Bug#1017064: lintian: incorrectly complains about adopted-extended-field XB-Ruby-Versions

2022-12-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 19:29:30 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:

[...]
> This bug is still present in the lintian version currently in sid.
> Please fix it.

Hello again,
XS-Ruby-Versions and XB-Ruby-Versions are now deprecated, see the
changelog entry for package [gem2deb/2.1].

[gem2deb/2.1]: 


As a consequence, I think that lintian should no longer point out that
either of those two fields is adopted (which is not the case), but, if
anything, it should point out that those two fields are deprecated and
need to be dropped...

Do you agree? Please let me know.

Thanks for your time and patience.
Bye (and Season's Greetings!).


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgpWjtOo7t7Ge.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1017064: lintian: incorrectly complains about adopted-extended-field XB-Ruby-Versions

2022-10-09 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: found -1 lintian/2.115.3


On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 18:03:50 +0200 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:

[...]
> Both reports look wrong, since I have no plain 'Ruby-Versions'
> field in my package source, and 'XB-Ruby-Versions' has not been
> adopted, thus requiring the 'XB-' prefix.
> 
> Please fix this bug in lintian.
> Thanks for your time and patience!

This bug is still present in the lintian version currently in sid.
Please fix it.


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgpBd6gxuKSin.pgp
Description: PGP signature