Bug#1028451: 2nd DisplayPort doesn't get video
Package: src:linux Version: 6.1.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #1028451 X-Debbugs-Cc: v.abr...@mittwald.de Dear Maintainer, I've the same issue on my ThinkPad X14 with amdgpu. I've two externel display that work fine with kernel version 6.0.12-1. After upgrading to version 6.1.4-1, the two external displays remain black. I can see both external displays in Gnome-Control-Center but I can't use them. Thank you for your graceful work Regards Viktor Abrams -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 6.1.0-1-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-13) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.39.90.20221231) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.4-1 (2023-01-07) ** Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-1-amd64 root=/dev/mapper/default-root ro quiet ** Tainted: W (512) * kernel issued warning ** Kernel log: [ 939.012765] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (19:44:1) MC17_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|AddrV|-|-|SyndV|CECC|-|-|-]: 0xdc20400c011b [ 939.012772] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0xfdeb1640 [ 939.012774] [Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x009600250f00, Syndrome: 0x01ff0a240701 [ 939.012776] [Hardware Error]: Unified Memory Controller Ext. Error Code: 12 [ 939.012778] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD [ 939.012782] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required. [ 939.012783] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (19:44:1) MC18_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|AddrV|-|-|SyndV|CECC|-|-|-]: 0xdc20400c011b [ 939.012790] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0xfdeb16c0 [ 939.012792] [Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x009600350f00, Syndrome: 0x01ff0a240701 [ 939.012795] [Hardware Error]: Unified Memory Controller Ext. Error Code: 12 [ 939.012796] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx: GEN, mem-tx: RD [ 970.456007] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225510.834:203): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 970.457820] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225510.838:204): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 970.458957] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225510.838:205): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 970.460339] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225510.838:206): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 973.632352] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225514.010:207): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 973.633587] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225514.014:208): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 973.634851] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225514.014:209): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 973.635882] audit: type=1400 audit(1674225514.014:210): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6" pid=3344 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 1250.308622] mce_notify_irq: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 1250.308630] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged [ 1250.308636] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required. [ 1250.308641] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (19:44:1) MC15_STATUS[Over|CE|MiscV|AddrV|-|-|SyndV|CECC|-|-|-]: 0xdc20400c011b [ 1250.308655] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0xefcfe240 [ 1250.308657] [Hardware Error]: IPID: 0x009600050f00, Syndrome: 0x01ff0a240701 [ 1250.308662] [Hardware Error]: Unified Memory Controller Ext. Error Code: 12 [ 1250.308665] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, tx:
Bug#411470: amanda-common: amfetchdump segmentation fault
Package: amanda-common Version: 1:2.5.1p1-2.1 Severity: normal Hi, amfetchdump terminates with a segmentation fault: amfetchdump -p daily localhost export 20070215 1 tape(s) needed for restoration segmentation fault I use the splitsize options in amanda.conf i.e.: tape_splitsize 512M fallback_splitsize 512M I've applied this patch and it solves the problem: http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.archivers.amanda.devel/2006-11/msg00018.html Could you please integrate it, if you plan a package upload next time. Thanks in advanced Viktor Abrams. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-vserver-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages amanda-common depends on: ii adduser 3.102 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.6.ds1-11GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.2-2 GNU readline and history libraries ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent ii netbase 4.29Basic TCP/IP networking system ii perl [perl5] 5.8.8-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii tar 1.16-2 GNU tar amanda-common recommends no packages. -- debconf information: amanda-common/merge_amandates: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359853: libgtk2.0-bin: missing dependencies to libglib2.0-0 = 2.10.1-2 and possibly to librsvg2-common = 2.12.7-5+b1
Package: libgtk2.0-bin Version: 2.8.16-1 Severity: normal I've got the following message while configuring libgtk2.0-bin: Richte libgtk2.0-bin ein (2.8.16-1) ... Updating the IM modules list for GTK+-2.4.0...done. Updating the gdk-pixbuf loaders list for GTK+-2.4.0...g_module_open() failed for /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/svg_loader.so: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/svg_loader.so: undefined symbol: rsvg_handle_new_gz done. upgrading to librsvg2-common from unstable solves that. I don't know where to place the dependency to librsvg2-common but if librsvg2-common is installed the svg-loader cause an error. Furthermore I've got sporadically the following error: Gtk-ERROR **: this version of Gtk+ requires GLib-2.10.1 upgrading to libglib2.0-0 from unstable eliminates that error. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libgtk2.0-bin depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo2 1.0.2-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.10.1-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.16-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.12.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrandr26.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359853: libgtk2.0-bin: missing dependencies to libglib2.0...
Am Mittwoch, den 29.03.2006, 14:08 + schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, On Wed, Mar 29, 2006, Viktor Abrams wrote: I've got the following message while configuring libgtk2.0-bin: Richte libgtk2.0-bin ein (2.8.16-1) ... Updating the IM modules list for GTK+-2.4.0...done. Updating the gdk-pixbuf loaders list for GTK+-2.4.0...g_module_open() failed for /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/svg_loader.so: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/svg_loader.so: undefined symbol: rsvg_handle_new_gz done. upgrading to librsvg2-common from unstable solves that. Thanks for your report. /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/loaders/svg_loader.so belongs to librsvg2-common, if it was unusable, it is a librsvg2-common bug. What version of librsvg2-common were you using *prior* to the upgrade? (Check your aptitude.log or dpkg.log.) I don't know where to place the dependency to librsvg2-common but if librsvg2-common is installed the svg-loader cause an error. The problem would be an incorrect dependency of librsvg2-common on librsvg2-2, or a regression in librsvg2-2 (symbols removed). that seems to be a little bit stange cause I had installed different versions of the librsvg2* packages: librsvg2-common 2.8.1-3 librsvg2-bin 2.8.1-3 librsvg2-2 2.12.7-1 Furthermore I've got sporadically the following error: Gtk-ERROR **: this version of Gtk+ requires GLib-2.10.1 upgrading to libglib2.0-0 from unstable eliminates that error. This is a separate bug, it seems Gtk should force a stronger dependency on libglib2.0-0 (it currently only requires = 2.10.0 as the shlibs said, but the message you quote implies it needs = 2.10.1). Gtk's NEWS indeed say: at least GLib-2.10.1 is required now I've got this error when I tried to reconfigure a package by using the gnome-frontend of debconf (libgnome2-perl) Thanks, Thank you for your excellent packaging of gnome, abrams. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340594: python-pisock: missing python bindings
Package: python-pisock Version: 0.11.8-0.12.0-pre4-2 Severity: normal Tags: experimental Thanks for your very good work. I'm using the pilot-link package from the debian repository for the last two years and it always works great. Could you tell me, why this package doesn't contained the python binding files? /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/_pisock.so /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pisock.py dpkg -L python-pisock /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/python-pisock /usr/share/doc/python-pisock/README /usr/share/doc/python-pisock/TODO /usr/share/doc/python-pisock/copyright /usr/share/doc/python-pisock/changelog.Debian.gz Thanks in advanced, Viktor Abrams. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages python-pisock depends on: ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337464: libcamel1.2-0: evolution mail component didn't start (missing link: libcamel-provider-1.2.so.3)
Package: libcamel1.2-0 Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental I don't know if this is a bug which will be fixed with the new evolution package from experimental. But evolution is not installable from experimental because of missing package: libgal-common (= 2.5.3) so I could not test it. libcamel-provider-1.2.so.3 - libcamel-provider-1.2.so.6.0.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ evolution (evolution:7152): evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot activate 'OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_Component:2.2': g_module_open of `/usr/lib/evolution/2.2/components/libevolution-mail.so' failed with `libcamel-provider-1.2.so.3: Kann die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libcamel1.2-0 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcamel1.2-0 1.4.1-1 The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libcomerr2 1.37+1.38-WIP-0509-1 common error description library ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.4.1-1 Utily library for evolution data s ii libcomerr2 1.37+1.38-WIP-0509-1 common error description library ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.4.1-1 Utily library for evolution data s ii libegroupwise1.2-8 1.4.1-1 Client library for accessing group ii libglib2.0-02.8.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libkrb531.3.6-3 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libnss3 2:1.7.12-1 Network Security Service Libraries ii libsoup2.2-82.2.6-1 an HTTP library implementation in ii libxml2 2.6.21-1 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information ii evolution 2.2.3-5The groupware suite
Bug#328464: anjuta: confuse sourceview
sorry forget to mention the following warnings: $ anjuta (anjuta:10202): libglade-CRITICAL **: glade_xml_build_interface: assertion `wid != NULL' failed (anjuta:10202): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed ** (anjuta:10202): CRITICAL **: anjuta_preferences_add_page: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (page)' failed ** (anjuta:10202): WARNING **: Could not open module: libgtkembedmoz.so: Kann die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ** (anjuta:10202): WARNING **: Invalid type: Can not load anjuta-devhelp:DevhelpPlugin Best Regards, abrams.
Bug#328464: anjuta: confuse sourceview
Subject: anjuta: confuse sourceview Package: anjuta Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: normal Tags: experimental When I start anjuta and load a sourcefile all text is place in very confusing order. I can't describe that, so I hope I could send a screenshot for additional explanation. Sorry I didn't find out how to solve. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages anjuta depends on: ii anjuta-common 2.0.1-2A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++ ii libapr0 2.0.54-4 the Apache Portable Runtime ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.9.0-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.10.0-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.5-1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libdevhelp-1-00.10-4 Library providing documentation br ii libesd0 0.2.35-2.1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgbf-1-00.1.2-2GNOME Development Framework - runt ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.1-4LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libgdl-1-00.6.0-1GNOME DevTool libraries - developm ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.3-1GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.10.3-2 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.10.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error0 1.1-4 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.2-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap2 2.1.30-8 OpenLDAP libraries ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-3 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpcre3 5.0-1.1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++64.0.1-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libsvn0 1.2.3-0.1 shared libraries used by Subversio ii libtasn1-20.2.13-1 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libvte4 1:0.11.13-2Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxml2 2.6.21-1 GNOME XML library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxslt1.11.1.15-1 XSLT processing library - runtime ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306238: Re-2: Bug#306238: missing dependency to libgtksourceview1.0-0 (= 1.2.0)
Hi, i've installed debian/sarge in the middle of last year. Later I make a partial upgrade to gnome 2.8 maybe also from the experimental tree. There were no dependency upgrades when gedit moves to unstable/testing. So i assume i got libgtksourceview1.0.-1 (1.1.1-1) also from experimental. What do you mean with (Please tag bugs reported against packages in experimental as such.) ? What tag is necesarry, so that I can write my reports correctly cause I always install gnome if it is avalible in experimental to help with bug reporting. Thanks for working on gnome-debian-packages. They have allways an excellent quality, so that it is difficult for me to find residual bugs :). Regards, abrams. Original Message Subject: Re: Bug#306238: missing dependency to libgtksourceview1.0-0 (= 1.2.0) (25-Apr-2005 12:16) From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 306238 + experimental moreinfo thanks Hi, On Mon, Apr 25, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: starting gedit in terminal produce the following warning: (gedit:12370): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: IA__g_object_set_valist: object class `GtkSourceView' has no property named `highlight_current_line' upgrading libgtksourceview1.0-0 from version 1.1.1-1 to 1.2.0-1 fix that. Thanks for your report. (Please tag bugs reported against packages in experimental as such.) Where did you get libgtksourceview1.0-0 in version 1.1.1-1? Regards, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other.
Bug#306238: Re-4: Bug#306238: missing dependency to libgtksourceview1.0-0 (= 1.2.0)
Hi, you are right, for people who have made an upgrade to sarge this never cares. Only for people like me who only make partial upgrades in regular intervals this is a little flaw. The destiny of version junkies :). Regards, abrams. Original Message Subject: Re: Re-2: Bug#306238: missing dependency to libgtksourceview1.0-0 (= 1.2.0) (25-Apr-2005 15:31) From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, On lun, avr 25, 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've installed debian/sarge in the middle of last year. Later I make a partial upgrade to gnome 2.8 maybe also from the experimental tree. There were no dependency upgrades when gedit moves to unstable/testing. So i assume i got libgtksourceview1.0.-1 (1.1.1-1) also from experimental. If that package ever was in experimental, it now isn't, so there's no point in fixing it. If I understood you correctly, you don't suffer from any bug right now, do you? What do you mean with (Please tag bugs reported against packages in experimental as such.) ? What tag is necesarry, so that I can write my reports correctly cause I always install gnome if it is avalible in experimental to help with bug reporting. Please use the reportbug tool to report bugs, it provides more information to maintainers such as the versions of packages depended on, and the distribution you track. It will also offer you the selection of tags. Regards, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neutral President: I have no strong feelings one way or the other.
Bug#298528: wrong debconf key settings - keyboard variant/options - in german locale mode
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 wrong debconf key settings: If I install xserver-xfree86 first time, the autoconfigure-script,running in german locale mode, sets the following two debconf variablescorrect: xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/keyboard/layout: de xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/keyboard/model: pc105 But "nodeadkeys" must be the valueof "variant" not of "options". Have to be like shown here: xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/keyboard/options:xserver-xfree86/config/inputdevice/keyboard/variant: nodeadkeys Thank you for fixing that. Viktor Abrams.
