Bug#1059511: pocl: FTBFS on many architectures: The testsuite has failed
Hi! On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 6:35 AM Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 pocl: FTBFS on riscv64: testsuite fails: can't link > double-float modules with soft-float modules > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > On 27/12/2023 09.54, Bo YU wrote: > > The same issue happend on 5.0 also: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl=experimental > > > > But from upstream 5.0 release note, there is support well expect 4 tests > > failed. So what is your advice here about the issue? > > In the buildlog I see > >13% tests passed, 228 tests failed out of 263 > > Errors seem to happen at OpenCL kernel build time: > >LLVM ERROR: unable to write nop sequence of 2 bytes > > and mostly > >/usr/bin/ld: /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libm.so: can't link double-float >modules with soft-float modules > >/usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file >/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libm.so > ... >error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > >Final linking of kernel test_shuffle_2_2 failed. > > > I'd suggest postponing further analysis until sid has pocl 5.0 and > switched from llvm-15 to llvm-16. These two changes will *not* happen in > a single upload. Thanks. I did not notice these special test logs from buildd. I will look at this more here. BR, Bo > > > Andreas
Bug#1059511: pocl: FTBFS on many architectures: The testsuite has failed
Control: retitle -1 pocl: FTBFS on riscv64: testsuite fails: can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules Control: severity -1 wishlist On 27/12/2023 09.54, Bo YU wrote: The same issue happend on 5.0 also: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl=experimental But from upstream 5.0 release note, there is support well expect 4 tests failed. So what is your advice here about the issue? In the buildlog I see 13% tests passed, 228 tests failed out of 263 Errors seem to happen at OpenCL kernel build time: LLVM ERROR: unable to write nop sequence of 2 bytes and mostly /usr/bin/ld: /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libm.so: can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libm.so /usr/bin/ld: /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1: can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 /usr/bin/ld: /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 /usr/bin/ld: /lib/ld-linux-riscv64-lp64d.so.1: can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file /lib/ld-linux-riscv64-lp64d.so.1 /usr/bin/ld: /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1: can't link double-float modules with soft-float modules /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file /lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) Final linking of kernel test_shuffle_2_2 failed. I'd suggest postponing further analysis until sid has pocl 5.0 and switched from llvm-15 to llvm-16. These two changes will *not* happen in a single upload. Andreas
Bug#1059511: pocl: FTBFS on many architectures: The testsuite has failed
Source: pocl Version: 4.0-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I am looking at the build issue from riscv64 port view but it can not be build many arches: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl It seems even updated the symbols file still failed due to exist debian/stamp-failed-testsuite file. ``` run_dh_makeshlibs: dh_makeshlibs delayed_check_dh_auto_test_result: run_dh_makeshlibs @set -ex; if test -f debian/stamp-failed-testsuite ; then \ echo "* The testsuite has failed! *" ; \ exit 1 ; \ fi @test -f obj-*/Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log && echo 'The testsuite has passed all tests.' || echo '*** The testsuite was *NOT* ru n! ***' ``` The same issue happend on 5.0 also: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pocl=experimental But from upstream 5.0 release note, there is support well expect 4 tests failed. So what is your advice here about the issue? http://portablecl.org/docs/html/notes_5_0.html#risc-v-cpu-support-improved -- Regards, -- Bo YU signature.asc Description: PGP signature
