Bug#1017527: acceptance-* tests should be marked as 'flaky'
Re: Pierre Gruet > The three autopkgtests acceptance-consul, acceptance-etcd and > acceptance-zookeeper began failing at a significant frequency recently, at > least on armhf, independently of each other. I wonder if we shouldn't strip down these tests to some basic smoke test, for example by running the first "basic replication" test only. While that of course reduces the test surface, it will hopefully get rid of the test failures we've been seeing. (Did the tests actually ever find a real bug as opposed to just the tests failing intermittently?) > Please see the page > https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/patroni/testing/armhf/ > and the bottoms of the various test logs for an illustration. ... and https://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/view/Binaries/job/patroni-binaries/ Christoph
Bug#1017527: acceptance-* tests should be marked as 'flaky'
Source: patroni Version: 2.1.4-1 Severity: normal Control: affects -1 src:zookeeper src:psycopg2 Dear Maintainer, The three autopkgtests acceptance-consul, acceptance-etcd and acceptance-zookeeper began failing at a significant frequency recently, at least on armhf, independently of each other. This makes the migration of reverse-dependencies to testing rather difficult, as one basically has to retry the CI tests again and again until the three above-quoted tests pass. Please see the page https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/patroni/testing/armhf/ and the bottoms of the various test logs for an illustration. I think the three acceptance-* tests should be marked with Restrictions: flaky so that they allow for smooth testing migrations of the reverse dependencies. Thanks a lot for considering, Best regards, -- Pierre
