Bug#505273: remove SURBL or issue a warning
Package: spamassassin In the future, according to this German news entry http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Anti-Spam-Blacklist-SURBL-wird-kostenpflichtig--/meldung/118674 SURBL will cost money, at least for larger ISPs and corporations. It might make sense to either fully remove it from SpamAssassin (if not done by the upstream), or to at least issue a warning. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#501122: DSBL is gone and needs to be removed from SpamAssassin
Package: spamassassin The DSBL blacklist has gone and needs to be removed from SpamAssassin. See http://www.dsbl.org and http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists Patch should be backported to Etch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: (kein Betreff)
It will be part of the next point release for stable. Fixed package is currently available from proposed-updates. It isn't. Having deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian sarge-proposed-updates main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org sarge/updates main contrib non-free in my sources.list, I still get the error after apt-get update apt-get upgrade Can you please insert it into the proposed-updates repository? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: (kein Betreff)
What version do you have installed or is it trying to install? Setting up base-config (2.53.10.1) ... Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not contain a 'Template:' line dpkg: error processing base-config (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9 Errors were encountered while processing: base-config E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: (kein Betreff)
Could anybody please move that to the repository? Bug still is there... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: Any news?
Anything new on this? This bug is still contained in the package repository... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: closed by Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#372734: base-config: solution the problem)
The updated package still has not made its way into proposed-updates, so the bug still exists for me. Any estimated date when this will happen? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: Reopen Bug#372734
I tried apt-get update apt-get -u dist-upgrade today, but the new package isn't in there. :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372734: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not contain a 'Template:' line
Package: base-config Version: 2.53.10.1 Upon installation of this package using apt-get, I receive: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.templates does not contain a 'Template:' line and the apt-get process ends with E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358596: removing package does not remove user
Package: uml-utilities Version: from Debian 3.1 Purging the package does not remove the uml-net user, neither is the entry in /var/lib/dpkg/statoverride being removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#357305: inetd restart kills inetd
Package: netkit-inetd Version: 0.10-10 Running /etc/init.d/inetd restart fully shuts down all inetd connections, telnetting on the appropriate port from localhost leads to connection refused. Only stop and start do work. inetd.cofn settings are: pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/in.qpopper -S -f /etc/qpopper.conf pop3s stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/in.qpopper -S -f /etc/qpopper-ssl.conf imap2 stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/imapd imaps stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/imapd rsync stream tcp nowait root /usr/bin/rsync rsyncd --daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332475: low priority questions are not being asked
Are you sure you installed from scratch? Or purged the package before installation? If you just upgraded and the answers were already in the debconf database debconf is not supposed to ask again. With dpkg-reconfigure working it does not look like a bug to me. Hm, that could be possible, indeed. I've upgraded a couple of 3.0 machines to 3.1 and quota has already been installed. Possibly invalid bug, sorry for the confusion. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332475: low priority questions are not being asked
Package: quota Version: 3.12-6 Even when debconf is set to low priority, these questions are not being asked in quota. Manually invoking dpkg-reconfigure quota -plow works fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295750: cannot compile kernel when 2.6.10 is installed
Package: gcc Version: 3.3.5-1 I'm not quite sure where to file that, but I guess gcc could be the right package. When I have installed the standard 2.6.8-2-686 kernel, I can compile and install a vanilla 2.6.10 kernel without problems. However, when I boot this kernel and try to compile a 2.6.10 again, I get dozens of internal memory allocation errors (error message translated by myself). When I switch back to 2.6.8, it works fine again. The 2.6.10 kernel has the same configuration as the 2.6.8 supplied by Debian has. What log files should I attach? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295750: cannot compile kernel when 2.6.10 is installed
Okay, will check that out! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
