Bug#1044073: python-altair and pandas 2.0

2024-02-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca,

Am Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 09:32:32PM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer:
> Please don't skip/xfail tests - my suggestion above is an actual fix:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/python-altair/-/tree/fix1044073?ref_type=heads
> 
> (In a fork because, despite its description, this is not actually a
> debian-science package.  The Salsa CI "fail" is because the *old* version is
> uninstallable due to Breaks: in pandas and the piuparts upgrade test counts
> this as a fail.)

The point I was making in my mail was that I had trouble running the
tests in **latest** upstream version (5.2.0).  I did not test your
suggested patch since I think we should strive for latest upstream in
general and this is a good chance to do so ... except if we might be
in a hurry to catch up with Pandas 2.x and there is no quick chance to
sort out the remaining python-altair issue.[1]

Kind regards
   Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-altair/-/jobs/5240584

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1044073: python-altair and pandas 2.0

2024-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer

Please don't skip/xfail tests - my suggestion above is an actual fix:

https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/python-altair/-/tree/fix1044073?ref_type=heads

(In a fork because, despite its description, this is not actually a 
debian-science package.  The Salsa CI "fail" is because the *old* 
version is uninstallable due to Breaks: in pandas and the piuparts 
upgrade test counts this as a fail.)