Bug#1028031: Acknowledgement (Main spamassassin.service file missing)
On 1/5/2023 7:11 PM, Matt Corallo wrote: Ah, sorry for the noise, the package was split. Seems funny to do in a backport. backports pull changes from what's in bookworm (testing). Nothing was "done" in the backport, it was a straight pull. Preserving bullseye's package structure would have been significant packaging work and wouldn't constitute a backport or be appropriate for bullseye-backports. Should the package split get a changelog notice for the bullseye upgrade? I'd assume most users of spamassassin actually use the spamd feature, so it being silently removed may be surprising for an upgrade. I guess apt didn't show /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/NEWS.Debian.gz when you upgraded, but it's all documented there. noah
Bug#1028031: Acknowledgement (Main spamassassin.service file missing)
Ah, sorry for the noise, the package was split. Seems funny to do in a backport. Should the package split get a changelog notice for the bullseye upgrade? I'd assume most users of spamassassin actually use the spamd feature, so it being silently removed may be surprising for an upgrade. Thanks for maintaining the package! On 1/5/23 7:09 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1028031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028031. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Noah Meyerhans If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 1028...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
