Bug#623429: trayer sets crazy strut values

2011-06-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I've reviewed this bug and it appears to still exist in trayer version
1.1.1-1, and indeed in upstream as well. This problem exists in an
up-to-date as of today testing system on amd64 using the nouveau X driver.

In my experimenting I have determined that rolling back to 1.0-5 fixes
the problem for me.

I am attaching here several files. First are the xprop outputs from
the two versions of trayer. These were obtained from 

$ trayer --SetPartialStrut true --SetDockType true

The difference in the *_STRUT settings is clear.

Additionally, I've stuck some debug prints in panel.c which produces
the following output: 

panel_set_wm_strut:70   : ENTER
panel_set_wm_strut:103  : raw strut 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1439
panel_set_wm_strut:104  : type 3. width 26. from 0 to 1439
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 21917488
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 0
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 0
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 0
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 874
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 0
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: -276931072
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 32767
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 0
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 0
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 1451580027
panel_set_wm_strut:121  : strut return: 32736
panel_set_wm_strut:124  : RETURN

lines 103 and 104 show how panel.c is trying to set the strut values
properly for my setup. 

the lines for 121 show the values extracted back out of the property
via XGetWindowProperty. Those strut values somewhat correspond with
the xprop result for that particular run:

$ xprop | grep STRUT
_NET_WM_STRUT(CARDINAL) = 0, 0, 0, 0
_NET_WM_STRUT_PARTIAL(CARDINAL) = 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 21980368, 0, 874, 
4018036224, 0, 1451580027

While it's not a perfect match, it's a close enough match to suggest
to me that something fishy is going on in gdk(?). Or that the problem
exists somewhere in the infrastructure underlying trayer. 

I have compared the current debian and upstream versions against the
version at 

http://anonscm.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/oldtrayer/

and the only relevant change I can see is that calls to
GDK_DISPLAY() have been replaced with gdk_helper_display(). 

Currently installed versions of immediate depends of trayer:

libatk1.0-0  2.0.0-1
libc6  2.13-4
libcairo2  1.10.2-6
libfontconfig1  2.8.0-2.2
libfreetype6  2.4.4-1
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0  2.23.3-3
libglib2.0-0  2.28.6-1
libgtk2.0-0  2.24.4-3
libpango1.0-0  1.28.3-6
libx11-6  2:1.4.3-1
libxmu6  2:1.1.0-2


Let me know what else I can do to help track down this problem. 

Thanks

A

-- 
WM_STATE(WM_STATE):
window state: Normal
icon window: 0x0
_NET_WM_STRUT(CARDINAL) = 0, 0, 0, 26
_NET_WM_STRUT_PARTIAL(CARDINAL) = 0, 0, 0, 26, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1440
_NET_WM_STATE(ATOM) = _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_PAGER, _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR, 
_NET_WM_STATE_STICKY
_WIN_HINTS(CARDINAL) = 1
WM_HINTS(WM_HINTS):
Client accepts input or input focus: True
Initial state is Normal State.
window id # of group leader: 0xe1
_MOTIF_WM_HINTS(_MOTIF_WM_HINTS) = 0x2, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0
_NET_WM_SYNC_REQUEST_COUNTER(CARDINAL) = 14680069
_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE(ATOM) = _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_DOCK
_NET_WM_USER_TIME_WINDOW(WINDOW): window id # 0xe4
WM_CLIENT_LEADER(WINDOW): window id # 0xe1
_NET_WM_PID(CARDINAL) = 18044
WM_LOCALE_NAME(STRING) = en_US.UTF-8
WM_CLIENT_MACHINE(STRING) = blinky
WM_NORMAL_HINTS(WM_SIZE_HINTS):
program specified location: 0, 0
program specified minimum size: 1440 by 26
program specified maximum size: 1440 by 26
window gravity: NorthWest
WM_PROTOCOLS(ATOM): protocols  WM_DELETE_WINDOW, WM_TAKE_FOCUS, _NET_WM_PING, 
_NET_WM_SYNC_REQUEST
WM_CLASS(STRING) = panel, trayer
WM_ICON_NAME(STRING) = panel
_NET_WM_ICON_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = panel
WM_NAME(STRING) = panel
_NET_WM_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = panel
WM_STATE(WM_STATE):
window state: Normal
icon window: 0x0
_NET_WM_STRUT(CARDINAL) = 0, 0, 0, 0
_NET_WM_STRUT_PARTIAL(CARDINAL) = 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9234816, 0, 2303789616, 
874, 4215058
WM_HINTS(WM_HINTS):
Client accepts input or input focus: False
Initial state is Normal State.
window id # of group leader: 0xe1
_MOTIF_WM_HINTS(_MOTIF_WM_HINTS) = 0x2, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0
_NET_WM_SYNC_REQUEST_COUNTER(CARDINAL) = 14680069
_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE(ATOM) = _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_DOCK
_NET_WM_USER_TIME_WINDOW(WINDOW): window id # 0xe4
WM_CLIENT_LEADER(WINDOW): window id # 0xe1
_NET_WM_PID(CARDINAL) = 32073
WM_LOCALE_NAME(STRING) = en_US.UTF-8
WM_CLIENT_MACHINE(STRING) = blinky
WM_NORMAL_HINTS(WM_SIZE_HINTS):
program specified location: 0, 0
program specified minimum size: 1440 by 26
program specified maximum size: 1440 by 26
window gravity: NorthWest

Bug#599003: emacs23-common: flymake fails on certain .tex filenames

2010-10-03 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: emacs23-common
Version: 23.1+1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When using flymake with .tex filenames that include a number just before the 
.tex extension, flymake fails to find the master file giving the message 
Flymake:! in the status bar and rendering flymake useless. 

For example:

myfile1.tex will fail where

myfile1a.tex will succeeed. 

I have not tested this with other modes or file extensions, but looking at 

http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/emacs/emacs/lisp/progmodes/flymake.el?view=markup

there is a regex in (defcustom flymake-allowed-file-name-masks...) that appears 
to apply:

([0-9]+\\.tex\\' flymake-master-tex-init flymake-master-cleanup)

when I remove this line from flymake.el, the problem appears solved. I don't 
know what other ramifications this may have, but it seems to work for me...

trivial patch attached, but note this is against rev 1.63 from savannah. not 
sure if/how it applies to debian source.

A


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages emacs23-common depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.15.7.2   Debian package management system
ii  emacsen-common1.4.19 Common facilities for all emacsen

emacs23-common recommends no packages.

Versions of packages emacs23-common suggests:
pn  emacs23-common-non-dfsg   none (no description available)
pn  emacs23-elnone (no description available)

-- no debconf information
--- flymake.el  2010-10-03 10:50:42.0 -0700
+++ flymake_org.el  2010-10-03 10:52:45.0 -0700
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
 (\\.php[345]?\\' flymake-php-init)
 (\\.h\\' flymake-master-make-header-init flymake-master-cleanup)
 (\\.java\\' flymake-simple-make-java-init flymake-simple-java-cleanup)
-;;([0-9]+\\.tex\\' flymake-master-tex-init flymake-master-cleanup)
+([0-9]+\\.tex\\' flymake-master-tex-init flymake-master-cleanup)
 (\\.tex\\' flymake-simple-tex-init)
 (\\.idl\\' flymake-simple-make-init)
 ;; (\\.cpp\\' 1)


Bug#599003: Acknowledgement (emacs23-common: flymake fails on certain .tex filenames)

2010-10-03 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Oops, here's a patch the right way around...

A
--- flymake_org.el  2010-10-03 10:52:45.0 -0700
+++ flymake.el  2010-10-03 10:50:42.0 -0700
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
 (\\.php[345]?\\' flymake-php-init)
 (\\.h\\' flymake-master-make-header-init flymake-master-cleanup)
 (\\.java\\' flymake-simple-make-java-init flymake-simple-java-cleanup)
-([0-9]+\\.tex\\' flymake-master-tex-init flymake-master-cleanup)
+;;([0-9]+\\.tex\\' flymake-master-tex-init flymake-master-cleanup)
 (\\.tex\\' flymake-simple-tex-init)
 (\\.idl\\' flymake-simple-make-init)
 ;; (\\.cpp\\' 1)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#452162: hmmm... solved but maybe it's still a bug?

2008-01-04 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:30:42PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
 reassign 452162 gnucash
 thanks
 
 Whoops, sorry for replying without reading this additional information.
 
 Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 12:14 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West a
 écrit :
  I went back to step zero. This problem showed up after a segfault in
  gnucash. This segfault occurred while printing checks (uses
  gtkprint). Subsequent instances of gnucash could no longer print
  checks. Since I had two machines fully-up-to-date. I decided to try a
  different user on the broken machine. lo and behold, no problem. :( or
  :) depending on your perspective. Anyway, moving ~/.gconf out of the
  way solved the problem. 
  
  Clearly, the segfault corrupted something in ~/.gconf/* resulting in
  this behavior. There is probably no way to track down the segfault as
  it happened in an instance of gnucash that may have been up for many
  days and may have been up across a variety of upgrades... 
  
  I have a copy of the problematic ~/.gconf available if you would
  like. 
 
 This definitely looks like a bug in gnucash, and the copy of the
 problematic gconf keys will certainly be useful to the gnucash
 maintainer.

I have that available. Well, I have the whole stinking tree available
;) if anyone wants it. 

The more I think about it, though, and the more I work on gnucash, I
suspect this is a fleeting, one-time thing. I strongly suspect that
instance of gnucash had been live across at least a couple significant
updates in sid, which brought it to its knees. I don't think any app
could be expected to gracefully recover from that kind of systemic
change. It was an unfortunate side-effect of the crash that corrupted
some gconf keys. 

This should probably be closed as unreproducible, or needinfo, or
whatever. 

Oh and thanks for finally getting to this. I know it was cryptic at
best. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#452162: hmmm... solved but maybe it's still a bug?

2007-11-25 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Okay, I've narrowed this down to a problem in .gconf. After playing
around with some other machines and upgrading various packages trying
to find this, I ended up with another machine fully up-to-date but
*without* the problem.

I went back to step zero. This problem showed up after a segfault in
gnucash. This segfault occurred while printing checks (uses
gtkprint). Subsequent instances of gnucash could no longer print
checks. Since I had two machines fully-up-to-date. I decided to try a
different user on the broken machine. lo and behold, no problem. :( or
:) depending on your perspective. Anyway, moving ~/.gconf out of the
way solved the problem. 

Clearly, the segfault corrupted something in ~/.gconf/* resulting in
this behavior. There is probably no way to track down the segfault as
it happened in an instance of gnucash that may have been up for many
days and may have been up across a variety of upgrades... 

I have a copy of the problematic ~/.gconf available if you would
like. 

Also, the gnumeric problem appears to be completely unrelated. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#452162: libgtk2.0-0: gtkPrint blank pages in gnucash and gnumeric

2007-11-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.12.1-3
Severity: important


Beginning somewhere around November 19, 2007 some printing has broken
and I think its related to gtkPrint. I realise there are lots of
printing changes going on in deb right now, but I think the commonality
I'm seeing in symptoms points to gtkPrint. 

Specifically, in gnucash (which uses both gnomeprint and gtkprint) check
printing is broken. For each check printed, a blank page is printed.
This result is consistent whether printing to a file (pdf or ps) or to an actual
printer. Check printing in gnucash uses gtkprint. Meanwhile, report
printing, using gnomeprint, functions just fine. I've also tested this
on gnucash svn trunk with the same results.

In gnumeric, which uses gtkprint, printing is completely broken. It
causes an foomatic-rip failed error in cups. There is more to the
gnumeric issue, I think. I downgraded out of the ghostscript package
into the gs-* packages and the foomatic-rip failure went away, and
gnumeric then printed only blank pages. 

I tried to downgrade libgtk, but that didn't seem to help, which
suggests it may be some other dependency involved. But I think it all
stems from gtkprint. 

Please let me know what I can do to help debug this. I'm happy to
downgrade packages, or try different packages to help diagnose this. 

thanks

A


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0 depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.20.0-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.6.1-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2 1.4.10-1   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libcomerr21.40.2-1   common error description library
ii  libcupsys21.3.4-1Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libfontconfig12.5.0-2generic font configuration library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.14.3-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnutls13   2.0.4-1the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libgtk2.0-common  2.12.1-3   Common files for the GTK+ graphica
ii  libjpeg62 6b-14  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkrb53  1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.18.3-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-01.2.15~beta5-3 PNG library - runtime
ii  libtiff4  3.8.2-7Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6  2:1.0.3-7  X11 client-side library
ii  libxcomposite11:0.3.2-1+b1   X11 Composite extension library
ii  libxcursor1   1:1.1.9-1  X cursor management library
ii  libxdamage1   1:1.1.1-3  X11 damaged region extension libra
ii  libxext6  1:1.0.3-2  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfixes31:4.0.3-2  X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii  libxi62:1.1.3-1  X11 Input extension library
ii  libxinerama1  1:1.0.2-1  X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxrandr22:1.2.2-1  X11 RandR extension library
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.4-1  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-7   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0 recommends:
ii  hicolor-icon-theme0.10-1 default fallback theme for FreeDes
ii  libgtk2.0-bin 2.12.1-3   The programs for the GTK+ graphica

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#452162: further info

2007-11-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I've also downgraded all of cups from 1.3.4-1 to 1.3.2-1 with no
improvement. That's the only printing dep I could see for gtk. 

A



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#447211: at76c503a-source: fails to build against 2.6.22-2-686

2007-10-20 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 12:06:00PM -0500, kev wrote:
 i´m experiencing the same problem as reported in Bug #447211:
 at76c503a-source: fails to build against 2.6.22-2-k7
 
 i have attached the module assistant buildlog plus cpu info. cpu is
 celeron D. i´m using debian/lenny. thanks

1) you can build from upstream outside of m-a with no problems check
   out http://at76c503a.berlios.de

2) maintainer says new version (0.17) should be out soon since I've
   confirmed it can be built unpatched within m-a by tweaking
   Makefile.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#447211: at76c503a-source: fails to build against 2.6.22-2-k7

2007-10-19 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:53:05AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
 On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 05:48:41PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
  Package: at76c503a-source
  Version: 0.15~dev0.20070427-2
  Severity: important
 The package needs an update to 0.17 badly - patches welcome.

I'm happy to attempt this. Ill see what I can figure out and get back
to you. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#447211: at76c503a-source: fails to build against 2.6.22-2-k7

2007-10-18 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: at76c503a-source
Version: 0.15~dev0.20070427-2
Severity: important

I've tried to build this against linux-image 2.6.22-2-k7 using
module-assistant and it fails:


output of `m-a a-i at76c503a`

dh_clean
/usr/bin/make  
INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/debian/at76c503a-modules-2.6.22-2-k7
 KVERS=2.6.22-2-k7 KSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.22-2-k7/build clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
rm -f core *.o *~ a.out *.d
rm -f *.ko *.mod.c .*.cmd
rm -f *.s *.i
rm -rf .tmp_versions
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
rm -f configure-stamp
rm -f build-stamp
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules binary-modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/make  
INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/debian/at76c503a-modules-2.6.22-2-k7
 KVERS=2.6.22-2-k7 KSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.22-2-k7/build clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
rm -f core *.o *~ a.out *.d
rm -f *.ko *.mod.c .*.cmd
rm -f *.s *.i
rm -rf .tmp_versions
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
rm -f configure-stamp
rm -f build-stamp
if [ -f /usr/src/modules/at76c503a/debian/control ]; then \
cp debian/control.template 
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/debian/control; \
fi
touch configure-stamp
/usr/bin/make  
INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/debian/at76c503a-modules-2.6.22-2-k7
 KVERS=2.6.22-2-k7 KSRC=/lib/modules/2.6.22-2-k7/build
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
/usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.22-2-k7/build M=/usr/src/modules/at76c503a 
KERNELRELEASE=2.6.22-2-k7 modules
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.22-2-k7'
  CC [M]  /usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.o
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.c: In function ‘at76_ieee80211_to_eth’:
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.c:3379: error: ‘struct sk_buff’ has no 
member named ‘mac’
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.c: In function ‘at76_ieee80211_fixup’:
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.c:3430: error: ‘struct sk_buff’ has no 
member named ‘mac’
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.c: In function ‘at76_rx_monitor_mode’:
/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.c:3856: error: ‘struct sk_buff’ has no 
member named ‘mac’
make[4]: *** [/usr/src/modules/at76c503a/at76_usb.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/at76c503a] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.22-2-k7'
make[2]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
make[1]: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/at76c503a'
make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2

it also fails to build just doing make in the source directory (with the
same errors) . Note that version 0.17 from upstream builds properly when built 
using the
typical make  sudo make install. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages at76c503a-source depends on:
ii  atmel-firmware1.3-3  Firmware for Atmel at76c50x wirele
ii  debhelper 5.0.57 helper programs for debian/rules

at76c503a-source recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#427447: Workaround for bug!

2007-08-10 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 02:46:52AM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
 In all the directories that fc-cache failed with errors like:
 
 /usr/share/fonts: failed to write cache
 /usr/share/fonts/X11: failed to write cache
 /usr/share/fonts/type1: failed to write cache
 /usr/local/share/fonts: failed to write cache
 
 I went to each directory and ran (as root)
 
 mkfontdir ; mkfontscale
 
 Only when both were run in each of the problematic directories, did the
 problem go away, which doesn't explain why its happening.

I wonder if this process is just missing from some package? As I
reported back to this bug, At some point the error just went away from
my aptitude stuff. So I must have inadvertantly installed some other
package that fixed it up. Not much help I know, but I'm willing to
send my aptitude log is anyoen wants it.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#427447: now its gone

2007-08-07 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Okay, this is wierd. I was continuing to configure this machine on the
assumption that the problem would sort itself out... and lo and
behold, it did with no apparent reason. I do not recall which of my
many aptitude installs did it, but at some point it just stopped
showing up as a package to reconfigure... go figure.

sorry I can't be of more help, but maybe the aptitude logs would help?
If you'd like them, please let me know.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#427447: this bug still lives!!!

2007-08-06 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I have encountered this bug using:

delappy:~# dpkg -l fontconfig
...
ii  fontconfig 2.4.2-1.2  generic font configuration library -
support

delappy:~# dpkg -l ttf-opensymbol

pH  ttf-opensymbol 2.2.1-7The OpenSymbol TrueType font


delappy:~# dpkg -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/ttf-opensymbol_2.2.1-7_all.deb
(Reading database ... 84133 files and directories currently
installed.)
Preparing to replace ttf-opensymbol 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch1 (using
.../ttf-opensymbol_2.2.1-7_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement ttf-opensymbol ...
Setting up ttf-opensymbol (2.2.1-7) ...
Updating fontconfig cache...
/usr/share/fonts: failed to write cache
/usr/share/fonts/X11: failed to write cache
/usr/share/fonts/type1: failed to write cache
/usr/local/share/fonts: failed to write cache
dpkg: error processing ttf-opensymbol (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 4
Errors were encountered while processing:
 ttf-opensymbol


this is on a newly installed system. This error appeared during the
lenny system install (business card installer). I left it unresolved
and migrated up to sid (where I usually live) and it is still
unresolved. I have tried manually purging both packages and
reinstalling. If I install ttf-opensymbol first, it will install, but
fontconfig will fail. If I install it the other way around, fontconfig
fails too. I have attached here the fontconfig.log in case that
helps. 

This is an up-to-date sid system.

A
/usr/share/fonts: /usr/share/fonts: failed to write cache
caching, 0 fonts, 3 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11: /usr/share/fonts/X11: failed to write cache
caching, 0 fonts, 6 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi: caching, 358 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi: caching, 358 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1: caching, 8 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/encodings: caching, 0 fonts, 1 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/encodings/large: caching, 0 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc: caching, 55 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/X11/util: caching, 0 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/truetype: caching, 0 fonts, 1 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu: caching, 21 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/type1: /usr/share/fonts/type1: failed to write cache
caching, 0 fonts, 1 dirs
/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts: caching, 35 fonts, 0 dirs
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts: skipping, no such directory
/usr/local/share/fonts: /usr/local/share/fonts: failed to write cache
caching, 0 fonts, 0 dirs
/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d: caching, 0 fonts, 5 dirs
/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/C: caching, 4 fonts, 0 dirs
/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/D: caching, 18 fonts, 0 dirs
/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/N: caching, 16 fonts, 0 dirs
/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/S: caching, 1 fonts, 0 dirs
/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/U: caching, 13 fonts, 0 dirs
/var/cache/fontconfig: cleaning cache directory
fc-cache: failed


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#434627: status of backport?

2007-08-03 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I wondered why a hadn't been getting my regular backup emails... This
bug explains it. 

I wonder, what is the status of the backport? My server runs etch and
pulls backups from several sid machines which are now no-longer backed
up automatically. Is there anything a lowly user can do to help with
backporting?

living in fear of the disk failure,

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#433275: mutt: buffy list shows new mail for old

2007-07-15 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.16-2
Severity: normal

I'm sure this is related to the whole slew of IMAP new mail bugs that
have been reported #421468, 428734, and 432148 if not others, but this
symptom hasn't been reported, afaict. 

The buffy list shows all folders with mail marked with New or Old.
previously, the buffy list only showed those folders with New mail.
This is using up-to-date sid (as of a few days ago) and the server is
running etch dovecot imap. 

A


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages mutt depends on:
ii  libc6  2.5-11GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgdbm3   1.8.3-3   GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libgnutls131.6.3-1   the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libidn11   0.6.5-1   GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libncursesw5   5.6-3 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsasl2-2 2.1.22.dfsg1-8+b1 Authentication abstraction library

Versions of packages mutt recommends:
ii  exim4 4.67-5 meta-package to ease Exim MTA (v4)
ii  exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.67-5 lightweight Exim MTA (v4) daemon
ii  locales-all [locales] 2.5-11 GNU C Library: Precompiled locale 
ii  mime-support  3.39-1 MIME files 'mime.types'  'mailcap

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#428734: confirm this bug

2007-07-10 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I can confirm this bug using 1.5.16-2, though mine shows all '0's
instead of some other number. also, this is surely a duplicate of
#421468.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#432585: mdadm: FTR report on raid level synonyms and initramfs hooks

2007-07-10 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.6-9
Severity: normal


this problem is documented in:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/03/msg05310.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/04/msg00923.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/05/msg01661.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/07/msg00856.html

with discussion and possible resolution. The problem boils down to a conflict 
between the manpage descriptions of 
usage of 'level=' parameters and how they are handled by initramfs hooks. The 
man pages imply that using various 
synonyms (eg. level=1 instead of level=raid1) are acceptable, but the initramfs 
hooks do not properly handle the 
synonyms resulting in arrays not starting during a boot. 

There are two sources for determining the MD modules to insert during boot. The 
first /scripts/local-top/mdadm sets 
all possible values for MD_MODULES. This is then modified by source 
/conf/md.conf which includes a new assignment for 
MD_MODULES based on information gathered from mdadm.conf using 
/usr/share/initramfs/hooks/mdadm at the time the 
initrd is built. This hook script does not properly handle all the possible 
scenarious for level= values in 
mdadm.conf resulting in erroneous information in /conf/md.conf and MD_MODULES 
being assigned a garbage value. 
Ultimately this leads to failed modprobes during the boot and arrays are not 
properly started.

I see two possible resolutions:

1) remove ambiguity in the mdadm and mdadm.conf man pages (less than ideal as 
the md utilities obviously handle the 
various synonyms and we'd end up with man pages that do not fully document the 
available options)

or

2) fix up the initramfs/hooks/mdadm script to handle all the synonyms. 
(preferred in my opinion, as the other md 
utilities still properly handle the various synonyms)

thanks

A

ps: information below shows running kernel 2.6.18-3-xen-686 but this
problem is known to exist in 2.6.18-4 as well. I honestly can't remember
why I'm running 2.6.18-3, but i'm quite sure its unrelated to this
problem (except that maybe I only fixed the one initrd, can't recall)


Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-- Package-specific info:
--- mount output
/dev/md1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
tmpfs on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/md0 on /boot type ext3 (rw)
/dev/mapper/mommadisk-music on /home/andrew/music type ext3 (rw)
/dev/mapper/mommadisk-video on /home/andrew/video type ext3 (rw)
/dev/mapper/mommadisk-photos on /home/andrew/photos type ext3 (rw)
/dev/mapper/mommadisk-backup on /home/backup/backup type ext3 (rw)
nfsd on /proc/fs/nfsd type nfsd (rw)
rpc_pipefs on /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs type rpc_pipefs (rw)

--- mdadm.conf
DEVICE /dev/hd[aceg][1256] /dev/md11 /dev/md12 
MAILADDR root

ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid5 num-devices=4 
UUID=b7213aca:e6636191:f83021d0:4dfb9941 devices=/dev/hd[aceg]5
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4 
UUID=8c7aacfb:edb6f0ee:fe6d33d7:40b96f38 devices=/dev/hd[aceg]1
ARRAY /dev/md11 level=raid1 num-devices=2 
UUID=abc053e7:32092950:8b13dc7d:db065753 devices=/dev/hd[ac]2
ARRAY /dev/md12 level=raid1 num-devices=2 
UUID=d0a76b21:c02f7ee7:5eb963fc:fa01d8ad devices=/dev/hd[eg]2
ARRAY /dev/md10 level=raid0 num-devices=2 
UUID=3cd26907:67ab0336:62bebf19:fd833d2b devices=/dev/md1[12]
ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid5 num-devices=4 
UUID=2f322698:75bf8431:69ddde7a:1129b942 devices=/dev/hd[aceg]6

--- /proc/mdstat:
Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
md2 : active raid5 hdg6[0] hde6[3] hdc6[2] hda6[1]
  452719296 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] []
  
md10 : active raid0 md11[0] md12[1]
  497664 blocks 64k chunks
  
md12 : active raid1 hda2[0] hdc2[1]
  248896 blocks [2/2] [UU]
  
md11 : active raid1 hde2[0] hdg2[1]
  248896 blocks [2/2] [UU]
  
md0 : active raid1 hda1[0] hde1[3] hdg1[2] hdc1[1]
  248896 blocks [4/4] []
  
md1 : active raid5 hde5[0] hdc5[3] hda5[2] hdg5[1]
  14650944 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] []
  
unused devices: none

--- /proc/partitions:
major minor  #blocks  name

   3 0  156290904 hda
   3 1 249007 hda1
   3 2 249007 hda2
   3 3  1 hda3
   3 54883728 hda5
   3 6  150906546 hda6
  22 0  156290904 hdc
  22 1 249007 hdc1
  22 2 249007 hdc2
  22 3  1 hdc3
  22 54883728 hdc5
  22 6  150906546 hdc6
  33 0  156290904 hde
  33 1 249007 hde1
  33 2 249007 hde2
  33 3  1 hde3
  33 54883728 hde5
  33 6  150906546 hde6
  34 0  156290904 hdg
  34 1 249007 hdg1
  34 2 249007 hdg2
  34 3 

Bug#431655: xorg restarts when playing video

2007-07-05 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:32:36AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
 Package: xorg
 Version: 1:7.2-5
 Severity: important

woah. fixed already!

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#431655: xorg restarts when playing video

2007-07-05 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 02:32:36AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
 Package: xorg
 Version: 1:7.2-5
 Severity: important

hey, nicely done bug report. I'll jump over and add my .02

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#431655: sorry!

2007-07-05 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
sorry for the noise! I didn't check my headers before sending . Those
were intended for Carl only... 

regardless: thanks! you guys are fantastic!

and sorry again for the noise.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#408265: followup on test file

2007-04-19 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
just for the record. the test file above, which crashes oocalc 2.2
reliably on my machine, but not 2.0 on etch, will also cause a crash
is saved in oocalc 1.x format, but if saved to .xls (95) and then
resaved as .ods works fine, so something is being translated and fixed
there. again, hth.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#408265: followup on test file

2007-04-19 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:22:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
 On 04/19/07 13:17, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
  just for the record. the test file above, which crashes oocalc 2.2
  reliably on my machine, but not 2.0 on etch, will also cause a crash
  is saved in oocalc 1.x format, but if saved to .xls (95) and then
  resaved as .ods works fine, so something is being translated and fixed
  there. again, hth.
 
 I just downloaded and opened payroll2007clean.ods using
 (experimental) OOo 2.2.0-1 without it crashing.  Then I upgraded to
 2.2.0-4 in unstable.  Still no crash.

hmmm... what can I do to get more info about what is happening here? 
my strace I think didn't show any real insight. I'll try from another
account. maybe that is the common factor.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#408265: followup on test file

2007-04-19 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 02:22:37PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
 
 I just downloaded and opened payroll2007clean.ods using
 (experimental) OOo 2.2.0-1 without it crashing.  Then I upgraded to
 2.2.0-4 in unstable.  Still no crash.

well, I just tried this on another sid box using versions
2.0.4.dfsg.2-7 and 2.2.0-4 and it works fine on both. 

Obviously something else is going on on my system. I'll have to mess
with cleaning up my configs. FTR, the crashing system has run Oo.o
since 1.x whereas the working system has only had 2.0.4 and better. 

I guess this needs to remain unreproducible.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#408265: openoffice.org-calc: confirm similar bug

2007-04-18 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: openoffice.org-calc
Version: 2.2.0-4
Followup-For: Bug #408265

I am seeing this behavior as well, but not with all oocalc spreadsheets.
It is happening in my payroll spreadsheets. Problem first appeared about
20 days ago or so on my sid system. Does not happen in etch with the
same files! In fact a file that opens, edits and saves in etch just fine
will not work in sid version even after the successful etch session (I
guess that rules out some sort of Save bug in sid version). 

As I said, this does not appear with all oocalc files, just my payroll
ones which use cell naming, multiple cross-linked pages etc. Of note,
these files generate an error but do open with gnumeric:

W2!F18 : Unable to parse
'oooc:=#REF!.$B$7'
because 'Invalid expression'

which at least points to a potential location for a problem in the file.

I have captured an strace, which I will attach. Also, the error message
doesn't actually appear in the terminal or strace until *after* the
crash/recovery dialog/and finally quit.

I can provide a data file that causes the crash, but give me a couple
days as I must obfuscate personal information of my employees first...

A


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages openoffice.org-calc depends on:
ii  libc6 2.5-2  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.1-21 GCC support library
ii  libstdc++64.1.1-21   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport5.1 5.1.2-1STLport C++ class library
ii  libufsparse   1.2-7  collection of libraries for comput
ii  lp-solve  5.5.0.10-3 Solve (mixed integer) linear progr
ii  openoffice.org-core   2.2.0-4OpenOffice.org office suite archit

openoffice.org-calc recommends no packages.

Versions of packages openoffice.org-core depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.13   Debian configuration management sy
ii  fontconfig  2.4.2-1.2generic font configuration library
ii  libaudio2   1.8-4The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6   2.5-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2   1.4.4-1  The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libcurl37.15.5-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libdb4.44.4.20-8 Berkeley v4.4 Database Libraries [
ii  libexpat1   1.95.8-3.4   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfontconfig1  2.4.2-1.2generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype62.2.1-5  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1 1:4.1.1-21   GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-02.12.11-3The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgstreamer-plugins-ba 0.10.12-2GStreamer libraries from the base
ii  libgstreamer0.10-0  0.10.12-3Core GStreamer libraries and eleme
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.10.11-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libhunspell-1.1-0   1.1.5-6  spell checker and morphological an
ii  libice6 1:1.0.3-2X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libicu363.6-2International Components for Unico
ii  libjpeg62   6b-13The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libldap22.1.30-13.4  OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libneon25   0.25.5.dfsg-6An HTTP and WebDAV client library
ii  libnss3-0d  3.11.5-3 Network Security Service libraries
ii  libpam0g0.79-4   Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.16.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpaper1   1.1.21   Library for handling paper charact
ii  libportaudio2   19+svn20070125-1 Portable audio I/O - shared librar
ii  libsm6  1:1.0.2-2X11 Session Management library
ii  libsndfile1 1.0.17-1 Library for reading/writing audio 
ii  libstartup-notification 0.9-1library for program launch feedbac
ii  libstdc++6  4.1.1-21 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport5.1   5.1.2-1  STLport C++ class library
ii  libx11-62:1.0.3-7X11 client-side library
ii  libxau6 1:1.0.3-2X11 authorisation library
ii  libxaw7 1:1.0.3-3X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxcursor1 1:1.1.8-2X cursor management library
ii  libxext61:1.0.3-2X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfixes3  1:4.0.3-2X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' 

Bug#394301: confirm this bug

2006-12-30 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I can confirm this bug and that the patch: rm'ing the *.bak's in the
${LIVE_CHROOT}/boot works. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy live-package
live-package:
  Installed: 0.99.14-1
  Candidate: 0.99.14-1
  Version table:
 *** 0.99.14-1 0
990 http://debian.midco.net unstable/main Packages
990 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

also 404314 is a duplicate of this bug.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#404153: libmysql-java: out-of-date package causes problems with mysql5

2006-12-21 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: libmysql-java
Version: 3.1.11-1
Severity: important


I am receiving unknown type '246 in column... error when using mysql 5
tables in openoffice.org base. this is a known issue over at mysql. you
can read about it at http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=14609 

this bug was fixed in 3.1.13 of the upstream package and was in the
nightly builds as of January 2006. upstream already has 3.1.14 out as
well. 

this bug makes the package unusable for me as I am using the dec type
fields in mysql. I could change them to floats, but that seems silly as
they aren't... an upgrade would be truly appreciated.

ftr, 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mysql -V
mysql  Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.30, for pc-linux-gnu (i486) using readline
5.2


thanks!

A


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libmysql-java depends on:
ii  gij [java2-runtime]   4:4.1.1-13 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  gij-4.1 [java1-runtime]   4.1.1-20   The GNU Java bytecode interpreter

libmysql-java recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#403998: sorry for the noise

2006-12-21 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I mis-read the bug reports. I'm sorry for the extra noise. 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#403998: gzip: confirm 1.3.9 uninstallable

2006-12-21 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: gzip
Version: 1.3.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #403998


I can confirm this bug. despite what packages.debian.org says, version
1.3.9-1 is coming down the pipe at debian.midco.net. Interestingly
though, apt-cache policy shows version 1.3.9-1 already installed.
menawhile aptitude is trying to install it, though it is NOT showing up in the
list of packages to upgrade. there is something fishy going on here. 

regardless, my messages are the same as above whether using aptitude or
dpkg -i. This of course borks all install processes...

A


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages gzip depends on:
ii  debianutils  2.17.4  Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

gzip recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#397083: openoffice.org-calc: OOCalc freezes while printing

2006-11-04 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Package: openoffice.org-calc
Version: 2.0.4-5
Severity: important

this occured some months ago with an older 2.0.x version, but quickly 
disappeared in 
a regular upgrade. It is now back with a vengeance in the current version. 

Printing from calc maximises CPU usage (confirmed with top) for about 45 
seconds 
while printing. This renders calc unusable during this time and can hamper the 
performance of the rest of the system. 

This happens every time like this:

open my spreadsheet (approx 290k, about 25 sheets, though each sheet is not 
overly 
complicated).

select area to print

click the print button on toolbar

click the button for printing only selection (though I think it is a problem 
with any 
print)

calc freezes up for about 45 seconds

here is a snip of top showing soffice.bin tying it all up while printing.

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND   
10745 andrew25   0  308m  70m  32m R 99.4 15.9   6:17.17 soffice.bin
 6393 root  15   0  226m  30m 9700 S  0.3  7.0   8:05.09 Xorg   
11186 andrew15   0  6568 2872 1896 S  0.3  0.6   0:00.13 aterm  
1 root  15   0  1944  636  544 S  0.0  0.1   0:01.12 init   
2 root  RT   0 000 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.00 migration/0 

when soffice.bin calms back down (about 45 seconds later), cups spits it right 
out.   

I know this isn't much to go on. I'm happy to provide whatever details you 
might need 
including a test file, though it does not matter which file I use except that 
smaller 
files, with a similarly sized selection SEEM to print faster.

A

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-calc depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.1-19  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6   4.1.1-19The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.6c2  4.6.2-3 STLport C++ class library
ii  libufsparse  1.2-7   collection of libraries for comput
ii  openoffice.org-core  2.0.4-5 OpenOffice.org office suite archit

openoffice.org-calc recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#381051: dependency bug

2006-08-01 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I can confirm this bug and that it affects many other packages. In my
case, I failed to install both qemu and mplayer (from marillat
repositories) due to nonexisting libdirectfb-0.9-24. How can I tell
apt-get or aptitude to ignore this particular requirement? 

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#381051: quick workaround

2006-08-01 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
FTR, libdirectfb-0.9-24 is in testing, so I've added that to my
sources list which seems to satisfy aptitude.

A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#343662: fsck errors halting boot after upgrade

2005-12-18 Thread Andrew Sackville-West



Theodore Ts'o wrote:



Are you using your system with hardware time set to some non-GMT local
time zone?  (i.e. /etc/defaults/rcS has UTC=no)  


you are, of course, correct. And its interesting in that I had set it to 
UTC at some point and I remember having trouble with my timezones and so 
forth (my clock in KDE kept getting munched) but the problem went away. 
h...





I think you can make the problem go away by making /etc/localtime
contain a copy of what it is currently symlinked to in
/usr/share/zoneinfo/timezone, and renaming
/etc/rcS.d/S22hwclockfirst.sh to /etc/rcS.d/S09hwclockfirst.sh.  This
is obviously not the proper fix; since among other things if the
localtime file needs to get updated (for example if the US Congress
changes the definition of daylight savings time), we need a way to
make sure /etc/localtime gets updated when the package gets updated.  


But I believe if you were to apply the above as a workaround, it
should address your problem.  Fixing this in the more global sense
will require making changes in the overall Debian boot setup, and I'm
going to have to take this up on debain-devel and consult other Debian
developers.


Well, I'm all for doing things the right way and will fix my clock and 
then unpin apt for e2fsprogs and move back up to 1.39. Thanks for your 
attention to this matter, and I hope my info will help to continue 
improvement of Debian for all ;)


A


Regards,

- Ted




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Boot aborts with message, '/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory'

2005-12-16 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
I can confirm, as others have mentioned, that this bug affects AMD 
systems as well. All of my symptoms were identical to others reported.


I chose to downgrade yaird to testing and this resolved the problem (now 
running 2.6.14-5). I appears to me that the patch mentioned above 
doesn't apply yet to AMD so I chose this route.


I encountered another problem at the same time and I'm trying to 
determine if they are related. If anyone else encountered this as well, 
please let me know.


All boots now (whether 2.8.14, or 2.6.12 my old kernel) fail with fsck 
errors on every partition(!). something along the lines of:


UNEXEPCTED DISCREPANCY: SuperBlock last write time is in the future.

I realise this is likely not related to this bug (especially because it 
was all part of a massive apt-get upgrade), but since this bug involved 
ide issues I thought it might apply.

any help appreciated.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343662: fsck errors halting boot after upgrade

2005-12-16 Thread Andrew Sackville-West

Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.39

This is specifically version 1.39 WIP (10-Dec-2005)

$uname -a

Linux basement 2.6.14-2-686 #2 Fri Dec 9 10:11:34 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux

$e2fsck -V
e2fsck 1.39-WIP (10-Dec-2005)
Using EXT2FS Library version 1.39-WIP, 10-Dec-2005

after upgrading kernel and many many packages, reboot gives the 
following problem:


fsck reports error on drives, mounts root with :

EXT3-fs warning: mounting fs with errors, running e2fsck is recommended


when boot process tries to mount remaining partitions I get:

/dev/hda3: Superblock last mount time is in the future
/dev/hda3: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY

I get identical messages for all partitions on two disks except 
/dev/hda1 which mounts on /boot

and
/dev/hdb1 and hdb3 which don't mount at boot time (and seem to mount 
fine later).


these errors halt the boot and drop to a shell with the recommendation 
to manually run fsck or type ctrl-D to continue. either choice, the boot 
finished fine and system operates fine.


so when I manually fsck all the available partitions, it fixes them and 
marks them as clean. reboot -- same problem happens again.


to help diagnose, I booted into knoppix and fsck'd all my partitions 
from there, then rebooted BACK into knoppix and checked them again 
(trying to rule out hardware issues) and there were no problems. I 
mounted a couple of partitions in knoppix just to make sure. all fine.


reboot back into Debian and it happens again just as before.

this problem also occurs when using kernel 2.6.12 in debian with same 
e2fsprogs.


FWIW, knoppix uses e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) and kernel 2.6.12

thanks

Andrew


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#343662: fsck errors halting boot after upgrade

2005-12-16 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
repeated testing with knoppix and a little help from debian-user has 
resulted in downgrading to 1.38-2 and it now works fine. the downgrade 
only changes two packages: e2fsprogs and e2fslibs so I think its a 
strong case that version 1.38-2-1.39-WIP is the source of this problem.


ah well. that'll teach me to reboot eh? goodbye sweet sweet uptime (4 
months + ).


A


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]