Bug#900328: snapd should depend on systemd-sysv instead of systemd

2018-05-29 Thread Nick Koretsky
Package: snapd
Version: 2.21-2+b1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

snapd doesnt work if systemd is not running as PID 1.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (650, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages snapd depends on:
ii  adduser   3.115
ii  apparmor  2.11.0-3+deb9u2
ii  ca-certificates   20161130+nmu1
ii  gnupg 2.1.18-8~deb9u1
ii  init-system-helpers   1.48
ii  libc6 2.24-11+deb9u3
ii  snap-confine  2.21-2+b1
ii  squashfs-tools1:4.3-3+deb9u1
ii  systemd   232-25+deb9u2
ii  ubuntu-core-launcher  2.21-2+b1

snapd recommends no packages.

snapd suggests no packages.



Bug#807473: Potential data loss and security breach when used with nfs server

2016-05-14 Thread Nick Koretsky
On Sat, 14 May 2016 10:34:16 +0200 
 Petter Reinholdtsen <p...@hungry.com> wrote:

> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mtorromeo/r8168/issues/4
> 
> I forwarded this issue upstream, and the response there was that a new
> version is available and he wonders if the problem still exist there.
> 
> Perhaps something to check out?

I dont have the original hardware anymore, but i just tried it on another
machine and got the same result.

-- 
  Nick Koretsky (nick.koret...@gmail.com)
  



Bug#807473: Potential data loss and security breach when used with nfs server

2015-12-21 Thread Nick Koretsky
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 15:01:46 +0100 
 Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> wrote:

> 
> I just uploaded a new upstream release. Unfortunately there is no
> upstream changelog available. Please try it, maybe it fixes your issue.
> 

Tried it, exact same problem. Also tried with older kernel
(3.16.0-4-686-pae) - same problem with minor difference: reading files over
nfs produces zeros instead of random garbage.


-- 
  Nick Koretsky (nick.koret...@gmail.com)
  



Bug#807473: Potential data loss and security breach when used with nfs server

2015-12-09 Thread Nick Koretsky

Package: r8168-dkms
Version: 8.040.00-1
Severity: critical


When this driver is used on the machine which acts as nfs server you can
mount shares, filesystem looks ok, but attempt to read any file produces
random garbage (i suspect parts of the server memory). Writing to files
works - this is a source for data loss, because a lot of programs will
attempt to override "incorrect" files. 
I am 100% sure this is caused by this driver: rmmod r8168 insmod r8169
corrects this, rmmod r8169 insmod r8168 brings it back.

Kernel 4.2.0-0.bpo.1-686-pae, libc6 2.19-18+deb8u1, gcc 4.9.2-10K
Hardware is Asustek M4A785TD motherboard's build in RTL8112L chip.


lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge
00:01.0 PCI bridge: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. AMD RS780/RS880 PCI to PCI bridge
(int gfx)
00:04.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] RS780/RS880 PCI to
PCI bridge (PCIE port 0)
00:0a.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] RS780/RS880 PCI to
PCI bridge (PCIE port 5)
00:11.0 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode]
00:12.0 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:12.1 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0 USB
OHCI1 Controller
00:12.2 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:13.0 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller
00:13.1 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SB7x0 USB
OHCI1 Controller
00:13.2 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller
00:14.0 SMBus: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 SMBus
Controller (rev 3c)
00:14.1 IDE interface: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 IDE Controller
00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia
(Intel HDA)
00:14.3 ISA bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller
00:14.4 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 PCI to PCI
Bridge
00:14.5 USB controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI2 Controller
00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 10h
Processor HyperTransport Configuration
00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 10h
Processor Address Map
00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 10h
Processor DRAM Controller
00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 10h
Processor Miscellaneous Control
00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 10h
Processor Link Control
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
RS780L [Radeon 3000]
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06)
03:00.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid
II Controller (rev 01)
04:06.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter (rev 10)

  


-- 
  Nick Koretsky (nick.koret...@gmail.com)
  



Bug#783961: gnome-keyring: Split gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so into separate package

2015-07-02 Thread Nick Koretsky
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:05:55 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:

  Please consider spliting gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so into separate package
so
  i386 version is installable on amd64 systems. Ubuntu already does this
  and uses libp11-kit-gnome-keyring as pacakage name.

 Why would I want to install gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so:i386 on amd64?

 Please elaborate.


Wine wants it for 32-bit prefixes.


Bug#783961: gnome-keyring: Split gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so into separate package

2015-05-01 Thread Nick Koretsky
Package: gnome-keyring
Version: 3.14.0-1+b1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

Please consider spliting gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so into separate package so
i386 version is installable on amd64 systems. Ubuntu already does this
and uses libp11-kit-gnome-keyring as pacakage name.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (650, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages gnome-keyring depends on:
ii  dbus-x11 1.8.16-1
ii  dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend]  0.22.0-1
ii  gcr  3.14.0-2
ii  libc62.19-18
ii  libcap-ng0   0.7.4-2
ii  libcap2-bin  1:2.24-8
ii  libdbus-1-3  1.8.16-1
ii  libgck-1-0   3.14.0-2
ii  libgcr-base-3-1  3.14.0-2
ii  libgcrypt20  1.6.3-2
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.42.1-1
ii  p11-kit  0.20.7-1

Versions of packages gnome-keyring recommends:
pn  libpam-gnome-keyring  none

gnome-keyring suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org