Bug#1039484: transition: gpsd
Sebastian, Could you also do a binNMU for collectd? The automatic transition tracker doesn't detect that one because it is only a Recommends instead of a Depends. Thank you, Jeremy Bícha
Bug#1039484: transition: gpsd
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2023-06-27 02:01:41 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 00:13 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2023-06-26 13:24:57 +, Boian Bonev wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org > > > Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd > > > > > > New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API (and > > > of > > > course ABI) > > > soname is bumped from 28 to 30 > > > > > > All rdeps should be good to binNMU against the new libraries, after > > > patching some of > > > them and asking the respective maintainers to upload to unstable. > > > > Have bugs for those issues been filed? > > No, bugs were not filed. > > I went the path of filing PRs and/or sending patches over email. All those are > already merged and the fixed packages have been uploaded. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1039484: transition: gpsd
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hi, On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 00:13 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2023-06-26 13:24:57 +, Boian Bonev wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd > > > > New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API (and of > > course ABI) > > soname is bumped from 28 to 30 > > > > All rdeps should be good to binNMU against the new libraries, after > > patching some of > > them and asking the respective maintainers to upload to unstable. > > Have bugs for those issues been filed? No, bugs were not filed. I went the path of filing PRs and/or sending patches over email. All those are already merged and the fixed packages have been uploaded. Sorry for being unclear that the above is already complete. ~exp2 differs from ~exp1 by a patch that fixes the build on Hurd. The rest of the ports did built fine besides alpha (not enough builders or it got stuck) and the ones that are missing deps... I am not expecting the build on alpha to fail. With best regards, b. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1039484: transition: gpsd
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2023-06-26 13:24:57 +, Boian Bonev wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd > > New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API (and of > course ABI) > soname is bumped from 28 to 30 > > All rdeps should be good to binNMU against the new libraries, after patching > some of > them and asking the respective maintainers to upload to unstable. Have bugs for those issues been filed? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1039484: transition: gpsd
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API (and of course ABI) soname is bumped from 28 to 30 All rdeps should be good to binNMU against the new libraries, after patching some of them and asking the respective maintainers to upload to unstable. The expected outcome is a smooth transition. Ben file: title = "gpsd"; is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libgps28|libqgpsmm28)\b/ | .depends ~ /\b(libgps30|libqgpsmm30)\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libgps30|libqgpsmm30)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libgps28|libqgpsmm28)\b/;