Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1
Hi Paul, Am Tue, May 23, 2023 at 01:52:38PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers: > Control: tags -1 confirmed Thanks. > On 17-05-2023 19:48, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I'd like to announce an upload to testing-proposed-updates > > You confused me here. I don't see traces of the upload yet, so I assume this > is a pre-approval. Yes, I was asking for pre-approval (sorry for the confusing wording). > > Thus an upload to testing-proposed-updates > > seems an appropriate solution for this and this bug report is > > about asking you for confirmation about this solution. > > Ack. For the future ideally this would be fixed by dh-r being less strict in > what it injects. I think the injection is sensible in principle to prevent any r-cran package that is build against r-base with a higher version than in testing to migrate to testing to early. Its just the accidental upload of a higher version which creates the problem. > > I propose to upload the following change to t-p-u: > > Please, always generate your debdiff comparing to what is currently in > testing. I'll do - just wanted to wait for confirmation of the versioning scheme to create the final diff. It is attached now. > However, I personally prefer the automatic > syncing of testing to unstable that we get if you use 1.7.4+dfsg-3+deb12u1 > (mind the version being *higher* than testing) or even 1.7.4+dfsg-4. But ACK > with whatever reasonable version number you choose. Hope this fits the easy route now. Kind regards and thanks for working in the release team Andreas. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/05/msg00623.html -- http://fam-tille.de diff -Nru r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/changelog r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/changelog --- r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/changelog2023-02-21 20:34:31.0 +0100 +++ r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/changelog2023-05-17 07:56:25.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-2+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Upload to testing-proposed-updates "bookworm" due to the fact that +there was an accidental upload of a new version of r-base to unstable + * Fix link for normalize.css +Closes: #1035428 + + -- Andreas Tille Wed, 17 May 2023 07:56:25 +0200 + r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * closure-compiler fails - simply symlinking uncompressed JS diff -Nru r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/links r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/links --- r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/links2023-02-21 20:34:31.0 +0100 +++ r-cran-shiny-1.7.4+dfsg/debian/links2023-05-17 07:56:25.0 +0200 @@ -37,5 +37,5 @@ usr/share/javascript/bootstrap/files/js/locales usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/datepicker/js/locales usr/share/javascript/bootstrap/files/less/datepicker.less usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/datepicker/less/datepicker.less # usr/share/javascript/selectize.js/selectize.min.js usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/selectize/js/selectize.min.js -usr/lib/nodejs/normalize.css/normalize.css usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/ionrangeslider/css/normalize.css +usr/share/javascript/normalize.css/normalize.css usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/ionrangeslider/css/normalize.css usr/share/nodejs/html5shiv/dist/html5shiv.min.js usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/bootstrap/shim/html5shiv.min.js
Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Andreas, On 17-05-2023 19:48, Andreas Tille wrote: I'd like to announce an upload to testing-proposed-updates You confused me here. I don't see traces of the upload yet, so I assume this is a pre-approval. Thus an upload to testing-proposed-updates seems an appropriate solution for this and this bug report is about asking you for confirmation about this solution. Ack. For the future ideally this would be fixed by dh-r being less strict in what it injects. I propose to upload the following change to t-p-u: Please, always generate your debdiff comparing to what is currently in testing. Nilesh Patra suggested to use version 1.7.4+dfsg-2+deb12u1 but I personally regard my version suggestion more logical (long explanation given in [2]). You missed the link to [2]. However, I personally prefer the automatic syncing of testing to unstable that we get if you use 1.7.4+dfsg-3+deb12u1 (mind the version being *higher* than testing) or even 1.7.4+dfsg-4. But ACK with whatever reasonable version number you choose. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1036227: bookworm-pu: package r-cran-shiny/1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-sh...@packages.debian.org, 1035...@bugs.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-shiny I'd like to announce an upload to testing-proposed-updates [ Reason ] As discussed on the mailing list debian-release@l.d.o[1] the accidental upload of r-base prevents r-cran-shiny from migrating to testing since it has some failing tests due to the r-base version conflict. Thus an upload to testing-proposed-updates seems an appropriate solution for this and this bug report is about asking you for confirmation about this solution. [ Impact ] R-cran-shiny has an RC bug and is in danger to be not released with bookworm. It has quite some dependencies that would be affected. [ Tests ] There is just a fixed symlink in the upload to fix the RC bug. All tests are passing as usual. [ Risks ] The change to the package is minimal. [ Checklist ] [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [ ] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable --> will be attached once uploaded [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable [ Changes ] I propose to upload the following change to t-p-u: $ git diff HEAD^ diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 21d12c3..a2b6c26 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Upload to testing-proposed-updates "bookworm" due to the fact that +there was an accidental upload of a new version of r-base to unstable + + -- Andreas Tille Wed, 17 May 2023 07:56:25 +0200 + r-cran-shiny (1.7.4+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium Nilesh Patra suggested to use version 1.7.4+dfsg-2+deb12u1 but I personally regard my version suggestion more logical (long explanation given in [2]). [ Other info ] Please confirm that I should upload to t-p-u (and raise your opinion about the most sensible version in your eyes). Kind regards and thanks for working as release team Andreas. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/05/msg00623.html
