Bug#1021102: RM: uim [armel armhf] -- RoQA; FTBFS, blocks Qt transition

2022-10-02 Thread Thorsten Alteholz 

Hi Dmitry,

On 02.10.22 10:07, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:

Unfortunately these reverse dependencies will need to be removed too:
gkrelluim, mlterm-im-uim, uim-chewing, uim-mozc.


please file separate RM bugs for each of them.

Thanks!
 Thorsten

Bug#1021102: RM: uim [armel armhf] -- RoQA; FTBFS, blocks Qt transition

2022-10-02 Thread Dmitry Shachnev 
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 11:01:22AM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Dear FTP masters,
>
> uim fails to build on armel and armhf, see https://bugs.debian.org/1019974.
>
> The previous maintainer stepped down, and I do not know if the current
> maintainer is active.
>
> uim is one of the few remaining blockers for Qt transition, see
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-6.html.
>
> Please consider removing the old binaries on armel/armhf to let Qt migrate.

Unfortunately these reverse dependencies will need to be removed too:
gkrelluim, mlterm-im-uim, uim-chewing, uim-mozc.

They are all leaf packages.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#1021102: RM: uim [armel armhf] -- RoQA; FTBFS, blocks Qt transition

2022-10-02 Thread Dmitry Shachnev 
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: u...@packages.debian.org

Dear FTP masters,

uim fails to build on armel and armhf, see https://bugs.debian.org/1019974.

The previous maintainer stepped down, and I do not know if the current
maintainer is active.

uim is one of the few remaining blockers for Qt transition, see
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-15-6.html.

Please consider removing the old binaries on armel/armhf to let Qt migrate.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature