Bug#1067094: pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh

2024-03-20 Thread Ben Westover
It turned out to just be a test expecting the 32 bit limit. This is 
patched in the newest version which I have just uploaded. Build fixed!

--
Ben Westover


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1067094: pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh

2024-03-20 Thread Ben Westover
Hello,

Arch Linux ARM supports armhf/armel just fine, so I think this can work 
with little to no patches. I haven't been able to take a look since the 
t64 transition because I have been busy with other things. I will likely 
have time tomorrow to fix this.

--
Ben Westover



Bug#1067094: pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh

2024-03-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
Source: pacman-package-manager
Version: 6.0.2-4.1
Severity: grave

Pacman currently fails to build on armel/armhf, probably as a fallout
from the time64 changes.

Given it seems extremely unlikely to be needed on those architectures,
given Archlinux doesn't even support them, I'd recommend to simply
build-depend on architecture-is-64-bit to drop all 32 bit arches
support, and revert the libalpm13 package rename that added the t64
suffix.