Bug#867757: Updating the powertop Uploaders list
Sure, will do. On 09/07/17, 10:56, Tobias Frost wrote: > Source: powertop > Version: 2.8-1 > Severity: minor > User: m...@qa.debian.org > Usertags: mia-teammaint > > Patrick Winnertzhas not been working on > the powertop package for quite some time. > > We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you > to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close > that part of the file. > > (If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please > step in as a new maintainer.) > > Thanks. -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co
Bug#804197: rtorrent no longer depends on libsigc++
You are right! Sorry I missed this; I'll get this on a new release this weekend. On 06/11/15, 01:37pm, Patrick Li wrote: > Package: rtorrent > Version: 0.9.6-1 > > Upstream has removed dependency on sigc++ in this commit. > > https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent/commit/370bae4b986ce541756491a0934d22db3cc69534 > > So the debian control file should no longer list libsigc++-2.0-dev as a > dependency. -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5
On 21/09/15, 09:52am, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 at 05:38:16 -0700, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > > The only reverse dependencies are rtorrent and it needs an upgrade as > > well since there's a newer upstream version (it's the same upstream) > > depending on the newer version of libtorrent. > > > > Do I really need to do the transition or is it safe then? > > libtorrent needs *some* transition: either the v5 rename, or the new SONAME. > > If you are prepared to deal with both libtorrent and rtorrent, including any > fallout from regressions in the new upstream version, then you can go the > new-SONAME route if you prefer. Yes, I have rtorrent ready, awaiting for libtorrent19 to pass NEW. -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5
Nevermind, upstream bumped soname anyway. On 08/09/15, 10:24pm, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from > unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? > > On 03/09/15, 08:21am, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Source: libtorrent > > Version: 0.13.2-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: breaks ABI without a package rename > > Tags: sid stretch > > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 > > > > Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the > > C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. > > Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one > > from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from > > this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, > > dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of > > the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition > > for the library. > > > > In the case of libtorrent, std::string appears in functions that are > > explicitly exported, so it seems very likely that a transition is needed. > > The transition normally consists of renaming the > > affected library packages, adding a v5 suffix (libtorrent14v5). > > The SONAME should not be changed when doing this. > > > > If an upgrade to a new upstream SONAME is already planned, and that > > SONAME has never been available in Debian compiled with g++-4, then an > > alternative way to carry out the transition would be to bump the > > SONAME. Please avoid doing this unless the new upstream version > > is very low-risk. > > > > These follow-up transitions for libstdc++ are not going through exactly > > the normal transition procedure, because many entangled transitions are > > going on at the same time, and the usual ordered transition procedure > > does not scale that far. When all the C++ libraries on which this library > > depends have started their transitions in unstable if required, this > > library should do the same, closing this bug; the release team will deal > > with binNMUs as needed. > > > > Looking at the build-dependencies of libtorrent, the C++ libraries > > are libcppunit and libsigc++, which have both had their renames > > already; so this sub-transition is ready to start. > > > > The package might be NMU'd if there is no maintainer response. The > > release team have declared a 2 day NMU delay[2] for packages involved > > in the libstdc++ transition, in order to get unstable back to a usable > > state in a finite time. > > > > Regards, > > S > > > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition > > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/08/msg0.html > > -- > ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5
On 09/09/15, 07:30am, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 09/09/15 07:00, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > > On 08/09/15, 10:24pm, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > >> Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from > >> unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? > > > > Nevermind, upstream bumped soname anyway. > > A new upstream SONAME makes the v5 transition rename unnecessary; but if > upstream have bumped SONAME, then they've broken API/ABI (or are doing > it wrong), which increases the risk that reverse-dependencies of > libtorrent will fail to compile or fail to work. > > A new upstream release that does not bump the SONAME does not have any > effect on the need for a transition/rename. > > I suspect that the lowest-risk approach to getting this transition > finished in a finite time is to do the v5 rename, then ask the release > team for a separate transition slot for the new upstream SONAME. > The only reverse dependencies are rtorrent and it needs an upgrade as well since there's a newer upstream version (it's the same upstream) depending on the newer version of libtorrent. Do I really need to do the transition or is it safe then? -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5
Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? On 03/09/15, 08:21am, Simon McVittie wrote: > Source: libtorrent > Version: 0.13.2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: breaks ABI without a package rename > Tags: sid stretch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 > > Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the > C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. > Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one > from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from > this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, > dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of > the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition > for the library. > > In the case of libtorrent, std::string appears in functions that are > explicitly exported, so it seems very likely that a transition is needed. > The transition normally consists of renaming the > affected library packages, adding a v5 suffix (libtorrent14v5). > The SONAME should not be changed when doing this. > > If an upgrade to a new upstream SONAME is already planned, and that > SONAME has never been available in Debian compiled with g++-4, then an > alternative way to carry out the transition would be to bump the > SONAME. Please avoid doing this unless the new upstream version > is very low-risk. > > These follow-up transitions for libstdc++ are not going through exactly > the normal transition procedure, because many entangled transitions are > going on at the same time, and the usual ordered transition procedure > does not scale that far. When all the C++ libraries on which this library > depends have started their transitions in unstable if required, this > library should do the same, closing this bug; the release team will deal > with binNMUs as needed. > > Looking at the build-dependencies of libtorrent, the C++ libraries > are libcppunit and libsigc++, which have both had their renames > already; so this sub-transition is ready to start. > > The package might be NMU'd if there is no maintainer response. The > release team have declared a 2 day NMU delay[2] for packages involved > in the libstdc++ transition, in order to get unstable back to a usable > state in a finite time. > > Regards, > S > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/GCC5#libstdc.2B-.2B-_ABI_transition > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/08/msg0.html -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754567: rtorrent: new upstream release (0.9.4)
On 02/02/15, 12:47am, deb...@chr1s.eu wrote: Hi Jose, do you have any news regarding a new rtorrent package? Jonathan McDowell put libtorrent 0.13.4 on experimental and rtorrent is to follow [0], yet the freeze has stopped it AFAIK. [0] https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libtorrent-dev -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#775382: libtorrent: please add debug package
On 15/01/15, 08:32am, Paul Wise wrote: Source: libtorrent Severity: wishlist I've recently had rtorrent segfault a few times. Please add a libtorrent-dbg package so that I can report a useful bug. ACK, sadly I'm out of time right now so if anybody wants to pick up these: the source is in collab-maint and I can sponsor uploads for non-developers. Kind regards, -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#773747: pgpdump: infinite loop on crafted file
On 22/12/14, 10:52pm, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2014-12-22, 22:41: pgpdump hangs when trying to dump the attached crafted file. Now really attached. But my MUA mangled it somehow. :-( Third time lucky. This command hangs: printf '\243\003' | pgpdump -- Jakub Wilk Just got this messages, thanks, now it's actually attached. -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#773747: pgpdump: infinite loop on crafted file
On 22/12/14, 10:31pm, Jakub Wilk wrote: Package: pgpdump Version: 0.28-1 Usertags: afl pgpdump hangs when trying to dump the attached crafted file. strace tells me it's repeatedly trying to read past EOF: read(0, , 8192) = 0 read(0, , 8192) = 0 read(0, , 8192) = 0 read(0, , 8192) = 0 read(0, , 8192) = 0 [...ad infinitum...] This bug was found using American fuzzy lop: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/afl Hi Jakub, what's the precise file you are trying here? Never got anything attached here. Kind regards. -- ⨳ PGP 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#772571: powertop uses /usr/sbin/hciconfig instead of /bin/hciconfig
tags 772571 confirmed upstream quit On 08/12/14, 06:21pm, Laurent Bigonville wrote: Package: powertop Version: 2.6.1-1 Severity: normal Hi, It seems that powertop uses /usr/sbin/hciconfig instead of /bin/hciconfig when it tries to optimize the bluetooth power usage on the Tunables tab. It path should be fixed and executables should maybe looked inside PATH instead of hardcoding the path like that ACK, working on a patch for it. Thanks for the report. -- ⨳ GPG 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#771810: rtorrent: hangs during DNS queries
tags 771810 upstream confirmed forwarded 771810 https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent/issues/247 quit On 02/12/14, 04:48pm, Simon Richter wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: normal Hi, one of the trackers for a file I'm hosting appears to be in a domain with a broken DNS server, making the query time out in the local recursive resolver. It appears as if rtorrent hangs the entire time the DNS request is outstanding. Thanks for your report, this was caused by the the DDoS yesterday on DNSimple. Not only that, this is already reported to the upstream[0]. [0] https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent/issues/247 Kind regards. -- ⨳ GPG 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#771811: rtorrent: blacklist for discontinued trackers
forwarded 771811 https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent/issues/256 tags 771811 confirmed upstream quit On 02/12/14, 04:52pm, Simon Richter wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Hi, it would be nice if there were a feature to drop trackers that are obviously discontinued, such as when their DNS name starts resolving to 127.0.0.1. Agreed, it would be very nice. -- ⨳ GPG 0x13EC43EEB9AC8C43 ⨳ https://ghostbar.co signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#765074: vagrant: Cannot download self-hosted vagrantcloud box
I can confirm this bug with a little difference: is downloading an image from an URL. The steps to reproduce this is simply trying to `vagrant up` dokku's Vagrantfile. ```sh git clone https://github.com/progrium/dokku.git cd dokku vagrant up ``` It gives me this error: 8--- == box: Adding box 'trusty' (v0) for provider: box: Downloading: https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/vagrant/trusty/current/trusty-server-cloudimg-amd64-vagrant-disk1.box An error occurred while downloading the remote file. The error message, if any, is reproduced below. Please fix this error and try again. The requested URL returned error: 400 Bad Request ---8 I know this URL works because I've been spawning this same Vagrantfile in several machines, this is the first Debian sid I try it today in a freshly installed machine. Plus, it works perfectly with upstream-provided .deb -- Jose Luis Rivas · http://joseluisrivas.net http://ghostbar.co GPG ∆ 4096R/D278 F9C1 5E54 61AA 3C1E 2FCD 13EC 43EE B9AC 8C43 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754567: rtorrent: new upstream release (0.9.4)
As a follow up: upstream author told me he would do a release shortly with this issue solved. On 12/10/14, 09:43am, Jose Luis Rivas wrote: ACK. I haven't made this update because there's a bug with the new release, I asked upstream to fix it and he kind of made it but didn't made a release tarball for this. I'm gonna ping him again about this. Kind Regards. On 12/10/14, 01:11pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.9.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #754567 Version 0.9.4 fixes an incompatibility with utorrent 3.x that causes chunks to be downloaded and ignored. The effect is that a lot more data is downloaded than is used and peers stall, not downloading anything anymore despite them offering. Please update rtorrent and libtorrent. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages rtorrent depends on: ii libc6 2.19-1 ii libcurl37.38.0-2 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.0-9 ii libncursesw55.9+20140913-1 ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.11-4 ii libstdc++6 4.9.0-9 ii libtinfo5 5.9+20140913-1 ii libtorrent140.13.2-1 ii libxmlrpc-core-c3 1.33.14-0.1 rtorrent recommends no packages. Versions of packages rtorrent suggests: ii screen 4.2.0-2 -- no debconf information -- Jose Luis Rivas · http://joseluisrivas.net http://ghostbar.co GPG ∆ 4096R/D278 F9C1 5E54 61AA 3C1E 2FCD 13EC 43EE B9AC 8C43 -- Jose Luis Rivas · http://joseluisrivas.net http://ghostbar.co GPG ∆ 4096R/D278 F9C1 5E54 61AA 3C1E 2FCD 13EC 43EE B9AC 8C43 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754567: rtorrent: new upstream release (0.9.4)
ACK. I haven't made this update because there's a bug with the new release, I asked upstream to fix it and he kind of made it but didn't made a release tarball for this. I'm gonna ping him again about this. Kind Regards. On 12/10/14, 01:11pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.9.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #754567 Version 0.9.4 fixes an incompatibility with utorrent 3.x that causes chunks to be downloaded and ignored. The effect is that a lot more data is downloaded than is used and peers stall, not downloading anything anymore despite them offering. Please update rtorrent and libtorrent. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages rtorrent depends on: ii libc6 2.19-1 ii libcurl37.38.0-2 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.0-9 ii libncursesw55.9+20140913-1 ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.11-4 ii libstdc++6 4.9.0-9 ii libtinfo5 5.9+20140913-1 ii libtorrent140.13.2-1 ii libxmlrpc-core-c3 1.33.14-0.1 rtorrent recommends no packages. Versions of packages rtorrent suggests: ii screen 4.2.0-2 -- no debconf information -- Jose Luis Rivas · http://joseluisrivas.net http://ghostbar.co GPG ∆ 4096R/D278 F9C1 5E54 61AA 3C1E 2FCD 13EC 43EE B9AC 8C43 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#729203: Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
On 28/07/14, 01:20am, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: Hi all, some of you may have noticed a weird ffmpeg package in the NEW queue[1]. Let me explain: In 2011 Libav[2] was forked from FFmpeg[3]. It was a time of great uncertainty, the fork happened with much drama that didn't help making a technical cut, and at that peculiar time Debian switched to Libav. Hi Andreas and everyone, FWIW, my experience with this is that I had to make my own FFmpeg package a while ago [0] because I needed it for a project I was working on at the moment [1]. [0] https://github.com/ghostbar/FFmpeg.deb [1] https://github.com/ghostbar/RTSP-Streaming.js The reason for having to package my own FFmpeg is the current libav which is taking the space of ffmpeg seemed to conflict with every other ffmpeg package out there, including marillat's and for my project I actually needed ffmpeg, not libav since it didn't had the functionality. (More specifically: the ability to take still images from an rtsp stream). Not having FFmpeg available in the debian repositories is a nuissance, and certainly having libav instead which seems to be a fork yet not having the full FFmpeg functionality and using the same package name is worst. I didn't figured this out at first because the binary said `ffmpeg`. Of course, I'm talking about [2] since now that seems to not be an issue yet remains the lack of functionality. [2] https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/ffmpeg If the issue is that this would mean having to fix security bugs twice then it would be reasonable to stop shipping libav and instead ship ffmpeg, since has more functionality and AFAICS from their repos bunch of active bug-fixing. I honestly do not understand why ffmpeg is not in the repos nor why there seems to be an active movement to block it. Kind regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas · ghostbar http://ghostbar.co The Debian Project · http://www.debian.org GPG · D278 F9C1 5E54 61AA 3C1E 2FCD 13EC 43EE B9AC 8C43 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#748610: ITP: node-lodash -- node-lodash
On 18/05/14, 10:39pm, Matthew Pideil wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthew Pideil matthewp_deb...@teledetection.fr * Package name: node-lodash Version : 2.4.1 Upstream Author : John-David Dalton john.david.dal...@gmail.com * URL : http://lodash.com/ * License : expat Programming Lang: js Description : Lo-dash is a Node.js utility library Lo-dash is a Node.js utility library delivering consistency, customization, performance, extras. Sponsored by the pkg-javascript-team Hello Matthew, Actually lodash works on the browser too. Why node-lodash? Why not liblodash-js? -- Jose Luis Rivas | ghostbar The Debian Project → http://www.debian.org GPG 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688816: crash: corrupted double-linked list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tag 688816 upstream confirmed forwarded 688816 https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent/issues/180 thanks El 22/04/14, 06:57am, Damyan Ivanov escribió: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.9.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #688816 I have another bit of information about the crash. It appears to be related to the network interface going down. The host that runs rtorrent uses DHCP to get its IP. When it fails to renew its IP address lease, rtorrent seems to crash some 5-15 minutes after the network interface is deconfigured. This sounds related to https://bugs.debian.org/721995 -- rtorrent segfaults when IP address changes after a sleep. Hello Damyan, yes, there are lot of issues with freezes on rtorrent 0.9.x, including the latest from the master branch. Already got forwarded to upstream and is aware of this. Kind regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas -- GPG: 0xCACAB118 http://www.joseluisrivas.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlNcZ1QACgkQOKCtW8rKsRj5vwCeIpUKIG/pTi7irclBvh2ZAEUU IDQAn3cSk3DFK2r781n+RGuA6HjLhUNc =UBpm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745792: [PATCH] Fixing FTBFS on i386 and kfreebsd-i386
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Package: encfs Version: 1.7.4-3 Control: tag -1 patch Hi, Here's a patch with a workaround for the output of `DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE` that's making encfs FTBFS on `linux-i386` and `kfreebsd-i386` since 1.7.4-3. The output is `i486-linux-gnu` which do not match with `/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu` that `--with-libboost-dir` expects during the `./configure`. Kind regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas - @ghostbar The Debian Project GPG: 0xCACAB118 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEAREDAAYFAlNZ8jwACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhaLwCfeCxqA9B/diJFiVvh7jYOtcaZ sCwAoJnhxefjTe77bNCPtuK+LpJ7lBbJ =1W7V -END PGP SIGNATURE- From: Jose Luis Rivas ghost...@debian.org Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:06:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Using MOD_ARCH instead of DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE on i386 architectures shows `i486-linux-gnu` or `i486-kfreebsd-gnu` while configure is expecting `i386-linux-gnu` or `i486-kfreebsd-gnu` which makes it break when loading the Boost library during the `./configure` with `--with-boost-libdir`. Using MOD_ARCH catches this input checking if DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU is `i486` and converting it then to `i386` while bypassing the other types. --- debian/rules | 10 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 3255b55..bf6c939 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ else CFLAGS += -O2 endif +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU),i486) + MOD_ARCH = i386 +else + MOD_ARCH = $(DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU) +endif + export CFLAGS export LDFLAGS @@ -31,7 +37,7 @@ config.status: configure dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. #-autoreconf -fi - ./configure $(CONFARG) || ./configure $(CONFARG) --with-boost-libdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) + ./configure $(CONFARG) || ./configure $(CONFARG) --with-boost-libdir=/usr/lib/$(MOD_ARCH)-$(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM) touch config.status build: build-stamp @@ -49,7 +55,7 @@ clean: dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp - ./configure $(CONFARG) || ./configure $(CONFARG) --with-boost-libdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) + ./configure $(CONFARG) || ./configure $(CONFARG) --with-boost-libdir=/usr/lib/$(MOD_ARCH)-$(DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM) $(MAKE) distclean || true -rm -f config.log #ifneq $(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub) -- 2.0.0.rc0
Bug#686699: powertop crashes if it's started with --calibrate
I know gustavo, thanks for reporting. This is fixed in newer versions uploaded on unstable On Nov 27, 2013 10:18 AM, Gustavo Nascimento gdiasnascime...@gmail.com wrote: Package: powertop Version: 2.0-0.3 Followup-For: Bug #686699 Dear Maintainer, My Debian 7 Linux use to much batery than Windows *** End of the template - remove these lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages powertop depends on: ii libc6 2.13-38 ii libgcc1 1:4.7.2-5 ii libncursesw5 5.9-10 ii libnl-3-200 3.2.7-4 ii libnl-genl-3-200 3.2.7-4 ii libpci3 1:3.1.9-6 ii libstdc++64.7.2-5 ii libtinfo5 5.9-10 ii zlib1g1:1.2.7.dfsg-13 powertop recommends no packages. Versions of packages powertop suggests: pn cpufrequtils none ii laptop-mode-tools 1.61-2 -- no debconf information
Bug#727786: follow-up for: removal of libc6-amd64 makes system unusable
On 10/26/2013 03:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: Seems this bug was indeed already reported: 699206 and 707185. However, it is not clear to me how I can get my system working again. Obviously, I can not remove or create symlinks to the right location as ln and friends don't work anymore (not to mention that sudo and getty don't help). Seems like I need to create a rescue USB drive without the possibility to copy files around Hope I can do this. I'll leave my laptop on tonight, if anybody has a great idea, feel free to share. Paul Paul, just like recovering a system. Boot from a USB drive live-image and make a chroot in the disk. Then you can start making the symlinks -- Jose Luis Rivas http://joseluisrivas.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721995: rtorrent segfaults when IP address changes after a sleep
On Fri Sep 6 11:39:01 2013, Alexander Prokoshev wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I have a repeating situation when rtorrent being started in screen session segfaults after the laptop wakes up from sleep. Steps to reproduce: 1) Start screen 2) Start rtorrent in screen session, start downloading a torrent. 3) Detach from the screen session 4) Suspend the laptop. 5) Move the laptop to another network with another address space (for example, if it was connected to a network 192.168.0.0/24, move it to a network 192.168.1.0/24). 6) Wake up the laptop. 7) Attache the screen session. 8) See the rtorrent segfaulted. This is a situation isolated for `screen` or it happens even without `screen`? -- Jose Luis Rivas http://joseluisrivas.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#695890: powertop: html output should use libjs-jquery instead of http://ajax.googleapis.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On 9/5/13 11:05 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 09/04/2013 09:43 PM, Jose Luis Rivas wrote: Because it's not a requirement to see `powertop.html`. If the file is not found then it's not giving errors which put `jquery` in the `suggests` field. Less people is installing suggestions than have internet while loading and HTML. If it's not a requirement to see it, then all the more reason to avoid interacting with a third-party server for a superfluity. Users with no (or intermittent) 'net connections can at least make the choice to install libjs-jquery when they are installing the machine, as can users *with* robust 'net access. Making something look ugly, removing usability and making it hard to get good usability just because you consider it a superfluity is not something I'm going to do. I know this is a common path to decisions in free-software, but is a path I'm not willing to take. Won't do that. In the package-management paradigm of Operating Systems there's no sane way to keep up with how JavaScript libraries work. Sorry, but there's nothing magical about javascript that makes js libraries somehow immune to the various issues that other libraries have. It's very different. So different I actually haven't met the first person that uses the JS libraries packaged in Debian for big production systems. It does take work to declare and maintain a stable API while patching security holes as they are discovered. And it takes work on behalf of the user of a library to choose and depend on a stable version of the API. The paradigm is clearly different in JavaScript. Hard-coding a particular version of a library (e.g. by embedding it) is the equivalent of static linking, which we agree is a bad idea in other applications. This is a comparison of apples and pears. We are talking about JavaScript, a scripting language. Only in this case, we're talking about statically linking to an internet resource that is delivered without any cryptographic guarantees of integrity. So, if it's delivered using https is good enough for you? Or the paranoic-argument will be transferred to something like but Google is a private third-party in which I don't trust? I do development on JavaScript primarily at work, and I can't use packaged js-libs because of this, so I refuse to suggest people to waste their time. To handle JavaScript libraries there's already two sane-ways: use either NPM or Bower. Most of this is transparent to the user unless is using a local file (which is the case in this report) and when using a local-file the suggested way is using a public CDN (which is what is being done). afaict, neither NPM nor Bower does cryptographic authentication of the code they fetch from the 'net, and neither of them appears to be committed to supporting a stable API while also patching security fixes. We've managed to do all of the above with most other libraries within debian for years now. Why should we ignore these same code-management issues for any package just because it's javascript? And anyway, again, people is not using Debian's packages in production for JavaScript development. Doesn't that tell you something? That's how it works, the primarily exploits from JavaScript are reading cookies which are not accessible if you are using file://. This is served from a public repository widely used, and the use of jQuery is limited to show and hide elements; If the legitimate use of jQuery is only for showing and hiding elements, maybe the best thing is just to patch to avoid jquery entirely and use native, cross-platform DOM. Even if you think jQuery is the best way to do this, i strongly doubt that the jQuery API for showing and hiding elements will change at this point, so the concern about what happens if debian moves libjs-jquery from 1.7 to 1.10 seems moot. I think this is actually a good solution. Sadly, I don't have the time to do it. If you make a patch for it I will implement it and send it upstream. not only that, there's no input of data in it. So, what's the security risk? If the code is fetched over the network, then whoever is serving the code (including any other machine on your LAN, if they decide to spoof traffic) can inject arbitrary code in the .js file. There are lots of other exploits to be had from arbitrary javascript besides reading cookies. Something easily fixable by just using the https version of it. What other security risks are there? well, anything that your browser is vulnerable to; e.g. flash objects, webGL craziness, hooks into audio or video elements to exploit your installed codecs, etc; IF there's injection of code, which is not doable with https. the server deploying that .js file could use it to display advertisements, Doubt they will. If that were the case shall we change the CDN, but it's not. (And if this were the case
Bug#695890: powertop: html output should use libjs-jquery instead of http://ajax.googleapis.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 9/3/13 2:04 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: i'm sorry to hear you feel this way. I'm not asking due to paranoia -- as i mentioned in the original bug report, there are at least three cases that could cause people to want to do this: concerns about google, concerns about cleartext code injection by someone who controls the network (e.g. in a public wifi zone), and concerns about machines that have no internet connection at all. You may think that the first two categories are paranoia (though others with different network habits or adversary models than you may disagree), but the last category is a basic operation requirement for some users. Why not make it friendly for them? Because it's not a requirement to see `powertop.html`. If the file is not found then it's not giving errors which put `jquery` in the `suggests` field. Less people is installing suggestions than have internet while loading and HTML. Not only that, I don't like how people believes JavaScript libraries are maintained as other languages libraries. Right now in unstable is 1.7.2 which isthe compatible with current powertop, but as soon as gets updated with 1.10.x it will break. That will create more bugs, and I wont create bugs for paranoia which will lead to nothing. If API version compatibility is a problem, and libjquery-js is breaking compatibility in ways that it needs to avoid, please submit a bug report asking for library-style packaging of core javascript libraries (e.g. libjs-jquery-1.7, if 1.7 is where the stable API is maintained). If a given version of jquery API is required for viewing the output, we should be explicit about that. Won't do that. In the package-management paradigm of Operating Systems there's no sane way to keep up with how JavaScript libraries work. Sorry but that's a no-no. More people is needed in other fields of Debian than maintaining highly changing JavaScript libraries. I do development on JavaScript primarily at work, and I can't use packaged js-libs because of this, so I refuse to suggest people to waste their time. To handle JavaScript libraries there's already two sane-ways: use either NPM or Bower. Most of this is transparent to the user unless is using a local file (which is the case in this report) and when using a local-file the suggested way is using a public CDN (which is what is being done). You can't access to local fs via JavaScript on the browser, and the exploit can be done in the same domain. You will read it from file:/// so nothing will happen. I may be misunderstanding what you're saying here, but it sounds to me like you're suggesting that there is no way for an attacker who can inject arbitrary javascript into a page loaded via a file:/// URL can do any harm. Even if this is true in the abstract (i'm not convinced it is, given that there are a number of possible attacks other than reading from the local filesystem), and if all browsers implemented their javascript stacks with the appropriate sandboxing, this wouldn't resolve the problem for machines without full internet access. That's how it works, the primarily exploits from JavaScript are reading cookies which are not accessible if you are using file://. This is served from a public repository widely used, and the use of jQuery is limited to show and hide elements; not only that, there's no input of data in it. So, what's the security risk? About people without internet, already said my argument in the first paragraph. Anyway, it is of course your call on what to do; but i think it's a shame that (a) all of the code involved is free software, already in debian, yet (b) we're relying on cleartext third-party transmissions for this functionality. And is serving free-software, there's no ties on licensing nor liberty using a CDN; just isn't bloating the software which is something some people tend to. My priorities is making a software that will work if you have internet but don't have libjquery installed from dpkg which is a bigger use-case than people who does not have internet AND has libjquery installed from dpkg. I can see the argument of but that's the Debian-way, but for this case is not the right way to do it. Thanks for your feedback Daniel, Kind Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas http://joseluisrivas.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSJ+GlAAoJEBPsQ+65rIxD4qgQAIYdWQQH1VOo2PGBodPVpQFf 9Gt5UEqu6BJQLB7N49+MgGPwJu1o0hQRnohKqhkQGIlQTIKnfMneRtUOTqa6Zlj1 kuxgNZbe7BfbLpZu7e6qFTRefNg4xqxEVNRXBLOpXXdkWNtcKeDQRZR+UWu1p39T 1uhWbCVKFb2dZHyaGjo4TopmhdcxgasbQHi7qkfPxqky9ccTgLokbACI2kvuK6dy Xq5waKUqGorKjiUe1XD8xnNGBBtbpsc1TwEyPJxcwpLaIbNs4GAf96C5f2icoy5i yecAzQ/Sivt8PlZrzFeU243vfPvOxzoJETsApcygEbl7MS1OYrE9yKCwUxJCJaFl zM6rS4smpX1c1aJViqO/Ia3zzdCtGa0qEH7ruNP2O6VO94JBVYl63f5MnEB0NHty NrH96yzup76yoxGdOVX1FMm
Bug#695890: powertop: html output should use libjs-jquery instead of http://ajax.googleapis.com/
tags 695890 wontfix severity 695890 wishlist quit Sorry Daniel, won't do this. Can't see a real reason besides paranoia. Specially seeing a report from your power usage. Not only that, I don't like how people believes JavaScript libraries are maintained as other languages libraries. Right now in unstable is 1.7.2 which isthe compatible with current powertop, but as soon as gets updated with 1.10.x it will break. That will create more bugs, and I wont create bugs for paranoia which will lead to nothing. You can't access to local fs via JavaScript on the browser, and the exploit can be done in the same domain. You will read it from file:/// so nothing will happen. Kind regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas http://joseluisrivas.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688816: crash: corrupted double-linked list
Is this happening yet? Full report at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688816 -- Jose Luis Rivas The Debian Project -- http://debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698554: Crash when parts of a file unreadable
Is this happening again? Full report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698554 -- Jose Luis Rivas The Debian Project -- http://debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#572485: xscreensaver: should not hardcode screenhacks list
On 12/06/2011 09:26 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: [...] José, do you think it is possible to implement Jamie's suggestion? There aren't many xscreensaver hacks in the archive, but they will benefit from this, and it would make a lot easier to package new hacks... Sure Martín, just send me a patch. We maintain everything on git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/xscreensaver.git Send it on email or just let me know from where make pull. Cheers! -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG: 0x7C4DF50D / 0xCACAB118 The Debian Project Developer -- http://ghostbar.ath.cx Barquisimeto, Venezuela signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#647110: xscreensaver: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
On 10/30/2011 12:45 PM, Tormod Volden wrote: tags 647110 pending thanks Hi Bill, Thanks for the notification. We will fix this in the next upload. Already uploaded the changes made by Tormod to ftp-master. It will soon hit the repos. Thanks for the notification Bill, Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG: 0x7C4DF50D 0xCACAB118 Debian Project Developer -- http://ghostbar.ath.cx Barquisimeto, Venezuela signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#628917: xscreensaver exits
Hi, So, you upgraded to 5.14 and? It keeps giving this? It changed? What? -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#349000: xscreensaver: New Login via gdmflexiserver impossible when 2 or more sessions active
So, what needs to be done here with this bug? Check if gdm still support this option and/or find the way to make xss open to multiple logins? Regards, -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#632420: xscreensaver: destroys GDM / X monitors setting
This is a video-driver bug. If you think it's not please feel free to re-open and gives us some log so we can trace the source of the issue. -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG: 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://www.joseluisrivas.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517797: xscreensaver: Does not correctly handle differing horizontal and vertical DPI
Is this still longer true? Did you found a way to configure your X server correctly? No one has complained about this and there's a lot of people with different video-configurations working correctly with xscreensaver. Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#538687: xscreensaver-data: ripples throws trap stack segment error
Are you still having this issue? I can't reproduce this. -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#538811: xscreensaver(-demo) does not set cursor
I can't reproduce this behavior, do you have this kind of issue any longer? -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#604686: can't return back into my desktop from xscreensaver
Hi Simon Kenyon, Are you guys still able to reproduce this bug? I can't. To refresh your memory, is this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604686 Regards, -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#617914: [PING] xscreensaver: fails detecting screen layout with new X server
Is this still happening to you? -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG: 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://www.joseluisrivas.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#615070: xscreensaver and unclutter lock the station
So, while using unclutter is that this happens? -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#632162: O: mybashburn -- Burn data and create songs with interactive dialog box
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org package: wnpp severity: normal This package has been in very bad shape since long time ago, upstream is not responding since 2008 and there have been no changes since that time. Maybe this should be removed, but there could be someone who would like to take over upstream and/or debian maintenance. Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. Debian Project Developer GPG 0xCACAB118 (old) 0x7C4DF50D (new) http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#620056: This bug is not grave
620056 severity wishlist quit This bug is not grave, if you don't like it then install 1.13, but please don't make a RC bug just because you don't like how the app works. 1.99 is on the way, fixing some crashes. The world changes, powertop as well. -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#609942: Please add Venezuela's SUSCERTE CA to ca-certificates
Hi hereby support the request to add SUSCERTE CA to the ca-certificates package. Regards, -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#607595: More information about this bug
On 12/20/2010 09:00 AM, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, +12:20:22 EET (UTC +0200), Jamie Zawinski j...@jwz.org pressed some keys: I really was running that screenhack called biof. I've never heard of this, what is it? Here is text from its settings-dialog: Clip here This is an attempt to recreate some of the work of William Latham. Take a look at the program 'organic art' at this site (http://www.artworks.co.uk). Written by Ronald Hordijk hk at dgmr.nl. Ported to Linux by Tugrul Galatali - http://rss-glx.sourceforge.net/. Clip here That screenhack obviously belongs to Debian-package called rss-glx . Please, separate hacks from xscreensaver-gl of rss-glx. If you found bugs on XScreenSaver Debian-distribution then please fill them here. If not please fill a bug against rss-glx. Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas - GPG (old/new): 0xCACAB118 / 0x7C4DF50D San Cristóbal, Venezuela - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ Debian Project Developer - http://debian.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#596944: please reconsider xscreensaver *-extra package split
Tormod from the checks I made I believe we could just drop the split. -Original Message- From: Tormod Volden debian.tor...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:27:49 To: Jamie Zawinskij...@jwz.org; 596...@bugs.debian.org Reply-To: Tormod Volden debian.tor...@gmail.com, 596...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#596944: please reconsider xscreensaver *-extra package split On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Jamie Zawinski wrote: In summary: The Debian package of xscreensaver currently excludes many savers from the default install, on the basis of them using too much CPU. This is no longer the case. As those savers no longer use too much CPU, the justification for excluding them from the default install no longer exists, and they should be installed by default. Short response: It is still the case on common hardware... Longer version: I believe these are the tests they ran, years ago: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Screensavers Yes, but I have occasionally been running more tests since then, so I know it is still a problem. I need to update that page though. It has always been my goal with xscreensaver that *no* screen saver should use significant CPU when running. Since he ran his tests, I have fixed those savers that were using too much CPU (mostly by adjusting their default settings to be gentler). It is my belief that currently, none of the screen savers included with xscreensaver use significant CPU when running with their default options. Note that the high CPU usage is often (always) due to lack of functionality in the graphic card drivers, and not to bugs in xscreensaver. We rely on our own testing on different hardware and of reported bugs about high CPU usage. This has not been very systematic but as often in distribution packaging, a compromise between time invested and getting most things to work for most people. Since we are providing a Linux distribution, the end user experience is what counts. We can not play the blame game (notourbug) and tell people to fix their graphics drivers. And yes, I try to fix graphics drivers also, at least by doing some xorg related QA work and smaller patches. Therefore, it is my belief that the -extra packages are unnecessary, and their contents should be folded in to the -data and -gl packages, reducing the number of xscreensaver packages from 5 to 3. I would like this to happen so that the default is to install the *complete* xscreensaver package instead of just an arbitrary subset of it. Since most users will just take the defaults, they won't even know that the part 2 savers exist, and many of them are pretty cool! And the justification for excluding them no longer exists. Yes, the package complexity is not nice for anyone, and it is sad when some users don't know they can try out all hacks by installing the extra packages. I would even have liked to see the package count down to 2 since everybody has GL libraries installed, at least if some detection of HW acceleration could be done run-time. However we haven't come up with a better mechanism for us or the consumers (whether users, system administrators or downstream packagers) to select which hacks to run by default. Most consumers of the hacks do not even run the xscreensaver engine and its preferences dialog. The treatment of the xscreensaver package certainly is made more complicated by the fact that parts of it are used by other screensaver engines. Which you probably have mixed feelings about :) Over the past 3 years, I have repeatedly asked Jose to re-run the tests he ran by which he decided which savers to push into the extras package, and let me know if he still sees any savers using excessive CPU (because I don't believe there are any, but if there are, I would like to fix that bug.) I'm sorry to say that he has never responded. In fact, I haven't gotten any mail from him at all since September 2008, so even though he is still listed as the Debian maintainer of xscreensaver, I'm not sure he is still paying attention. Jamie, I have the impression you are reading some of the xscreensaver bug mail, so you have certainly seen that Jose is actively maintaining it together with me. So please no theater. On the other hand it is better that you route your requests through the bug tracker like you are doing this time, or to the package maintainer list (which I fail to remember the address of here and now) rather than sending him private e-mail. None of us are working full time on this, and in busy times some things slip through the cracks. So -- if there is anyone reading this who considers themselves to be in charge of the Debian xscreensaver package, please reconsider the split between the default and extras packages, because I believe it to be based on old data and on assumptions which are no longer true. We are continuously reconsidering the split (ever since before we made it), but we would need an alternative solution
Bug#596944: please reconsider xscreensaver *-extra package split
Hello Jamie, I'm going to check these tonight at home. ;-) I don't like neither the extra split but too much users were complaining. Regards -Original Message- From: Jamie Zawinski j...@jwz.org Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:25:52 To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Reply-To: Jamie Zawinski j...@jwz.org, 596...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#596944: please reconsider xscreensaver *-extra package split Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.05-3 In summary: The Debian package of xscreensaver currently excludes many savers from the default install, on the basis of them using too much CPU. This is no longer the case. As those savers no longer use too much CPU, the justification for excluding them from the default install no longer exists, and they should be installed by default. Longer version: Currently, Debian divides xscreensaver into five packages: xscreensaver (base) xscreensaver-data (non-OpenGL screen savers, part 1) xscreensaver-data-extra (non-OpenGL screen savers, part 2) xscreensaver-gl (OpenGL screen savers, part 1) xscreensaver-gl-extra (OpenGL screen savers, part 2) The choice of which savers to put in the part 2 packages instead of the part 1 packages was made by Jose Luis Rivas Contreras ghostba...@gmail.com and Tormod Volden debian.tor...@gmail.com back in 2007 or 2008 by running each of the screen savers and timing their CPU usage, and putting those with high CPU usage in the part 2 packages, not installed by default. I believe these are the tests they ran, years ago: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Screensavers It has always been my goal with xscreensaver that *no* screen saver should use significant CPU when running. Since he ran his tests, I have fixed those savers that were using too much CPU (mostly by adjusting their default settings to be gentler). It is my belief that currently, none of the screen savers included with xscreensaver use significant CPU when running with their default options. Therefore, it is my belief that the -extra packages are unnecessary, and their contents should be folded in to the -data and -gl packages, reducing the number of xscreensaver packages from 5 to 3. I would like this to happen so that the default is to install the *complete* xscreensaver package instead of just an arbitrary subset of it. Since most users will just take the defaults, they won't even know that the part 2 savers exist, and many of them are pretty cool! And the justification for excluding them no longer exists. Over the past 3 years, I have repeatedly asked Jose to re-run the tests he ran by which he decided which savers to push into the extras package, and let me know if he still sees any savers using excessive CPU (because I don't believe there are any, but if there are, I would like to fix that bug.) I'm sorry to say that he has never responded. In fact, I haven't gotten any mail from him at all since September 2008, so even though he is still listed as the Debian maintainer of xscreensaver, I'm not sure he is still paying attention. So -- if there is anyone reading this who considers themselves to be in charge of the Debian xscreensaver package, please reconsider the split between the default and extras packages, because I believe it to be based on old data and on assumptions which are no longer true. Thanks...
Bug#593233: xscreensaver-data-extra: segfault in maze
Hi Marc, thanks for your report; I'll be checking this as soon as I get home. Could you please tell me how to reproduce it? When segfaults? What kind of machine does you have? Graphic controller? How often does segfaults? Is your only screensaver or does you have it configured to cycle? All this will help us to get into this bug and squash it :-) Regards, -Original Message- From: Marc F. Clemente m...@mclemente.net Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:37:48 To: Debian Bug Tracking Systemsub...@bugs.debian.org Reply-To: Marc F. Clemente m...@mclemente.net, 593...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#593233: xscreensaver-data-extra: segfault in maze Package: xscreensaver-data-extra Version: 5.11-1 Severity: normal # dmesg | grep maze [771455.651377] maze[21281]: segfault at 7f22693318d6 ip 004030c3 sp 7fff35021490 error 4 in maze[40+16000] [777213.609964] maze[21445]: segfault at 7f81ed037560 ip 004030c3 sp 7fff12d79990 error 4 in maze[40+16000] [965870.889105] maze[568]: segfault at 7f2e2d216554 ip 004030c3 sp 7fff97830840 error 4 in maze[40+16000] It doesn't always segfault. I see it working sometimes. Questions? Please email me. Thanks, Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xscreensaver-data-extra depends on: ii dictionaries-common 1.5.11 Common utilities for spelling dict ii libc62.11.2-2Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.1-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg-progs8b-1Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-3 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.1.2-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1 X11 pixmap library ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii netpbm 2:10.0-12.2 Graphics conversion tools between ii xscreensaver-data5.11-1 data files to be shared among scre xscreensaver-data-extra recommends no packages. xscreensaver-data-extra suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#591414: xscreensaver: error while running deprecated it says
It's working OK; just a few warnings from Gtk library that doesn't affect how xscreensaver-demo works. This is _not_ a bug. Thanks -Original Message- From: yellow yellowprot...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:22:13 To: Debian Bug Tracking Systemsub...@bugs.debian.org Reply-To: yellow yellowprot...@gmail.com, 591...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#591414: xscreensaver: error while running deprecated it says Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.11-1 Severity: normal $ xscreensaver-demo xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated xscreensaver-demo: 23:21:05: Gtk-warning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated it seems that it is not working well. Stable was more stable or at all best regards -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xscreensaver depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.30.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo2 1.8.10-4 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.4-1library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-02.24.1-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam0g1.1.1-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-0 1.28.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1X11 Session Management library ii libx11-62:1.3.3-3X11 client-side library ii libxext62:1.1.1-3X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama12:1.1-3 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-4 GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1X11 pixmap library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-3X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.5-2X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.0-2X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii xscreensaver-data 5.11-1 data files to be shared among scre Versions of packages xscreensaver recommends: ii libjpeg-progs 8b-1 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii miscfiles [wordlist] 1.4.2.dfsg.1-9Dictionaries and other interesting ii perl [perl5] 5.10.1-13 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii xli1.17.0+20061110-3 command line tool for viewing imag Versions of packages xscreensaver suggests: ii elinks [www-browser]0.12~pre5-2 advanced text-mode WWW browser ii fortune-mod [fortune] 1:1.99.1-4 provides fortune cookies on demand ii galeon [www-browser]2.0.7-2.1+b1 GNOME web browser for advanced use ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.5.10-1 Web browser based on Firefox ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8dev.4-2 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup pn qcam | streamer none (no description available) pn xdaliclock none (no description available) pn xfishtank none (no description available) pn xscreensaver-gl none (no description available) -- no debconf information
Bug#588288: README.Debian vs 'Obsolete conffile /etc/xdg/autostart/xscreensaver-daemon.desktop ... Saving as .bak'
Thank you Daniel, you are right and we are going to fix this ASAP! Thanks again for reporting this! -Original Message- From: Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:49:32 To: Debian Bug Tracking Systemsub...@bugs.debian.org Reply-To: Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de, 588...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#588288: README.Debian vs 'Obsolete conffile /etc/xdg/autostart/xscreensaver-daemon.desktop ... Saving as .bak' Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.11-1 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The README.Debian file says, that one should copy the xscreensaver-daemon.desktop to /etc/xdg/autostart to start the screen saver. I simply link to it. But during updates this leads to [..dpkg..] Obsolete conffile /etc/xdg/autostart/xscreensaver-daemon.desktop has been modified by you. Saving as /etc/xdg/autostart/xscreensaver-daemon.desktop.dpkg-bak ... [..dpkg..] So I have to renew the link with every update. I think, this is a bug in your preinst script or in RREADME.Debian. Regards, Daniel - -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (560, 'stable'), (110, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages xscreensaver depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.30.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcairo2 1.8.10-4 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2.1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.4-1library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-02.24.1-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.20.1-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam0g1.1.1-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-0 1.28.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1X11 Session Management library ii libx11-62:1.3.3-3X11 client-side library ii libxext62:1.1.1-3X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama12:1.1-3 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-4 GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1X11 pixmap library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-3X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.5-2X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.0-2X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii xscreensaver-data 5.11-1 data files to be shared among scre Versions of packages xscreensaver recommends: ii libjpeg-progs 8b-1 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii perl [perl5]5.10.1-13Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii wamerican [wordlist]6-3 American English dictionary words ii wngerman [wordlist] 20091006-4.1 New German orthography wordlist pn xli | xloadimagenone (no description available) Versions of packages xscreensaver suggests: ii epiphany-browser [www-brows 2.30.2-3 Intuitive GNOME web browser pn fortune none (no description available) ii galeon [www-browser]2.0.7-2.1+b1 GNOME web browser for advanced use ii iceape-browser [www-browser 2.0.5-1 Iceape Navigator (Internet browser ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.5.10-1 Web browser based on Firefox ii kazehakase [www-browser]0.5.8-4 GTK+-based web browser that allows ii konqueror [www-browser] 4:4.4.4-1KDE 4's advanced file manager, web ii links2 [www-browser]2.2-1+b2 Web browser running in both graphi ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8dev.4-2 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup ii netrik [www-browser]1.16.1-1 text mode WWW browser with vi like ii opera [www-browser] 10.60.6386 A fast and secure web browser and pn qcam | streamer none (no description available) ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.2-6 WWW browsable pager with excellent pn xdaliclock none (no description available) pn xfishtank none (no description available) ii xscreensaver-gl 5.11-1 GL(Mesa) screen hacks for xscreens - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:
Bug#519061: New solution
Thanks Sebastian, I never had a way to reproduce this issue, it should be reassigned to whoever is gulty on this. If you could help us on this we would be vastly regreted :) --Mensaje original-- De: Sebastian Weisgerber Para:519...@bugs.debian.org Responder a:Sebastian Weisgerber Responder a:519...@bugs.debian.org Asunto: Bug#519061: New solution Enviado: 29 Jun, 2010 3:09 PM It seems i got some weird Special chars in my password. A friend of mine proposed to change my password to one with no special chars and everything is fine. He also proposed that different keymaps are active under different circumstances. I don't where to investigate further :( I use en_US.UTF-8 systemwide. Write me a mail if i should invesigate in a certain direction. I repeat: this is no problem of xscreensaver. Your's sincerely Sebastian Weisgerber -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519061: More info
Hi Christophe, Please, could you give me more info about how is built your system? Which kind of notebook, which system, wich kernel? Thanks -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519061: xscreensaver: Won't unlock my screen at all due to apparent password difficulties.
Hi, At the moment I'm not @ home and doesn't have my notebook @ hand, only my PDA, tomorrow I'll be at home and try your way for reproducing the bug. Thanks for your report! :-) -Original Message- From: Christophe TROESTLER christophe.troest...@umons.ac.be Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 20:52:39 To: 519...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#519061: xscreensaver: Won't unlock my screen at all due to apparent password difficulties. Hi, I have the same problem. Adding the lines @include common-password @include common-session at the end of /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver did not help. In /var/log/auth.log, I have the message : May 15 20:43:14 poincare xscreensaver: pam_unix(xscreensaver:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=1000 euid=1000 tty=:0.0 ruser= rhost= user=xxx May 15 20:43:16 poincare xscreensaver[2125]: FAILED LOGIN 1 ON DISPLAY :0.0, FOR xxx On my machine, an operation that usually triggers the bug is to lock the screen by closing the lid (locking is activated through kpowersave) and unplugging then plugging back the AC power. A workaround is to switch to the console and then back to X. Any help will be appreciated.
Bug#567738: xscreensaver-data-extra: GNOME menu continues to list screensavers after uninstallation
Well Don, if /usr/lib/xscreensaver/xjack is there then there's a problem with xscreensaver, if not I believe is an issue with xlock and don't know which packages ships it. Please make dpkg -S xlock and see which is and relocate this bug ticket. On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Don Pellegrino d...@drexel.edu wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jose Luis Rivas josel...@rivco.net wrote: I'm sorry Don, I cannot understand. xlock is not shipped by xscreensaver neither by xscreensaver-data-extra. What you mean? I apologize if I have submitted this bug to the wrong package. Perhaps it should have been filed against the xlockmore package? I would appreciate your assistance with identifying the appropriate package for this bug report. The use case is that the GNOME Applications - Other menu includes the following items: Anemone Ant Ant3d Ant Truchet Apollonian Atlantis Atunnels Available Back Soon Ball Bat Bee Bee Truchet Biof Blank Blot Bomb Bouboule Bouboule3d Bounce Braid Brilliant! Bubble Bubble3d Bug Cage Clock Coral Crazy Boy Crazy Girl Crystal Daisy Dclock Decay Deco Deluxe Demon Dilemma Discrete Dragon Drift ... Xjack The commands associated with these launchers in the GNOME menu take the form of /usr/bin/xlock -remote -nice 19 -mode xjack Performing a Debian Package Content Search for xjack finds the /usr/lib/xscreensaver/xjack file in the xscreensaver-data-extra package. I have removed the xlockmore and xscreensaver-data-extra packages however these menu items persist. I do not know which package establishes these GNOME menu items but presumably that would be the package against which this bug should be filed. I think that these menu items should be removed when the packages they depend upon are removed however I don't know which package should be responsible for the removal scripts. -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#567738: xscreensaver-data-extra: GNOME menu continues to list screensavers after uninstallation
I'm sorry Don, I cannot understand. xlock is not shipped by xscreensaver neither by xscreensaver-data-extra. What you mean? On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Don Pellegrino d...@drexel.edu wrote: Package: xscreensaver-data-extra Severity: minor The GNOME Applications - Other menu continues to list menu entries for the xlock screensaver commands after the package has been removed. For example the menu item Bouboule exists for command /usr/bin/xlock -remote -nice 19 -nolock -mode bouboule +use3d. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#566984: xscreensaver: screensaver only shows a black screen instead of the actual animation
Check on xscreensaver-demo if you have blnak screen instead of any screensaver, please. -Original Message- From: Hugo A. M. Torres macabr...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:40:33 To: Debian Bug Tracking Systemsub...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#566984: xscreensaver: screensaver only shows a black screen instead of the actual animation Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.10-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I leave the pc unattended and when I come back I see a black screen instead of the screensaver. Porwermanager is set to never blank screen. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xscreensaver depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.28.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.8.8-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype62.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.4-1library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-02.22.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.18.3-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam0g1.1.0-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-0 1.26.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1X11 Session Management library ii libx11-62:1.3.2-1X11 client-side library ii libxext62:1.1.1-2X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama12:1.1-2 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.7.6.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1X11 pixmap library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-2X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.5-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii libxxf86misc1 1:1.0.2-1X11 XFree86 miscellaneous extensio ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.0-2X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii xscreensaver-data 5.10-6 data files to be shared among scre Versions of packages xscreensaver recommends: ii libjpeg-progs 7-1 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii perl [perl5] 5.10.1-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii wamerican [wordlist] 6-3 American English dictionary words ii xli1.17.0+20061110-3 command line tool for viewing imag Versions of packages xscreensaver suggests: pn fortune none (no description available) ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.5.6-1 lightweight web browser based on M ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8dev.2-1 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup ii midori [www-browser]0.1.8-1 fast, lightweight graphical web br pn qcam | streamer none (no description available) ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.2-2.1WWW browsable pager with excellent pn xdaliclock none (no description available) pn xfishtank none (no description available) ii xscreensaver-gl 5.10-6 GL(Mesa) screen hacks for xscreens -- no debconf information
Bug#566984: xscreensaver: screensaver only shows a black screen instead of the actual animation
Hugo, did you check it what I told you? Please let me know so I can close this bug. Check in xscreensaver-demo if you have blank screensaver instead of Only One Screensaver or Random Screensaver. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Hugo A. M. Torres macabr...@gmail.com wrote: Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.10-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I leave the pc unattended and when I come back I see a black screen instead of the screensaver. Porwermanager is set to never blank screen. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages xscreensaver depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.28.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.8.8-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.8.0-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.11-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.4-1 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.18.3-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam0g 1.1.0-4 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-0 1.26.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.3.2-1 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.1.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama1 2:1.1-2 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.7.6.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.8-1 X11 pixmap library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-2 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.5-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii libxxf86misc1 1:1.0.2-1 X11 XFree86 miscellaneous extensio ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.0-2 X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii xscreensaver-data 5.10-6 data files to be shared among scre Versions of packages xscreensaver recommends: ii libjpeg-progs 7-1 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii perl [perl5] 5.10.1-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii wamerican [wordlist] 6-3 American English dictionary words ii xli 1.17.0+20061110-3 command line tool for viewing imag Versions of packages xscreensaver suggests: pn fortune none (no description available) ii iceweasel [www-browser] 3.5.6-1 lightweight web browser based on M ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8dev.2-1 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup ii midori [www-browser] 0.1.8-1 fast, lightweight graphical web br pn qcam | streamer none (no description available) ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.2-2.1 WWW browsable pager with excellent pn xdaliclock none (no description available) pn xfishtank none (no description available) ii xscreensaver-gl 5.10-6 GL(Mesa) screen hacks for xscreens -- no debconf information -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about
Bug#559693: xscreensaver: depends on obsolete libxxf86misc
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:31:10 +, Jose Luis Rivas wrote: Let me check when I get home, thanks for the bug :) ping? See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559689#15 for some more details. I'm so sorry Julien, I forgot this. I have updated the package and tested it. Right now is building the final version and will upload it as soon as finish. Cheers and keep the good work! -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562884: xscreensaver can be killed with Alt+SysRq+F
Hi, I wrote to Jamie about this and he frankly doesn't know how to fix this without doing it as root. I found that with a binary helper with SETUID may introduce a new security issue and honestly I don't have the time right now to write the code to patch this bug. I would like all the help that people could give me. I compromise to do the tests and patch this issue. Remember that xscreensaver is maintained under collab-maint with git so it's very easy to do any patching and tests on the code. Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#560173: xscreensaver-data-extra package: bsod screensaver missing
Install xscreensaver-screensaver-bsod --Mensaje original-- De: Massimo Gagliasso Para:Debian Bug Tracking System Responder a:Massimo Gagliasso Responder a:560...@bugs.debian.org Asunto: Bug#560173: xscreensaver-data-extra package: bsod screensaver missing Enviado: 9 Dic, 2009 08:54 Package: xscreensaver-data-extra Version: 5.10-4 Debian Sid Regards MG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559693: xscreensaver: depends on obsolete libxxf86misc
Let me check when I get home, thanks for the bug :) --Mensaje original-- De: Julien Cristau Para:Debian Bug Tracking System Responder a:Julien Cristau Responder a:559...@bugs.debian.org Asunto: Bug#559693: xscreensaver: depends on obsolete libxxf86misc Enviado: 6 Dic, 2009 07:56 Package: xscreensaver Severity: normal User: debia...@lists.debian.org Usertags: xf86misc Hi, your package depends or build-depends on libxxf86misc{1,-dev}. Recent X servers don't support the XFree86-Misc X11 extension, so we're considering removal of the corresponding client library. Thanks, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#558024: xscreensaver: does not kill running processes when package removed
You're right, sorry about that, thanks for pointing out this. I will fix it when I get home :) Cheers! --Mensaje original-- De: Michael Gilbert Para:Debian Bug Tracking System Responder a:Michael Gilbert Responder a:558...@bugs.debian.org Asunto: Bug#558024: xscreensaver: does not kill running processes when package removed Enviado: 25 Nov, 2009 19:04 package: xscreensaver version: 5.10-3 severity: normal after remove the xscreensaver package, xscreensaver processes continue to run. as a matter of least suprise, the postrm script should kill all of the existing xscreensaver processes. thanks. mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550042: xscreensaver still starts automatically in KDE sessions
We are waiting for your answer. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Tormod Volden debian.tor...@gmail.com wrote: Yitz, Both KDE and GNOME ship by default their own screensaver daemons (kscreensaver and gnome-screensaver). I am most familiar with gnome-screensaver so I will use it as the example, but I think kscreensaver does the same. The gnome-screensaver package ships its own desktop file which is active by default. It is not the desktop environment which is activating it, it is the desktop file from the screensaver package which makes it start. We offer the xscreensaver as a substitute, for those who do not like gnome-screensaver for some reason. If they remove the gnome-screensaver package and install xscreensaver instead, they expect xscreensaver to be activated by default. This is also the case. Otherwise it would be considered a security issue that a screensaver package is not active after installation. Users of any other xdg-compliant desktop environment will also expect that xscreensaver is starting if they install it. We expect those who install both packages, to have a special reason for this, because a normal user on the other hand will just use gnome-screensaver which comes with GNOME. The special users will have to choose which one to use in their sessions. I don't know if you fall into any of those categories. Why do you install the xscreensaver package? If you have an elegant solution which caters for all needs, I would be very interested. I don't see why xscreensaver should be more defensive than gnome-screensaver in the both-installed corner case. Maybe the desktop environments (whatever function is sourcing the desktops) should note that two screensavers are installed and only start one of them? -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550042: xscreensaver still starts automatically in KDE sessions
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Yitzchak Gale g...@sefer.org wrote: reopen 550042 = severity 550042 important thanks In the proposed fix for this bug, the Xsession.d item was replaced by an xdg autostart item. So xscreensaver still starts automatically for every desktop session. In a KDE session, this causes a conflict between xscreensaver and KDE's own screen saver service. The xscreensaver daemon should not be launched during a KDE session. With XscreenSaver 5.10-3 we shipped xdg and the Xsession.d file wasn't removed, please remove the Xsession.d and test. This bug (shipping both files) is going to be fixed on next upload. On my system, if a KDE session is left untouched for a while, the session locks in a way that makes it impossible to unlock: any keyboard or mouse activity brings up the xscreensaver unlock dialogue, and even the correct password is rejected. Unless it is possible to log in remotely and take some action as root, the system has become completely unusable. Therefore, I have upgraded the severity to important, though perhaps it ought to be grave. In my opinion, this package should not cause any automatic startup at all of the xscreensaver daemon. It is the responsibility of each desktop environment and window manager to decide what automatic screen saver services, if any, to provide by default. So KDE will provide it only for kscreensaver and GNOME only gnome-screensaver. If someone is new and doesn't know how to set it up automatic startup for xscreensaver it can't do it. Right? Sorry but I don't think so. With the xdg.desktop it's suppossed you can deactivate it on your window manager - startup manager. Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550201: Processed: Re: Bug#550201: this is an xscreensaver package installation script bug
Just for the record I've fixed this already on my git and will upload this fixed (the postinst removal) tonight --Mensaje original-- De: Tormod Volden Para:550...@bugs.debian.org Responder a:Tormod Volden Responder a:550...@bugs.debian.org Asunto: Bug#550201: Processed: Re: Bug#550201: this is an xscreensaver package installation script bug Enviado: 4 Nov, 2009 10:04 Thanks for your report. The faulty startup script was already removed in 5.10-3. However, this reminds me that we did not make sure we clean it away on upgrades for those who happened to install 5.10-2. We will take care of this in the next version. The item in the Startup Applications list is a feature. If people install xscreensaver they expect it to start. We do not recommend installing both gnome-screensaver and xscreensaver, but we do not want to inhibit it for those with special needs. We looked at the NotShowIn=GNOME option, but some people run Gnome but prefer xscreensaver to gnome-screensaver.
Bug#553529: xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver should not be enabled by default
I'm already separating webcollage and bsod, don't worry. This will be uploaded probably this night. I already talked about this with Daniel. -Original Message- From: Tormod Volden debian.tor...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:15:50 To: Daniel Dickinsoncrazycsh...@gmail.com; 553...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#553529: xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver should not be enabled by default On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Dickinson crazycsh...@gmail.com wrote: Another point of what a *package* is supposed to do, is that it is supposed to be generally usable without having to vet every options of every screen of the package. That would defeat the point of using packages and and distribution over a micromanaged LFS or Gentoo system. If I have to go over every package, in detail, to be sure that the maintainer hasn't got a landmine in the package for my users, I haven't gained much by using a prepackaged distribution like Debian. Debian isn't just for developers. The -extra package is not included by any installer, so normal users will not get the BSOD screensaver. They have to actively hunt it down and install it. If they get so far, there are much worse examples of what they can install that can be potentially dangerous if used the wrong way. With reference to prepackaged distribution I do not think we have to dumb down all packages available in the Debian repository. This is one of the reasons we have a separate -extra package. Your suggestion is should not be enabled by default and that is exactly what we are doing by putting BSOD into -extra. I think the huge majority of Debian users (developers or not) find BSOD very entertaining, and they would be upset if we remove it or make it difficult to use. And frankly, I do not think many people panic and hit the power button without even move the mouse or press a key (which would stop the screensaver). Tormod
Bug#553529: xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver should not be enabled by default
reassign 553529 xscreensaver-data-extra quit On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Daniel Dickinson crazycsh...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 04:05:10 + Jose Luis Rivas josel...@rivco.net wrote: Severity 553529 wishlist Quit Haha. This is a problem between the chair and the keyboard, this is not a RC bug. ;-) This isn't funny. I have had users mistakenly reboot because they didn't know any better. For a *default* screensaver on a system that is supposed to be used by people who won't know any better, this *is* an RC bug. I'm bumping the severity, and am quite willing to take this to the next level. If were not a *default* screensaver I wouldn't be worried, but I have had upset users, and I don't blame them. Even I had a moment of panic the first time it happened to me. It may be a 'joke' but it's from UI point of view it's RC. It doesn't matter that the programming is between the chair and the keyboard rather than the computer. It's a natural reaction to see the computer die badly, especially given what happens to Windows computers under such circumstances. It's not a RC, it may be an *important* bug but not a RC. It's *not* installed by default, is on xscreensaver-data-extra which you have to manually install yourself. Again, is not installed by default. It's a RC bug? Let's take some already big bugs that really rendered to data loss but because of user actions: rm -rf /. [0] Even in that case it was not a grave bug but a *wishlist* bug, because it wasn't an issue on the app side but on the user side. It does the package make you lose information? Or your overreaction? Yes, is the second so is not on the package part but on the user and you can't report a bug against an user. Plus, is the intended behavior, the package was made on that sense, that's what the screensaver is supposed to do. So it's not a bug but a feature! About why it may be an important severity bug -- If your reasoning is good and users overreaction to expected behavior of the app counts as bugs then it should be important instead of grave. The simple reason is because doesn't renders to data loss for every the users but only to the users that are used to press reset button before moving the mouse or pressing a key. And yes, I'm quite willing to take this the CTTE. Well, I already asked for advice on #debian-devel and most of their solutions was to close this bug and tell you to uninstall the package xscreensaver-data-extra. I'm being nice and I'm willing to unmark it by default, I never said I was not going to customize it so your users wouldn't complain, but I'm *not* willing to receive any kind of threats. And really, *is not even a bug!*. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/174283 -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#553529: xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver should not be enabled by default
Severity 553529 wishlist Quit Haha. This is a problem between the chair and the keyboard, this is not a RC bug. ;-) Cheers! -Original Message- From: Daniel Dickinson crazycsh...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:54:55 To: Debian Bug Tracking Systemsub...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#553529: xscreensaver: Fake crash screensaver should not be enabled by default Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.05-3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss The fake crash screensaver causes users who don't know about it to panic and reboot the system, without necessarily hit other keys first, thereby potentially causing data loss. It's really a bad idea to have something that look like a fatal error and says to reboot, for a user who is not expecting it. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages xscreensaver depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.22.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.6.4-7 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.2-1library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-02.16.6-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.12-1~lenny1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam0g1.0.1-5+lenny1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpango1.0-0 1.20.5-5 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2X11 Session Management library ii libx11-62:1.1.5-2X11 client-side library ii libxext62:1.0.4-1X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama12:1.0.3-2X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.6.32.dfsg-5+lenny1 GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.7-1X11 pixmap library ii libxrandr2 2:1.2.3-1X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-2X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii libxxf86misc1 1:1.0.1-3X11 XFree86 miscellaneous extensio ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.0.2-1X11 XFree86 video mode extension l ii xscreensaver-data 5.05-3 data files to be shared among scre Versions of packages xscreensaver recommends: ii libjpeg-progs 6b-14 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii perl [perl5] 5.10.0-19lenny2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii wamerican [wordlist] 6-2.3 American English dictionary words ii wcanadian-huge [wordli 6-2.3 Canadian English dictionary words ii xli1.17.0+20061110-3 command line tool for viewing imag ii xloadimage 4.1-16.1 Graphics file viewer under X11 Versions of packages xscreensaver suggests: ii elinks [www-browser] 0.11.4-3 advanced text-mode WWW browser ii fortune-mod [fortune] 1:1.99.1-3.1 provides fortune cookies on demand ii iceweasel [www-browser]3.0.6-3 lightweight web browser based on M ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.7dev9-2.1 Text-mode WWW Browser with NLS sup pn qcam | streamernone(no description available) ii w3m [www-browser] 0.5.2-2+b1WWW browsable pager with excellent pn xdaliclock none(no description available) pn xfishtank none(no description available) pn xscreensaver-glnone(no description available) -- no debconf information
Bug#550042: XScreensaver has hooks in Xsession
Allan there's another ticket about this, please merge it, I'm not at home ;-) --Mensaje original-- De: Allan Sandfeld Jensen Para:Debian Bug Tracking System Responder a:Allan Sandfeld Jensen Responder a:550...@bugs.debian.org Asunto: Bug#550042: XScreensaver has hooks in Xsession Enviado: 7 Oct, 2009 04:46 Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.10-2 XScreenSaver has an entry in /etc/X11/Xsession.d that starts it automatically. This entry has to go. The problem is that xscreensaver should not start automatical. Many desktop- environments has wrappers around xscreensaver. When xscreensaver starts by itself it no longer respects any user settings which are currently set in the desktop environment. Solution is simple: Remove /etc/X11/Xsession.d/80xscreensaver_start -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#357297: Please revert this awful feature or fix it.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: After the latest xscreensaver version which includes this feature, I now have xscreensaver being started when X is started no matter what user logs in. That is unacceptable since when I have mythtv logged in I specifically do not want a screensaver, and I already made sure I don't have one by using a custom .xsession. Now all of a sudden I have a screensaver being forced on me just by installing the xscreensaver pacakge (which is a nice screensaver to have, just not for all users with no way to disable it). At the very least it should be possible to set an environment in the .xsession or similar to prevent xscreensaver from starting. Starting it without exception is not acceptable. Besides there are other screensavers out there that some users may choose to run instead (like the gnome and kde screensavers). Yah, but we want to take over da world g I would prefer this bad change be reverted ASAP though. Please just remove the file, I will work on this ASAP. Wait at least until this weekend. -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548507: xscreensaver: please restore hypercube
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote: Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.10-1 Severity: wishlist Hello Thei hyperball and hypercube hacks were removed in the recent xscreensaver release. While I admit they are not particularly brilliant compared to the other hacks available these days they are not too bad either. Another reason I liked these hacks is that they are good for testing line drawing functions in the graphics system. They are excerscising line drawing quite a bit and flaws in the implementation are often visible. When there was a problem with line drawing on a particular card model it was quite easily reporducible using these hacks. Hi Michal, They were removed from upstream since 5.10, the reason is that they are redundant with polytopes. ( http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/changelog.html ) Cheers! -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548385: xscreensaver-data installation fails (trying to overwrite file from gnome-screensaver)
Hi Vincent, just for the record this was fixed in the version I just uploaded 5.10-2. Regards. -Original Message- From: Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.org Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:46:20 To: Debian Bug Tracking Systemsub...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#548385: xscreensaver-data installation fails (trying to overwrite file from gnome-screensaver) Package: xscreensaver-data Version: 5.05-3+nmu1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get the following error: # apt-get install xscreensaver-data [...] Preparing to replace xscreensaver-data 5.05-3+nmu1 (using .../xscreensaver-data_5.10-1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xscreensaver-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xscreensaver-data_5.10-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/applications/screensavers/popsquares.desktop', which is also in package gnome-screensaver 0:2.26.1-1 Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/xscreensaver-data_5.10-1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26.5-20080922 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages xscreensaver-data depends on: ii libc6 2.9-26 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libglib2.0-0 2.22.0-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.18.0-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-15 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libsm62:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.2.2-1 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxpm4 1:3.5.7-2 X11 pixmap library ii libxt61:1.0.6-1 X11 toolkit intrinsics library xscreensaver-data recommends no packages. xscreensaver-data suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#495633: Status?
2009/7/15 Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org: And, 11 months later, what's the status on this one? Is flurry still crashy? I may try to rebuild xscreensaver with it, but if you had chance to test it… Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis You're right Yves-Alexis, we haven't been able to reproduce the crash (nor once) but since was such a severe bug (freezin' all the system!) we decided to demote it. Anyway I just included it on 5.08-1~pre2, you can find it on http://debian.rivco.info or directly from the git repo on alioth [0] I just tagged it debian/5.08-1-pre2. It doesn't crash to me as ever, anyway I'm BCC'in to Gunnar who reported the freeze so he can check by himself as well. If anyone wants to test it and is using i386 or wants to apt-get source it then can use: deb{-src} http://reprepro.deb.rivco.info/debian unstable main Yves-Alexis, thanks for popping out this bug I forgot. :-) Regards, [0] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/xscreensaver.git -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 0x7C4DF50D http://joseluisrivas.net/acerca - http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#505379: Is bug similar to redhat bug #481146?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 2009/5/15 Frans Pop : tags 505379 + patch fixed-upstream thanks On Monday 04 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 03 May 2009, Scott Howard wrote: If this bug is still around, is it the same as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481146? That bug has phosphor SEGV in xscreensaver, apparently fixed in xscreensaver-5.08. I've compiled Lenny's phosphor with that patch now and will report if it works or not. Thanks for the pointer. I've not seen the segfault anymore since applying the patch, so it probably is the same issue. In the meantime I've also seen the segfault on my i386 laptop, so I'll patch it there as well. Here's a direct link to the patch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329709 Thanks Frans, I'm working right now on it. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkoPGV4ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRjG2gCgvyP+9084+aUnR0f2aQ7jw9pB NSsAnio6NWtmxXX8X0b9tAeY8I3iQPMb =eH/l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#527880: libtorrent11: Incorrent version numbers or incorrect package?
2009/5/10 Victor Song curiouserandcuriou...@gmail.com: Package: libtorrent11 Version: 0.12.4-2 Severity: normal Version number do not seem to match in: 1) aptitude: libtorrent11 0.12.4 Is it supposed to be libtorrent12? No, it's not. The number in the package is the soname version, not the library version. Anyway, normally this numbers are the same but libtorrent is not that normal. 2) The banner on starting rtorrent says rTorrent 0.8.3/0.12.3 Is 0.12.4 or 0.12.3? Wrong package? (This is libtorrent's bug page, I'll answer you this on rtorrent's bugs) -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libtorrent11 depends on: ii libc6 2.9-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.4.0-4 GCC support library ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.0.18-2 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-16 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++6 4.4.0-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 Versions of packages libtorrent11 recommends: ii rtorrent 0.8.4-3 ncurses BitTorrent client based on libtorrent11 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve `ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#527882: rtorrent: Wrong package or wrong version?
2009/5/10 Victor Song curiouserandcuriou...@gmail.com: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.8.4-3 Severity: normal Version number do not seem to match. The banner on starting rtorrent says rTorrent 0.8.3/0.12.3 In aptitude the version is shown as 0.8.4-3. Wrong package? Hello Victor, you're right. There was an issue in the git branchs. Hey guys, if you're building the packages with git-buildpackage you need to import new origs tarballs to upstream branch (which is yet at 0.12.3 for unstable, 0.12.4 is only at upstream-experimental). This is merged in master and this way we have the latest software on master and upstream tarball uncompressed on a separate branch :) (If you guys don't answer this at 16H GMT -04:30 I'll do it by myself) Thanks for your feedback Victor, Regards. -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve `ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519061: xscreensaver: Won't unlock my screen at all due to apparent password difficulties.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Klein wrote: I can reproduce this behaviour on unstable/amd64 with xscreensaver 5.05-3 and 5.07-1 from experimental. It doesn't occur on unstable/i386 (version 5.05-3). Regarding weird PAM settings, I've made no modifications to the PAM configuration on either system from what the packages provide. What's interesting is that on my laptop, I have a file /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver.pam.11612. Contents: /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver: (this is the same on both i386 and amd64) # # /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver - PAM behavior for xscreensaver # @include common-auth @include common-account Hi Ben, the .pam file is doing nothing, you can delete it. Please try adding to pam.d/xscreensaver this lines at the bottom: @include common-password @include common-session And let me know if that works :) Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknXpwoACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhMpgCgmBBT0gEfOqBHzRiWF0XKYtyk UmoAn3Mq7xyELMYCCOCgx5Mi3QA697U8 =CZO2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516886: xscreensaver-gl: preview crashes GDM in lenny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau wrote: OK, I understand. Had a quick trawl through my logfiles, but can't see any other error messages related to X or GDM. OTOH, currently my xscreensaver is completely disabled. Are there any pointers you could provide for things to try out? Special places to search? Cheers Wolfgang -Original Message- From: Jose Luis Rivas [mailto:ghostba...@gmail.com] Sent: 31 March 2009 01:37 To: Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau; 516...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#516886: xscreensaver-gl: preview crashes GDM in lenny Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau wrote: Package: xscreensaver-gl Version: 5.05-3 Severity: normal when selecting any of the gl screensavers in preview mode (i.e. after opening System-Preferences- Screensaver), GDM crashes, all open windows are closed and I end up back at the login prompt. This does not seem to be affected by whatever applications I am running, as it happens all the same when all user applications are closed. The system log produces: gdm[19178]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0 There's some issue with your X caused by something XScreenSaver ran, probably something related to your graphic card configuration. Please check with other GL stuff the logs. I'll let this bug open but I don't believe is a xscreensaver bug. Regards. You could try with any GL app so we could see if there's anything going on with GL-specific tasks. I've had many gdm issues lately that I think should not be related but my incapacity to get the source of the issues had made me to not submit any bug to gdm. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknTk0gACgkQOKCtW8rKsRh5jgCcDBnDGLxn4O4y1bT7Bsr3wI/a yuMAn0H4UMAnXUoNPZdGyL/e9inJL/C4 =q2Wh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516522: xscreensaver: will not start in Lenny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Sorry for my late answer, I was pretty busy. This only happens on mga cards according to what you said, anyway I tried in an old PC with mga card and worked as should, I'll downgrade this bug to important while there's more work over debugging of this case. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknRFJcACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhN7QCgjuqsaTivrPFePFrC7dwczpq8 GG8AnRjwsykqnafZVEKo+wQZUJtbwhXR =FGHp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#513726: working_directory option doesn't exist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rafal Czlonka wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.7.9-2.2 Severity: normal Hi, When using 'working_directory' option I get: % rtorrent rtorrent: Error in option file: ~/.rtorrent.rc:1: Command working_directory does not exist. Please update the manual page and/or fix the missing option. According to the man I've in my machine is cmd instead of working_directory... Are you sure about this? Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknRYO8ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhzuACgi2TwTEJl+ATlkGkKTsiWswCk krgAoJE/trg5JfNhkA5R/pLfW8vgI4Zj =rWAR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514527: Generation of non-correct XML on SCGI interface.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: Hi, Luis! I maintain a package (rtpg) which depends to rtorrent/librtorrent. Also there are a lot of people who use rtorrent/rtpg with non-english trackers. This bug delivers bad feeling to those people. I rebuilt rtorrent with the patch and every time when somebody knocks my jabber and tells about errors in my rtpg, I give him to download these versions (0.7.9 and 0.8.4). Could you apply the patch to version 0.8.4 and upload it to debian/unstable? I can become your sponsor if you need. Also I could help to maintain the rtorrent :) PS: there is an obsolete link in rtorrent:debian/control which points to VCS: http://bzr.debian.org/collab-maint/rtorrent/debian/. Could you make actualization for it, or recreate GIT-repo on git.debian.org? Hello Dmitry, sorry for my late answer, please feel free, I was lacking time for debian work, the git repo is at git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/{libtorrent,rtorrent}.git , there's no update in qa-page because the git update to debian/control was on experimental and unstable hasn't been uploaded. I'll be working on this ASAP, probably tomorrow since I'm getting in sync with all my packages bugs. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknRZHYACgkQOKCtW8rKsRh7VACgkGrUflRo89pztJnHPJVAXqkZ h78An3og+vTn2uSdUJ7O74YamCw3U+TH =2do8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#515273: rtorrent: Read past initial payload after incoming encrypted handshake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.7.9-2.2 Severity: important Hi, I've just had rtorrent quit on me 2 times with the following message: rtorrent: Read past initial payload after incoming encrypted handshake I had this in my .rtorrentrc: encryption=allow_incoming,enable_retry I've just disabled it, we'll see if it helps or not. Kurt Hi Kurt, did this helped you? - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknRZN4ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRijVwCgxNppX9F7NFcicGLGPgSwd871 CH8AoL4z/OryYgel6o6Vv0XpWdqRvAlI =y6bh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#519061: xscreensaver: Won't unlock my screen at all due to apparent password difficulties.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willy Gommel wrote: Subject: xscreensaver: Won't unlock my screen at all due to apparent password difficulties. Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.05-3 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line. I have been noticing that I cannot break out of the locked screen mode at all without pressing the reset button. The problem I've been having is that, although I KNOW that I have been supplying the correct password, no possible typing of it will do the trick at all. If there is a work-around, I have been unable to find it. I rated this as Important in severity because of the need to press the reset button to break out of the locked screen condition. I much prefer to have the machine shut down normally. I have noted this on my AMD64 machine ONLY. Two IA-32 machines I have happen to function normally in that regard. Hello Willy, Does you use any kind of weird pam configuration? Please give me as many details as you can. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknRZm4ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRgHQgCguBF58vJ6O1FgNsDgNGedpmxQ +pMAnicLWc+MitHBFFF129gEBepOJWSa =KdZJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#516886: xscreensaver-gl: preview crashes GDM in lenny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau wrote: Package: xscreensaver-gl Version: 5.05-3 Severity: normal when selecting any of the gl screensavers in preview mode (i.e. after opening System-Preferences- Screensaver), GDM crashes, all open windows are closed and I end up back at the login prompt. This does not seem to be affected by whatever applications I am running, as it happens all the same when all user applications are closed. The system log produces: gdm[19178]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0 There's some issue with your X caused by something XScreenSaver ran, probably something related to your graphic card configuration. Please check with other GL stuff the logs. I'll let this bug open but I don't believe is a xscreensaver bug. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknRZcIACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhucACeIycyfsuO1hVru+ciGCyJfUSq c80An25gy2TVpJdpLzs7ccadhOvCMumu =Wn+D -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521783: RFH: xscreensaver - Automatic screensaver for X (looking for co-maintainers)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance for maintaining XScreenSaver, I've been without too much time lately and the bugs requests a lot of debugging in several areas. The main tasks are: * Debug the tickets and check which ones are yet a bug and which not. * Checking and applying patches. * Checking that there are no issues with packages like kdescreensaver which depends on build-time of xscreensaver. I use git to maintain it, is hosted at git.debian.org [0], you can fork it as well from my github account [1], so if you're interested you should know basic stuff about git and about maintaining packages with git (in case of not knowing anything this could be useful [2]). There are remaining tasks like before launching 5.08 (which is basically ready): * Complete the debian/copyright file: it was almost empty, most of the hacks were obviated and in my spare time I've almost filled the file at 50%. This is the main reason why I haven't tried to upload new xscreensaver. * Checking which bugs were closed with the latest upstream-release. * Checking with the KDE-team any issue xscreensaver may give during build-time for kdescreensaver (which often happens) This includes the xscreensaver source which is conformed by the following binaries: * xscreensaver Automatic screensaver for X * xscreensaver-data data files to be shared among screensaver frontends * xscreensaver-data-extra data files to be shared among screensaver frontends * xscreensaver-gl GL(Mesa) screen hacks for xscreensaver * xscreensaver-gl-extra GL(Mesa) screen hacks for xscreensaver There's currently a pending approval for a project in alioth so there could be more syncing between co-maintainers. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknQSyIACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhiygCdGy8bqdm+Ggt9tSJ4OjtlaGmu Ah4An0Ox2ZwxYJYPlZOdFg5NkdY0GgsK =Klhb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521783: RFH: xscreensaver - Automatic screensaver for X (looking for co-maintainers)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [0] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/xscreensaver.git [1] http://github.com/ghostbar/deb-xscreensaver [2] http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.html - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknQTNMACgkQOKCtW8rKsRjy4QCfVjY0qzOSwZCUeLHlu4iJqcfO tZAAn1VevtcgDS32KSgJSrnZGExSCqj0 =pNTM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#490171: Bug#470416: rtorrent: random crash (grave)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jari Aalto wrote: Jose Luis Rivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jari Aalto wrote: Confirmed. There seesm to be more a serious problem. Not just the rtorrent crash, but the whole workstation dies: kernel becomes unresponsive to the point where nothing happens. Can you please try with experimental release? I'm not in position to make this test (starting by my lack of bandwith and lack of hardware, I'm not always online in my machine). I'm about to push experimental to unstable and this one would make another good reason to do this. (Besides of #506748) Same results with 0.8.4-1. Kernel completely freezes after a while. Jari I just noted something, I've got system freezing too with 2.6.26 (and only with this kernel) but without using rtorrent. Please, could you try with another kernel? (I'm right now using 2.6.27 and haven't got any freeze) Just for checking Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk8jVYACgkQOKCtW8rKsRi2mQCfVbPlpPm7tvouomOKyvVbOJP2 rfQAn3yqgB9aJZOF74au8JCCrOtXkYuP =1/D5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#506748: crash rtorrent by scgi-interface (function: 'fi.get_filename_last')
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: I don't mind loading this package (0.8.4) into unstable. However it will not be included into lenny. Only 0.7.9 version can be included into lenny. Because now it is frozen. :( Well, I believe right now is the only sane way to fix it ASAP, 0.8.2 isn't as good as 0.8.4 (even when upstream says is the stable release) since has a lot of bugs and in fact it was the most troublesome release they made so I'm not willing to push something that will make more errors that what we have right now. IMO, 0.8.4 could be a nice release at end of december since has passed a long time without bugs being reported against this version (since nov-19) and until december is a prudential time. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk6Zc8ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRioIQCglKhu3pJ+vDZwyI8WZ3mCPYKR pCAAoLzfEWyZIs1hRqkfPpwtyJkuNWWn =gkbX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#506748: closed by Jose Luis Rivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fixed in experimental)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: reopen 506748 thanks But this upload does not fix this bug in the testing :( lenny is frozen, version for lenny is 0.7.9 If you want to fix this bug unsing upload version != 0.7.9 you must receive release-team's permission sorry Mmm... I'm closing it from 0.8.4-1 so remains open for 0.7.9-1+b2 this way people on experimental knows this bug is indeed fixed, people in unstable see this bug is open and in fact keeps as RC in bugs overview since there's a release on Debian with the bug open. That's the functionality of found while submitting and version while setting as done (as long as I know) so I'll not need r-t permission for closing the bug in _experimental_. Please, let me know if this is wrong and I'll let then the bug as is right now, open. If not I in 2 days or something will set it as done, again :) Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk7AD4ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRiXZACg0HM4u/KLWMxjNGF4BzIRYxKY e4UAn3YznJZRQAtD+THIRtsnbUmyUjE1 =Dhb+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#507946: xscreensaver: Does not stay operation on the second of a dual screen display
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Dickinson wrote: Package: xscreensaver Version: 5.07-1 Severity: normal xscreensaver, when told to 'blank now' blanks the first and second display, but the second display (which has lower resolution and bit depth and no acceleration) immediately becomes unblanked and sits unblanked. Hello Daniel, There's a specific hack where this happens? If that's the case, is from xsscreensaver-glx? - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk7CgoACgkQOKCtW8rKsRgbjgCff1DMoHsFJzI6bm6gugxDUkfF 0NMAn0Bucg4L9Zl0SJmQEjbMRnaBXkkn =PoUk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#490171: Bug#470416: rtorrent: random crash (grave)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jari Aalto wrote: Confirmed. There seesm to be more a serious problem. Not just the rtorrent crash, but the whole workstation dies: kernel becomes unresponsive to the point where nothing happens. Can you please try with experimental release? I'm not in position to make this test (starting by my lack of bandwith and lack of hardware, I'm not always online in my machine). I'm about to push experimental to unstable and this one would make another good reason to do this. (Besides of #506748) Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk5zSsACgkQOKCtW8rKsRh3dgCcDIxoLqKd17O8qCr2uA7P5aOZ TvkAoK2UoqwKXza14HYaK4Vd4sn3lElr =EMGd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#506748: crash rtorrent by scgi-interface (function: 'fi.get_filename_last')
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: Package: rtorrent Severity: grave Version: 0.7.9-2+b2 Architecture: i386 version of libtorrent10 - 0.11.9-1.1 (lenny) If command 'fi.get_filename_last' received from SCGI interface, then rtorrent crashes. Version rtorrent/librtorrent from experimental works fine. Hello, Sorry, I'm short of time (I'm in finals) right now. Experimental version is stable enough right now like to use it on unstable but no to use it on lenny so I guess this will make yet another stable release without rtorrent. I'm not in position to upload new binaries to take into consideration for lenny next release. I think (differently to what upstream thinks) that 0.12.4/0.8.4 is more stable that 0.12.2/0.8.2 (which doesn't build in bsd environments and don't have several fixes that *.*.4 does have). Please if any of you have something against me uploading experimental release to unstable let me know, if not I'm gonna send it to Dmitry (hoping he's ok with this) to upload it to unstable and leave lenny without rtorrent/libtorrent (there's not yet a new-release stable enough for lenny anyway, I think) Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkk5zgQACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhKYgCfcftexN86wgomVex3lhT5/TYX j+gAn0TWWn4NP382tpBm2rjO9Kdd97J2 =XltO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#506396: new version rtorrent available in upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 506396 pending quit Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: Package: rtorrent Version: 0.7.9 Please, package new version rtorrent: http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no/ Stable Release * libtorrent-0.12.2.tar.gz * rtorrent-0.8.2.tar.gz Unstable Release * libtorrent-0.12.4.tar.gz * rtorrent-0.8.4.tar.gz many gui-systems for rtorrent (rtgui, rtwi, etc) have depends to rtorrent 0.8. Hello Dmitry, Since something like 2 days ago there are packages ready for 0.12.4/0.8.4 [0]. Right now they're waiting for my sponsor to get them to the archive (experimental). Since 2 days ago, as well, Jaris upgraded stable to 0.12.3/0.8.3, I packaged and yesterday he made a downgrade to 0.12.2/0.8.2 (these goes to unstable) but I haven't make the downgrade yet in my git[3](but not pushed 0.8.3 when I noticed this) since I haven't got time to do this and probably don't gonna have the time until monday (my country is on elections this weekend and I'm volunteer). Anyway, experimental packages are tested and ready to be uploaded [1][2] Regards. [0] http://ghostbar.ath.cx/node/78 [1] http://debian.rivco.info/libtorrent/0.12.4-1.exp/libtorrent_0.12.4-1.dsc [2] http://debian.rivco.info/rtorrent/0.8.4-1.exp/rtorrent_0.8.4-1.dsc [3]http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/libtorrent.git;a=commit;h=79571f3d3be390f615fd77e60cb2e4371f5cb60f - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkm3X0ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRiHpgCffuT4eDJcm9eU0zLhVIS7Flv5 DEgAn39cvtt2qW19Ljs8vXZ/C+s6I8EK =8cAA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#506396: new version rtorrent available in upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: If You want, I can become a sponsor for this upload(s) :) Oh please, I would love that :) http://debian.rivco.info/libtorrent/0.12.4-1.exp/libtorrent_0.12.4-1.dsc There's a change of name for binary libtorrent10 to libtorrent11 so will be delayed a little in NEW then I'll let you now for uploading rtorrent. Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. GPG 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/about - http://debian.org.ve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkknKUgACgkQOKCtW8rKsRjBeACgz7R0hdPcjKYjW6s2OIYDPBBe hwAAoLORkxiSHsBPADDCvhuUrSuufipO =ieIT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#505251: ITP: libnet-amazon-s3-tools-perl -- Command line tools for Amazon AWS S3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Plessy wrote: I did not manage to set ACLs with s3cmd, so I did a Google search and found this set of tools that fit my purpose. Is the Perl team interested in having it in its repository ? If not, another possibility would be to have it on collab-maint or in a co-maintained repository dedicated to computer clouds. I strongly believe in team work, and if nobody shows interest to co-maintain, I will simply conclude that the package is too trivial and not interesting enough for Debian anyway, and close the ITP. Anyone using some perl module pkg-perl will be glad to have it in its repository as the wiki page says :) http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianPerlGroup?highlight=(perl) Regards. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkY7SgACgkQOKCtW8rKsRjQhgCg2FN/0u9zYs0Cu3BUIxP1HYeo RRYAoJzSXzobPe/FCxXwv/I7ftJMhWI6 =/Uc6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#450907: fireworxx shows live screen contents when xcompmgr is running
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reassign 450907 xcompmgr quit Hello, I'm reassigning this bug since there's no solution from xscreensaver side and this only happens when xcompmgr is running. Please see the feedback at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450907 Regards. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkO4bUACgkQOKCtW8rKsRjOdwCaAgYZ2gxKsnyWGG694hImduYH 3o8AoKlwzk3XlB86NlE+TIes75kIxu/w =G+Ow -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#504262: xscreensaver: fails to remove menu items on uninstall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Auger wrote: Package: xscreensaver Version: xscreensaver Severity: important When xscreensaver is removed from the system, it leaves several menu items in the gnome menu. On my system, there were nine items under 'Other' after uninstalling. That's because you just removed xscreensaver, you need to remove as well the packages of the hacks. Anyway, if you're using gnome-screensaver or kscreensavers they use those files. If you want them removed then remove xscreensaver-* packages. This is not a bug. Regards. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkNZBgACgkQOKCtW8rKsRgkSgCfXBKFmZwP2l/jWF26KpJFw3TN amAAn1NAfHEklSkXwaR5tZ59/4L6SBhW =3TRC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#504241: ITP: libb-hooks-endofscope-perl -- Execute code after a scope finished compilation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jose Luis Rivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libb-hooks-endofscope-perl Version : 0.04 Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Hooks-EndOfScope/ * License : Perl (GPL/Artistic) Programming Lang: Perl Description : Execute code after a scope finished compilation This module allows you to execute code when perl finished compiling the surrounding scope. This packages is a build-depend of the new upstream version of libnamespace-clean-perl and will be maintained by the debian-perl group. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkNEHYACgkQOKCtW8rKsRixcwCfeFsaVhd8jvLb3Uwtrc8jx35G 3k8AoIQ9UIafsT55HEScGDF8xhcaKZLa =1etg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497405: [xscreensaver] fails to start when using dual head with different resolutions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jamie Zawinski wrote: Fixed in 5.07. Come on already, Debian people -- will you please push out the new version so that we stop getting these reports? Sorry Jamie, I already sent it out to my sponsor, don't know why's the delay. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve `ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki8b4cACgkQOKCtW8rKsRi2YQCfd/tZm3dABtgEJa6++WVCi0nZ 0V0Amwa5JBMBJMpJDEtqejreV4I6Xffa =x05a -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#494725: RFA: gkrellm -- The GNU Krell Monitors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: normal With a single process, gkrellm manages multiple stacked monitors and supports applying themes to match the monitors appearance to your window manager, Gtk, or any other theme. I'm no longer using gkrellm in my machines, right now is working with a patch for support of sysfs battery from Leo L. Schwab. (I already sent it to upstream but haven't respond anything). At the date there's a RC-bug already fixed in the GIT repository [0] and sent to my sponsor awaiting to get uploaded [1]. Upstream doesn't seem inactive, even when I sent the new patch for sysfs battery support and haven't respond anything (the patch is kind of big). [0] git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/gkrellm.git [1] http://debian.rivco.info/gkrellm/2.3.1-7/gkrellm_2.3.1-7.dsc - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve `ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkigh78ACgkQOKCtW8rKsRhUswCfQYIfCGhVNCbuBJdfk7IVvsJj SdwAnihPXKyHxblhGPnbwqGvry4Nx0EV =gdVF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492068: Doesn't work for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Javier Barroso wrote: Hi, I got the same bug After applying the patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492068#59 I get with dpkg-buildpackage: screens.c: In function ‘update_screen_layout’: screens.c:894: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input screens.c:894: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input Any workaround ? Thank you! Hello Javier, We didn't found that bug while compiling, in fact that patch is already part of upstream so I doubt too many people passed that bug without notice it. Could you please re-check? Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve `ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkigvdMACgkQOKCtW8rKsRi1DwCgpQT2LazVxIiWSZ96Lcnny7sp rNsAoM+rpbUDzzSb7q4ZQ2WUzlyMCqxi =ezVD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484112: [xscreensaver-gl] flurry hack causes the whole system to freeze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ana Guerrero wrote: Hola José Luis, On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 02:35:32PM -0430, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: Tormod Volden wrote: Thanks for your report. The problem has also been reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224065 For now, we'll demote flurry to the -extra package so that it is not installed by default. This is done in the git-version, I'll reassign this bug to xss-gl-extra when that version gets uploaded. This was like a month ago. Could you please address this problem and the serious probleems in xscreensaver-gl? My main concern is due to kdeartwork not being able to migrate to testing because of this :/ Ana Hi Ana, Of course, I was just waiting to get it uploaded as well with the new patch for other issues of xscreensaver, this weekend is the deadline for getting it ready and working, so with what's done already xscreensaver will be sent to a sponsor to get uploaded. Thanks for asking :) Regards. - -- Jose Luis Rivas. San Cristóbal, Venezuela. PGP: 0xCACAB118 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/{about,acerca} - http://debian.org.ve `ghostbar' @ irc.debian.org/#debian-ve,#debian-devel-es -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh89eAACgkQOKCtW8rKsRjd9gCgzNzi6zcHyUnVPIExQ16wPfop EzMAn3QsSAPkH+az/HnqdhYpYYAYyStw =ln7W -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]