Bug#1008369: scikit-learn testing migration
Hi On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 17:57, M. Zhou wrote: > The previous segfault on armel becomes Bus Error on armel and armhf. > I can build it on Power9, but it seems that the test fails on power8 (our > buildd). In #1003165, one of the arm porters wrote they are happy to look at the bus errors, but the baseline issue should be fixed first. > I have skimmed over the build logs and one of the main issues is the use of > -march flags to enforce a certain baseline [1]: > > powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option > ‘-march=native’; did you mean ‘-mcpu=native’? This may be the cause of the test failures on power8. Regards Graham
Bug#1008369: scikit-learn testing migration
Am Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 08:57:09AM -0700 schrieb M. Zhou: > The previous segfault on armel becomes Bus Error on armel and armhf. Which does not make it much better as long as no-one is investigating the issue in a timely manner. So my suggestion to remove arm 32 bit architectures (at least until the issue is fixed) remains. > I can build it on Power9, but it seems that the test fails on power8 (our > buildd). Hmmm, can we talk to buildd admins about this? Kind regards Andreas. > On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 09:56 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Control: tags -1 unreproducible > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Control: severity -1 important > > > > Hi, > > > > BTW, there is another bug in scikit-learn, but I can't reproduce it and > > have set tags accordingly. Could someone else please give it a try? > > > > Kind regards > > > > Andreas. > > > > Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 09:23:28PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > > Hi Nilesh, > > > > > > Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:21:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > > > On 7/20/22 4:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > Before we stop progress in Debian for many other architectures since > > > > > we > > > > > cant't solve this on our own or otherwise are burning patience of > > > > > upstream I'd alternatively consider droping armel as supported > > > > > architecture. > > > > > > > > I am definitely +1 for this, however scikit-learn is a key package and > > > > dropping > > > > it from armel would mean dropping several revdeps as well. > > > > I am a bit unsure if that is fine or not. > > > > > > Its not fine at all and I would not be happy about it. However, the other > > > side of a key package is, that lots of package have testing removal > > > warnings > > > on architectures which are widely used and we have real trouble because of > > > this. > > > > > > Kind regards > > > > > > Andreas. > > > > > > -- > > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > > > > > > > -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#1008369: scikit-learn testing migration
The previous segfault on armel becomes Bus Error on armel and armhf. I can build it on Power9, but it seems that the test fails on power8 (our buildd). On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 09:56 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 unreproducible > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > Control: severity -1 important > > Hi, > > BTW, there is another bug in scikit-learn, but I can't reproduce it and > have set tags accordingly. Could someone else please give it a try? > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 09:23:28PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Hi Nilesh, > > > > Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:21:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > > On 7/20/22 4:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > Before we stop progress in Debian for many other architectures since we > > > > cant't solve this on our own or otherwise are burning patience of > > > > upstream I'd alternatively consider droping armel as supported > > > > architecture. > > > > > > I am definitely +1 for this, however scikit-learn is a key package and > > > dropping > > > it from armel would mean dropping several revdeps as well. > > > I am a bit unsure if that is fine or not. > > > > Its not fine at all and I would not be happy about it. However, the other > > side of a key package is, that lots of package have testing removal warnings > > on architectures which are widely used and we have real trouble because of > > this. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Andreas. > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > >
Bug#1008369: scikit-learn testing migration
Control: tags -1 unreproducible Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: severity -1 important Hi, BTW, there is another bug in scikit-learn, but I can't reproduce it and have set tags accordingly. Could someone else please give it a try? Kind regards Andreas. Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 09:23:28PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Nilesh, > > Am Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 06:21:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > On 7/20/22 4:50 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Before we stop progress in Debian for many other architectures since we > > > cant't solve this on our own or otherwise are burning patience of > > > upstream I'd alternatively consider droping armel as supported > > > architecture. > > > > I am definitely +1 for this, however scikit-learn is a key package and > > dropping > > it from armel would mean dropping several revdeps as well. > > I am a bit unsure if that is fine or not. > > Its not fine at all and I would not be happy about it. However, the other > side of a key package is, that lots of package have testing removal warnings > on architectures which are widely used and we have real trouble because of > this. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > -- http://fam-tille.de
