Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?

2022-07-28 Thread Fabio Fantoni

Il 28/07/2022 04:36, Joshua Peisach ha scritto:
Hey everyone - chipping in as I have been kind of lame in helping with 
this process.


I'll spin up a Debian VM and get testing, though I don't think any of 
the issues are critical. The packages should be safe to enter unstable 
IMO as already lots of point revisions has been made upstream. Also, 
cinnamon is broken in Ubuntu Kinetic at the moment 


There are still many issues with cinnamon 5.4 and some parts was rebased 
only in these days in cinnamon-settings-daemon and 
cinnamon-control-center and seems still a work in progress (I did't test 
them for now, I'll do in the weekend) so I think is not good to migrate 
to unstable/testing now


About ubuntu 22.10 I don't use it, what is broken? In latest days I 
tested only the experimental but in unstable FWIK there was only an 
issue with cinnamon-settings cause by libnotify 0.8.0-1 and solved in 
0.8.1-1 FWIK (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015006)




When that is all said and done, I'll get to updating xapp to 2.2.14, 
nemo-fileroller and nemo-python to 5.4.1.


xapp have only one commit that don't affect cinnamon FWIK and can wait 
and about these 2 nemo extensions I'll do in the weekend also excluding 
nemo-*-build-deps_*.buildinfo nemo-*-build-deps_*.changes from imported 
source


what told you Bage about nemo-audio-tab and other extensions you are 
preparing for NEW where files was not really excluded?




-Josh



*From:* Roland Clobus
*Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2022 1:57 PM
*To:* fantonifa...@tiscali.it; 1006...@bugs.debian.org
*Subject:* Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?

Hello Fabio,

On 24/07/2022 23:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> Il 24/07/2022 22:12, Roland Clobus ha scritto:
>> would you consider to upload this fix to unstable? It is currently
>> only in experimental.
...
> I think however that within a few weeks with the next bugfixes they 
will

> be good enough to be able to migrate them to unstable.
>
> Is it a problem to wait up to a few more weeks or I should upload this
> change to unstable faster?

No need to hurry. I now know that you are planning to bring the fix to
unstable in a few weeks, when the issues are fixed.

I'm working together with Phil Hands on https://openqa.debian.net which
contains automated testing. At the moment a Cinnamon image is not (yet)
tested, but it could be possible to have a Cinnamon image with the
packages from experimental (using apt-pinning) and some tests.
See e.g. the start-stop test for the GNOME apps:
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/65161
or the general tests of the live image:
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian=sid=20220711T17Z_sid=14 
<https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian=sid=20220711T17Z_sid=14>


With kind regards,
Roland Clobus





OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?

2022-07-25 Thread Roland Clobus

Hello Fabio,

On 24/07/2022 23:00, Fabio Fantoni wrote:

Il 24/07/2022 22:12, Roland Clobus ha scritto:
would you consider to upload this fix to unstable? It is currently 
only in experimental.

...
I think however that within a few weeks with the next bugfixes they will 
be good enough to be able to migrate them to unstable.


Is it a problem to wait up to a few more weeks or I should upload this 
change to unstable faster?


No need to hurry. I now know that you are planning to bring the fix to 
unstable in a few weeks, when the issues are fixed.


I'm working together with Phil Hands on https://openqa.debian.net which 
contains automated testing. At the moment a Cinnamon image is not (yet) 
tested, but it could be possible to have a Cinnamon image with the 
packages from experimental (using apt-pinning) and some tests.

See e.g. the start-stop test for the GNOME apps:
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/65161
or the general tests of the live image:
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian=sid=20220711T17Z_sid=14

With kind regards,
Roland Clobus


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?

2022-07-24 Thread Fabio Fantoni

Il 24/07/2022 22:12, Roland Clobus ha scritto:

Hello maintainer of nemo,

would you consider to upload this fix to unstable? It is currently 
only in experimental.


I've found this issue, because it makes the Cinnamon live image 
non-reproducible.

See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleInstalls/LiveImages.

With kind regards,
Roland Clobus


Hi, nemo and major of cinnamon 5.4 components are in experimental due 
many bugs still present related to big changes, upstreamsolved a lot of 
problems with the latest versions which i uploaded to experimental and 
tried a bit in the last few days but didn't have much time for in-depth 
testing.


I think however that within a few weeks with the next bugfixes they will 
be good enough to be able to migrate them to unstable.


Is it a problem to wait up to a few more weeks or I should upload this 
change to unstable faster?




OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1006472: Upload to unstable?

2022-07-24 Thread Roland Clobus

Hello maintainer of nemo,

would you consider to upload this fix to unstable? It is currently only 
in experimental.


I've found this issue, because it makes the Cinnamon live image 
non-reproducible.

See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleInstalls/LiveImages.

With kind regards,
Roland Clobus


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature