Bug#1054747: ruby-octokit: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: require 'pry-byebug'

2023-12-03 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:20:42PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: ruby-octokit
> Version: 4.20.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie
> 
> Hi,
> 
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
> 
> 
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > Failure/Error: require 'pry-byebug'
> > 
> > Gem::MissingSpecError:
> >   Could not find 'pry' (~> 0.13.0) among 122 total gem(s)


A possible fix for this issue could be to just update pry-byebug package to a
more recent release.

https://github.com/deivid-rodriguez/pry-byebug/commit/a915f21fc63aa94473bbe7cb752c0fabacc3e567

pry-byebug 3.10.1 depends on a pry version that's in the archive.

https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/pry



Bug#1054747: ruby-octokit: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: Failure/Error: require 'pry-byebug'

2023-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: ruby-octokit
Version: 4.20.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: require 'pry-byebug'
> 
> Gem::MissingSpecError:
>   Could not find 'pry' (~> 0.13.0) among 122 total gem(s)
>   Checked in 
> 'GEM_PATH=/<>/debian/ruby-octokit/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all:/<>/debian/.debhelper/generated/_source/home/.local/share/gem/ruby/3.1.0:/var/lib/gems/3.1.0:/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0:/usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.1.0:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/gems/3.1.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/3.1.0:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/rubygems-integration/3.1.0'
>  at: 
> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/specifications/pry-byebug-3.9.0.gemspec, 
> execute `gem env` for more information
> # ./spec/helper.rb:12:in `'
> # ./spec/octokit_spec.rb:1:in `'
> # --
> # --- Caused by: ---
> # LoadError:
> #   cannot load such file -- pry-byebug
> #   ./spec/helper.rb:12:in `'
> No examples found.
> 
> Finished in 0.6 seconds (files took 2.89 seconds to load)
> 0 examples, 0 failures, 66 errors occurred outside of examples
> 
> Coverage report generated for RSpec to /<>/coverage. 1360 / 7524 
> LOC (18.08%) covered.
> Stopped processing SimpleCov as a previous error not related to SimpleCov has 
> been detected
> /usr/bin/ruby3.1 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.12.0/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.12.0/exe/rspec 
> --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: 


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/10/27/ruby-octokit_4.20.0-1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20231027;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na=ign=7=7=only=ftbfs-20231027=lu...@debian.org=1=1=1=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.