Bug#1061857: Recommends: is too strong for dante-client

2024-02-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:17:03AM +0100, Robin Jarry wrote:
> Nilesh Patra, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:07:
> > From what I gather, filters/html still uses socksify from dante package.
> > This looks OK as recommends - given that in 2024, people do get a bunch of 
> > HTML mails.
> > 
> > I want to close this bug if you agree.
> 
> We *could* drop it and change the default html filter to only use w3m
> without socksify.
> 
> Actually, aerc already ships an html-unsafe filter that does exactly that:
> 
> https://git.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc/tree/master/item/filters/html-unsafe
> 
> The name may be frightening, I guess we could remove the hard dependency to
> socksify. People with high concerns for privacy can always tweak it to their
> needs.
> 
> Thoughts?

This probably should only be done if/when the default html filter is update to
not use socksify. I don't want end users to run into surprises.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1061857: Recommends: is too strong for dante-client

2024-02-01 Thread Robin Jarry

Nilesh Patra, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:07:

From what I gather, filters/html still uses socksify from dante package.
This looks OK as recommends - given that in 2024, people do get a bunch of HTML 
mails.

I want to close this bug if you agree.


We *could* drop it and change the default html filter to only use w3m 
without socksify.


Actually, aerc already ships an html-unsafe filter that does exactly 
that:


https://git.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc/tree/master/item/filters/html-unsafe

The name may be frightening, I guess we could remove the hard dependency 
to socksify. People with high concerns for privacy can always tweak it 
to their needs.


Thoughts?



Bug#1061857: Recommends: is too strong for dante-client

2024-02-01 Thread Nilesh Patra
> [ I wanted to git-blame the control file, and/or submit a patch, but
>  Salsa is down right now and I couldn't find a mirror ]

This is the relevant commit:

commit 4077340f13b46f2fd9dcb17d3f50b4a59292530c (tag: debian/0.3.0-1)
Author: Ben Fiedler 
Date:   Sat Apr 25 17:57:31 2020 +0200

Recommend dante-client and w3m

These packages are used for viewing html mails using the default html
filter.

From what I gather, filters/html still uses socksify from dante package.
This looks OK as recommends - given that in 2024, people do get a bunch of HTML 
mails.

I want to close this bug if you agree.

Best,
Nilesh


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1061857: Recommends: is too strong for dante-client

2024-01-29 Thread Jonathan Dowland

Package: aerc
Version: 0.16.0-1
Severity: minor

Hi there,

I don't think dante-client meets the bar for Recommends: "The Recommends
field should list packages that would be found together with this one in
all but unusual installations." Quite honestly I think the opposite is
true, the need for things like dante-client is somewhat esoteric. I
think this should be dropped to Suggests, or removed entirely.

[ I wanted to git-blame the control file, and/or submit a patch, but
  Salsa is down right now and I couldn't find a mirror ]