Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: this is no bug in the package, bug in the script doing the rebuild?
On 24/04/2024 20:38, Rene Engelhard wrote: My point is that you don't need the alternative. Hi Rene, but it would surely be needed if someone wanted to build winff from source on armel? Even though that case is perhaps unlikely. I can't see how the alternative is doing any harm. Regards, Peter
Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: this is no bug in the package, bug in the script doing the rebuild?
Hi, Am 24.04.24 um 21:35 schrieb Peter B: Why is it bad? The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui packages. Exactly. That#s why they should be used in package building for converting stuff. One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its available? It is available. As indep builds are not done on armel that it's not available on armel does not really matter :) My point is that you don't need the alternative. Regards, Rene
Bug#1069554: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#1069554: this is no bug in the package, bug in the script doing the rebuild?
On 24/04/2024 20:02, Rene Engelhard wrote: This bugreport now caused the following "fix" in winff: Build-Depends-Indep: faketime, libreoffice-draw-nogui | libreoffice-draw, libreoffice-writer-nogui | libreoffice-writer, which I consider bad... Hi Rene, Why is it bad? The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui packages. One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its available? Regards, Peter P.S. Relates to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065447
