Bug#1041331: Note on the example configuration

2024-01-03 Thread Angel Ortega

I think the configuration file, as shown in the bug report, has a bug; the last 
location should probably be


ProxyPass http://127.0.0.1:8001/snac
ProxyPreserveHost On
RequestHeaderset X-Forwarded-Proto 'https' env=HTTPS


Note the leading /snac at the end of ProxyPass; with the proposed 
configuration, the data reaches the snac server correctly, but the path is 
truncated to /USER/inbox (instead of the expected /snac/USER/inbox), and as the 
path is used in the HTTP Signature, the validation fails.

Hope it helps (I'm by no means an Apache2 expert and use nginx myself with 
snac).

Best regards,
Ángel Ortega



Bug#1036626: giara: Crashes on startup

2023-05-23 Thread Angel Ortega
Package: giara
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

giara crashes on startup with the following output:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/bin/giara", line 46, in 
gi.require_version('Gtk', '4.0')
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gi/__init__.py", line 129, in 
require_version
raise ValueError('Namespace %s not available for version %s' %
ValueError: Namespace Gtk not available for version 4.0

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.0
  APT prefers testing-security
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages giara depends on:
ii  dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend]  0.40.0-4
ii  gir1.2-gtksource-4   4.8.4-4
ii  gir1.2-webkit2-4.0   2.40.1-1
ii  libhandy-1-0 1.8.1-1
ii  python3  3.11.2-1+b1
ii  python3-bs4  4.11.2-2
ii  python3-dateutil 2.8.2-2
ii  python3-mistune  2.0.4-1
ii  python3-praw 7.6.0-1
ii  python3-requests 2.28.1+dfsg-1

giara recommends no packages.

giara suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#709267: File Corruption Problems

2013-05-23 Thread Angel Ortega
2013/5/23 Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com:

 Ola Lundqvist wrote:
 ... My guess is that you have some kind of bit errors on your disk.
 ...
 I'll close this bug report and I think you should check your
 disk using the badblocks command. :-)

 You might also consider running 'debsums' which will verify package
 files against the MD5 checksum lists included in the package.  A
 useful file integrity checking tool.

Given that neither badblocks nor smartctl reported aboutn any HD
failure, I'll try this approach.

Thanks!

Regards,
Angel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#709267: cron-apt: Syntax error: in unexpected

2013-05-22 Thread Angel Ortega
2013/5/22 Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org:

 I can not find any in in the source I have. Could you please
 send me the file so I can have a look.

Of course. Please find it attached to this message.

 And you are sure there is no chance that this file may have
 been modified by anyone on your system?

No. I'm the only user on this system.

I've replaced the in by an if, but today I had received another
error. I think the file went corrupted somehow in the wheezy
transition.

I've --reinstall'ed the package and the in is no longer an if, so
you may file this in the unexplainable folder and move on.

Thanks for your help and keep the good work,
Angel Ortega


cron-apt
Description: Binary data


Bug#709267: cron-apt: Syntax error: in unexpected

2013-05-21 Thread Angel Ortega
Package: cron-apt
Version: 0.9.1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

Since a couple of days I receive an email message from Cron Daemon
with the following content:

/usr/sbin/cron-apt: 381: /usr/sbin/cron-apt: Syntax error: in unexpected

Line 381 of /usr/sbin/cron-apt contains the mentioned in instead
of if.

Please fix.

Best regards,
Angel Ortega

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cron-apt depends on:
ii  apt  0.9.7.8

Versions of packages cron-apt recommends:
ii  cron3.0pl1-124
ii  heirloom-mailx [mailx]  12.5-2
ii  liblockfile11.09-5

cron-apt suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#517866: closed by Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt (mped has been removed from Debian, closing #517866)

2009-05-05 Thread Angel Ortega
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 07:39:59PM +0100, E Taylor wrote:

  I'm not sure to understand you fully here. The config.sh script just
  searches for ncursesw and uses ncursesw (no mention about plain ncurses,
  other than including curses.h), the problem was on Debian dependencies.
  Remember I have no control on that.
 
When I was talking with Barry deFreese about it, he said that isn't wasn't
enough to have ncursesw in the build dependencies, he also had to add
ncurses for it to work.  He thought that the build was checking for the
existence of the curses.h from the ncurses package, and then, if it found
it, using the curses.h from the ncursesw package.  Someone else in IRC
commented hmm ideally you should use the curses.h header from the
ncursesw dir to match the library used and Barry replied Aye, that's an
upstream bug.  I hope that makes sense.

Well, certainly this can be considered a bug; I've already fixed it for
the 5.1.2 release.

As I'm writing this email, I would like to take this opportunity to ask
whether MP supports highlighting multiple language syntaxes in one file. 
For example, could it highlight JavaScript syntax inside an HTML document
where the tags were also correctly highlighted?  There could also be CSS
and PHP in the same file.

It sounds like a non-trivial change, but I'll think about it.

  As a work around, or as an extra feature, you
could have an option in the menus for selecting which highlighting to use
on the current file.

As an even dirtier workaround :-D, you can force the syntax highlighting to
the active document (to PHP, say) by executing the following MPSL snippet:

local l = mp.active(); l.syntax = mp.syntax.php;

You can execute MPSL code by hitting Escape (escape+escape, if under
curses), or from the Edit menu.

By the way, there are currently no JavaScript nor CSS syntax definitions.

Thanks again for your help getting this package to as high a standard as
possible.

You're welcome.

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#517866: closed by Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt (mped has been removed from Debian, closing #517866)

2009-04-29 Thread Angel Ortega
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:35:34PM +0100, E Taylor wrote:

 It's such an honour to have my bug report answered by the author  
 himself.  I was actually thinking of emailing you about the program, but  
 I wasn't sure if that was the correct procedure.  Hopefully you don't  
 mind me responding to your email directly like this.

I think it's an author's duty to follow and reply to bugs or queries.

 Firstly thank you for creating such an amazing program, it really will  
 help me abandon the six-legged freak of vi, and I will encourage  
 everyone who is new to Debian and Ubuntu to use this fantastic editor.   

I'm glad to know you find it useful.

 Secondly, thank you for giving me this workaround for forcing the  
 interface.  I had thought there must be a way to trick mped, but I  
 thought that it would require resetting the DISPLAY variable after you  
 exit mped.  Is there any chance you could make the interface choice a  
 command line argument, though?  mped -i curses   or   mped -i gtk

The 3.x branch have an option like that, but I never reimplemented it on
5.x, just because overriding DISPLAY is enough and nobody cared. If you
think it's really important, I will reconsider it.

 so the NAME section should probably be something like:
 mped - Minimum Profit EDitor, a text editor for programmers

That's fine, I've changed that header line in the man page source.

The inconsistency about the binary name in the man page is because 'mp-5'
is the original name, but Debian renamed it (for historical reasons, I
suppose) to mped. I added an option to config.sh to ease this transition.

But sadly, the Debian package has always been in flux. I made some
suggestions to the (then) maintainer, and though he is/was a fine person,
it seems Debian packaging was not too high in his priorities' list. For
example, I always wanted to have two binary packages, one ncursesw-only,
and the other GTK+ncursesw, but my prayers were never heard. Now, the
editor also has a KDE4 interface, but being things like they are (and
remember, mped has *no* maintainer other than the QA Team), I never even
bothered to suggest it. Just take a look at README.Debian; it's just *my*
document about Debian and it says it's 'unofficial' (I don't know if that
is fixed now, but didn't was last time I checked).

Back to the man page binary name inconsistency, I think the proper thing is
to add an inline sed oneliner to replace 'mp-5' with 'mped' inside mped.1
in the Debian package build or install scripts and everything would be
fine.

 Finally, do you think there is a problem with your build script that  
 makes it check for one package and then, if it finds it, it uses a  
 completely different package?

I'm not sure to understand you fully here. The config.sh script just
searches for ncursesw and uses ncursesw (no mention about plain ncurses,
other than including curses.h), the problem was on Debian dependencies.
Remember I have no control on that.

 Thank you again for writing such a great text editor, and I hope you  
 don't mind this email.

You're welcome.

 P.S. How do you access the Easter Egg?

There is no longer an easter egg, that was from the 3.x branch many years
ago (this is another mark of the package's state of abandonment, the list
of features is from 2004 or so. Take note that it does not mention
important things as undo levels and Unicode support). The easter egg was
there as a contest, and I always said it was meant to be there until
someone found it. A user found it, and I deleted it from the code.

If you are curious, it was the following: if you wrote (as an exact full
string of keystrokes, no editing nor cursor moving) [Fear the
Triceratops], a crappy, ASCII-art dinosaur was inserted into the text.

Regards,

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#517866: closed by Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt (mped has been removed from Debian, closing #517866)

2009-04-28 Thread Angel Ortega
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:46:03PM +0100, E Taylor wrote:

 Anyway, this new version has made its way into unstable and testing and  
 I can report that it does indeed fix this bug, #517866.  I haven't found  
 a way to force mped to use the ncurses interface if the GTK one is  
 available, but again this would be a separate bug or feature request.

You can force mped to ncurses mode just by unsetting the DISPLAY value or
setting it to something unusable, as in

DISPLAY=none mped

Hope it helps.

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#515563: Please remove package mped

2009-02-16 Thread Angel Ortega
Thanks for the quick response.

Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote:

 It could be fixed in a point release, though only with a targeted fix
 (no new upstream version).

Though I understand the reasoning, this does not change the truth: the
über-old version in Lenny can break things. This may cause user frustration
or even liability issues.

Thanks,

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#515563: Please remove package mped

2009-02-16 Thread Angel Ortega
Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote:

 Well, stable won't be touched till the point release so until the point
 release it will stay this broken I'm afraid. At the point release we can
 choose to either remove the package or fix the package (small targeted
 diff). Do you think the latter is not possible and we should just remove
 it at that point?

There is no way a small diff could fix that bug, changes should be huge,
they were the main reason to jump to the current source branch many years
ago. The source branch in Debian is a dead end. So it seems that lenny will
never have a working version.

I'm afraid the damage is done, so why bother.

Thank you very much,

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#515563: Please remove package mped

2009-02-15 Thread Angel Ortega
Package: mped
Version: 3.3.17-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lenny

(Note: I'm upstream author for the mped package).

Lenny has been released containing a version of the Minimum Profit text
editor that is from 2005 and that can cause severe information lossage due
to an incorrect handling of UTF-8 encoding.

An RC bug was filed (#514096) against lenny to suggest a package update or
deletion, but it was ignored and this dangerous version entered the stable
release.

As there is nothing that can be done by now, I urge the archive masters to
delete this +4 year old, dangerous package.

Regards,

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#514096: Minimum Profit text editor version 3.x can destroy UTF-8 files

2009-02-04 Thread Angel Ortega
Package: mped
Version: 3.3.17-1
Severity: critical
Tags: lenny

If you open and save files in an UTF-8 environment (the default in
lenny and any other modern system), non-ascii characters can be
incorrectly saved as question marks or simply deleted.

This bug is fixed in unstable (version 5.1.1-1).

Thanks,

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#445159: I second this

2008-07-28 Thread Angel Ortega
 It may be too late for Lenny but I'd really like to see this updated.
 
 I second the bit about seperate curses and gtk packages.  This used to be my 
 favorite editor for quick server-side edits but now I can't use it without 
 dragging in X.

I also second this (I'm upstream author). The 3.x branch is getting really
old, and the curses/gtk separation would be great.

-- 
Angel Ortega


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature