Bug#503706: xmame: Superflous spaces in Debconf templates
Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Bruno Barrera C. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Bruno, what are your plans regarding xmame translation updates? Do you have a plan for an upload soon? Quite soon. ? And now ? I was about to do it, but there is still missing some .po files, (gl.po, cs.po, etc.). What do you do in this case? -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#503706: xmame: Superflous spaces in Debconf templates
Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): OK, Bruno mentioned me in private something like please help...:) So, how to unfuzzy things ? First, take your package source tree .../... Bruno, what are your plans regarding xmame translation updates? Do you have a plan for an upload soon? Quite soon. -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#413451: Bug #413451
Do you agree to merge this bug with #449305? Thanks, -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#424905: Packaging .SDLMame
As maintainer of Xmame, I'll be working on this package. Thanks, -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#455224: Please add libxext-dev to build depends
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:53 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 455224 severity 455225 important thanks So this is a bug in bbkeys (the configure script aborts if it can't find libXext but does not build-depend on libxext-dev), and will become a serious bug once the libx11-dev in experimental reaches unstable. Please consider fixing this before then. Cheers, Hi Steve, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I just don't wanted to sound rude, but I wasn't happy with the way this bug was submitted - sort of responsibility of keeping the same changes that ubuntu has. I will happily take care of this. Cheers, -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#411385: Portsentry translation
Hi, Could you please add the translation file related to #411385 in order to prepare the new upload? -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#429061: portsentry.conf permission
Hi, What does actually makes you (un)happy of the file permission? The owner? Seems right to me (root.root) The permissions? rw-r--r-- seems right to me too, comparing to other daemons, ssh, databases, etc. Or would you suggest something like rw---? If yes, why? -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#445467: About the new version
Please prepare a new version of the package and I would be glad, again, to sponsor it. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer The most dangerous moment comes with victory. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#381574:
severity 381574 wishlist thanks Hello, I must say that I'm not happy with this severity. This problem makes the package unusable under some circumstances, however, using xinerama _is not_ common, then it sounds like a request for compiling with the corresponding support. Anyway, I expect to use this for the next upload. Thanks, -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308200: blackbox-themes copyright file
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 11:48 -0400, Andrew Moise wrote: Bruno, would you object if I NMUed a new version of this package, with the copyright file I attached earlier in this bug report? I would prefer if we can discuss the changes in IRC or through Email. What do you plan to do? I'm interested in to see that it can be done. Thanks, -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#349370: (no subject)
So, should we close this bug or not? -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#368222: dies after losing the game
Package: xbat Version: 1.11-9.1 Severity: grave Hi, xbat dies after losing the game. Here is the log: This GDB was configured as powerpc-linux-gnu...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/games/xbat (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x10009694 in ?? () That's not so much information, but well, as I said, after losing 1 Life this game died with a Segmentation Fault message. -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#367900: RM: aget -- dead upstream; better alternatives exist
Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove aget from unstable. Upstream doesn't reply anymore, and this program has a lot of issues in its behavior as you can see in the reported bugs, specially at [0]. [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359854 Thanks, -- Bruno Barrera C. In this life, we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fools. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#339775:
Could you please try the new Xmame 1.04? -- In this life, we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fools. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#349653: xmame: exploitable buffer overflows [CVE-2006-0176]
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 11:22 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:00:16AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: This bug has been pending for more than two months and no fix in Debian yet... Does Bruno still track his bugs? Here is two patches for both Sarge and Sid versions. Pierre Riteau (CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the stable fix, and the Co-Maintainer as I don't know if he receives BTS replies) (Email address in previous message for tagging is wrong, I was playing with bts thinking it wouldn't commit the changes) Xmame is non-free and thus not supported by the Security Team. (Only the relatively obscure -svgalib version is affected, anyway.) Is it the case that this bug doesn't affect the other frontends *at all*, or just that, not being suid root, it's just an arbitrary code execution bug instead of a root exploit? It's a local vulnerability, the only security ramification would be a privilege escalation: If untrusted input can trigger arbitrary code execution, then that still has security implications. I don't think that most users only use trusted ROMs with xmame. :) Yeah, but according to the original advisory the overflows are in args parsing. (It could be possible that these values can somehow be influenced from a crafted ROM, though.) Cheers, Moritz Hi, Sorry for the delay in this reply. Timeline: 26 Mar 2006: I submitted a NEW package (xmame-1.0.4) with xmess-SDL. Sun, 02 Apr 2006: xmame_0.104-1_i386.changes REJECTED (Due to a minor mistake) Sun, 02 Apr 2006: xmame_0.104-1_i386.changes is NEW (Fixed the mistake and uploaded the new package). Changelog: * New upstream release. * Fixed exploitable buffer overflows [CVE-2006-0176]. (closes: #349653) * Added xmess-sdl binary package. (closes: #340460) Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 340460 349653 So, please be patient. Thanks, Bruno. -- In this life, we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fools. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#314486:
Hi, I suppose this bug can be safely closed. Do you agree? -- In this life, we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fools. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#359854: doesn't detect recv()=0
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 01:49 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: tag 359854 patch thanks It is looping with recv()=0, which means the remote end has shut down. It is a special return value, and has to be handled as such. Attached is functional and mildly tested patch. I also made some changes to fix some ugly stuff valgrind turned up. It still doesn't detect errors, but this didn't work before anyway. I would seriously reconsider maintenance of this package..trivially fixed valgrind warnings, saved files aren't correct, overwrites files which wget wouldn't, and improper use of recv. Could you please explain me what does reconsider maintenance of this package means? Are referering to my work or upstream?. FYI, I've written a lot of patches for aget and sent it directly to upstream as you can see in the bug reports before. Sadly, upstream is a bit slow replying and that's why I don't want to make this package fully of patches, because is a small program and we can introduce changes directly to the official source code. Alternatives: aria axel cget icecream The one thing it has going for it is that it is small, and if you wanted to make relatively heavy modifications, you could do so without much pain. Thanks for the patch. -- In this life, we are Kings or Pawns. Emperors or Fools. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#349653: xmame: exploitable buffer overflows [CVE-2006-0176]
tags 349653 pending thanks On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:03 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: Package: xmame Version: 0.101-1 Severity: critial Tags: security Hi! A recent post on bugtraq [1] mentions several exploitable buffer overflows. According to the CVE page [2] this was fixed upstream on January 11. This becomes critical if xmame is installed suid root. Please mention the CVE number in the changelog when you fix this. Thanks, Martin [1] http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/421849/100/0/threaded [2] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0176 Preparing New Upload, thanks. -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#345193:
tags 345193 confirmed thanks Right. I'll be working on this. -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#334259:
forwarded 334259 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks You're certainly right. I'll be working on this with upstream. -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308200: blackbox-themes: Copyright status still not resolved
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 11:14 -0500, Andrew Moise wrote: Has there been any more progress on this? 250 days is a long time for Debian to be (apparently) distributing someone else's copyrighted works without a license. Again, if you want me to do any of the work associated with fixing this bug, say the word; I appreciate the work you've done for Debian and I don't want to make more work for you. Hi Andrew, I have been really busy these days. I will really appreciate if you can help me a bit with this issue. Thanks, -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#315947:
Hi, Many changes have been made on 0.70.1 Could you please try this new version? -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#334798:
Hi, Many changes have been made on 0.70.1 Could you please try this new version? -- Midway upon the journey of our life, I found myself within a forest dark, For the straightforward pathway had been lost. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#259581: bbconf status.
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 17:17 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: reassign 259581 ftp.debian.org retitle 259581 RM: bbconf -- orphaned for over a year thanks * Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-01 09:36]: retitle 259581 O: bbconf -- A Blackbox configuration utility noowner 259581 thanks So, We have to wait a bit to get a new fully-working version of bbconf. There seems to have been no CVS activity since July 16. Do you still intend to adopt bbconf? I haven't heard back from you, so I'm assuming you're no longer interested. If you are, feel free to retitle the bug again. I think there has been plenty of time to give people a chance to adopt this... If I requested this package it's because I _really_ tried to adopt it. I have recently got an answer from upstream: From: Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BBconf. Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:21:41 -0500 (12:21 CLST) On Sunday 31 July 2005 11:21, Bruno Barrera C. wrote: Hi there, I'm the Debian Maintainer of blackbox, bbkeys and bbconf. I just wanted to know when (or if) are you going to release a new version of bbconf to work directly with the new releases of Blackbox and bbkeys (0.70 and 0.90 respectively). Hi Bruno, I hate to admit defeat, but I have to here. I have absolutely no time to devote to bbconf anymore. I had someone who said he would help me, but nothing has happened in the last several months and I have no inclination that anything will anytime soon. Any spare time that I have, I tend to spend more on KDE-related things anyway. So, if you need to drop bbconf from debian, I completely understand and I think it would probably be better that way anyway. =:/ Sorry to wait so long to admit the obvious. =:/ Thank you for waiting for me. -- Bruno Barrera C. The most dangerous moment comes with victory. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#322306:
tags 322306 unreproducible thanks Using: blackbox : 0.70.0-5 xserver-xorg : 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 I wasn't able to reproduce your bug report (bbpager ran fine). Could you please send more details about this issue (versions, debug, etc.). -- Bruno Barrera C. The most dangerous moment comes with victory. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#316723:
Hi, I have recently uploaded xmame 0.99, so, it will be really nice if you can do some bin-NMU for the PowerPC architecture. Thanks, -- Bruno Barrera C. The most dangerous moment comes with victory. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#322569:
Sure. It will be added to the next version. -- Bruno Barrera C. The most dangerous moment comes with victory. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#259581: bbconf status.
Quoting Upstream: Yes, there is work being done on it, finally. I have done some work on it lately, and there's another guy, Keith, who has said he would help me. I'm hoping that in a couple of weeks, I will have a better idea on when a release will be made--hopefully soon. So, We have to wait a bit to get a new fully-working version of bbconf. -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#314920:
I put in the README.Debian file the instructions to fix this. Blackbox v0.70 uses a new syntax for its 'styles files'. Thus a new utility, bstyleconvert, is provided to convert your old styles to the new format. usage: bstyleconvert list-of-files This will produce a new file with the extension '-new' Please, confirm if this works to close this bug report. -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#190811: bbmail status
Hi, Are you still interested in to maintain bbmail? I would like to see this being worked on. -- Bruno Barrera C. The most dangerous moment comes with victory. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#316723:
This sounds interesting. I'm currently preparing the 0.97 upload, so I will contact you, if you don't mind, for this port. Thanks, -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#301623:
Is this still present in 0.96? -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#259581: still intending to adopt bbconf?
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 14:23 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Bruno Barrera C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-27 12:00]: If you no longer intend to work on bbconf I will investigate some more and probably file a removal request. No, I will not take care about bbconf, so I really think that you should file a removal request. ... but then you said on debian-devel that you will. So what now? I'm happy for this package to remain in unstable for now if you're still undecided, but maybe we should remove it from sarge? I decided to adopt the package. With respect to the sarge issue, I think there is not problem to remove it since that the debian-release team didn't accept blackbox 0.70 into sarge, so it will be an unnecessary tool. -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#306934:
We have a manpage for this already in 0.94, right? -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308016:
We have a manpage for this already in 0.94, right? -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308157:
Yep, I knew. I'm uploading a new version. -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#308200: blackbox-themes: Copyright status still not resolved
if I could include their themes into the Debian package obviously, and I got answers like: From rom Carlos Oliva: 'That's fine. Please do. I'll be glad to share my theme into the Debian Package' Then I uploaded the package. Now, the true is that I will require all emails digitally-signed, otherwise it will not be legal because somebody could think that they are fake. I'm going to request the same thing that I've requested time ago, and I will change the debian/copyright, including his reply on the file. That do you think that would be correct? Thanks for your report, -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#300619:
Hi, I couldn't reproduce this bug report. Is this still present in 0.70? -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#269814:
Hi there, Is this still present using blackbox 0.70 + bbkeys 0.9? -- Bruno Barrera C. I'm a soldier, not a monster. Even though if I sometimes work for monsters. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#297632: Upgrade package to 0.70.0
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 13:57 -0800, Andy Hochhaus wrote: Package: blackbox Version: 0.65.0-5 Severity: wishlist Upgrade blackbox to the 0.70.0 stable release (This upstream package was released on 3/1/05) Yes, I'm currently working on it, but to implement the new menu system is not so easy and fast to handle. I'll hope to get a new version soon. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#191040:
Hi Osamu, I was wondering what should I do about this issue? I think this bug can be safely closed, but I want your opinion anyway. Regards, -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#259581: still intending to adopt bbconf?
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 00:16 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Hi Bruno I'm currently checking all packages owned by the Debian QA Group to decide whether they should be removed from Debian or not. In October 2004 you stated your intend to adopt this package. Are you still working on it? If you no longer intend to work on bbconf I will investigate some more and probably file a removal request. Please CC me on replies to the bug report. Gaudenz No, I will not take care about bbconf, so I really think that you should file a removal request. Regards, -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#296968: xmame: dpkg error procesing
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 23:14 +, David Roguin wrote: Package: xmame Version: 0.90-1 Severity: important [...] Could you please stop reporting bugs with respect to unofficial packages? -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#135322:
tags 135322 + confirmed pending thanks This is fixed in the new upstream pre-release version, finishing the port of the menu system, a new version will be uploaded. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#292114:
tags 292114 + confirmed pending thanks I'm preparing a new version due the new upstream pre-release, so please wait. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#121203:
tags 121203 + confirmed pending thanks This is fixed in the new upstream pre-release version, finishing the port of the menu system, a new version will be uploaded. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#293302:
tags 293302 + confirmed pending thanks We have a fix for this ready, We are waiting the new upstream (0.91 or 0.92) to include it. (Which will be released soon) -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#287232:
We have a fix for this ready, We are waiting the new upstream (0.91 or 0.92) to include it. (Which will be released soon) -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#293462:
tags 293462 + confirmed pending thanks We have a fix for this ready, We are waiting the new upstream (0.91 or 0.92) to include it. (Which will be released soon). -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#292806:
This problem is fixed in the new upstream version (0.92). Please, upload a new package in order to fix this problem. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#293624:
Hi, Those fonts that you installed are avalaible in Debian? Without installing those fonts I was able to use the program, so I was thinking into change that dependencies to some kind of 'Suggests'. What do you think? -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#293624:
tags 293624 patch
thanks
Here is a little patch to fix this issue.
--
Bruno Barrera C.
Debian Developer
--- ../fcitx-3.0.3.orig/debian/control 2005-02-05 17:53:58.0 -0300
+++ debian/control 2005-02-05 17:56:16.0 -0300
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
Package: fcitx
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp | ttf-arphic-gkai00mp
+Suggests: ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp | ttf-arphic-gkai00mp
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: Free Chinese Input Toy for X (XIM)
fcitx is a simplified Chinese input server. It supports WuBi,
Pinyin and QuWei input method. It's small and fast.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#292806:
Hi, Well, the reason of this issue is that pmksetup is broken (Segmentation Fault). A quick look on the sources and debugging shows that there is some problem with the strlen() function (seems like a NULL argument or something like that). I'm bit busy nowadays but I'll try to make some patch ASAP. Regards, -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#293462: xmame-x: Please build with LIRC support
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 11:30 -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote: Hi Bruno, Starting with xmame 0.89, LIRC (Linux infrared control) is supported. For machines without a keyboard or mouse (like a dedicated MythTV box connected to a TV and controlled just with a remote infrared control) it would be very convenient to be able to control MAME from a remote control. For this to happen, MAME has to be built with LIRC support. This should be easy to do and should not have side effects - just source-depend on liblirc-dev, enable the right configuration option, and build ;-) I look forward to being able to play MAME via my remote control and a joystick! [...] This sounds interesting, I'll add it to the next version. Thanks, -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#153485:
It will be very interesting in to know if this problem still ocurrs in the last version. Otherwise this bug report will be closed. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#291692:
Well, I need to know what happened with this bug. Is there some news about this issue? -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#291807:
Well, I think you mean the 'Verifying the message'? part. Indeed, this process takes some time and you can't check the body of message until the process is finished, but the question is, evolution gets freeze or something like that after that period? Please, detail your problem more finely with examples. -- Bruno Barrera C. Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
