Bug#1057363: RM: twitterwatch -- RoQA; Upstream Dead; Useless with Twitter API Changes
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 12:04:31AM -0500, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > I am not the package maintainer for db2twitter or retweet, so I am not in the > position > of saying whether I should object or not. > > I see that you are also a Debian Developer; you should have the same > permission or right > on RM bug submission as I do. Ack. I already pinged directly the maintainer for the packages I mentioned and I'll take action soon if no answer is received. I thought twitterwatch removal was asked as part of general QA process so that's why I asked for those packages in the first place. Cheers, Miguel.
Bug#1057363: RM: twitterwatch -- RoQA; Upstream Dead; Useless with Twitter API Changes
Hi, 在 2023-12-04星期一的 21:02 +，Miguel Landaeta写道： > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:09 AM Boyuan Yang wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Dear Debian FTP Masters, > > > > As discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/1056613 , package twitterwatch > > makes use > > of Twitter API, which is gone since 2023. Its upstream shows no activity > > for 7 years, > > and the Debian package received no maintainer updates since 2016. As a > > result, I > > believe we should have package twitterwatch removed from Debian archive. > > > > Hi Boyuan, > > Thanks for submitting this bug. > > Do you have any objection to doing the same for db2twitter and retweet > packages? > > I think they are in the same situation. I am not the package maintainer for db2twitter or retweet, so I am not in the position of saying whether I should object or not. I see that you are also a Debian Developer; you should have the same permission or right on RM bug submission as I do. Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1057363: RM: twitterwatch -- RoQA; Upstream Dead; Useless with Twitter API Changes
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:09 AM Boyuan Yang wrote: > > [...] > > Dear Debian FTP Masters, > > As discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/1056613 , package twitterwatch makes > use > of Twitter API, which is gone since 2023. Its upstream shows no activity for > 7 years, > and the Debian package received no maintainer updates since 2016. As a > result, I > believe we should have package twitterwatch removed from Debian archive. > Hi Boyuan, Thanks for submitting this bug. Do you have any objection to doing the same for db2twitter and retweet packages? I think they are in the same situation. Cheers, Miguel. -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
Bug#1057363: RM: twitterwatch -- RoQA; Upstream Dead; Useless with Twitter API Changes
Package: ftp.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:twitterwatch X-Debbugs-Cc: twitterwa...@packages.debian.org User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: by...@debian.org cha...@debian.org nomad...@debian.org Severity: normal Dear Debian FTP Masters, As discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/1056613 , package twitterwatch makes use of Twitter API, which is gone since 2023. Its upstream shows no activity for 7 years, and the Debian package received no maintainer updates since 2016. As a result, I believe we should have package twitterwatch removed from Debian archive. Thanks, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
