Bug#1018801: stdx-allocator ftbfs: assertThrown failed: No Exception was thrown.

2022-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 31. Aug. 2022 um 03:01 Uhr schrieb Steve Langasek
:
>
> Source: stdx-allocator
> Version: 3.1.0~beta.2-3
> Severity: serious
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> After fixing up stdx-allocator build-deps so that they're installable,
> stdx-allocator fails to build from source due to a test failure:
>
> [...]

Hah! I need to test this, but this *may* just be related to removing
the dip1008 flag from the mir-core flags list entirely - it may be
needed after all.
Or this is completely unrelated to that and a completely different bug
- unfortunately, I can only really dive into this at the weekend...

Thanks!
Matthias

-- 
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/



Bug#1018801: stdx-allocator ftbfs: assertThrown failed: No Exception was thrown.

2022-08-30 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: stdx-allocator
Version: 3.1.0~beta.2-3
Severity: serious
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic

Hi Matthias,

After fixing up stdx-allocator build-deps so that they're installable,
stdx-allocator fails to build from source due to a test failure:

[...]
 1/1 =
test: stdx-allocator-test
start time:   00:11:36
duration: 0.03s
result:   exit status 1
command:  MALLOC_PERTURB_=202 
'/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/stdx-allocator-test'
--- stderr ---
core.exception.AssertError@../source/stdx/allocator/package.d(1399): 
assertThrown failed: No Exception was thrown.

/usr/lib/ldc/x86_64-linux-gnu/include/d/std/exception.d:299 [0x55d86e05b4d5]
../source/stdx/allocator/package.d:1399 [0x55d86e065d87]
??:? [0x7fbe61462c85]
??:? [0x7fbe61480d7a]
??:? int rt.sections_elf_shared.DSO.opApply(scope int delegate(ref 
rt.sections_elf_shared.DSO)) [0x7fbe61481e08]
??:? int rt.minfo.moduleinfos_apply(scope int 
delegate(immutable(object.ModuleInfo*))) [0x7fbe61480d0b]
??:? int object.ModuleInfo.opApply(scope int delegate(object.ModuleInfo*)) 
[0x7fbe6146e9be]
??:? runModuleUnitTests [0x7fbe61462b34]
??:? void rt.dmain2._d_run_main2(char[][], ulong, extern (C) int 
function(char[][])*).runAll() [0x7fbe6147738a]
??:? _d_run_main2 [0x7fbe614771d5]
??:? _d_run_main [0x7fbe6147702d]
??:? [0x7fbe6119654f]
??:? __libc_start_main [0x7fbe61196608]
??:? [0x55d86dffd9b4]
1/22 modules FAILED unittests
==
[...]

You can see this in the Ubuntu build logs at
.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature