Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)
Control: reopen -1 On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 08:12 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all > > to > > libnanomsg6 > > and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias > > proceed? > > yes, this is correct. Change soname and go for experimental, and ask upstream > to change > soname only > if symbols are changed. > > G. Hi Gianfranco, This is now done and ready for review. Regards copyrights that pop-up i.e.: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059236#16 This is the original author, now working under their company name. Regards Phil -- Playing the game for the games sake. Web: * Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett * Website: https://kathenas.org * Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/ * Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)
On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 08:12 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, > > > I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all > > to > > libnanomsg6 > > and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias > > proceed? > > yes, this is correct. Change soname and go for experimental, and ask upstream > to change > soname only > if symbols are changed. > > G. Thanks for the advice. I will process the package in the next day or so. Playing priority catch-up after a number of days in bed due to my back condition. Regards Phil -- Playing the game for the games sake. Web: * Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett * Website: https://kathenas.org * Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/ * Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 08:18 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > 1059236 Hi Gianfranco, I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all to libnanomsg6 and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias proceed? Regards Phil -- Playing the game for the games sake. Web: * Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett * Website: https://kathenas.org * Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/ * Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1059236: closed by Gianfranco Costamagna (Re: Bug#1057954: RFS: nanomsg/1.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- nanomsg utilities)
Hello, >I think I need advice here. I am tempted to breaks replace and upgrade all to >libnanomsg6 >and then work with upstream on SONAMES etc. How would you and Tobias proceed? yes, this is correct. Change soname and go for experimental, and ask upstream to change soname only if symbols are changed. G.
