Bug#549622: follow-up to test

2009-11-23 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Oleg,

The resolver in libcupt-perl 1.3.0 got substantially modified, can you try now
'cupt -s install -t stable kde -o cupt::resolver::quality-bar=-2000' and
report does it produce a solution and in what time on your machine?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#554773: cupt: Wrong computation of preferences/pinning

2009-11-23 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
David Kalnischkies wrote:
 Or in short: A package version has multiply pin-settings:
 - a version specific one (e.g. 5.8*)

 - one for each origin/release/distribution (e.g. sid or )
I don't understand this one. And anyway it isn't stated anywhere, so it
doesn't count.

 And this is btw what i expect with the given pin-file,
 but your mileage may vary, of course.
 (Or to rephrase it: how to get the same behavior in cupt?)
 
 I would therefore reassign the bug (again) to cupt and proceed
 with improving the manpage in #557637 instead, but i don't want to
 play bug-ping-pong. So what do you think Eugene V. Lyubimkin?

So I don't get your point. Again: Failing that, if any
general-form records match an available package version then the first such
record determines the priority of the package version, and cupt do exactly 
that.

I definitely will not accept bug reports based on points like 'do what I mean,
not what I say'.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#554773: cupt: Wrong computation of preferences/pinning

2009-11-23 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
David Kalnischkies wrote:
 (i guess we simply have a different understanding of version in
  this context and therefore different behavior in apt vs. cupt)
Yes, seems so.

 2009/11/23 Eugene V. Lyubimkin jackyf.de...@gmail.com:
 - one for each origin/release/distribution (e.g. sid or )
 I don't understand this one. And anyway it isn't stated anywhere, so it
 doesn't count.
 In The Effect of APT Preferences it is said:
 The general form assigns a priority to all of the package versions
 in a given distribution (that is, to all the versions of packages that
 are listed in a certain Release file) or to all of the package versions
 coming from a particular Internet site, as identified by the site´s fully
 qualified domain name.
 (I have quoted the first few words already in my first mail)
That phrase doesn't say anything about the same version entry treating is
multiple ones, one for each Packages which it belongs to.

 So why it is not stated somewhere and therefore doesn't count?
 The versions from a different distribution/origin doesn't have a pin
 assigned yet, so another pin-setting can match them.
Yes, for cupt they all are the same version (which I considered natural). This
concept is one of libcupt's cornerstones.

Jean-Christophe, now it's up to you to decide which point you support. If the
bug got reassigned to libcupt in the end, I will mark it 'wontfix'. I don't
want to play reassigning ping-pong as well.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#556650: libcupt-perl: Unable to upgrade console-setup, install keyboard-configuration

2009-11-23 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package libcupt-perl
tags 556650 + pending
thanks

Hi James,

James Vega wrote:
 Package: libcupt-perl
 Version: 1.3.0
 Severity: normal
 
 Given the following new version of console-setup and new package
 keyboard-configuration, I'm unable to upgrade console-setup.
 keyboard-configuration is being installed while console-setup is still
 present, which results in a file conflict.
 
 Package: console-setup
 Version: 1.47
 Depends: debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, console-terminus (= 4.26), xkb-data 
 (= 0.9), keyboard-configuration
 
 Package: keyboard-configuration
 Version: 1.47
 Depends: debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
 Conflicts: console-setup ( 1.47), console-setup-mini ( 1.47)

This bug should be now fixed in the master branch.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#557661: libcupt-perl: Division by zero attempting to 'cupt update' from security.d.o squeeze/updates non-free

2009-11-23 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package libcupt-perl
tags 557661 + confirmed pending
thanks

James Vega wrote:
 Package: libcupt-perl
 Version: 1.2.1
 Severity: normal
 
 I recently added non-free to my sources.list, and cupt bombs out when it
 attempts to update non-free from security.debian.org.  Limited test-case
 shown below.  I've tested with 1.3.0 and seen similar results.
 
Hi James, another good catch. The file with defined size 0, heh. Should be
fixed in the master branch now.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#557451: xfce4-terminal: background transparency is broken

2009-11-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: xfce4-terminal
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: normal

The option 'Edit-Preferences-Appearance-Background' set to
'Transparent background' enables only transparency against selected
background color and not against other windows.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xfce4-terminal depends on:
ii  exo-utils 0.3.102-1  Utility files for libexo
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.26.0-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.10.1-2   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdbus-1-3   1.2.16-2   simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2  0.82-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libexo-0.3-0  0.3.102-1  Library with extensions for Xfce
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.22.2-2   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.18.3-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.26.0-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libvte9   1:0.22.4-1 Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 
ii  libx11-6  2:1.2.2-1  X11 client-side library
ii  libxfce4util4 4.6.1-1Utility functions library for Xfce

Versions of packages xfce4-terminal recommends:
ii  dbus-x11  1.2.16-2   simple interprocess messaging syst

xfce4-terminal suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#557452: xfce4-xkb-plugin: segfaults repeatedly after add and removal of the 'fi' layout

2009-11-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: xfce4-xkb-plugin
Version: 0.5.3.2-2
Severity: important

I had three keyboard layouts (en, ru, ua), controlled by
xfce4-xkb-plugin (i.e. no XkbLayout entries in xorg.conf). Then I tried
to add the 'fi' keyboard layout, and it worked. Then I tried to remove
it, and the plugin segfaulted.  Now I can't even launch it - the plugin
just repeatedly segfaults:

Nov 22 11:39:05 1501-debian kernel: [48995.014079]
xfce4-xkb-plugi[4928]: segfault at 20 ip 7fd83e36e411 sp
7fffbb35d548 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[7fd83e2f5000+14a000]
Nov 22 11:39:32 1501-debian kernel: [49021.617278]
xfce4-xkb-plugi[9745]: segfault at 60 ip 7f3037bd5411 sp
7fffbfcc3298 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[7f3037b5c000+14a000]
Nov 22 11:39:46 1501-debian kernel: [49035.776836]
xfce4-xkb-plugi[9753]: segfault at 20 ip 7fc154f0c411 sp
7fffd202dd68 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[7fc154e93000+14a000]


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xfce4-xkb-plugin depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-01.26.0-1  The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6  2.10.1-2  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2  1.8.8-2   The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1 2.6.0-4   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6   2.3.11-1  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.22.2-2  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-02.18.3-1  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.26.0-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  librsvg2-2 2.26.0-1  SAX-based renderer library for SVG
ii  libwnck22  2.26.1-1  Window Navigator Construction Kit 
ii  libxfce4util4  4.6.1-1   Utility functions library for Xfce
ii  libxfcegui4-4  4.6.1-1+b1Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4
ii  libxklavier15  4.0-2 X Keyboard Extension high-level AP
ii  libxml22.7.6.dfsg-1  GNOME XML library
ii  xfce4-panel4.6.2-1   The Xfce4 desktop environment pane
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime

xfce4-xkb-plugin recommends no packages.

xfce4-xkb-plugin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#557451: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#557451: xfce4-terminal: background transparency is broken

2009-11-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
 On dim., 2009-11-22 at 11:17 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Package: xfce4-terminal
 Version: 0.4.2-1
 Severity: normal

 The option 'Edit-Preferences-Appearance-Background' set to
 'Transparent background' enables only transparency against selected
 background color and not against other windows.
 
 Is compositing enabled in the general settings, Window Manager Tweaks,
 Compositing tab?
 
 Cheers,
Sure. It's enabled, all other transparency tweaking bars on the Window Manager
Tweaks controls transparency work well.

And I surely remember that it (transparent background) worked in some of
previous versions of xfce4-terminal, however I didn't need terminal
transparency for a while and can't say which last good version was.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#557452: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#557452: xfce4-xkb-plugin: segfaults repeatedly after add and removal of the 'fi' layout

2009-11-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
 Nov 22 11:39:05 1501-debian kernel: [48995.014079]
 xfce4-xkb-plugi[4928]: segfault at 20 ip 7fd83e36e411 sp
 7fffbb35d548 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[7fd83e2f5000+14a000]
 Nov 22 11:39:32 1501-debian kernel: [49021.617278]
 xfce4-xkb-plugi[9745]: segfault at 60 ip 7f3037bd5411 sp
 7fffbfcc3298 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[7f3037b5c000+14a000]
 Nov 22 11:39:46 1501-debian kernel: [49035.776836]
 xfce4-xkb-plugi[9753]: segfault at 20 ip 7fc154f0c411 sp
 7fffd202dd68 error 4 in libc-2.10.1.so[7fc154e93000+14a000] 
 
 Could you try to backtrace it (replace the executable by a wrapper
 running in gdb (more info at
 http://wiki.xfce.org/howto/panel_plugin_debug)
 

Here's. However, not much info there. Should I try to capture STDERR?
It segfaulted earlier, but now it just returns 1 and exits (still unexpectedly).

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer


xfce4-xkb-plugin-gdb.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


xfce4-xkb-plugin-valgrind.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#557452: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#557452: xfce4-xkb-plugin: segfaults repeatedly after add and removal of the 'fi' layout

2009-11-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
 Which keyboard exactly do you chose in the layout list?

fi, or fi (classic). Also, I suspect that the crash/unexpected exit caused
not by exact layout, but by attempt to remove the layout listed as default, it
was the case for all repeatable exits, and one time when other (than the newly
added) layout was selected as default, the behavior was normal.

I however got a few other segfaults/unexpected exits while trying to debug
this one (one of them took place when I switched the keyboard not using
plugin, by keyboard key), so I can't be sure.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#557177: libcupt-perl: broken cupt source: Can't locate object method new via package Digest

2009-11-19 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package libcupt-perl
tags 557177 + confirmed pending
thanks

Hi Cyril,

Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 Package: libcupt-perl
 Version: 1.3.0
 Severity: important
 Tags: patch
 
 Hi,
 
 unfortunately, cupt source $pkg was broken by commit 5aa189408a. Please
 find attached a patch to fix this. (Please keep in mind Perl is not my
 mother tongue, there might be better ways to fix that.)
 
Ouch, right. I applied the fix to the master branch.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#556650: libcupt-perl: Unable to upgrade console-setup, install keyboard-configuration

2009-11-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package libcupt-perl
tags 556650 + confirmed
found 556650 libcupt-perl/1.2.1
thanks

James Vega wrote:
 Package: libcupt-perl
 Version: 1.3.0
 Severity: normal
 
 Given the following new version of console-setup and new package
 keyboard-configuration, I'm unable to upgrade console-setup.
 keyboard-configuration is being installed while console-setup is still
 present, which results in a file conflict.
 
 Package: console-setup
 Version: 1.47
 Depends: debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, console-terminus (= 4.26), xkb-data 
 (= 0.9), keyboard-configuration
 
 Package: keyboard-configuration
 Version: 1.47
 Depends: debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
 Conflicts: console-setup ( 1.47), console-setup-mini ( 1.47)
Hi James, thanks for the report. This is indeed a bug.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#275357: state of #275357

2009-11-15 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
tags 275357 + confirmed
found 275357 5.10.1-7
thanks

Steve Cotton wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:06:52PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 I cannot reproduce the bug with the Perl 5.10.1 in Debian unstable. Can you?
 
 Hi Eugene,
 
 It's reproducible every time for me.
 
Hm. Right. It seems I did not properly create a fifo before. Confirmed, thanks.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#306228: state of #306228

2009-11-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
 Eugene Hello Ian, Do you encounter the problem nowadays? If yes, can
 Eugene you issue a new test case?
 
 It still happens exactly as in the bug:
 
But Brendan said earlier that it's normal for distribution-installed modules,
so I expected an example for some locally-installed module.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#555209: libcupt-perl: Ignores satisfied ORed Depends and installs first one

2009-11-13 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
James Vega wrote:
 I would, but I'm getting this error:
 
 Resolving possible unmet dependencies... Can't call method 
 get_package_entry on unblessed reference at Cupt/System/Resolvers/Native.pm 
 line 409, $fh line 28664.
  at Cupt/System/Resolvers/Native.pm line 409
 
 Cupt::System::Resolvers::Native::__is_version_array_intersects_with_packages('ARRAY(0x9f1e460)',
  'HASH(0x97af658)') called at Cupt/System/Resolvers/Native.pm line 944
 
 Cupt::System::Resolvers::Native::_resolve('Cupt::System::Resolvers::Native=ARRAY(0x8aebda0)',
  'CODE(0x9e301e0)') called at Cupt/System/Resolvers/Native.pm line 1213
 
 Cupt::System::Resolvers::Native::resolve('Cupt::System::Resolvers::Native=ARRAY(0x8aebda0)',
  'CODE(0x9e301e0)') called at ./cupt line 1679
 main::manage_packages('safe-upgrade') called at ./cupt line 128
 main::__ANON__() called at ./cupt line 143
 eval {...} called at ./cupt line 142
 main::main() called at ./cupt line 157
  at Cupt/Core.pm line 110
 Cupt::Core::mycatch() called at ./cupt line 145
 main::main() called at ./cupt line 157
 
Oops, nice catch. Should be fixed now, can you try again?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#556014: libcupt-perl: Unable to upgrade packages which mutually Break

2009-11-13 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
James Vega wrote:
 Package: libcupt-perl
 Version: 1.2.1
 Severity: important
 
 As is the case right now, cupt can't upgrade consolekit  udev because
 the new versions both Break the currently installed version of the other
 package.  Attached debug log.
 
 N.B., I haven't tried the git repo yet due to the traceback I posted in
 my other bug.
 
Good catch. I've fixed that bug in master and just pushed a change to pass
--force-breaks to dpkg too, it should fix this bug. Can you confirm?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#555824: dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
reassign 555824 dpkg
thanks

Hi Guillem,

Firstly, this has nothing to do with cupt, I did the command manually. Where
did you see 'cupt' in the report?

Guillem Jover wrote:
 reassign 555824 cupt
 retitle 555824 cupt: Wrong use of --force-depends --force-conflicts
 thanks
 
 On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 23:46:13 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Package: dpkg
 Version: 1.15.4
 Severity: grave
 Justification: causes non-serious data loss
 
 I had next packages installed on my system: perl-base, perl,
 perl-modules, perl-doc (all from current unstable, 5.10.1-7).

 -8-
 sudo dpkg -i --force-depends --force-conflicts perl_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb 
 perl-doc_5.10.1-8_all.deb perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb 
 perl-base_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb
^
 
 [sudo] password for jackyf: 
 dpkg: considering removing perl-modules in favour of perl ...
 dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
  perl depends on perl-modules (= 5.10.1-7)
   perl-modules is to be removed.
 
 [ ... More warnings on dependency problems. ... ]
 
 dpkg: yes, will remove perl-modules in favour of perl.
 (Reading database ... 140092 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace perl 5.10.1-7 (using perl_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement perl ...
 Preparing to replace perl-doc 5.10.1-7 (using perl-doc_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
 Leaving `diversion of /usr/bin/perldoc to /usr/bin/perldoc.stub by perl-doc'
 Unpacking replacement perl-doc ...
 Unpacking perl-modules (from perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
 Preparing to replace perl-base 5.10.1-7 (using perl-base_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb) 
 ...
 Unpacking replacement perl-base ...
 Setting up perl-base (5.10.1-8) ...
 Processing triggers for man-db ...
 Setting up perl (5.10.1-8) ...
 Setting up perl-doc (5.10.1-8) ...
 -8-

 The result: the package 'perl-modules' is not installed (e.g. removed), 
 despite
 the direct query to install new version, ignoring any dependency conflicts.
 
 Well, you asked for it, don't do that. As indicated by --force-help,
 usage of those specific options you used there “can seriously damage
 your installation” which is what happened.
Dpkg ignored the request to install new perl-modules. Silently. Why? I didn't
read 'seriously damage your installation' as 'ignore some command-line 
requests'.

 To try to get out of the situation dpkg tries to remove a package,
 because you added --force-depends then it ignored any problem and
 considered it an ok solution. The --force-conflicts gets considered
 later on.

 Check what apt is doing. Cupt should not use force options on
 --unpack, --install, --configure or --triggers-only. Ideally no
 front-end would need to use force options, but using --force-depends
 on --purge and --remove seems kind of reasonable for now I guess.
Again, this has nothing to do with any high-level package manager.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#555824: dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Sven Joachim wrote:
 This is because your perl 5.10.1-8 package both Replaces and Conflicts
 with the installed version of perl-modules.  In such a case, dpkg
 removes the offending package, assuming that the to-be-installed
 conflicting one supersedes it (because of the Replaces).  Note that dpkg
 processes packages in the order given on the command line, so the old
 version of perl-modules will be removed before unpacking perl.  However,
 the new version should be installed later...
Yes.

 
 dpkg: yes, will remove perl-modules in favour of perl.
 (Reading database ... 140092 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace perl 5.10.1-7 (using perl_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement perl ...
 Preparing to replace perl-doc 5.10.1-7 (using perl-doc_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
 Leaving `diversion of /usr/bin/perldoc to /usr/bin/perldoc.stub by perl-doc'
 Unpacking replacement perl-doc ...
 Unpacking perl-modules (from perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
 
 ... and here it gets unpacked.
 
 Preparing to replace perl-base 5.10.1-7 (using perl-base_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb) 
 ...
 Unpacking replacement perl-base ...
 Setting up perl-base (5.10.1-8) ...
 Processing triggers for man-db ...
 Setting up perl (5.10.1-8) ...
 Setting up perl-doc (5.10.1-8) ...
 -8-
 
 Is that all?  I would expect that perl-modules should also get configured.
Yes, that was all.

 The result: the package 'perl-modules' is not installed (e.g. removed), 
 despite
 the direct query to install new version, ignoring any dependency conflicts.
 
 Are you sure that it is not installed?  What does dpkg -l perl-modules
Yes, I was sure. 'dpkg -s perl-modules' showed 'Status: unknown ok 
not-installed'.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#275357: state of #275357

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Patrick, Steve,

I cannot reproduce the bug with the Perl 5.10.1 in Debian unstable. Can you?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#299804: state of #299804

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello,

Do you encounter spamassassin segfaults nowadays?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#306228: state of #306228

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Ian,

Do you encounter the problem nowadays? If yes, can you issue a new test case?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#309366: state of #309366

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Bas,

The test case works fine for me as for Perl 5.10.1. Can you confirm?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#555824: dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Sven Joachim wrote:
 Could you upload your packages somewhere?  I would like to reproduce the
 problem.
Yes, see http://people.debian.org/~jackyf/perl-candidates/.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#555824: dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Guillem Jover wrote:
 As you have reported similar reports in the past, I went and checked
 cupt sources and it seems to be passing those flags to dpkg (which is
 wrong
No, it just necessary for plenty of upgrade actions. And I see no reason why
passing these options is wrong, nor in the manual, nor in your words.

 Here it says it will try this to get out of the situation...
I requested installing new version of the package 'perl-modules'. Dpkg should
install it before unpacking 'perl', or remove it meanwhile, but install the
new version later. As correctly pointed by Sven:

 Unpacking perl-modules (from perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
Wtf is that if the package status after the actions is 'not-installed'?

 The result: the package 'perl-modules' is not installed (e.g. removed), 
 despite
 the direct query to install new version, ignoring any dependency conflicts.
 Well, you asked for it, don't do that. As indicated by --force-help,
 usage of those specific options you used there “can seriously damage
 your installation” which is what happened.
 
 Dpkg ignored the request to install new perl-modules.
 
 As said before, only because you asked it to.
Err, wait, do you mean it ignored install request because I've asked to ignore
dependencies?

 Silently.
 
 It does not seem silent to me. Although it could repeat the message
 when actually doing the removal
It said nothing about why the 'install perl-modules 5.10.1-8' action was not
performed (except for weird 'unpack perl-modules 5.10.1-8' message without a
further appropriate configure which (unpack I mean) was not actually performed).

 Well, then apart from the possible request for an additional removal
 printing I don't see any problem here. The upgrade works w/o the need
 for the force options (except for the unhandled /etc/perl/Net/libnet.cfg
 conffile, which does not get properly moved), and it causes major
 problems when using the force options (as expected), which should really
 *not* be used on normal operations, as said before.
And I say again that using some --force-* is necessary to perform some
actions, some dependencies are to be broken unavoidably temporarily. Maybe,
not in my case, but this is not important (to me) anymore as it revealed the
grave problem in general and I would want it to be fixed in the future.

I read your reasoning as, basically, --force-* options are marked as 'can
damage your installation', so dpkg is free to do anything wrong if you
specified them. Am I right?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#555824: dpkg removed a package when told to upgrade it

2009-11-11 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Hello.

I had next packages installed on my system: perl-base, perl,
perl-modules, perl-doc (all from current unstable, 5.10.1-7).

-8-
sudo dpkg -i --force-depends --force-conflicts perl_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb 
perl-doc_5.10.1-8_all.deb perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb 
perl-base_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb
[sudo] password for jackyf: 
dpkg: considering removing perl-modules in favour of perl ...
dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 perl depends on perl-modules (= 5.10.1-7)
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 pristine-tar depends on perl-modules
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 libmodule-scandeps-perl depends on perl-modules (= 5.10.0) | 
libmodule-build-perl (= 0.28)
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 libmodule-scandeps-perl depends on perl-modules (= 5.9.4)
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 libtree-avl-perl depends on perl-modules
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 libmime-tools-perl depends on perl-modules (= 5.10)
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 po4a depends on perl-modules
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 git-core depends on perl-modules
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 dpkg-dev depends on perl-modules
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: may have trouble removing perl-modules, as it provides 
libmodule-build-perl ...
dpkg: warning: ignoring dependency problem with removal of perl-modules:
 libmodule-scandeps-perl depends on perl-modules (= 5.10.0) | 
libmodule-build-perl (= 0.28)
  perl-modules is to be removed.

dpkg: yes, will remove perl-modules in favour of perl.
(Reading database ... 140092 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace perl 5.10.1-7 (using perl_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement perl ...
Preparing to replace perl-doc 5.10.1-7 (using perl-doc_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
Leaving `diversion of /usr/bin/perldoc to /usr/bin/perldoc.stub by perl-doc'
Unpacking replacement perl-doc ...
Unpacking perl-modules (from perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb) ...
Preparing to replace perl-base 5.10.1-7 (using perl-base_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement perl-base ...
Setting up perl-base (5.10.1-8) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up perl (5.10.1-8) ...
Setting up perl-doc (5.10.1-8) ...
-8-

The result: the package 'perl-modules' is not installed (e.g. removed), despite
the direct query to install new version, ignoring any dependency conflicts.

Here is control info for the new packages that had to be installed:

-8-
$ echo perl_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb perl-doc_5.10.1-8_all.deb 
perl-modules_5.10.1-8_all.deb perl-base_5.10.1-8_amd64.deb | xargs -n1 dpkg-deb 
-I
 new debian package, version 2.0.
 size 7807518 bytes: control archive= 32934 bytes.
4668 bytes,22 lines  control  
   81112 bytes,  1100 lines  md5sums  
 560 bytes,21 lines   *  postinst #!/bin/sh
 274 bytes,10 lines   *  postrm   #!/bin/sh
1105 bytes,31 lines   *  preinst  #!/bin/sh
 110 bytes, 8 lines   *  prerm#!/bin/sh
 Package: perl
 Version: 5.10.1-8
 Architecture: amd64
 Maintainer: Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
 Installed-Size: 33052
 Depends: perl-base (= 5.10.1-8), libbz2-1.0, libc6 (= 2.4), libdb4.7, 
libgdbm3 (= 1.8.3), zlib1g (= 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg)
 Recommends: netbase, make
 Suggests: perl-doc, libterm-readline-gnu-perl | libterm-readline-perl-perl
 Conflicts: libansicolor-perl ( 1.10-1), libarchive-tar-perl ( 1.52), 
libattribute-handlers-perl ( 0.85), libautodie-perl ( 2.06.01), 
libcgi-pm-perl ( 3.43), libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl ( 2.020), 
libcompress-raw-zlib-perl ( 2.020), libcompress-zlib-perl ( 2.020), 
libcpanplus-perl ( 0.88), libdigest-md5-perl ( 2.39), libdigest-sha-perl 
( 5.47), libextutils-cbuilder-perl ( 0.2602), libextutils-parsexs-perl ( 
2.2002), libfile-temp-perl ( 0.22), libi18n-langtags-perl ( 0.35-1), 
libio-compress-base-perl ( 2.020), libio-compress-bzip2-perl ( 2.020), 
libio-compress-perl ( 2.020), libio-compress-zlib-perl ( 2.020), 
libio-zlib-perl ( 1.09), liblocale-codes-perl ( 2.07), 
liblocale-maketext-perl ( 1.13), liblocale-maketext-simple-perl ( 0.18-1), 
libmath-bigint-perl ( 1.89), libmime-base64-perl ( 3.08), 
libmodule-build-perl ( 0.340201), libmodule-corelist-perl ( 2.18), 
libmodule-load-conditional-perl ( 0.30), libmodule-load-perl 

Bug#555209: libcupt-perl: Ignores satisfied ORed Depends and installs first one

2009-11-09 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi James,

James Vega wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 05:53:06PM -0500, James Vega wrote:
 debug::resolver=1 log attached.
 
 Here it is. :)
 
 
Saw it. One change that is already in master branch should fix the problem.
Can you buildtest?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#443018: libvte9: confirmed

2009-11-08 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: libvte9
Version: 1:0.22.3-1
Severity: normal

Confirmed seeing garbage sometimes in xfce4-terminal.

For me it started to happen only in recent libvte9 changes, in 0.22.x
series.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libvte9 depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.26.0-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.10.1-2   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2 1.8.8-2The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig12.6.0-4generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.3.11-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.22.2-2   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.18.3-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libncurses5   5.7+20090803-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.26.0-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libvte-common 1:0.22.3-1 Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 

libvte9 recommends no packages.

libvte9 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#544682: vim: segfault on reading gzipped file

2009-11-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
James Vega wrote:
 tag 544682 unreproducible
 thanks
 
 On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:00:37PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 James Vega wrote:
 This worked fine for me when using
 /usr/share/doc/vim-common/changelog.Debian.gz as the test file.
 Yes, this worked for me for many months, for many other compressed files. 
 This
 is the first time I saw segfault.
 
 Is it still reproducible for you?  I've tried to reproduce it and
 haven't had any luck.  I get messages about not being able to create the
 tempfile and then I'm presented with the uncompressed file, but no
 crash.
Yes. Here's how I reproduce it:

-8-
/media/net$ mount | grep smbnetfs
smbnetfs on /media/net type fuse.smbnetfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,allow_other)
/media/net$ vim /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/changelog.gz
Vim: Caught deadly signal SEGV

Vim: Finished.
many empty lines
Segmentation fault
-8-

 I tried in a setup where there was no /tmp, $TMPDIR and $HOME were
 unset, and '.' wasn't writable by the user.  Aside from being unable to
 display the uncompressed text, it worked fine.
 
FTR, In the setup above /tmp, $HOME are set and writeable.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#554945: Autoflushing of stdout is broken with perl 5.10

2009-11-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Roger,

Roger Leigh wrote:
 Package: perl
 Version: 5.10.1-6
 Severity: normal
 
 This thread also describes the problem:
   
 http://coding.derkeiler.com/Archive/Perl/comp.lang.perl.misc/2009-06/msg00035.html
Actually, the thread conclusion is the construction itself works. See three
last messages. Personally, I use STDOUT flushing in one of my Perl programs
and it works fine.

Moreover, this program which uses dup() works perfectly fine:

-8-
#!/usr/bin/perl -w

use strict;
use warnings;

use FileHandle;
use POSIX;

my $new_stdout = FileHandle-new_from_fd(dup(fileno(STDOUT)), 'w');
$new_stdout-autoflush(1);

while (1) {
print { $new_stdout } 'a';
sleep(1);
}
-8-

Can you construct a small program to reproduce?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#269919: state of #269919

2009-11-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Gerfried,

| When any level of bundling is enabled, option values may be inserted in
| the bundle. For example:
|
| -h24w80
|
| is equivalent to
|
| -h 24 -w 80

 *argh*  This is sooo wrong. How does Getopt::Bundle guess if one
doesn't want to use -h 24w80 instead? This is absolutely
non-intuitively.  *sigh*

By looking into format specifier. It it's 'i', then 24 will be passed to h and
80 to w, if it's 's', then '24w80' will be passed to h. Is this satisfiable
for you to close this bug?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#554620: cupt: Network problems not handled gracefully

2009-11-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt libcupt-perl
reassign 554620 libcupt-perl
tags 554620 + unreproducible
thanks

James Vega wrote:
 Can you reproduce the issue again so we can debug it?
 
 That was the first and only time I've seen it so far.  The added checks
 look right, but I'm not sure I'll be able to verify whether it truly
 solves the problem.
That checks hardly can solve the problem, they can post-handle it better. And
for debugging purposes.

I marked this bug as unreproducible. Let it dangle for a while.

If you will ever reproduce this E: read from socket failed, I would like to
see output of program with '-o debug::downloader=1' appended.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#544682: vim: segfault on reading gzipped file

2009-11-07 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
James Vega wrote:
 Hmm, a fuse filesystem.  That may be the important bit of information.
 Could you attach a gzipped log of “strace -f -o 544682.log vim
 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/changelog.gz”?
 
Sure, here is it.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer


544682.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#554620: cupt: Network problems not handled gracefully

2009-11-05 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt libcupt-perl
reassign 554620 libcupt-perl
tags 554620 + unreproducible
thanks

James Vega wrote:
 Package: cupt
 Version: 1.1.1
 Severity: minor
 
 Attempted to update and saw the following backtrace.  Looks like there
 was an intermittent network problem, which caused some variable not
 to be set.

Hi James,
 $ sudo cupt update
 Get:1 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian squeeze Release
 Get:2 http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release
 0% [1 squeeze Release 0B][2 squeeze/updates Release 0B]
 
  | 0B/s | ETA: 0sE: read from socket failed:
This is an error from Unix local socket, not network one, but I can't guess
why it happened. Looks like something went bad with the listener socket, and
some client sockets received error from read(), and some even got wrong data
(which led to a crash).

I just added two more internal checks to master branch though just in case.

Can you reproduce the issue again so we can debug it?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#547951: reports warnings and errors about apt config

2009-11-04 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt libcupt-perl update-notifier-common
clone 547951 -1
reasssign -1 update-notifier-common
retitle -1 wrong syntax in apt config snippet
reassign 547951 libcupt-perl
severity 547951 minor
tags 547951 + confirmed pending
thanks

Hello Jean, thanks for your report,

Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
 Package: cupt
 Version: 1.2.1
 Severity: normal
 
[...]
 The content of these files are:
 $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/15update-stamp 
 APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Success:: {touch 
 /var/lib/apt/periodic/update-success-stamp 2/dev/null || true;};
Wrong syntax. The '::' before '{' are wrong and should be removed. Cloned the
bug report and reassigned to binary package that provide this snippet.

 $ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades 
 [...]
Fixed these warnings in master branch.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#554356: cupt: Retrieve package specifications from file

2009-11-04 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt
tags 554356 + pending
thanks

Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
 Package: cupt
 Version: 1.2.1
 Severity: wishlist
 Tags: patch
 
 I really would like cupt to be able to retrieve its file list from a file
 (or some combination of files and args on cmdline, but I just need one
 file for my personnal projects). The syntax could be '@/some/file' instead
 of a package description (in which case, the content of the file is
 read line by line and each line becomes a package description).
 
Thanks, applied a slightly adjusted patch to the master branch.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#547952: Starting cupt without arguments shows perl warnings again

2009-11-04 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt
tags 547952 + pending

Hi Didier,

Didier Raboud wrote:
 Package: cupt
 Version: 1.2.1
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi,
 
 sorry to reopen this bug, but I still get ugly warnings when launching cupt
 without arguments:
 
Arh, I broke it again recently. Fixed and added the test case.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#553126: qmmp main window does not draw anything

2009-11-03 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Norbert Preining wrote:
 Some discussion more at upstream issue page and now there is a patch.
 I confirmed that using this patch *and* turning n Openbox compatibility
 makes qmmp work as expected.
 
Ok. Do you prefer me to apply this patch for a Debian package?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#553629: cupt: Dependency on File::Path missing

2009-11-01 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt libcupt-perl
reassign 553629 libcupt-perl
tags 553629 + confirmed pending
thanks

Hi,

Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
 Package: cupt
 Version: 1.2.1
 Severity: normal
 
 Installing cupt on a system which was not updated for a few months showed
 that cupt seems to need a dependency on File::Path:
 
 remove_tree is not exported by the File::Path module
Thanks for this catch, fixed in the master branch.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#178564: state of #178564

2009-10-30 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Evan Harris wrote:
 
 I stopped running the app that exhibited the behaviour more than a year
 ago. But as far as I can remember, it was never fixed while I still was,
 so I just worked around it.
 
Do you still have the vulnerable version of your ? Without any test case I
will have to close the bug.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#553126: qmmp main window does not draw anything

2009-10-29 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package qmmp
forwarded 553126 http://code.google.com/p/qmmp/issues/detail?id=186
thanks

Norbert Preining wrote:
 Package: qmmp
 Version: 0.3.0-3+b1
 Severity: important
 
 running gnome, metacity with composite_manager turned on, staring qmmp
 does not give a toplevel window. Well in fact there is one, ALT-TAB shows
 its borders. And clicking into the (not to be seen) window I can actually
 make menus pop up etc etc, interact with qmmp, but the main window does 
 not draw *any* pixel on screen.
Hello Norbert, thanks for the report, I forwarded it upstream.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551356: libpar-packer-perl: fails to extract Parl with Perl 5.10.1

2009-10-29 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
gregor herrmann wrote:
 I think it's an OK solution at least for the moment as long as it's
 made binNMU safe.
 
 Ok, I've now come up with the change below, which leads to:
 Depends: perl (= 5.10.1), [..] libperl5.10 (= 5.10.1), perl ( 5.10.2~), 
 [..]
 
[...]

Looks good for me.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#553259: perl-suid: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by ./usr/bin/sperl5.10.1 but the package doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this indicates that ${shlibs: Depends} was omitted f

2009-10-29 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl perl-suid
reassign 552797 perl-suid
forcemerge 552797 553259
thanks

Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 Package: perl-suid
 Version: 5.10.1-5
 Severity: serious
 Justification: The listed file appears to be linked against the C library,
 User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
 Usertags: missing-dependency-on-libc
ACK'ed.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#200540: state of #200540

2009-10-28 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Evan, without a test case I not see much chance to reproduce it.

Did you try that script in perl 5.10.x?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#203579: state of #203579

2009-10-28 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Daniel,

I just run your code by perl 5.10.1-5 and it got no segfault but instead:

Thread 1 terminated abnormally: cond_signal can only be used on shared values
at ./test.plx line 142.

I guess your script suffers from some limitations mentioned in threads::shared
documentation.

Thoughts?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#552291: Upstream fix available

2009-10-27 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl-base
tags 552291 + fixed-upstream
thanks

Matt Kraai wrote:
 tag 552291 + patch
 thanks
 
 Hi,
 
 This problem has been fixed upstream by the attached commit, which is
 also available from
 
  
 http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commit/0abd0d78a73da1c4d13b1c700526b7e5d03b32d4
Thanks for the message, Matt.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#477694: downgrading #477694

2009-10-27 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
severity 477694 important
tags 477694 + unreproducible
thanks

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#552389: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#552389: cups-pdf: wrong check for 'removing' in postinst script

2009-10-26 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
 On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org 
 wrote:
 Package: cups-pdf
 Severity: normal

 From the postinst script:

 -8-
 case $1 in
  configure|removing)
 -8-

 Postinst script never get 'removing' as the first argument.
 
From http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html
 
 * deconfigured's-postinst abort-deconfigure in-favour
 failed-install-package version [removing conflicting-package version]
 
 'removing' very much appears there.
 
As sixth parameter, so 'case $1' will never match it.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#545794: updated patch for #545794

2009-10-26 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Junichi,

Now I realized right option order for --build, and implemented '-y' in cupt.
The patch became less intrusive.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
diff -urN pbuilder-0.189/Makefile pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/Makefile
--- pbuilder-0.189/Makefile	2009-06-23 02:43:13.0 +0300
+++ pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/Makefile	2009-09-27 19:48:57.943519414 +0300
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
 	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pbuilder-satisfydepends-gdebi $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
 	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
 	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pbuilder-satisfydepends-experimental $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
+	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pbuilder-satisfydepends-cupt $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
 	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pbuilder-satisfydepends-checkparams $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
 	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pbuilder-satisfydepends-funcs $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
 	$(INSTALL_EXECUTABLE) pdebuild-internal $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/pbuilder/
diff -urN pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs
--- pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs	2009-02-26 07:33:11.0 +0200
+++ pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs	2009-10-23 12:17:21.984880080 +0300
@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@
 	yes) BUILDOPT=--binary-arch;;
 	*) ;;
 esac
+
+	if [ -n $USE_CUPT ]; then
+		PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSCMD=/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends-cupt
+	fi
+
 if $PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSCMD --control $1 --chroot ${BUILDPLACE} --internal-chrootexec ${CHROOTEXEC} ${BUILDOPT} ; then
 	:
 else
@@ -50,7 +55,12 @@
 fi
 # install extra packages to the chroot
 if [ -n $EXTRAPACKAGES ]; then 
-	$CHROOTEXEC usr/bin/apt-get -y --force-yes install ${EXTRAPACKAGES}
+		if [ -n $USE_CUPT ]; then
+			PACKAGE_MANAGER_COMMAND=/usr/bin/cupt -y --no-auto-remove -o cupt::console::allow-untrusted=1
+		else
+			PACKAGE_MANAGER_COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-get -y --force-yes
+		fi
+		$CHROOTEXEC $PACKAGE_MANAGER_COMMAND install ${EXTRAPACKAGES}
 fi
 }
 
diff -urN pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-checkparams pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-checkparams
--- pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-checkparams	2009-03-07 03:07:51.0 +0200
+++ pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-checkparams	2009-09-27 21:47:54.529461681 +0300
@@ -210,6 +210,12 @@
 	outputfile[${#outputfi...@]}]=$2;
 	shift; shift; 
 	;;
+	--cupt)
+	log I: Using cupt as package manager
+	USE_CUPT=yes
+	EXTRAPACKAGES=$EXTRAPACKAGES cupt
+	shift;
+	;;
 
 	## internal options.
 	--internal-chrootexec)
diff -urN pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-satisfydepends-cupt pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-satisfydepends-cupt
--- pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-satisfydepends-cupt	1970-01-01 03:00:00.0 +0300
+++ pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-satisfydepends-cupt	2009-10-23 12:54:17.612881957 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#   pbuilder -- personal Debian package builder
+#   Copyright (C) 2001,2002,2003,2005-2007 Junichi Uekawa
+#   Copyright (C) 2009 Eugene V. Lyubimkin
+#
+#   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+#   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+#   the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+#   (at your option) any later version.
+#
+#   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+#   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+#   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+#   GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+#   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+#   along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+#   Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301 USA
+#
+# module to satisfy build dependencies; cupt flavor
+
+set -e
+
+. /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends-funcs
+
+function checkbuilddep_internal () {
+	local FLAGS=-y -o apt::install-recommends=0 -o cupt::downloader::max-simultaneous-downloads=1
+	FLAGS=$FLAGS -o cupt::console::allow-untrusted=1
+echo  - Attempting to parse the build-deps 
+	BUILD_DEPENDS=$(get_control_re $DEBIAN_CONTROL $BD_REGEXP)
+	BUILD_CONFLICTS=$(get_control_re $DEBIAN_CONTROL $BC_REGEXP)
+
+	# trim them
+	BUILD_DEPENDS=$(echo $BUILD_DEPENDS | sed 's/^ +//')
+	BUILD_CONFLICTS=$(echo $BUILD_CONFLICTS | sed 's/^ +//')
+
+	if [ -n $BUILD_CONFLICTS ]; then
+		BUILD_CONFLICTS=$BUILD_CONFLICTS-
+	fi
+
+	if $CHROOTEXEC /usr/bin/cupt $FLAGS satisfy $BUILD_DEPENDS $BUILD_CONFLICTS; then
+	  echo  - Finished parsing the build-deps
+	else
+	  echo E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. 2
+	fi
+}
+
+. /usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-satisfydepends-checkparams
+
diff -urN pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-updatebuildenv pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-updatebuildenv
--- pbuilder-0.189/pbuilder-updatebuildenv	2009-10-24 14:33:57.013018027 +0300
+++ pbuilder-0.189+jackyf1/pbuilder-updatebuildenv	2009-10

Bug#552291: CVE-2009-3626: DoS in Unicode processing

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl perl-base
reassign 552291 perl-base
found 552291 perl-base/5.10.1-5
tags 552291 + confirmed upstream
thanks

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 Package: perl
 Version: 5.10.1-5
 Severity: grave
 Tags: security
 
 Quoting a posting from Jan Lieskovsky/Red Hat to oss-security.
 I've verified that Etch and Lenny are not affected.
 
Thanks for the report. An upstream fix is not yet available, waiting for it.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#547950: state of #547950

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Patrick.

Since this bug was filed, important change was made in libcupt-perl 1.1.0:
caching of parsed version entries. And this caching is turned on when you
calls 'shell' subcommand. So, to receive quick search, one has to launch cupt
shell, and then first search will be slow, but all subsequent will be quick,
as the versions cache is preserved between read-only operations.

Do you consider this ability enough to close the bug?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#547948: state of #547948

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package cupt libcupt-perl
tags 547948 + wontfix
thanks

Hi Patrick,

I thought one more time about this bug, and I'm tagging it wontfix. Even 'file
not found' deserves a warning by default for those who has country-specific
translation files. Those who has not and will not for the foreseeable future
have to set 'apt::acquire::translation' manually.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#161610: state of #161610

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Mark, do you still encounter this bug nowadays?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#171547: state of #171547

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Jason,

Works for me as of Perl 5.10.1-5, do you confirm?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#178564: state of #178564

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Evan, do you encounter this big leak with 5.10.x Perl versions?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#552389: cups-pdf: wrong check for 'removing' in postinst script

2009-10-25 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: cups-pdf
Severity: normal

From the postinst script:

-8-
case $1 in
  configure|removing)
-8-

Postinst script never get 'removing' as the first argument.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#550234: imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its dependencies to non-X system

2009-10-24 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
retitle 550234 mc: downgrade imagemagick dependency to Suggests
reassign 550234 mc
severity 550234 important
thanks

Denis Briand wrote:
 retitle 550234 imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its 
 dependencies to non-X system
 reassign 550234 imagemagick
 severity 550234 wishlist
 #mc need imagemagick, see #534681, its an imagemagick issue, sorry
No, mc doesn't need imagemagick to work. Mc is a file manager, not an image
viewer. Please demote it to Suggests and wrote a paragraph in the long
description that one needs it to view JPEG or whatever pictures.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#550234: imagemagick pulls by default libgtk2.0-0 and a number of its dependencies to non-X system

2009-10-24 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Nelson,

Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Just in case it matters, ImageMagick in experimental already has some
 modules split in a new package, removing the dependencies on a lot
 of graphical libs (including gtk). See #478538
 An upload to unstable will follow soon.
Good news for sure, but I still prefer Suggests for mc-imagemagick dependency.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#154708: state of #154708

2009-10-24 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Walter, do you see this weird issue nowadays?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#552121: git-core: misleading error message when trying to push to read-only repo

2009-10-23 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: git-core
Version: 1:1.6.5-1
Severity: normal

$ git push
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

Isn't helpful at all and made me think about server's problem.

Please print a graceful error message when the real error is trying to
push to read-only repository.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages git-core depends on:
ii  libc6  2.10.1-1  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcurl3-gnutls7.19.5-1.1Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libdigest-sha1-perl2.12-1NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
ii  liberror-perl  0.17-1Perl module for error/exception ha
ii  libexpat1  2.0.1-4   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  perl-modules   5.10.1-5  Core Perl modules
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages git-core recommends:
ii  less  436-1  pager program similar to more
ii  openssh-client [ssh-client]   1:5.1p1-7  secure shell client, an rlogin/rsh
ii  patch 2.5.9-5Apply a diff file to an original
ii  rsync 3.0.6-1fast remote file copy program (lik

Versions of packages git-core suggests:
pn  git-arch  none (no description available)
pn  git-cvs   none (no description available)
pn  git-daemon-runnone (no description available)
pn  git-doc   none (no description available)
pn  git-email none (no description available)
pn  git-gui   none (no description available)
ii  git-svn   1:1.6.5-1  fast, scalable, distributed revisi
pn  gitk  none (no description available)
pn  gitwebnone (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#551831: limit source to cupt, tagging 551831

2009-10-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
James Vega wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:29:07PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 #- Honor the configuration option
 #  'cupt::worker::allow-indirect-upgrade' to work around packages 
 with
 #  broken-by-design dependencies that make the package unupgradeable.
 #  Thanks to James Vega. Upload priority is set to 'high' due to this
 #  fix. (Closes: #551831)
 
 Although the upgrade did work, I'm not sure it's working as cleanly as
 it should be:
 
 Preconfiguring packages ...
 (Reading database ... 106538 files and directories currently installed.)
 Removing libc6-i686 ...
 Purging configuration files for libc6-i686 ...
 (Reading database ... 106488 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace libc-bin 2.9-27 (using .../libc-bin_2.10.1-1_i386.deb) 
 ...
 Unpacking replacement libc-bin ...
 Preparing to replace libc-dev-bin 2.9-27 (using 
 .../libc-dev-bin_2.10.1-1_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement libc-dev-bin ...
 Processing triggers for man-db ...
 (Reading database ... 106488 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace libc6-dev 2.9-27 (using .../libc6-dev_2.10.1-1_i386.deb) 
 ...
 Unpacking replacement libc6-dev ...
 Preparing to replace locales-all 2.9-27 (using 
 .../locales-all_2.10.1-1_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement locales-all ...
 Preparing to replace libc6 2.9-27 (using .../libc6_2.10.1-1_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
 dpkg: locales-all: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you 
 requested:
  locales-all depends on glibc-2.10-1; however:
   Package glibc-2.10-1 is not installed.
 Setting up locales-all (2.10.1-1) ...
 dpkg: libc6: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
  libc6 depends on libc-bin (= 2.10.1-1); however:
   Package libc-bin is not configured yet.
 Setting up libc6 (2.10.1-1) ...
 dpkg: libc6-dev: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested:
  libc6-dev depends on libc-dev-bin (= 2.10.1-1); however:
   Package libc-dev-bin is not configured yet.
 Setting up libc6-dev (2.10.1-1) ...
 Setting up libc-bin (2.10.1-1) ...
 Setting up libc-dev-bin (2.10.1-1) ...
 (Reading database ... 106489 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.25-2 (using 
 .../libgstreamer0.10-0_0.10.25-3_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement libgstreamer0.10-0 ...
 Setting up libgstreamer0.10-0 (0.10.25-3) ...
 Selecting previously deselected package libc6-i686.
 (Reading database ... 106484 files and directories currently installed.)
 Unpacking libc6-i686 (from .../libc6-i686_2.10.1-1_i386.deb) ...
 Setting up libc6-i686 (2.10.1-1) ...
 
 It seems like locales-all, libc6, and libc6-dev should have been able to
 be installed without the use of force-depends.

Locales-all has the strict dependency on libc6, and libc6 has the strict
dependency on libc-bin, so --force-depends might be needed.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551831: limit source to cupt, tagging 551831

2009-10-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi James,

James Vega wrote:
   r...@succubus:/# cupt -R --purge -o debug::worker=1 -o debug::resolver=1 
 safe-upgrade
[...]

Thanks for detailed report, but this is probably not related to #551831.
Considering the upgrade did work for snapshot, I won't clone the report for
now. I will upload 1.1.0 shortly to make original bug fixed. Please file
separate reports if you feel something wrong in 1.1.0.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#126608: state of #126608

2009-10-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello era,

I agree with explanation given by Kalle that the current situation is not a
bug, so I'm about to close it. Do you have objections?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#137290: state of #137290

2009-10-22 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello hausen,

I run the attached script 1100 times, and it worked flawlessy for me on Perl
5.10.1. Can you confirm?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551831: cupt: Incorrectly upgrades libc6, breaking the system

2009-10-21 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello James,

James Vega wrote:
 Package: cupt
 Version: 1.0.0
 Severity: critical
 
 Running cupt -R --purge safe-upgrade today, ended up breaking the
 system because of an incorrect upgrade order.  Partway through the
 process, dpkg segfaulted and most other tools also segfaulted due to
 mis-matching libc package versions.  Running apt-get upgrade worked
 fine after I rebooted to a rescue cd and downgraded the libc packages to
 2.9-27.
Firstly, I am sorry about the troubles you had.

 Here's the information I have from another computer that I can deal with
 being broken for a few days (hand-typed so apologies for typos and
 truncation of non-libc6 information).
 
 The upgrade was from 2.9-27 to 2.10.1-1.  The 5 binary packages from the
 eglibc source package that were being considered for upgrade were:
 libc-bin, libc-dev-bin, libc6-dev, libc6-i686, and libc6.

 $ cupt -R --purge safe-upgrade
 ...
 W: the pre-dependency(ies) 'libc6 (= 2.9-27)' will be broken during the
actions, the packages involved: 'libc6', 'libc6-i686'
 W: the pre-dependency(ies) 'libc6 (= 2.10.1-1)' will be broken during the
actions, the packages involved: 'libc6-i686', 'libc6'

However, this is another side of already archived
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543365 (ironically, reported
by you too). On i386 we have the issue: libc6-i686 strictly Pre-Depends on
libc6 (= ...), and whatever package from this two cupt tries to upgrade first,
the pre-dependency will be broken.

Let me try to add libc maintainers to the loop to know the correct upgrade path.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551831: cupt: Incorrectly upgrades libc6, breaking the system

2009-10-21 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Gabor,

Gabor Gombas wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:01:51PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 
 However, this is another side of already archived
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543365 (ironically, reported
 by you too). On i386 we have the issue: libc6-i686 strictly Pre-Depends on
 libc6 (= ...), and whatever package from this two cupt tries to upgrade 
 first,
 the pre-dependency will be broken.

 Let me try to add libc maintainers to the loop to know the correct upgrade 
 path.
 
 Hmm. remove old libc6-i686, upgrade libc6, install new libc6-i686
 seems to be a sequence where the Pre-Depends never breaks. Since
 libc6-i686 is not needed for the system to function properly
Good idea, but the package manager doesn't know this. Ok, I can add the list
option to libcupt to list the packages allowed to 'remove old ... install new'
instead of 'upgrade old - new', with the first value is 'libc6-i686'. I will
implement this for the next version if nothing better appears.

Now the question is can it be generalized to other packages?
Yes, it's the question. My first answer is 'no' because this may break upgrade
actions in maintainer scripts silently, so, such packages are likely to be
specified and verified manually.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#87674: state of #87674

2009-10-21 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello David,

I cannot reproduce this bug with current perl in Debian sid (.e.g no 'local/'
got appended to install paths). Can you confirm?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#92122: state of #92122

2009-10-21 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Simon,

can you still reproduce this bug with the modern Perl versions?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551769: glibc: /usr/bin/perl: double free or corruption

2009-10-20 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl-base libsvn-perl
reassign 551769 libsvn-perl
thanks

Hello Sten, thanks for your report.

Sten Heinze wrote:
 Package: perl-base
 Version: 5.10.1-5
 Severity: normal
 
 When running git svn clone for an repository otherwise working with svn, I 
 get after a few files
 are downloaded from the repository:
 
 Temp file with moniker 'svn_delta' already in use at /usr/share/perl5/Git.pm 
 line 1022. 
 
 *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/perl: double free or corruption (!prev): 
 0x097598d0 ***

Since libsvn-perl contains binary Perl module in the middle of the stack
strae, it is a possible culprit of this bug. Reassigned.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#75890: state of #75890

2009-10-20 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Brian, Martin,

I believe Perl is doing right here. As verified by me and showed in original
report:

-8-
fork()  = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
-8-

So, as resource is _temporarily_ unavailable, Perl tries to acquire it again
and again, which is right way to me. Objections?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#64757: state of #64757

2009-10-19 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Derrik,

Can you reproduce the bug with the modern 5.10.x Perl versions?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#69378: state of #69378

2009-10-19 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Daniel, hello Jamie,

Is this bug still reproducible by you?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551301: unetbootin doesn't add syslinux kernel and other syslinux files to the usb stick

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package unetbootin
tags 551301 + moreinfo
thanks

Hello,

joblack wrote:
 Package: unetbootin
 Version: 372-1
 Severity: important
 
 
 
 unetbootin doesn't add syslinux kernel and other syslinux files to the usb 
 stick so the usb stick doesn't boot 
This is too generic. Please describe your situation better, e.g. what
configuration you chose in the unetbootin window, what distribution was
selected etc.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551323: dpkg-repack: eats an epoch from version number in the name of result file

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: dpkg-repack
Version: 1.31
Severity: important

$ dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg-video-voodoo
ii  xserver-xorg-video-voodoo1:1.2.2-1
$ fakeroot -u dpkg-repack xserver-xorg-video-voodoo
dpkg-deb: building package `xserver-xorg-video-voodoo' in
`./xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.2.2-1_amd64.deb'


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages dpkg-repack depends on:
ii  dpkg-dev  1.15.4 Debian package development tools
ii  perl  5.10.1-5   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

dpkg-repack recommends no packages.

dpkg-repack suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#551326: packages.debian.org: web address for changelogs and copyrights don't contain a version epoch

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Example: http://packages.debian.org/sid/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo
contains a link
'http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.2.2-1/changelog',
which doesn't have an epoch.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#551279: executing scripts APT::Update::Pre-Invoke '/usr/bin/daptup --pre'

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Edward,

Edward J. Shornock wrote:
 Package: daptup
 Version: 0.9.1
 Severity: normal
 
 
 The new version gets a little further, but it still crashes without defining
 DAPTUP_EXTRA_APTITUDE_ARGUMENTS
 
Really, the first fix was only partial one. Should be fixed fully in the next
version.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551301: doesn't add syslinux kernel and other syslinux files to the usb stick

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package unetbootin
tags 551301 - moreinfo
forwarded 551301 https://bugs.launchpad.net/unetbootin/+bug/454037
thanks

joblack wrote:
 Package: unetbootin
 Version: 372-1
 Severity: normal
 
 additional information:
 [...] 

Thanks. I just forwarded your report upstream.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551356: libpar-packer-perl: fails to extract Parl with Perl 5.10.1

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: libpar-packer-perl
Version: 0.991-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The /usr/bin/pp cannot bundle even tiny printer:

$ pp -o haha -e print 'hello'
Perl lib version (5.10.1) doesn't match executable version (v5.10.0) at
/usr/lib/perl/5.10/Config.pm line 50.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl/5.10/File/Find.pm line
1336.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm
line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip/Archive.pm line 7.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/perl5/Archive/Zip.pm line
254.
Compilation failed in require at -e line 449.
/usr/bin/pp: Failed to extract a parl from 'PAR::StrippedPARL::Static'
to file 'parlGqZisDq' at /usr/share/perl5/PAR/Packer.pm line 1155,
DATA line 1.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libpar-packer-perl depends on:
ii  libarchive-zip-perl   1.30-1 Perl module for manipulation of ZI
ii  libc6 2.9-27 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgetopt-argvfile-perl   1.11-1 Perl module for reading script opt
ii  libio-compress-perl [libcompr 2.020-2IO::Compress modules
ii  libmodule-scandeps-perl   0.95-1 Perl module to recursively scan Pe
ii  libpar-dist-perl  0.45-1 perl module to create and manipula
ii  libpar-perl   0.994-1Perl redistributable module packag
ii  libperl5.10   5.10.1-5   Shared Perl library
ii  perl [libcompress-zlib-perl]  5.10.1-5   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages libpar-packer-perl recommends:
pn  libtk-perlnone (no description available)

libpar-packer-perl suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#551323: dpkg-repack: eats an epoch from version number in the name of result file

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Joey Hess wrote:
 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Severity: important
 
 Filenames of .deb files are not important.
They are important. Unless .deb have a canonical name, I cannot use packed
.debs as cached archives to install with cupt/apt.

 $ dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg-video-voodoo
 ii  xserver-xorg-video-voodoo1:1.2.2-1
 $ fakeroot -u dpkg-repack xserver-xorg-video-voodoo
 dpkg-deb: building package `xserver-xorg-video-voodoo' in
 `./xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.2.2-1_amd64.deb'
 
 This is done by dpkg-deb when building any package with an epoch in any
 way. Epochs are not intended to be user-visible.
 
This is news for me. Where can I find the source of this statement?

Anyway, I need the way the rename the target file to the name I want to have.
As I understand, the best I can do is guess the target .deb name by package
name, right? I.e. no option where I can specify the target name myself?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551323: dpkg-repack: eats an epoch from version number in the name of result file

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
reopen 551323
reassign 551323 dpkg
severity 551323 normal
thanks

Joey Hess wrote:

 This is done by dpkg-deb when building any package with an epoch in any
 way.
I reassigned then.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551323: dpkg-repack: eats an epoch from version number in the name of result file

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Joey Hess wrote:
 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 They are important. Unless .deb have a canonical name, I cannot use packed
 .debs as cached archives to install with cupt/apt.
 
 apt web-escapes various characters, including the : in an epoch, so
 you would have to modify filenames even if the epoch was included.
Cupt is able to pick up both web-escaped and non-web-escaped characters. I
would prefer non-escaped variant as more clear, but that's not so important.

 This is done by dpkg-deb when building any package with an epoch in any
 way. Epochs are not intended to be user-visible.

 This is news for me. Where can I find the source of this statement?
 
 dpkg 1.2.0:
 
   * Epochs in version numbers implemented, using the syntax
 epoch:version-revision.  (Epoch not usually displayed.)
 
 Although they eventually changed this policy, see #107449. So
 perhaps they'd be willing to change dpkg-deb to include epochs now if asked.
Yeah. Epochs are shown everywhere nowadays, that's why I asked.

And, yes, fellow dpkg developers, please do this.

 apt determines the filenames for its cache using the package name and version,
 AFAIK.
Exactly. Including epoch.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551356: libpar-packer-perl: fails to extract Parl with Perl 5.10.1

2009-10-17 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
gregor herrmann wrote:
 tag 551356 + confirmed
 thanks
 
 On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:16:23 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 
 $ pp -o haha -e print 'hello'
 Perl lib version (5.10.1) doesn't match executable version (v5.10.0) at
 /usr/lib/perl/5.10/Config.pm line 50.
 
 Hm, nasty.
 
 I thought about adding perlapi-$Config{version} to Depends manually [0],
 but that wouldn't buy us anything in this case: The current version
 of libpar-packer-perl would have perlapi-5.10.0 -- and perl-base
 5.10.1 provides perlapi-5.10.1 and perlapi-5.10.0, and we would be
 back at square one.
Honestly I am not acquainted with PAR, just tried to run it first time. Do you
mean PAR requires perl version exact that was used for building?..

 Do we need to add libperl5.10 ( $current+1~) or something like
 that? Or is there a better way to ensure that the runtime
 dependencies match the perl version at build time?
..seems so.

I don't know better solutions so far. Fortunately even patch Perl updates are
quite rare AFAIK, so this should work, and if set up automatically in rules,
should require only binNMU at the every next Perl update.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#58398: state of #58398

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello,

Unfortunately this bug wasn't touched for years.
Can you reproduce it with modern Perl versions?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#64308: state of #64308

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Joey,

CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says
For full information on cookies see
http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt
I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless:

CGI::Cookie uses only the old
expires field that is in the old netscape cookies spec.
This is still the case with Perl 5.10.1. Is it still a problem with any
browser? Should I forward upstream the request to implement 'Max-Age' now?

Note: For backward compatibility, the separator in the Cookie header
   is semi-colon (;) everywhere.  A server should also accept comma (,)
   as the separator between cookie-values for future compatibility.
This part works well for me in Perl 5.10.1.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551279: crash executing scripts APT::Update::Pre-Invoke '/usr/bin/daptup --pre'

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Edward J. Shornock wrote:
 Package: daptup
 Version: 0.9.0
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable

Hello Edward, thanks for your report. Please attach your /etc/daptup.conf.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#64308: state of #64308

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl
tags 64308 + confirmed
forwarded 64308 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=50576
thanks

Joey Hess wrote:
 I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current
 version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to
 Max-Age).
 
 I'd still appreciate it if perl followed the actual RFC, even if every
 browser has support for the old spec.
 
Ok, I just forwarded the report upstream.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551279: crash executing scripts APT::Update::Pre-Invoke '/usr/bin/daptup --pre'

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package daptup
tags 551279 + confirmed pending
thanks

Edward J. Shornock wrote:
 * Eugene V. Lyubimkin jackyf.de...@gmail.com [16-10-2009 23:52 EEST]:
 Edward J. Shornock wrote:
 Package: daptup
 Version: 0.9.0
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 Hello Edward, thanks for your report. Please attach your /etc/daptup.conf.
 
 Here it is. I've not edited it so it *should* be the same as was shipped
 with the package.
 
Hm. Ok, nevertheless, I applied the patch which should fix this issue in 0.9.1.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#550825: reassigning to APT

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl-modules
reassign 550825 apt
thanks

Hello,

The original error comes directly from APT, so I'm reassigning it. If some
other packages involved, reassign/clone to them accordingly.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#477694: is #477694 still relevant

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Florian,

This bug is still open, but given there was no activity on it since Lenny and
all lenny versions and sid ones build correctly, IMHO it's apparently time to
close this bug as not relevant anymore and doesn't block releasing squeeze. Do
you agree?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#481508: some investigations

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Paul,

I think this is a good idea, however depending on unicore-data will pull
additional ~8 MiB to standard system (which perl-modules is part of and
unicode-data will need to become standard too):

$ dpkg -L perl-modules  | grep unicore | grep txt | xargs wc -c | tail -n1
4120543 total

$ cupt show unicode-data | grep size
Uncompressed size: 12.0MiB

Also, since unicode-data contains the files under different paths I don't know
whether perl can be configured to use Unicode data from other location. Niko?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#57217: new info?

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello James,

Unfortunately no one touched this bug for many years, and now I doubt someone
can reproduce something from such outdated info. Can you reproduce this with
the modern (= 5.10.0) perl versions? Otherwise I'll close this bug as we
cannot do anything with it in its current state.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#404593: new info?

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Vincent,

Given zsh got some corruption and zsh does not contain any Perl programs, I
conclude that Perl isn't a culprit of your problem. Did you see problems since
the report has been filed? If no, maybe it'd better to close this bug.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#479711: state of #479711

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Raphael,

Brendan is apparently not active anymore, but it would good to stick on
something in Squeeze regarding this bug to not hit it when the 5.10 - 5.12
transition comes.

Raphael, I cannot explain why the first variant doesn't work (Niko, maybe you
can?), but can you try whether it works if you change from eval 'use... ' to
eval { use... }?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#479711: state of #479711

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl perl-base perl-modules
severity 479711 normal
thanks

Raphael Hertzog wrote:
 On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Brendan is apparently not active anymore, but it would good to stick on
 something in Squeeze regarding this bug to not hit it when the 5.10 - 5.12
 transition comes.
 
 $ head -5 /usr/bin/update-alternatives 
 #!/usr/bin/perl --
 
 BEGIN { # Work-around for bug #479711 in perl
 $ENV{PERL_DL_NONLAZY} = 1;
 }
 
 And same goes for all perl scripts in dpkg itself.
Ah ok, so you did the change already. This wasn't mentioned anyhow in the bug
report, so I questioned.

 
 Raphael, I cannot explain why the first variant doesn't work (Niko, maybe you
 can?), but can you try whether it works if you change from eval 'use... ' 
 to
 eval { use... }?
 
 Why don't you try yourself ? I did everything needed on the dpkg side already.
I was looking for a method to resolve it on dpkg side in one place as you
suggested earlier, but considering the change was anyway done, that's no more
needed. I'm downgrading the severity of this bug. Not sure whether can it be
fully closed.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551000: ITP: sandbox -- Collaborative 3D game editor for education

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Scott Howard wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com
 
 
 * Package name: sandbox
   Version : 2.4
   Upstream Author : Platinum Arts, LLX platinuma...@gmail.com
 * URL : http://sandboxgamemaker.com/

The name 'sandbox' is too generic. Can you change it to 'sandboxgamemaker'?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#551009: debdelta: add Enhances and/or Suggests on 'cupt'

2009-10-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: debdelta
Version: 0.33
Severity: wishlist

Hi, subject says it all. Users who use debdelta may be interested in
using the package manager which supports it. Having an additional
paragraph for cupt in debdelta's long description would be also nice.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages debdelta depends on:
ii  binutils  2.19.91.20091006-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2 1.0.5-3high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libbz2-1.01.0.5-3high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6 2.9-27 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  python2.5.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages debdelta recommends:
ii  bsdiff  4.3-8generate/apply a patch between two
ii  lzma4.43-14  Compression method of 7z format in
ii  python-apt  0.7.13.2 Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  xdelta  1.1.3-9  A diff utility which works with bi
ii  xdelta3 0v2.dfsg-1.1 A diff utility which works with bi

debdelta suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#539738: this is a task for du, isn't it?

2009-10-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hi Jari,

$ du -hsc books_Vanya html2text-problems
23M books_Vanya
1.1Mhtml2text-problems
24M total

Since du can do this, and ncdu's task is merely the ncurses interface and not
batch mode, I'm about to close this bug. Do you agree?

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#550465: fbreader: please improve text selection

2009-10-10 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
 Package: fbreader
 Version: 0.8.17-11
 Severity: wishlist

 Awsome reader. Please improve text selection so that one can select a
 word by double clicking it. This would make it easier to use qstardict
 for translation. Thank you.
Hello Luca, can you try fbreader from Debian testing (0.10.7)? Works for me in
that version.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#550475: /usr/bin/dpkg-deb: dpkg-deb: support environment variable to set up compression type

2009-10-10 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.4
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-deb

Please support an environment variable like 'DPKG_BUILD_COMPRESSION_TYPE'
to set default value for -Z option.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils 7.5-6  GNU core utilities
ii  libc6 2.9-26 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  lzma  4.43-14Compression method of 7z format in

dpkg recommends no packages.

Versions of packages dpkg suggests:
ii  apt   0.7.24 Advanced front-end for dpkg

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#550475: /usr/bin/dpkg-deb: dpkg-deb: support environment variable to set up compression type

2009-10-10 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Guillem Jover wrote:
 Hi!
 
 On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 15:01:49 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Package: dpkg
 Version: 1.15.4
 Severity: wishlist
 File: /usr/bin/dpkg-deb

 Please support an environment variable like 'DPKG_BUILD_COMPRESSION_TYPE'
 to set default value for -Z option.
 
 What's the situation you'd use it instead of the command line option?
 
Hi, in the situations when I don't call dpkg-deb directly. My situation: I
have a program that calls dpkg-repack which calls 'dpkg --build'. If I want to
allow user to change the compression format of .debs on the final output, I
should implement an option to my program, then convince dpkg-repack to have
that option... Having an environment variable would work much easier.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#550475: /usr/bin/dpkg-deb: dpkg-deb: support environment variable to set up compression type

2009-10-10 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Guillem Jover wrote:
 On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 17:19:00 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
[...]
 Hi, in the situations when I don't call dpkg-deb directly. My situation: I
 have a program that calls dpkg-repack which calls 'dpkg --build'. If I want 
 to
 allow user to change the compression format of .debs on the final output, I
 should implement an option to my program, then convince dpkg-repack to have
 that option... Having an environment variable would work much easier.
 
 Easier sure, but I don't think that's the right solution in this
 particular case. Adding -z and -Z pass-through support in dpkg-repack
 would be worthwhile by itself.
 
Maybe, but implementing this for upper-stack programs is not worthwhile as for
me. I would still want to have an environment variable.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >