Bug#769657: patch

2015-07-02 Thread Bart Verwilst
Hello, 

Any ETA on the inclusion of this patch into the package for Jessie? 

Regards, 

Bart 


Bug#673606: 7.2

2013-01-04 Thread Bart Verwilst

Hello, sorry for the late reply!

Since I switched to phpStorm, I no longer use netbeans. So I have no 
plans to package netbeans, sorry!


Kind regards,

Bart

On 02/12/12 18:25, Carsten Schoenert wrote:

retitle 673606 netbeans: new version available (7.2.1)
thanks

Hello Bart,
any plans to package a current version of netbeans?
The version 7.0.1 is from the august 2011, a new version would really be
welcome while the version in wheezy isn't able to use a project
directory from the current stable version.

Thanks
Carsten

On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:44:53AM +0200, Bart Verwilst wrote:

In the meantime Netbeans 7.2 is the latest version available. Having
an up to date package would be awesome!



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#683898: FAIL: virnetsockettest on i386

2012-08-05 Thread Bart Verwilst

Package: libvirt
Version: 0.9.13-1

While trying to build your package on my Precise PPA, amd64 built fine, but the 
i386 build failed with this:

snip
TEST: virnetsockettest
Cannot identify IPv4/6 availability
FAIL: virnetsockettest
snip
===
1 of 67 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to libvir-l...@redhat.com
===
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libvirt-0.9.13/debian/build/tests'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libvirt-0.9.13/debian/build/tests'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libvirt-0.9.13/debian/build'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-check] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

I have found this mailinglist post with a small diff that should fix this: 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-July/msg01158.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#673606: 7.2

2012-08-01 Thread Bart Verwilst
In the meantime Netbeans 7.2 is the latest version available. Having an 
up to date package would be awesome!



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#674941: Acknowledgement (Upgrade to Zabbix 2.0.0)

2012-05-28 Thread Bart Verwilst

Build-depend should be changed from openjdk-7-jdk to java-jdk.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#674941: Upgrade to Zabbix 2.0.0

2012-05-28 Thread Bart Verwilst

A few question remain before i can continue on the package:

- 2:2.0.0 is ok as version? Or should it be 1:2.0.0?
- The Debian Java policy IIRC wants java jars to be in 
/usr/share/appname . However this is used for the zabbix frontend. Any 
ideas on that?




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#654688: JavaScriptError: Object #Object has no method 'autocomplete'

2012-01-05 Thread Bart Verwilst

Package: otrs2
Version: 3.0.11+dfsg1-1

When going tohttp://otrs.localhost/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketPhone  
http://otrs.intux/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketPhone  for example, the text 
editor seems to be throwing errors:

[ERROR] JavaScriptError: Object #Object  has no method 'autocomplete'
Core.Debug.js:42  http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/Core.Debug.js[STACKTRACE] HTMLDocument.anonymous  
(http://otrs.localhost/otrs-web/js/Core.App.js:39:21  http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/Core.App.js) Function.anonymous  
(http://otrs.localhost/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js:3032:11  
http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js) Function.each 
(http://otrs.localhost/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js:692:29  
http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js) Function.ready 
(http://otrs.localhost/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js:3031:12  
http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js) HTMLDocument.anonymous  
(http://otrs.localhost/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js:3056:11  
http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js)
Core.Exception.js:113  http://otrs.intux/otrs-web/js/Core.Exception.jsUncaught 
TypeError: Object #Object  has no method 'autocomplete'

This renders anything javascript-based useless (eg buttons,...).

Downloading the source of 3.0.11 and using this works just fine.

It seems that the debian package has differences from the original source, as 
seen here:

Debian package has: jQuery JavaScript Library v1.3.2 
/usr/share/otrs/var/httpd/htdocs/js/thirdparty/jquery/jquery.js

Original source has:jQuery JavaScript Library v1.4.4 
/opt/otrs/var/httpd/htdocs/js/thirdparty/jquery-1.4.4/jquery.js

I'm not sure why this has been changed?

Kind regards,

Bart



Bug#654688: JavaScriptError: Object #Object has no method 'autocomplete'

2012-01-05 Thread Bart Verwilst

On 01/05/2012 10:52 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:

Uhm, what shows ups:
uname -a
dpkg -l|grep libjs


Well, i must admit that this has been installed on an Ubuntu Lucid ;)

Which gave me old versions of the libjs-* libs:

ii  libjs-jquery1.3.3-2ubuntu1
JavaScript library for dynamic web applications
ii  libjs-jquery-ui 1.7.2-1   
JavaScript UI library for dynamic web applications
ii  libjs-prototype 1.6.1-1   
JavaScript Framework for dynamic web applications
ii  libjs-yui   2.8.0r4-1 
Yahoo User Interface Library


I upgraded them:

ii  libjs-jquery1.7.1-1   
JavaScript library for dynamic web applications
ii  libjs-jquery-ui 1.8.ooops.16+dfsg-1   
JavaScript UI library for dynamic web applications
ii  libjs-prototype 1.7.0-2   
JavaScript Framework for dynamic web applications
ii  libjs-yui   2.8.2r1~squeeze-1 
Yahoo User Interface Library


And now it works! I know this is probably 'unsupported', but a 
satisfactory resolution of this bug would be to pin the versions of 
above libs to a version that is = the current values to avoid backport 
issues in the future?




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#450528: (no subject)

2009-04-17 Thread Bart Verwilst
Any update on this? It's pretty annoying, and hard to make work with 
Puppet this way..




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#524205: Addition of /etc/init.d/zabbix-agent status

2009-04-15 Thread Bart Verwilst

Package: zabbix
Version: 1.6.4-1

There is no way to request the status of the Zabbix agent ( or server 
for that matter ) from the init script. This easy little addition 
enables the status parameter.
--- /etc/init.d/zabbix-agent.orig	2009-04-15 14:54:27.0 +0200
+++ /etc/init.d/zabbix-agent	2009-04-15 15:00:54.0 +0200
@@ -34,6 +34,16 @@
 	sleep 5
 	$0 start
 	;;
+  status)
+	ls -l /proc/`cat $PID`/exe  /dev/null
+	if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
+		echo Zabbix agent is running
+		exit 0
+	else
+		echo Zabbix agent is NOT running
+		exit 1
+	fi
+	;;
   *)
 	N=/etc/init.d/$NAME
 	echo Usage: $N {start|stop|restart|force-reload} 2



Bug#522074: Loosen up depends for libgnutls

2009-03-31 Thread Bart Verwilst

Package: zabbix
Version: 1.6.3-1

Currently the package has libcurl4-gnutls-dev as a dependency, while Debian 
4.0 ( which i am recompiling the Zabbix package for ) only has libcurl3-gnutls-dev.
I changed the dep to libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl3-gnutls-dev. This works 
great!





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#522076: zabbix-frontend-php postinst FAIL

2009-03-31 Thread Bart Verwilst

Package: zabbix
Version: 1.6.3-1

(Reading database ... 33659 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace zabbix-frontend-php 1:1.6.3-1 (using 
.../zabbix-frontend-php_1.6.3-1_all.deb) ...

Unpacking replacement zabbix-frontend-php ...
Setting up zabbix-frontend-php (1.6.3-1) ...
sed: -e expression #1, char 39: unknown option to `s'
dpkg: error processing zabbix-frontend-php (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 zabbix-frontend-php

Looking at the postinst script, i can see that the $zabbix_server 
variable has the following value:


10 zabbix-frontend-php/zabbix-server doesn't exist

I'm on Etch, upgrading from 1.6.2.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#389579: Bug 389579

2007-01-04 Thread Bart Verwilst

Hi!

It seems this module is being replaced by this one in apache 2.2.3?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_authn_dbd.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#296610: More information about ndb cluster

2005-08-14 Thread Bart Verwilst
Hi!

Sure, sounds fine by me, the missing init scripts where the most annoying part 
of this ;)
What exactly is mysql-dfsg ? will that replace mysql-server?? Any ETA on 5.0.11 
in debian? :d Can't wait to start using it :$ I need it for some projects at 
work ;)

Thanks a lot!

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Christian Hammers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zo 14-8-2005 14:30
Aan: Bart Verwilst; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Bug#296610: More information about ndb cluster
 
Hello Bart

On 2005-07-06 Bart Verwilst wrote:
 Perhaps mysql-ndb-4.1 and mysql-ndb-mgm-4.1 packages would be for the best. 
 Since mysql-server ( the mysqld and stuff is ( an optional ) part of the 
 cluster too ( as sql nodes ) )

The latest MySQL packages (mysql-dfsg-4.1 and mysql-dfsg-5.0) did not split up
the ndb stuff but the mysql-server-* packages now contain three init scripts.
  /etc/init.d/mysql
  /etc/init.d/mysql-ndb
  /etc/init.d/mysql-ndb-mgm
The last two do nothing if /etc/mysql/ndb_mgmd.conf resp. the ndb
cluster config in /etc/mysql/my.cnf is missing. They are all executed in
/etc/runlevel.conf.
The /usr/share/doc/README.Debian will be used to explain how to disable one or
more of the init scripts using update-rc.d.

Given the low number of people using NDB and the fact that mysql-server-4.1
from Sarge already did include ndb binaries splitting the binaries into 3
packages would have been too complicated.

bye,

-christian-




Bug#296610: Any news?

2005-07-30 Thread Bart Verwilst
Any news on the 5.0 binaries? Can't wait to start using them, i'm willing to 
test them! :D

Thanks!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#296610: More information about ndb cluster

2005-07-07 Thread Bart Verwilst
Yeah sure, makes sense to me :)
It's great to see MySQL 5 getting into debian :) 5.0 is a lot better on
many areas, let's make sure it rocks on Debian too! ;) You have my help
;)

-Original Message-
From: sean finney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 12:45 AM
To: Bart Verwilst; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296610: More information about ndb cluster

hi bart,

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:48:16AM +0200, Bart Verwilst wrote:
 Perhaps mysql-ndb-4.1 and mysql-ndb-mgm-4.1 packages would be for the
best. 
 Since mysql-server ( the mysqld and stuff is ( an optional ) part of
the 
 cluster too ( as sql nodes ) )

thanks for the information.  unfortunately i don't foresee us doing this
with the 4.0 release (which is going away Real Soon Now anyway), or
the 4.1 release.  this is primarily because i'm afraid that doing so
might pull the rug out from underneath anyone currently using the
mysql-server packages for the ndb stuff.

*however*, i think it would be very nice to do what you suggest
in the soon-to-come mysql-5.0 series of packages.  christian,
what do you think of splitting out these packages in 5.0?  i
can take a stab at it in the next couple of weeks if you feel
that's acceptable.


sean

-- 



Bug#296610: More information about ndb cluster

2005-07-06 Thread Bart Verwilst
Hi

Perhaps mysql-ndb-4.1 and mysql-ndb-mgm-4.1 packages would be for the best. 
Since mysql-server ( the mysqld and stuff is ( an optional ) part of the 
cluster too ( as sql nodes ) )

These are the files that should be in the ndb-mgm pkg:

usr/bin/ndb_mgm
usr/sbin/ndb_mgmd
var/lib/mysql-cluster/config.ini

Contents of config.ini:

[NDBD DEFAULT]
NoOfReplicas=2
DataMemory=1000MB
IndexMemory=250MB
MaxNoOfTables=256
MaxNoOfOrderedIndexes=256
MaxNoOfUniqueHashIndexes=128
[MYSQLD DEFAULT]
[NDB_MGMD DEFAULT]
[TCP DEFAULT]
# Managment Server
[NDB_MGMD]
Id=1
HostName=192.168.1.90# the IP of THIS SERVER
# Storage Engines
[NDBD]
Id=2
HostName=192.168.1.91# the IP of the FIRST storage node
DataDir= /var/lib/mysql-cluster
[NDBD]
Id=3
HostName=192.168.1.90# the IP of the SECOND storage node
DataDir=/var/lib/mysql-cluster

[MYSQLD]
# MYSQL-CLUSTER SQL NODE 1
Id=4
HostName=192.168.1.101

[MYSQLD]
# MYSQL-CLUSTER SQL NODE 2
Id=5
HostName=192.168.1.102


ndb-mgm can be a totally stand-alone pkg.

These are the files that should be in the ndb pkg:

usr/bin/ndb_delete_all  
usr/bin/ndb_desc
usr/bin/ndb_drop_index  
usr/bin/ndb_drop_table  
usr/bin/ndb_restore 
usr/bin/ndb_select_all  
usr/bin/ndb_select_count
usr/bin/ndb_show_tables 
usr/bin/ndb_waiter
usr/sbin/ndbd
usr/sbin/ndb_cpcd
etc/init.d/mysql-ndb



/etc/init.d/mysql-ndb should just startup ndb

Also, debconf could ask the ip of the management server ( ndb-mgm ). This is 
filled in like this in /etc/mysql/my.cnf:

[mysql_cluster]
ndb-connectstring=192.168.1.90   # the IP of the MANAGMENT SERVER

I hope this at least helps you a little further...
Don't hesitate to ask for any more help! I'd be glad to help out ;)

Thanks!

-- 
Bart Verwilst
Linux RD Engineer
Hostbasket NV


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#259264: Dell Poweredge 750

2005-06-15 Thread Bart Verwilst
Hi,

I'm trying to install Debian 3.1, but when booted with the 2.6 kernel, it says 
there is no cdrom device present... 2.4 works fine though.. :$
Anything i can do to help?

Thanks!

Bart Verwilst


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#293569: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp incorectly tries to load megaraid2 on a 2.6 kernel

2005-06-07 Thread Bart Verwilst
Hi,

Still nothing.. I installed this kernel, added scsi_mod and megaraid 
to /etc/mkinitrd/modules.. Still doesn't boot..
Any more ideas?

Op maandag 6 juni 2005 19:30, schreef u:
 Horm put up some test images a couple of days ago at

 http://debian.vergenet.net/testing/
 The debian version is 5.hls.2005052700

 You might want to try those, as they have the MEGARAID_NEWGEN drivers  
 compiled into the kernel.

 They work for booting my 2850.

 Best.

 Satadru



Bug#293569: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp incorectly tries to load megaraid2 on a 2.6 kernel

2005-06-06 Thread Bart Verwilst
I'm having this issue too.. We're switching from Gentoo to Debian 3.1 in the 
datacenter, and all our servers are Dell's, mostly 1850's.. We want to use 
kernel 2.6 instead of 2.4, but this is not possible for now.. Isn't this a RC 
bug for Debian 3.1?

Kind regards,

Bart


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#293569:

2005-06-06 Thread Bart Verwilst
I tried installing the 2.6.11-1-386 from unstable, it failed to boot too..

Op maandag 06 juni 2005 16:47, schreef Satadru Pramanik:
 afaik, this is patched for 2.6.11 is debian svn...
 -Original Message-
 From: Bart Verwilst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Monday, Jun 6, 2005 9:53 am
 Subject: Bug#293569: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp incorectly tries to load
 megaraid2 on a 2.6 kernel

 I'm having this issue too.. We're switching from Gentoo to Debian 3.1 in
 the  datacenter, and all our servers are Dell's, mostly 1850's.. We want to
 use  kernel 2.6 instead of 2.4, but this is not possible for now.. Isn't
 this a RC  bug for Debian 3.1?

 Kind regards,

 Bart


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]