Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:46:16PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break > debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? > > (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas > 2.x transition. I agree that upgrading to a new upstream is a good idea in > the long run.) Dear Rebecca, A quick update on this: version -9 failed its autopkgtests on some archs, so I uploaded version -10 this morning. Hopefully that will pass and migrate in a couple of days. On the pandas front, though, I don't know if you've seen the roadmap: version 2.2 is released, and version 3.0 is in preparation. But 3.0 will depend on PyArrow - the string data type will use PyArrow as a backend rather than NumPy as at present. This is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970021 and it looks like this is going to be a monster to package. It's probably worth getting a small group of developers together to work on this soonish - I don't have the capacity to take it on, I'm afraid. Best wishes, Julian
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:46:16PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break > debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? > > (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas > 2.x transition. I agree that upgrading to a new upstream is a good idea in > the long run.) Fair point; I've just uploaded 2.10.0+ds-9. Best wishes, Julian
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
Is that a yes to>> Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy?or have you not tried specifically that? (I'm looking for a quick fix for the autopkgtest fail to unblock the pandas 2.x transition. I agree that upgrading to a new upstream is a good idea in the long run.) the bytecode version in pydevd is behind that in Debian, This is currently true (Debian has python3-bytecode 0.15.1, upstream pydevd 2.10.0 vendors 0.13.0.dev), but if it were a problem I'd expect it to mean that pydevd/debugpy were *already* buggy, not that my patch makes them worse.
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:36:29PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > Thank you for caring about not breaking other packages, and yes, that's a > good reason to not upload that new upstream for now. > > Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy? (It > shouldn't be able to, since it only touches test code.) It's taking time to locate the source of the problem. It's a bit messy: debugpy vendors pydevd, pydevd in turn vendors bytecode. I've split out bytecode and pydevd into separate packages. Unfortunately, the bytecode version in pydevd is behind that in Debian, though that should not be too much of a problem. The native version of debugpy (with all other packages being Debian ones) passes all the tests in a Debian testing lxc container, but with the Debian versions of bytecode, pydevd and debugpy, it doesn't. So something's gone wrong somewhere, but it's taking some effort to locate (and hopefully fix!) the cause. Best wishes, Julian
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
Thank you for caring about not breaking other packages, and yes, that's a good reason to not upload that new upstream for now. Does just the patch (not the new upstream) also break debugpy? (It shouldn't be able to, since it only touches test code.)
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:03:34AM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > This has been merged but not uploaded - is there a reason it shouldn't be, > or have you just not had time? Hi Rebecca, Yes; I've upgraded to the latest version in my local repo, which includes this patch upstream, but it's now causing FTBFS issues in debugpy, which I haven't managed to track down yet. :-( Julian
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
This has been merged but not uploaded - is there a reason it shouldn't be, or have you just not had time?
Bug#1063274: pydevd: autopkgtest-failing warning with pandas 2.1
Source: pydevd Severity: serious Tags: patch A pydevd test uses DataFrame.applymap(), and fails because this now raises a FutureWarning. Replacing it with DataFrame.map() as this message suggests would probably fix it.
