Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Paul Gevers 于2022年3月31日周四 16:16写道： > > Hi YunQiang, > > On 24-03-2022 12:29, YunQiang Su wrote: > > Yes. I am aware of it. And I am waiting for gcc-12-cross-mipsen to finish > > building on all of these architectures. > > Although not clear to me why you wanted to wait, this happened 3.5 days > ago. Will you do the source only upload soon? > The new version was uploaded. > Paul -- YunQiang Su
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Hi YunQiang, On 24-03-2022 12:29, YunQiang Su wrote: Yes. I am aware of it. And I am waiting for gcc-12-cross-mipsen to finish building on all of these architectures. Although not clear to me why you wanted to wait, this happened 3.5 days ago. Will you do the source only upload soon? Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Paul Gevers 于2022年3月24日周四 19:26写道： > > Hi YunQiang, > > On 22-03-2022 07:06, YunQiang Su wrote: > > Paul Gevers 于2022年3月22日周二 04:04写道： > >> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > >>> The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing > >>> and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in > >>> testing [1]. Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to > >>> migrate for 62 days [2]. > >> > >> It's been 161 days now. We expect from you to solve these kind of > >> issues, especially if they have been brought to your attention. > >> > > > > ohh. sorry for it. I upload gcc-11-cross-mipsen some days ago. > > I thought that gcc-defaults-mipsen will migrate ok. > > > > I will fix it just now. > > You are aware that gcc-12-cross-mipsen needs another source-only upload > because it's new and you needed to upload all binaries but non-buildd > built binaries are not allowed to migrate. Unfortunately on the current > infrastructure binNMU's of arch:all binaries don't work. > gcc-12-cross-mipsen needs to be able to migrate together with > gcc-11-cross-mipsen (and gcc-defaults-mipsen). > Yes. I am aware of it. And I am waiting for gcc-12-cross-mipsen to finish building on all of these architectures. > Paul -- YunQiang Su
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Hi YunQiang, On 22-03-2022 07:06, YunQiang Su wrote: Paul Gevers 于2022年3月22日周二 04:04写道： On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to migrate for 62 days [2]. It's been 161 days now. We expect from you to solve these kind of issues, especially if they have been brought to your attention. ohh. sorry for it. I upload gcc-11-cross-mipsen some days ago. I thought that gcc-defaults-mipsen will migrate ok. I will fix it just now. You are aware that gcc-12-cross-mipsen needs another source-only upload because it's new and you needed to upload all binaries but non-buildd built binaries are not allowed to migrate. Unfortunately on the current infrastructure binNMU's of arch:all binaries don't work. gcc-12-cross-mipsen needs to be able to migrate together with gcc-11-cross-mipsen (and gcc-defaults-mipsen). Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Paul Gevers 于2022年3月22日周二 04:04写道： > > Hi mips porters, > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing > > and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in > > testing [1]. Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to > > migrate for 62 days [2]. > > It's been 161 days now. We expect from you to solve these kind of > issues, especially if they have been brought to your attention. > ohh. sorry for it. I upload gcc-11-cross-mipsen some days ago. I thought that gcc-defaults-mipsen will migrate ok. I will fix it just now. > Paul -- YunQiang Su
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Hi mips porters, On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to migrate for 62 days [2]. It's been 161 days now. We expect from you to solve these kind of issues, especially if they have been brought to your attention. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Graham Inggs 于2022年2月16日周三 18:57写道： > > Dear MIPS Porters > > Could somebody take a look a this issue please? > Thank you. I will take care about it. > > > Hi YunQiang, > > > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to > > > migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. > > > > Any progress? It has been 1.5 months and I haven't seen anything > > happening. This is NOK. gcc-defaults-mipsen is a key package, so I can't > > just remove it. Please ensure the package can migrate. It seems to me > > that your failing to build all kind of required packages, although it's > > not clear if those should come from e.g. gcc-11 (which apparently > > started to build again itself on mipsel and mips64el. I'm not versed > > enough in how this piece of toolchain should work. If you need my help > > as a Release Team member, don't hesitate to reach out, but I don't want > > to spend time on reverse engineering this *. > > > > Paul > -- YunQiang Su
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Dear MIPS Porters Could somebody take a look a this issue please? > Hi YunQiang, > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to > > migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. > > Any progress? It has been 1.5 months and I haven't seen anything > happening. This is NOK. gcc-defaults-mipsen is a key package, so I can't > just remove it. Please ensure the package can migrate. It seems to me > that your failing to build all kind of required packages, although it's > not clear if those should come from e.g. gcc-11 (which apparently > started to build again itself on mipsel and mips64el. I'm not versed > enough in how this piece of toolchain should work. If you need my help > as a Release Team member, don't hesitate to reach out, but I don't want > to spend time on reverse engineering this *. > > Paul
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Hi YunQiang, On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:51:28 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. Any progress? It has been 1.5 months and I haven't seen anything happening. This is NOK. gcc-defaults-mipsen is a key package, so I can't just remove it. Please ensure the package can migrate. It seems to me that your failing to build all kind of required packages, although it's not clear if those should come from e.g. gcc-11 (which apparently started to build again itself on mipsel and mips64el. I'm not versed enough in how this piece of toolchain should work. If you need my help as a Release Team member, don't hesitate to reach out, but I don't want to spend time on reverse engineering this *. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1001595: src:gcc-defaults-mipsen: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Source: gcc-defaults-mipsen Version: 1.189 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.194 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:gcc-defaults-mipsen has been trying to migrate for 62 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bookworm, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable. If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-defaults-mipsen OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
