Bug#1031594: os-prober is disabled by default in /etc/default/grub - Windows not found
There have been a few bug reports about this in the past but I don't remember seeing a reply. Here's mine: https://bugs.debian.org/1012865 It would be really unfortunate to release bookwork in this state, we are going one step forward with non-free-firmware and two steps backwards with this change, it underestimates how many users are dual booting Debian and I foresee lots of people not bothering with it (they'll just use something else, especially new users).
Bug#1031594: os-prober is disabled by default in /etc/default/grub - Windows not found
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:42:10AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >Package: os-prober >Version: 1.79 >Severity: normal > >Dear Maintainer, > >In testing for Debian Bookworm Alpha 2 release > >Windows not found when dist-upgrade from existing 11.6 system > >Disabled in /etc/default/grub > >* grub2: >Add commented-out GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER to /etc/default/grub >to make it easier for users to turn os-prober back on if they want >it (#1013797, #1009336) > >This needs to be discussed Thinking something like: * *maybe* a debconf Q in grub to ask "do you want me to look for other OSes?" * we can set that if we find what looks like other OSes in d-i * and also check on upgrades - if we have other OSes listed in the current grub config Otherwise we *are* going to get panicky Windows users using d-i or upgrading and "losing" their Windows installation. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com < liw> everything I know about UK hotels I learned from "Fawlty Towers"
Bug#1031594: os-prober is disabled by default in /etc/default/grub - Windows not found
Package: os-prober Version: 1.79 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, In testing for Debian Bookworm Alpha 2 release Windows not found when dist-upgrade from existing 11.6 system Disabled in /etc/default/grub * grub2: Add commented-out GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER to /etc/default/grub to make it easier for users to turn os-prober back on if they want it (#1013797, #1009336) This needs to be discussed