Bug#1059939: linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64: dkms will not build zfs module for rt-amd64

[T. J. Pinkert]

Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.69-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: t.j.pink...@alumnus.utwente.nl

Dear Maintainer,

I tried to install linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64, building zfs modules with
dkms failed.
The output of aptitude while installing the packages is appended to this
report.

The important line seems to be:
Error! The /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.11/6.1.0-17-rt-amd64/x86_64/dkms.conf for
module zfs includes a BUILD_EXCLUSIVE directive which does not match this
kernel/arch/config

Somehow the directory 6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 seems to be missing.
---
$ ls /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.11/
6.1.0-16-amd64  6.1.0-17-amd64  source
---

whether this is a flaw in the installer script or in the zfs package is unclear
to me.

The expected outcome is, logically, that the dkms modules would all compile as
they do on the normal amd64 kernel image.

Best regards,


Tjeerd Pinkert



Output of aptitude install process on the terminal:
-
Performing actions...
Selecting previously unselected package linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64.
(Reading database ... 744179 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64_6.1.69-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (6.1.69-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64_6.1.69-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (6.1.69-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package linux-image-rt-amd64.
Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-rt-amd64_6.1.69-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking linux-image-rt-amd64 (6.1.69-1) ...
Setting up linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (6.1.69-1) ...
I: /vmlinuz.old is now a symlink to boot/vmlinuz-6.1.0-17-amd64
I: /initrd.img.old is now a symlink to boot/initrd.img-6.1.0-17-amd64
I: /vmlinuz is now a symlink to boot/vmlinuz-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64
I: /initrd.img is now a symlink to boot/initrd.img-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms:
dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-17-rt-amd64.
Sign command: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.1/scripts/sign-file
Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key
Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub
Error! The /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.11/6.1.0-17-rt-amd64/x86_64/dkms.conf for
module zfs includes a BUILD_EXCLUSIVE directive which does not match this
kernel/arch/config.
This indicates that it should not be built.
Error! One or more modules failed to install during autoinstall.
Refer to previous errors for more information.
dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 failed!
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 11
dpkg: error processing package linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (--configure):
 installed linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 package post-installation script
subprocess returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-rt-amd64:
 linux-image-rt-amd64 depends on linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (= 6.1.69-1);
however:
  Package linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 is not configured yet.

dpkg: error processing package linux-image-rt-amd64 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Setting up linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (6.1.69-1) ...
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms:
dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-17-rt-amd64.
Sign command: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.1/scripts/sign-file
Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key
Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub
Error! The /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.11/6.1.0-17-rt-amd64/x86_64/dkms.conf for
module zfs includes a BUILD_EXCLUSIVE directive which does not match this
kernel/arch/config.
This indicates that it should not be built.
Error! One or more modules failed to install during autoinstall.
Refer to previous errors for more information.
dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 failed!
run-parts: /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 11
Failed to process /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-
headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64.postinst line 11.
dpkg: error processing package linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (--configure):
 installed linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 package post-installation script
subprocess returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64
 linux-image-rt-amd64
 linux-headers-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Setting up linux-image-6.1.0-17-rt-amd64 (6.1.69-1) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms:
dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-17-rt-amd64.
/usr/sbin/dkms: line 2497: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Sign command: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.1/scripts/sign-file
Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key
Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub
Error! The /var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.1.11/6.1.0-17-rt-amd64/x86_64/dkms.conf for
module zfs includes a BUILD_EXCLUSIVE directive which does not match this
kernel/arch/config.
This indicates that it should not be built.
Error! One or more 

Bug#1059329: cinnamon-desktop-environment: dependency on noto-font installs too many fonts, fontlist exploded.

[T. J. Pinkert]

Package: cinnamon-desktop-environment
Version: 5.6.0
Severity: whishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: t.j.pink...@alumnus.utwente.nl

Dear Maintainer,

to have several desktop environments available on my computer, I installed the
cinnamon desktop environment.
This package has a hard dependency on the noto-font package. Latter package
contains fonts for all unicode languages, and it is thus not a bad idea to have
that installed per-see.
But since there are for every language about 10 to 20 fonts installed, the
fontlist on my computer "exploded".
This is a hussle as font selection should not be cumbersome, but usefull.
Scrolling along a list of hundreds of noto fonts to come to the next usefull
font is clearly not.

When I tried to deinstall the noto-font, the dependency on this package tried
to deinstall also part of the cinnamon desktop.
I could work around it though, by manually selecting all packages that were to
be deinstalled. However must this be?

For me the question is, is the dependency on the noto-font really necessary? Or
is it a nice to have?
Could the noto-font be a recommended package? That would allow easier
deinstallation when wanted.

Another solution could be to separate the noto-font out into a much finer
selection of font packages, such that only those for installed languages are
installed.
I do understand that native speakers of, say, thai, may want the thai part of
the noto-font, but we "westerners" do typically not need that part of this huge
font base.

I hope some thoughts on this will help to make Debian better.

Best regards,


Tjeerd Pinkert


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 
'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-16-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages cinnamon-desktop-environment depends on:
ii  atril [pdf-viewer]   1.26.0-2+b1
ii  cinnamon-core5.6.0
ii  eog  43.2-1
ii  evince [pdf-viewer]  43.1-2+b1
ii  fonts-liberation 1:1.07.4-11
pn  fonts-noto   
ii  gnome-calculator 1:43.0.1-2
ii  gnome-screenshot 41.0-2
ii  gnome-text-editor43.2-1
ii  gv [pdf-viewer]  1:3.7.4-2+b1
ii  xdg-user-dirs-gtk0.11-1

Versions of packages cinnamon-desktop-environment recommends:
ii  blueman  2.3.5-2+b1
ii  brasero  3.12.3-2
ii  bsd-mailx [mail-reader]  8.1.2-0.20220412cvs-1
ii  cheese   43.0-1
ii  chromium [www-browser]   120.0.6099.129-1~deb12u1
ii  cups 2.4.2-3+deb12u5
ii  deja-dup 44.0-2
ii  evolution [mail-reader]  3.46.4-2
ii  firefox-esr [www-browser]115.6.0esr-1~deb12u1
ii  gdebi0.9.5.7+nmu6
ii  gnome-characters 43.1-1+deb12u1
ii  gnome-disk-utility   43.0-1
ii  gnome-font-viewer43.0-1
ii  gnome-games  1:43+1
ii  gnome-logs   43.0-1
ii  gnome-software   43.5-1~deb12u1
ii  gnome-sound-recorder 43~beta-1
ii  gnome-system-monitor 42.0-2
ii  gnote43.1-1
ii  gstreamer1.0-libav   1.22.0-2
ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly1.22.0-2+deb12u1
ii  hexchat  2.16.1-1+b3
ii  libreoffice-calc 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1
ii  libreoffice-gnome4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1
ii  libreoffice-impress  4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1
ii  libreoffice-writer   4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1
ii  lynx [www-browser]   2.9.0dev.12-1
ii  mate-themes  3.22.23-1
ii  mpv  0.35.1-4
ii  orca 43.1-1
ii  pidgin   2.14.12-1
ii  remmina  1.4.29+dfsg-1
ii  rhythmbox3.4.6-2+b1
ii  rhythmbox-plugin-cdrecorder  3.4.6-2+b1
ii  rhythmbox-plugins3.4.6-2+b1
ii  seahorse 43.0-1
ii  shotwell 0.30.17-1+b1
ii  simple-scan  42.5-2
ii  smplayer 22.7.0~ds0-1
ii  sound-juicer 3.38.0-2.1
ii  sound-theme-freedesktop  0.8-2
ii  synaptic 0.91.3
ii  system-config-printer1.5.18-1
ii  thunderbird [mail-reader]1:115.6.0-1~deb12u1
ii  totem43.0-2
ii  transmission-gtk 3.00-2.1+deb12u1
pn  vino | x2goserver
ii  vlc  3.0.20-0+deb12u1
ii  yelp 42.2-1
ii  zenity   3.44.0-1

Versions of packages cinnamon-desktop-environment suggests:
pn  gedit-plugins   
ii  gimp

Bug#996594: ardour shows no GUI after asking for and confirming session (core dumped)

[T. J. Pinkert]

Package: ardour
Version: 1:6.5.0+ds0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: t.j.pink...@alumnus.utwente.nl

Dear Maintainer,

I recently upgraded to Debian bullseye. Ardour was working fine on the
oldstable.
Upon starting ardour it gets as far as showing the session selection dialogue,
but then crashes.

Up till now I have not found a solution for the problem. However, when I
started ardour from the commandline I got the following debug information as
last few lines of the output:
...
no more csLADSPA plugins
ardour-6.5.0~ds0: src/freeverb/revmodel.cpp:37: void revmodel::setrate(int):
Assertion `rate <= TUNING_MAX_SAMPLE_RATE' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
user@machine:~$

The sample rate for the selected session is 48 kHz for professional audio.
I think this must be a bug in the software. Ardour is supposed to be capable of
running at 48 kHz or higher sampling rates.

Best regards,


Tjeerd Pinkert

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-
debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.70 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not
set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages ardour depends on:
ii  ardour-data   1:6.5.0+ds0-1
ii  ardour-lv2-plugins1:6.5.0+ds0-1
ii  libarchive13  3.4.3-2+b1
ii  libasound21.2.4-1.1
ii  libatkmm-1.6-1v5  2.28.0-3
ii  libaubio5 0.4.9-4+b4
ii  libc6 2.31-13+deb11u2
ii  libcairo2 1.16.0-5
ii  libcairomm-1.0-1v51.12.2-4
ii  libcurl3-gnutls   7.74.0-1.3+b1
ii  libcwiid1 0.6.91-2+b1
ii  libdbus-1-3   1.12.20-2
ii  libfftw3-single3  3.3.8-2
ii  libfluidsynth22.1.7-1.1
ii  libfontconfig12.13.1-4.2
ii  libgcc-s1 10.2.1-6
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0   2.42.2+dfsg-1
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.66.8-1
ii  libglibmm-2.4-1v5 2.64.2-2
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.24.33-2
ii  libgtkmm-2.4-1v5  1:2.24.5-4
ii  libjack-jackd2-0 [libjack-0.125]  1.9.17~dfsg-1
ii  liblilv-0-0   0.24.12-2
ii  liblo70.31-1
ii  liblrdf0  0.6.1-2
ii  libltc11  1.3.1-1
ii  libpango-1.0-01.46.2-3
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0   1.46.2-3
ii  libpangoft2-1.0-0 1.46.2-3
ii  libpangomm-1.4-1v52.42.1-1
ii  libpulse0 14.2-2
ii  libqm-dsp01.7.1-4
ii  librubberband21.9.0-1
ii  libsamplerate00.2.1+ds0-1
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0v5 2.10.4-2
ii  libsndfile1   1.0.31-2
ii  libstdc++610.2.1-6
ii  libsuil-0-0   0.10.10-1
ii  libtag1v5 1.11.1+dfsg.1-3
ii  libusb-1.0-0  2:1.0.24-3
ii  libvamp-hostsdk3v52.10.0-1
ii  libvamp-sdk2v52.10.0-1
ii  libwebsockets16   4.0.20-2
ii  libx11-6  2:1.7.2-1
ii  libxml2   2.9.10+dfsg-6.7

Versions of packages ardour recommends:
ii  ardour-video-timeline  1:6.5.0+ds0-1

ardour suggests no packages.

Bug#839706: redmine: wrong version of rake installed -> RAILS_ENV not set with apache2-alias configuration

[T. J. Pinkert | OPNT]

A bit off topic:

redmine is now working here with the passenger configuration.

The environment problem still exists with the fcgid module and redmine
installed as per /usr/share/doc/redmine/examples/apache2-alias.conf

Somehow, when adding:
FcgidInitialEnv RAILS_ENV production
to the Virtualhost (should solve the problem?) some of the errors
disappear, an empty page shows up, but the environment error stays.
Maybe something to look into at some point.

Best regards,


Tjeerd Pinkert

Bug#839706: redmine: wrong version of rake installed

[T. J. Pinkert | OPNT]

Dear Maintainer,

I tracked this issue to the file /var/lib/redmine/Gemfile.lock which
appears to have the wrong versions (probably due to having had a local
version of ruby around), however, when I (re)move it and it is
recreated, it does get the system installed versions back, so that part
seems to be solved.

However, than the next error appears:

config.eager_load is set to nil. Please update your
config/environments/*.rb files accordingly:

  * development - set it to false
  * test - set it to false (unless you use a tool that preloads your
test environment)
  * production - set it to true

I'm now trying out how to solve it, but the bug can be closed...

Best regards,


Tjeerd Pinkert

Bug#673049: gnome-panel: Workspace switcher applet: single colour, no workspaces visible

[T. J. Pinkert]

Package: gnome-panel
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

An upgrade to the current version of gnome-panel made the workspace switcher 
applet a single gray colour. The workspaces blend out in the panel background 
(which I have set to a light grey colour). I have tried a different background 
colour to see if this does give contrast, but the workspace switcher keeps it's 
own light grey colour. Making the panel partly opaque does not provide contrast 
either. When applications are open they appear as black squares on the grey bar 
though.

The switcher applet itself is functioning, only the visible behaviour is not 
good.

I would expect that some colour contrast between the workspace switchers 
representation of the workspaces and the colour of the panel is present. A 
still different colour should then represent the opened windows.

It could be an idea to add configurable colours to the preferences dialog? Then 
the user is able to set colours himself when the system default does not give a 
good result

Yours,


Tjeerd Pinkert


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gnome-panel depends on:
ii  gconf-service  3.2.5-1
ii  gnome-icon-theme-symbolic  3.4.0-2
ii  gnome-menus3.2.0.1-2
ii  gnome-panel-data   3.4.1-1
ii  libatk1.0-02.4.0-2
ii  libc6  2.13-32
ii  libcairo-gobject2  1.12.2-1
ii  libcairo2  1.12.2-1
ii  libcamel-1.2-293.2.2-1
ii  libdconf0  0.12.1-1
ii  libebook-1.2-123.2.2-1
ii  libecal-1.2-10 3.2.2-1
ii  libedataserver-1.2-15  3.2.2-1
ii  libedataserverui-3.0-1 3.2.2-1
ii  libgconf-2-4   3.2.5-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.32.2-1
ii  libgnome-desktop-3-2   3.4.1-2
ii  libgnome-menu-3-0  3.2.0.1-2
ii  libgtk-3-0 3.4.1-2
ii  libgweather-3-03.4.1-1
ii  libical0   0.44-3
ii  libice62:1.0.8-2
ii  libnspr4-0d4.9-1
ii  libnss3-1d 3.13.4-1
ii  libpanel-applet-4-03.4.1-1
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.30.0-1
ii  librsvg2-2 2.36.1-1
ii  libsm6 2:1.2.1-2
ii  libsoup2.4-1   2.38.1-2
ii  libsqlite3-0   3.7.11-3
ii  libtelepathy-glib0 0.18.1-2
ii  libwnck-3-03.4.0-1
ii  libx11-6   2:1.4.99.901-2
ii  libxau61:1.0.7-1
ii  libxml22.7.8.dfsg-9
ii  libxrandr2 2:1.3.2-2

Versions of packages gnome-panel recommends:
ii  alacarte0.13.2-3
ii  evolution-data-server   3.2.2-1
ii  gnome-applets   3.4.1-1
ii  gnome-control-center1:3.2.2-3+b1
ii  gnome-icon-theme3.4.0-2
ii  gnome-session   3.4.1-1
ii  gnome-session-fallback  3.4.1-1
ii  gvfs1.12.2-1

Versions of packages gnome-panel suggests:
ii  epiphany-browser  3.4.1-1
ii  evolution 3.2.2-1
ii  gnome-terminal [x-terminal-emulator]  3.4.1.1-1
ii  gnome-user-guide  3.4.1-1
ii  nautilus  3.4.1-1
ii  xterm [x-terminal-emulator]   278-1
ii  yelp  3.4.1-1

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#661649: sawfish: Gnome 3 fallback + sawfish fails to start

[T. J. Pinkert]

Package: sawfish
Version: 1:1.5.3-2.1+b1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

After the upgrade to Gnome 3, I have tried to start sawfish as the default 
window manager in several ways, which almost all fail and give the Gnome 
fullscreen message something has gone wrong, please logout. I can however 
kill the default WM when logged into a Gnome session and then start sawfish, 
this works fine, it shows no errors on the command line.

I tried the following things to make sawfish the default WM:
1. add the line: export WINDOW_MANAGER=sawfish
   to the .profile line, since the /usr/bin/gnome-wm script looks for this 
environment variable to start the preferred WM.
   Sawfish is started but the Gnome session stalls and the Gnome error screen 
appears.
2. I make files /usr/share/xsession/gnome-fallback-sawfish.desktop, 
/usr/share/gnome-session/sessions/gnome-fallback-sawfish.session and 
/usr/bin/gnome-session-fallback-sawfish, the latter one refering to the 
.session file (see /usr/bin/gnome-session-fallback) changing in the .session 
file the WM from gnome-wm to sawfish
   Sawfish is started but the Gnome session stalls and the Gnome error screen 
appears.
3. I changed the order of known WM's in the /usr/bin/gnome-wm script to sawfish 
first.
   Sawfish is started but the Gnome session stalls and the Gnome error screen 
appears.
   
I would expect that any of the three things above would properly start a Gnome 
session with sawfish, however, this unfortunately seems in vain. Next to this 
bug, I would like to know if I do something entirely wrong and there might be 
another way to start sawfish as a default WM.

Yours,


Tjeerd Pinkert



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=locale: Cannot set 
LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages sawfish depends on:
ii  gnome-terminal [x-terminal-emulator]  3.2.1-2
ii  libatk1.0-0   2.2.0-2
ii  libaudiofile1 0.3.3-2
ii  libc6 2.13-26
ii  libcairo2 1.10.2-6.2
ii  libesd0   0.2.41-10+b1
ii  libfontconfig12.8.0-3.1
ii  libfreetype6  2.4.8-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-02.24.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.30.2-6
ii  libgmp10  2:5.0.4+dfsg-1
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.24.9-2
ii  libice6   2:1.0.7-2
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.29.4-2
ii  librep9   0.90.2-1.3
ii  libsm62:1.2.0-2
ii  libx11-6  2:1.4.4-4
ii  libxext6  2:1.3.0-3
ii  libxft2   2.2.0-3
ii  libxinerama1  2:1.1.1-3
ii  libxrandr22:1.3.2-2
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.6-2
ii  rep   0.90.2-1.3
ii  rep-gtk   1:0.90.0-2
ii  sawfish-data  1:1.5.3-2.1
ii  xterm [x-terminal-emulator]   276-2

sawfish recommends no packages.

Versions of packages sawfish suggests:
ii  gnome-control-center  1:3.2.2-2
ii  menu  2.1.46
ii  yelp  3.2.1+dfsg-1+b1

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org