Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 2023-06-12 19:40:14 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > Hello Sebastian, > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:26:50 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 trixie > > > > On 2023-01-19 15:38:06 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > > > On 1/17/23 22:37, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > > > On 2023-01-12 11:45:45 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > > > >> Package: release.debian.org > > > >> Severity: normal > > > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > >> Usertags: transition > > > >> > > > >> Dear Release Team, > > > >> > > > >> I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. > > > >> > > > >> I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the > > > >> library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0 > > > > > > > > Why is the SONAME going backwards? > > > > > > > I believe this was an upstream decision, please check it out: > > > > > > "the soversion is now set only from the $major version (e.g. 2), > > > and not from $major$minor (e.g. 12) like it used to be." > > > https://github.com/paolostivanin/libcotp/releases/tag/v2.0.0 > > > > Is upstream aware that the can never release with major versions 11 and > > 12 (at least)? Please clarify this with upstream. > > > Yes, upstream is aware of this. > > > > In any case, let's postpone this transition to trixie. > > > I just uploaded version 2.0.1-1~exp1 for experimental. > I await your authorization to proceed with the transition. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
Hello Sebastian, On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:26:50 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 trixie > > On 2023-01-19 15:38:06 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > On 1/17/23 22:37, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On 2023-01-12 11:45:45 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > > >> Package: release.debian.org > > >> Severity: normal > > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > >> Usertags: transition > > >> > > >> Dear Release Team, > > >> > > >> I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. > > >> > > >> I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the > > >> library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0 > > > > > > Why is the SONAME going backwards? > > > > > I believe this was an upstream decision, please check it out: > > > > "the soversion is now set only from the $major version (e.g. 2), > > and not from $major$minor (e.g. 12) like it used to be." > > https://github.com/paolostivanin/libcotp/releases/tag/v2.0.0 > > Is upstream aware that the can never release with major versions 11 and > 12 (at least)? Please clarify this with upstream. > Yes, upstream is aware of this. > In any case, let's postpone this transition to trixie. > I just uploaded version 2.0.1-1~exp1 for experimental. I await your authorization to proceed with the transition. Thanks! -- Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro 4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
Control: tags -1 trixie On 2023-01-19 15:38:06 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On 1/17/23 22:37, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2023-01-12 11:45:45 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > >> Usertags: transition > >> > >> Dear Release Team, > >> > >> I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. > >> > >> I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the > >> library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0 > > > > Why is the SONAME going backwards? > > > I believe this was an upstream decision, please check it out: > > "the soversion is now set only from the $major version (e.g. 2), > and not from $major$minor (e.g. 12) like it used to be." > https://github.com/paolostivanin/libcotp/releases/tag/v2.0.0 Is upstream aware that the can never release with major versions 11 and 12 (at least)? Please clarify this with upstream. In any case, let's postpone this transition to trixie. Cheers > > > I checked it this way: > > $ readelf -d libcotp.so.1.2.8 | grep SONAME > 0x000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libcotp.so.12] > > $ readelf -d libcotp.so.2.0.0 | grep SONAME > 0x000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libcotp.so.2] > > > > Cheers > > > > Thanks! > -- > Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro > 4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00 -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
Hi Sebastian, On 1/17/23 22:37, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2023-01-12 11:45:45 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> >> Dear Release Team, >> >> I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. >> >> I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the >> library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0 > > Why is the SONAME going backwards? > I believe this was an upstream decision, please check it out: "the soversion is now set only from the $major version (e.g. 2), and not from $major$minor (e.g. 12) like it used to be." https://github.com/paolostivanin/libcotp/releases/tag/v2.0.0 I checked it this way: $ readelf -d libcotp.so.1.2.8 | grep SONAME 0x000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libcotp.so.12] $ readelf -d libcotp.so.2.0.0 | grep SONAME 0x000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libcotp.so.2] > Cheers > Thanks! -- Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro 4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2023-01-12 11:45:45 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. > > I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the > library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0 Why is the SONAME going backwards? Cheers > introducing the ABI change has been in experimental since 2023-01-10. > > I have successfully rebuilt the reversed dependencies on amd64. > > $ reverse-depends -b src:libcotp > Reverse-Build-Depends > * otpclient (for libcotp-dev) > > There is already a tracker available here: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcotp.html > > Thanks! > -- > Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro > 4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00 -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1028528: transition: libcotp
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I would like to update libcotp in unstable to the 2.0.0-1. I would like to request a transition slot for libcotp, changing the library name from libcotp12 to libcotp2. The version 2.0.0 introducing the ABI change has been in experimental since 2023-01-10. I have successfully rebuilt the reversed dependencies on amd64. $ reverse-depends -b src:libcotp Reverse-Build-Depends * otpclient (for libcotp-dev) There is already a tracker available here: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcotp.html Thanks! -- Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro 4096R: 1B8C F656 EF3B 8447 2F48 F0E7 82FB F706 0B2F 7D00 OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
