Bug#1018039: FTBFS on ppc64el with gcc-12

2022-11-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:46:59PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>...
> On 8/24/22 16:50, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> > powerpc-utils 1.3.9-1 fails to build atm with gcc-12.
> > I checked latest 1.3.10 and it's roughly the same.
> > I've opened an issue upstream.
> 
> Interestingly, the error due to "-Werror=maybe-uninitialized" does not show
> on the openSUSE builds, see [1]. openSUSE does not ship any patch to address
> the issue though.

openSUSE overwrites the CFLAGS set in configure.ac (including -Werror) with
  make CFLAGS="..."

> Fedora doesn't seem to have a patch to address the issue either [2].
>...

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/powerpc-utils/blob/rawhide/f/powerpc-utils.spec#_72

> Adrian
>...

cu
Adrian



Bug#1018039: FTBFS on ppc64el with gcc-12

2022-11-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Hi!

On 8/24/22 16:50, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:

powerpc-utils 1.3.9-1 fails to build atm with gcc-12.
I checked latest 1.3.10 and it's roughly the same.
I've opened an issue upstream.


Interestingly, the error due to "-Werror=maybe-uninitialized" does not show
on the openSUSE builds, see [1]. openSUSE does not ship any patch to address
the issue though.

Fedora doesn't seem to have a patch to address the issue either [2]. Also, no
update from upstream either.

Adrian


[1] 
https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/hardware/powerpc-utils/openSUSE_Factory_PPC/ppc64le
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/powerpc-utils/tree/rawhide


--
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



Bug#1018039: FTBFS on ppc64el with gcc-12

2022-08-24 Thread Frédéric Bonnard
Package: src:powerpc-utils
Version: 1.3.9-1
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Control: forwarded -1 
https://github.com/ibm-power-utilities/powerpc-utils/issues/85

--

Dear maintainer,
powerpc-utils 1.3.9-1 fails to build atm with gcc-12.
I checked latest 1.3.10 and it's roughly the same.
I've opened an issue upstream.

Regards,


F.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature