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging strace+. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of strace+ back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging strace+, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678870 ITP: strace+ -- An improved version of strace that collects stack traces owner 678870 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679905: cctbx: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679905 RFP: cctbx -- Computational Crystallography Toolbox noowner 679905 tag 679905 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cctbx. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cctbx back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging cctbx, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679905 ITP: cctbx -- Computational Crystallography Toolbox owner 679905 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679504: lazylpsolverlibs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679504 RFP: lazylpsolverlibs -- libraries that proxy function calls noowner 679504 tag 679504 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging lazylpsolverlibs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of lazylpsolverlibs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging lazylpsolverlibs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679504 ITP: lazylpsolverlibs -- libraries that proxy function calls owner 679504 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679237: ecflow: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679237 RFP: ecflow -- Work flow controller for running programs based on time or dependencies noowner 679237 tag 679237 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ecflow. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ecflow back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging ecflow, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679237 ITP: ecflow -- Work flow controller for running programs based on time or dependencies owner 679237 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680426: libprocess: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680426 RFP: libprocess -- An actor-style concurrency library for C++. noowner 680426 tag 680426 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libprocess. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libprocess back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libprocess, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680426 ITP: libprocess -- An actor-style concurrency library for C++. owner 680426 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679559: scratch-text-editor: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679559 RFP: scratch-text-editor -- text editor written in Vala noowner 679559 tag 679559 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging scratch-text-editor. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of scratch-text-editor back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging scratch-text-editor, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679559 ITP: scratch-text-editor -- text editor written in Vala owner 679559 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676504: pocl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 676504 RFP: pocl -- Portable OpenCL noowner 676504 tag 676504 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pocl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pocl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging pocl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 676504 ITP: pocl -- Portable OpenCL owner 676504 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 676...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678641: libpoe-component-server-jsonrpc-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678641 RFP: libpoe-component-server-jsonrpc-perl -- POE tcp and http based JSON-RPC noowner 678641 tag 678641 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libpoe-component-server-jsonrpc-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libpoe-component-server-jsonrpc-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libpoe-component-server-jsonrpc-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678641 ITP: libpoe-component-server-jsonrpc-perl -- POE tcp and http based JSON-RPC owner 678641 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678598: e2defrag: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678598 RFP: e2defrag -- ext[234] filesystem defragmenter noowner 678598 tag 678598 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging e2defrag. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of e2defrag back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging e2defrag, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678598 ITP: e2defrag -- ext[234] filesystem defragmenter owner 678598 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#677860: gloss: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 677860 RFP: gloss -- Pygame OpenGL wrapper noowner 677860 tag 677860 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gloss. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gloss back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging gloss, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 677860 ITP: gloss -- Pygame OpenGL wrapper owner 677860 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 677...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#678643: libpoe-component-schedule-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 678643 RFP: libpoe-component-schedule-perl -- This perl module is a POE component noowner 678643 tag 678643 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libpoe-component-schedule-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libpoe-component-schedule-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging libpoe-component-schedule-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 678643 ITP: libpoe-component-schedule-perl -- This perl module is a POE component owner 678643 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 678...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679078: acpi-support-minimal: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679078 RFP: acpi-support-minimal -- minimal acpi scripts noowner 679078 tag 679078 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging acpi-support-minimal. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of acpi-support-minimal back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging acpi-support-minimal, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679078 ITP: acpi-support-minimal -- minimal acpi scripts owner 679078 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#676295: cellml-api: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 676295 RFP: cellml-api -- The CellML API Reference Implementation lets you manipulate and simulate mathematical models in the CellML modelling language noowner 676295 tag 676295 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cellml-api. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cellml-api back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging cellml-api, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 676295 ITP: cellml-api -- The CellML API Reference Implementation lets you manipulate and simulate mathematical models in the CellML modelling language owner 676295 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 676...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679426: python-tonicdnscli: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679426 RFP: python-tonicdnscli -- TonicDNS Client noowner 679426 tag 679426 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-tonicdnscli. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-tonicdnscli back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-tonicdnscli, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679426 ITP: python-tonicdnscli -- TonicDNS Client owner 679426 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680087: openmm: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680087 RFP: openmm -- library for molecular dynamics noowner 680087 tag 680087 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging openmm. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of openmm back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging openmm, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680087 ITP: openmm -- library for molecular dynamics owner 680087 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#681704: homealoned: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 681704 RFP: homealoned -- Daemon that run personalized scripts when is alone in the network noowner 681704 tag 681704 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging homealoned. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of homealoned back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging homealoned, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 681704 ITP: homealoned -- Daemon that run personalized scripts when is alone in the network owner 681704 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 681...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680958: be-shell: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680958 RFP: be-shell -- lightweight kde shell noowner 680958 tag 680958 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging be-shell. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of be-shell back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging be-shell, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680958 ITP: be-shell -- lightweight kde shell owner 680958 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#681509: google-apps: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 681509 RFP: google-apps -- command line tool to manage Google Apps via API 2.0 noowner 681509 tag 681509 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging google-apps. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of google-apps back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging google-apps, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 681509 ITP: google-apps -- command line tool to manage Google Apps via API 2.0 owner 681509 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 681...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#680565: taudem: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 680565 RFP: taudem -- Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models noowner 680565 tag 680565 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging taudem. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of taudem back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 12 months. If you are still interested in packaging taudem, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 680565 ITP: taudem -- Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models owner 680565 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 680...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
