Bug#1042428: lintian.debian.org off ?
On 19/11/23 at 23:49 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > This issue still exists. I would now have the need to send the url > > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/service-file-is-not-a-file to upstream > > > developers to learn about this Lintian issue, but the URL does not > > > serve any contents nor does it redirect to a new location. > > > > > > I am still willing to contribute the Apache/Nginx rewrite rules if > > > somebody can point me to a code repository where I can read/contribute > > > at like I announced on September 27th in this thread. > > > > I finally fixed this. Sorry for the delay. > > > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian?packages=entr has a link for each lintian > > tag, that points to (e.g.) > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag.cgi?tag=superfluous-file-pattern > > That page includes a description of the tag as well as all packages > > affected by the tag. > > Thanks! > > Could you consider setting up also redirects from old url, as it seems > that search engines had it indexed pretty well and tend to offer links > to lintian.debian.org as the primary result on on searches for various > Lintian errors? > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/([a-z-]*)/?$ > -> > https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag.cgi?tag=$1 That would be something for DSA to do. @DSA: alternatively, maybe you could setup lintian.debian.org as served by an apache on ullmann.debian.org, and managed by the uddadm group? Then I could handle redirects myself. Lucas
Bug#1042428: lintian.debian.org off ?
> > This issue still exists. I would now have the need to send the url > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/service-file-is-not-a-file to upstream > > developers to learn about this Lintian issue, but the URL does not > > serve any contents nor does it redirect to a new location. > > > > I am still willing to contribute the Apache/Nginx rewrite rules if > > somebody can point me to a code repository where I can read/contribute > > at like I announced on September 27th in this thread. > > I finally fixed this. Sorry for the delay. > > https://udd.debian.org/lintian?packages=entr has a link for each lintian > tag, that points to (e.g.) > https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag.cgi?tag=superfluous-file-pattern > That page includes a description of the tag as well as all packages > affected by the tag. Thanks! Could you consider setting up also redirects from old url, as it seems that search engines had it indexed pretty well and tend to offer links to lintian.debian.org as the primary result on on searches for various Lintian errors? https://lintian.debian.org/tags/([a-z-]*)/?$ -> https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag.cgi?tag=$1
Bug#1042428: lintian.debian.org off ?
Hi! On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > #1042428 is the bug for "no explanation for lintian tags on UDD" > > On 26/09/23 at 21:35 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > I know Lintian tag info is available via command line, but I > > frequently need to educate upstreams about Lintian rules, and thus > > really also need a URL to share to them. Perhaps I could implement > > that later in the year. > > That's indeed a good rationale for adding a web interface to lintian > tags explanations. Thanks. > > I still plan to work on adding that eventually. This issue still exists. I would now have the need to send the url https://lintian.debian.org/tags/service-file-is-not-a-file to upstream developers to learn about this Lintian issue, but the URL does not serve any contents nor does it redirect to a new location. I am still willing to contribute the Apache/Nginx rewrite rules if somebody can point me to a code repository where I can read/contribute at like I announced on September 27th in this thread. - Otto
Bug#1042428: lintian.debian.org off ?
Hi, #1042428 is the bug for "no explanation for lintian tags on UDD" On 26/09/23 at 21:35 -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I know Lintian tag info is available via command line, but I > frequently need to educate upstreams about Lintian rules, and thus > really also need a URL to share to them. Perhaps I could implement > that later in the year. That's indeed a good rationale for adding a web interface to lintian tags explanations. Thanks. I still plan to work on adding that eventually. Lucas
