On 2023-10-27 09:07, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> What happens if you use bing 192.168.7.123 192.168.7.1
>
> where .1 is your gw and .123 your own ipv4 in this subnet instead of
> localhost
It doesn't seem very happy. Here's a log. There are a bunch of errors
or at least messages surrounding some bandwidth information. The dots
at the end were ongoing when I ctrl-Ced it.
# bing 192.168.7.165 192.168.7.1
Found 2 key hosts
0: 192.168.7.165 (192.168.7.165)
1: 192.168.7.1 (192.168.7.1)
--
Using 10 data payload sizes:
44 205 367 529 691 852 1014 1176 1338 1500
--
ttl=1 probe_res=2 host=192.168.7.165
--bing.c:740-- -> hit
adding host 192.168.7.165 at ttl 0
ttl=1 probe_res=2 host=192.168.7.1
--bing.c:740-- -> hit
adding host 192.168.7.1 at ttl 1
Found 2 hosts
0: 0 - 192.168.7.165 (insight.lan/192.168.7.165)
1: 1 - 192.168.7.1 (gw/192.168.7.1)
0 192.168.7.1650.004 ms, 1.000/2 , 80.0%,
0.0%
| 8361.29Kb/s, 845.78 us ( 884 bytes), 1.000/2
| 11.78Mb/s, 1.50 ms ( 2216 bytes)
1 192.168.7.1 1.509 ms, 0.981/7 , 30.0%,
0.0%
Round 1 hinvalid: 11 (55.0%), linvalid: 0 (0.0%), redo: 0 (0.0%), total:
11 (55.0%)
RTT status for method 0
0: ( 0.008) ( 0.008) ( 0.014) ( 0.033) ( 0.010) ( 0.009) ( 0.009)
0.008 ( 0.013)0.009
1:1.747 1.901 ( 2.531) ( 2.996)2.463 2.546 2.808
3.196 ( 4.566)3.817
Host level regression errors for method 0
0: - - - - - - -
-0. - -0.
1:0.11310.0480 - - -0.0513 -0.1874 -0.1459
0.0217 -0.2018
Link level rtt differences for method 0
1: - - - - - - -
3.1880 -3.8080
Link level regression errors for method 0
1: - - - - - - -
-0. - -0.
0 192.168.7.1650.004 ms, 1.000/2 , 80.0%,
0.0%
| .-- b/s, ---.-- ms (- bytes), -.---/--
| 13.38Mb/s, 1.54 ms ( 2573 bytes)
1 192.168.7.1 1.543 ms, 0.938/8 , 20.0%,
0.0%
Round 2 hinvalid: 10 (50.0%), linvalid: 0 (0.0%), redo: 0 (0.0%), total:
10 (50.0%)
RTT status for method 0
0: ( 0.008) ( 0.008) ( 0.014) ( 0.033) ( 0.010) ( 0.009) ( 0.009)
0.008 ( 0.013)0.009
1:1.747 1.901 1.981 2.180 2.463 2.546 ( 2.808) (
3.196)2.792 3.817
Host level regression errors for method 0
0: - - - - - - -
-0. - -0.
1:0.09400.0550 -0.0592 -0.05450.0343 -0.0757 -
- -0.41240.4184
Link level rtt differences for method 0
1: - - - - - - -
- -3.8080
Link level regression errors for method 0
1: - - - - - - -
- - -
0 192.168.7.1650.004 ms, 1.000/2 , 80.0%,
0.0%
| 4133.97Kb/s, ---.-- ms (- bytes), 1.000/2
| 14.50Mb/s, 1.56 ms ( 2831 bytes)
1 192.168.7.1 1.566 ms, 0.910/9 , 10.0%,
0.0%
Round 3 hinvalid: 9 (45.0%), linvalid: 0 (0.0%), redo: 0 (0.0%), total:
9 (45.0%)
RTT status for method 0
0: ( 0.008) ( 0.008) ( 0.014) ( 0.033) ( 0.010) ( 0.009) ( 0.009)
0.008 ( 0.013)0.009
1:1.747 1.901 1.981 2.180 2.463 2.546 ( 2.602)
2.562 2.792 3.817
Host level regression errors for method 0
0: - - - - - - -
-0. - -0.
1:0.07910.0550 -0.0443 -0.02460.0792 -0.0160 -
-0.3585 -0.30780.5379
Link level rtt differences for method 0
1: - - - - - - -
2.5540 -3.8080
Link level regression errors for method 0
1: - - - - - - -
-0. - -0.
0 192.168.7.1650.004 ms, 1.000/2 , 80.0%,
0.0%
| 4133.97Kb/s, ---.-- ms (- bytes), 1.000/2
| 14.85Mb/s, 1.56 ms ( 2894 bytes)
1 192.168.7.1 1.564 ms, 0.902/9 , 10.0%,
0.0%
Round 4 hinvalid: 9 (45.0%), linvalid: 0 (0.0%), redo: 0 (0.0%), total:
9 (45.0%)
RTT status for method 0
0: ( 0.008) ( 0.008) ( 0.014) ( 0.033) ( 0.010) ( 0.009) ( 0.009)
0.008 ( 0.013)0.009
1:1.747 1.901 1.981 2.180 2.463 ( 2.546)2.515
2.562 2.792 3.817
Host level regression errors for method 0
0: - - - - - - -
-0. - -0.
