Bug#1069620: RFS: lua-mode/20231023~git-1 -- Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs
Control: retitle -1 RFS: lua-mode/20221027+git20231023.d074e41-1 -- Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs Hi Phil, Phil Wyett writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi all, > > Do we have a consensus as yet on the versioning? > I actually lost track of this. I have now changed to use the version of the package with git snapshot date plus hash. New changes pushed to team repo[1] and rebuilt package uploaded to mentors[2]. PTAL. > Regards > > Phil > > > On Sat, 11 May 2024 10:29:56 -0700 Xiyue Deng wrote: >> Hi Tobias, >> >> Tobias Frost writes: >> >> > Hi Xiyue, >> > >> > when packaging a git snapshot, I feel this should be indicated in the >> > upstream version that it is based on the old one, something like >> > + >> > >> > In your case I'd 20210802+git20231023 as upstream version. >> > >> > Long time ago I did something like that for dhewm3, you >> > can see the watch file here: >> > > https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/dhewm3/-/blob/debian/1.5.0+git20181221+dfsg-1/debian/watch?ref_type=tags >> > >> > (not marking moreinfo, as other people might see that differently.) >> >> Thanks for your comments! I actually also thought about this but ended >> up not following that idea because it will end up with 3 different >> versions based on dates: >> >> * 20210802 which is the last tagged version[1], >> * 20221027 which is specified in the upstream source[2] and will end up >> in the installed elpa package directory but was never tagged, and >> * 20231023 which is the date of the latest upstream commit[3] when >> sending this email. >> >> I think 20210802+git20231023. follows the current practice but >> will be *very* confusing when user will find that the package is >> installed at /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/lua-mode-20221027. I chose >> 20231023~git as a compromise just to avoid having too many dates there, >> which is still possible to upgrade to 20231023 should that be tagged one >> day. I think the next choice could be 20221027+git20231023. just >> so there is one less date to deal with. >> >> Wdyt? >> >> [1] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/tags >> [2] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/blob/master/lua-mode.el#L15 >> [3] > https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/commit/d074e4134b1beae9ed4c9b512af741ca0d852ba3 >> >> > >> > -- >> > tobi >> > >> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: >> >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> >> Severity: normal >> >> >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-mode": >> >> >> >> * Package name : lua-mode >> >> Version : 20231023~git-1 >> >> Upstream contact : immerrr >> >> * URL : https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode >> >> * License : GPL-3+ >> >> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/lua-mode > > -- > > "I play the game for the game’s own sake" > > Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans > > -- > > Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg > > Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas > > Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org > > Website: https://kathenas.org > > Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ > > Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg [1] https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/lua-mode [2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-mode/ -- Xiyue Deng signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1069620: RFS: lua-mode/20231023~git-1 -- Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs
Hi all, Do we have a consensus as yet on the versioning? Regards Phil On Sat, 11 May 2024 10:29:56 -0700 Xiyue Deng wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > Tobias Frost writes: > > > Hi Xiyue, > > > > when packaging a git snapshot, I feel this should be indicated in the > > upstream version that it is based on the old one, something like > > + > > > > In your case I'd 20210802+git20231023 as upstream version. > > > > Long time ago I did something like that for dhewm3, you > > can see the watch file here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/dhewm3/-/blob/debian/1.5.0+git20181221+dfsg-1/debian/watch?ref_type=tags > > > > (not marking moreinfo, as other people might see that differently.) > > Thanks for your comments! I actually also thought about this but ended > up not following that idea because it will end up with 3 different > versions based on dates: > > * 20210802 which is the last tagged version[1], > * 20221027 which is specified in the upstream source[2] and will end up > in the installed elpa package directory but was never tagged, and > * 20231023 which is the date of the latest upstream commit[3] when > sending this email. > > I think 20210802+git20231023. follows the current practice but > will be *very* confusing when user will find that the package is > installed at /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/lua-mode-20221027. I chose > 20231023~git as a compromise just to avoid having too many dates there, > which is still possible to upgrade to 20231023 should that be tagged one > day. I think the next choice could be 20221027+git20231023. just > so there is one less date to deal with. > > Wdyt? > > [1] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/tags > [2] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/blob/master/lua-mode.el#L15 > [3] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/commit/d074e4134b1beae9ed4c9b512af741ca0d852ba3 > > > > > -- > > tobi > > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Package: sponsorship-requests > >> Severity: normal > >> > >> Dear mentors, > >> > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-mode": > >> > >> * Package name : lua-mode > >> Version : 20231023~git-1 > >> Upstream contact : immerrr > >> * URL : https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode > >> * License : GPL-3+ > >> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/lua-mode -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1069620: RFS: lua-mode/20231023~git-1 -- Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs
Hi Tobias, Tobias Frost writes: > Hi Xiyue, > > when packaging a git snapshot, I feel this should be indicated in the > upstream version that it is based on the old one, something like > + > > In your case I'd 20210802+git20231023 as upstream version. > > Long time ago I did something like that for dhewm3, you > can see the watch file here: > https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/dhewm3/-/blob/debian/1.5.0+git20181221+dfsg-1/debian/watch?ref_type=tags > > (not marking moreinfo, as other people might see that differently.) Thanks for your comments! I actually also thought about this but ended up not following that idea because it will end up with 3 different versions based on dates: * 20210802 which is the last tagged version[1], * 20221027 which is specified in the upstream source[2] and will end up in the installed elpa package directory but was never tagged, and * 20231023 which is the date of the latest upstream commit[3] when sending this email. I think 20210802+git20231023. follows the current practice but will be *very* confusing when user will find that the package is installed at /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa/lua-mode-20221027. I chose 20231023~git as a compromise just to avoid having too many dates there, which is still possible to upgrade to 20231023 should that be tagged one day. I think the next choice could be 20221027+git20231023. just so there is one less date to deal with. Wdyt? [1] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/tags [2] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/blob/master/lua-mode.el#L15 [3] https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode/commit/d074e4134b1beae9ed4c9b512af741ca0d852ba3 > > -- > tobi > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: >> Package: sponsorship-requests >> Severity: normal >> >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-mode": >> >> * Package name : lua-mode >>Version : 20231023~git-1 >>Upstream contact : immerrr >> * URL : https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode >> * License : GPL-3+ >> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/lua-mode >>Section : lisp >> >> The source builds the following binary packages: >> >> elpa-lua-mode - Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs >> >> To access further information about this package, please visit the following >> URL: >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-mode/ >> >> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: >> >> dget -x >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-mode/lua-mode_20231023~git-1.dsc >> >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> lua-mode (20231023~git-1) unstable; urgency=medium >> . >>* Sync to latest upstream snapshot (d074e41) >>* Drop the patch applied upstream and reorder the remaining patch >>* Update upstream license to GPL-3+ following upstream change >>* Add a missing upstream copyright holder >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Xiyue Deng >> -- Xiyue Deng
Bug#1069620: RFS: lua-mode/20231023~git-1 -- Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs
Hi Xiyue, when packaging a git snapshot, I feel this should be indicated in the upstream version that it is based on the old one, something like + In your case I'd 20210802+git20231023 as upstream version. Long time ago I did something like that for dhewm3, you can see the watch file here: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/dhewm3/-/blob/debian/1.5.0+git20181221+dfsg-1/debian/watch?ref_type=tags (not marking moreinfo, as other people might see that differently.) -- tobi On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-mode": > > * Package name : lua-mode >Version : 20231023~git-1 >Upstream contact : immerrr > * URL : https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode > * License : GPL-3+ > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/lua-mode >Section : lisp > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > elpa-lua-mode - Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-mode/ > > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-mode/lua-mode_20231023~git-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > lua-mode (20231023~git-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Sync to latest upstream snapshot (d074e41) >* Drop the patch applied upstream and reorder the remaining patch >* Update upstream license to GPL-3+ following upstream change >* Add a missing upstream copyright holder > > Regards, > -- > Xiyue Deng >
Bug#1069620: RFS: lua-mode/20231023~git-1 -- Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-mode": * Package name : lua-mode Version : 20231023~git-1 Upstream contact : immerrr * URL : https://github.com/immerrr/lua-mode * License : GPL-3+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/lua-mode Section : lisp The source builds the following binary packages: elpa-lua-mode - Emacs major-mode for editing Lua programs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-mode/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-mode/lua-mode_20231023~git-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: lua-mode (20231023~git-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Sync to latest upstream snapshot (d074e41) * Drop the patch applied upstream and reorder the remaining patch * Update upstream license to GPL-3+ following upstream change * Add a missing upstream copyright holder Regards, -- Xiyue Deng
