Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-02-04 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:20 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 On 02/02/2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:40 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
   On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:36 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Further diagnosis showed that these are the error causing lines, along
with the fixes:
   
diff -u mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure 
mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
--- mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
+++ mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
@@ -15820,11 +15820,11 @@
# turn off f90
F90=
else
-   F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modflag`
-   F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
+   F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile 
f90modflag`
+   F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile 
f90modspec`
 if test -z $USER_SET_F90INC -a -z $F90INC ; then
# This should use a test or try to get it from the 
f90module.
-   F90INC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
+   F90INC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
 fi
 fi
 fi
   
For some reason, make was printing make[1]: entering directory...
(and confusing the build). And this resulted in a bad config.status,
with sed errors (and commands like sed s,make[1] ...),  which produced
an empty mpe_fortdefs.h, which didn't result in defines for the
relevant MPI_* stuff.
 
  I'm not getting something here.  In my build, and I see in yours as
  well, there's this:
 
  make --no-print-directory mpi-addons
  Making a shared library of libmpich.a
  farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
  farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
  farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
  farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
  Successfully linked libmpich.a
  Making a shared library of libpmpich.a
  farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
  farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
  farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
  farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
  Successfully linked libpmpich.a
  Making a shared library of libfmpich.a
  farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
  farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
  farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
  farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
  Successfully linked libfmpich.a
  Making a shared library of libpmpich++.a
  Successfully linked libpmpich++.a
  Testing that MPI applications can be linked with shared libs...
 
 This is due to the following patch I introduced:
 
 @@ -170,7 +170,10 @@
  libbase=`basename $libname .a`
 # The -h name sets the name of the object; this is necessary to
 # ensure that the dynamic linker can find the proper shared library.
 -if $CLINKER -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o
 ../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
 +export F77_GETARGDECL=intrinsic GETARG
 +   if $CLINKER -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o
 ../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
 +   echo Successfully linked $libname
 +   elif gfortran -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o
 ../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
 echo Successfully linked $libname
 else
 echo Linking $libname shared lib failed 
 
 Note that $CLINKER will fail to resolve the getarg calls. However, the
 elif case retries with gfortran, and thus, ends up linking fine. The
 ideal solution would be for you to use $CLINKER for those stuff which
 don't need GETARG, and gfortran for linking the stuff which uses
 GETARG.

Ah yes, forgot about that.  Thanks for the clarification.  I'll go ahead
and upload.  It would be nice if it didn't print the error messages...
Maybe for -7 I'll have it print a success message if gfortran works.

[snip]

  I've neatened up the patches, and am putting everything at
  http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/mpich/ with a bunch of new mpif90 support
  stuff.  If you're sure it's right, I'll upload it.  But it will have to
  get through the new queue because of the ldbl-gf name change.
 
 I guess things should be fine, though you might want others with
 rdepends to check. To allay fears of breakage, experimental might be
 OK?

Because mpicc and friends seem to work, I think I'll try unstable and if
it causes problems I'll deal with those later.

  [BTW, are you on debian-beowulf and/or debian-science?  If so, I won't
  CC you in my announcement to those lists of the mpich transition.]
 
 No, I am not (yet). Please do CC me, though I'll be a mere observer.

Okay, will do.

Thanks again,
-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools

Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-02-01 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:40 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:36 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
  Further diagnosis showed that these are the error causing lines, along
  with the fixes:
  
  diff -u mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
  --- mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
  +++ mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
  @@ -15820,11 +15820,11 @@
  # turn off f90
  F90=
  else
  -   F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modflag`
  -   F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
  +   F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modflag`
  +   F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
   if test -z $USER_SET_F90INC -a -z $F90INC ; then
  # This should use a test or try to get it from the f90module.
  -   F90INC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
  +   F90INC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
   fi
   fi
   fi
  
  For some reason, make was printing make[1]: entering directory...
  (and confusing the build). And this resulted in a bad config.status,
  with sed errors (and commands like sed s,make[1] ...),  which produced
  an empty mpe_fortdefs.h, which didn't result in defines for the
  relevant MPI_* stuff.

I'm not getting something here.  In my build, and I see in yours as
well, there's this:

make --no-print-directory mpi-addons
Making a shared library of libmpich.a
farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Successfully linked libmpich.a
Making a shared library of libpmpich.a
farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Successfully linked libpmpich.a
Making a shared library of libfmpich.a
farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Successfully linked libfmpich.a
Making a shared library of libpmpich++.a
Successfully linked libpmpich++.a
Testing that MPI applications can be linked with shared libs...

Funny thing is, the libraries are there, and mpicc seems to be able to
use them.  So it seems to work, but I'm not sure I understand how or
why...  Any ideas?

I've neatened up the patches, and am putting everything at
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/mpich/ with a bunch of new mpif90 support
stuff.  If you're sure it's right, I'll upload it.  But it will have to
get through the new queue because of the ldbl-gf name change.

I don't have anything real to test it now, because I've migrated all of
my code to OpenMPI.  That's why I filed the RFA bug #447678...

Thanks again, this is a real milestone for the mpich package!

[BTW, are you on debian-beowulf and/or debian-science?  If so, I won't
CC you in my announcement to those lists of the mpich transition.]

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-02-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On 02/02/2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
 On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 07:40 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:36 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
   Further diagnosis showed that these are the error causing lines, along
   with the fixes:
  
   diff -u mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure 
   mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
   --- mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
   +++ mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
   @@ -15820,11 +15820,11 @@
   # turn off f90
   F90=
   else
   -   F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modflag`
   -   F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
   +   F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile 
   f90modflag`
   +   F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
if test -z $USER_SET_F90INC -a -z $F90INC ; then
   # This should use a test or try to get it from the f90module.
   -   F90INC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
   +   F90INC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
fi
fi
fi
  
   For some reason, make was printing make[1]: entering directory...
   (and confusing the build). And this resulted in a bad config.status,
   with sed errors (and commands like sed s,make[1] ...),  which produced
   an empty mpe_fortdefs.h, which didn't result in defines for the
   relevant MPI_* stuff.

 I'm not getting something here.  In my build, and I see in yours as
 well, there's this:

 make --no-print-directory mpi-addons
 Making a shared library of libmpich.a
 farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
 farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
 farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
 farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 Successfully linked libmpich.a
 Making a shared library of libpmpich.a
 farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
 farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
 farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
 farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 Successfully linked libpmpich.a
 Making a shared library of libfmpich.a
 farg.o: In function `mpir_iargc_':
 farg.f:(.text+0x9): undefined reference to `_gfortran_iargc'
 farg.o: In function `mpir_getarg_':
 farg.f:(.text+0x39): undefined reference to `_gfortran_getarg_i4'
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 Successfully linked libfmpich.a
 Making a shared library of libpmpich++.a
 Successfully linked libpmpich++.a
 Testing that MPI applications can be linked with shared libs...

This is due to the following patch I introduced:

@@ -170,7 +170,10 @@
 libbase=`basename $libname .a`
# The -h name sets the name of the object; this is necessary to
# ensure that the dynamic linker can find the proper shared library.
-if $CLINKER -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o
../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
+export F77_GETARGDECL=intrinsic GETARG
+   if $CLINKER -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o
../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
+   echo Successfully linked $libname
+   elif gfortran -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o
../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
echo Successfully linked $libname
else
echo Linking $libname shared lib failed 

Note that $CLINKER will fail to resolve the getarg calls. However, the
elif case retries with gfortran, and thus, ends up linking fine. The
ideal solution would be for you to use $CLINKER for those stuff which
don't need GETARG, and gfortran for linking the stuff which uses
GETARG.

 Funny thing is, the libraries are there, and mpicc seems to be able to
 use them.  So it seems to work, but I'm not sure I understand how or
 why...  Any ideas?

So, I'd suggest you list out the libraries which need getarg, and link
them using gfortran, and others using $CLINKER. Sounds OK?

 I've neatened up the patches, and am putting everything at
 http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/mpich/ with a bunch of new mpif90 support
 stuff.  If you're sure it's right, I'll upload it.  But it will have to
 get through the new queue because of the ldbl-gf name change.

I guess things should be fine, though you might want others with
rdepends to check. To allay fears of breakage, experimental might be
OK?

 Thanks again, this is a real milestone for the mpich package!

I am glad to have been of help!

 [BTW, are you on debian-beowulf and/or debian-science?  If so, I won't
 CC you in my announcement to those lists of the mpich transition.]

No, I am not (yet). Please do CC me, though I'll be a mere observer.

Many thanks.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600036



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-01-31 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:36 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 # Bcc'ing control
 severity 195509 important
 tags 195509 + patch
 thanks
 
 On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:25:30AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
  @@ -170,7 +170,10 @@
   libbase=`basename $libname .a`
  # The -h name sets the name of the object; this is necessary to 
  # ensure that the dynamic linker can find the proper shared library.
  -if $CLINKER -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o 
  ../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
  +export F77_GETARGDECL=intrinsic GETARG
  +   if $CLINKER -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o 
  ../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
  +   echo Successfully linked $libname
  +   elif gfortran-4.3 -shared -Wl,-h,$libbase.$slsuffix -o 
  ../shared/$libbase.$slsuffix *.o $OtherLibs ; then
  echo Successfully linked $libname
  else
  echo Linking $libname shared lib failed  
  
  This is certainly not good, but seems to work. Maybe you can refine
  it. This is also the reason why you see the getarg errors interspersed
  in the build logs.
  
  Now, the failure is this:
 
 [snip]
 
  I have no idea on how to handle this. My observation is that the lines
  in question are related to some f2c and c2f. For example, the
  lines in question in mpi.h are:
 
 [snip more]
 
 Further diagnosis showed that these are the error causing lines, along
 with the fixes:
 
 diff -u mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
 --- mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
 +++ mpich-1.2.7/src/fortran/configure
 @@ -15820,11 +15820,11 @@
   # turn off f90
   F90=
   else
 - F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modflag`
 - F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
 + F90_MODINCFLAG=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modflag`
 + F90MODINCSPEC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90modspec`
  if test -z $USER_SET_F90INC -a -z $F90INC ; then
   # This should use a test or try to get it from the f90module.
 - F90INC=`$MAKE -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
 + F90INC=`$MAKE -s -f ../../f90modules/Makefile f90incflag`
  fi
  fi
  fi
 
 For some reason, make was printing make[1]: entering directory...
 (and confusing the build). And this resulted in a bad config.status,
 with sed errors (and commands like sed s,make[1] ...),  which produced
 an empty mpe_fortdefs.h, which didn't result in defines for the
 relevant MPI_* stuff.
 
 I have attached a patch and a successful build log. I hope this is
 useful to you to base your changes on. Please note that my fixes are
 far from elegant, but I didn't have (or try spending) the time to make
 them neat...

Terrific!  Thanks for the hard work!  I'll neaten them up myself, that's
the easy part.

 And, I have raised the severity of the bug to important since this is
 part of the gfortran transition. (But if you thought it's just because
 I want more brownie points for producing a patch for an important bug,
 well I won't deny it! :-)

Actually, given how many years this bug has been open, and that it's
holding up a major transition, and several people have bugged me about
it, I'd say important is a fair characterization. :-)

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-01-31 Thread Colin Tuckley
Kumar Appaiah wrote:

 Er, apologies for the previous post... it failed due to getarg, in all
 likelihood. I missed reading the logs properly.

ARM Ltd are sponsoring work by CodeSourcery (the gFortran compiler writers)
to fix the GETARG problem, but it will be a few weeks before we see anything
I think.

Colin

-- 
Colin Tuckley  |  +44(0)1903 236872  |  PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian Developer   |  +44(0)7799 143369  | 0x1B3045CE

There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that know binary, and those
that don't.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-01-30 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 01:09 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Based on Tobias Burnus advice on:
 
 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.toolchain/733/focus=22611
 
 I have been able to make a patch for mpich which sort of proceeds with
 the build using gfortran (I have fixed it to gfortran-4.3).

Excellent, thanks very much for the patch and for your help!

 However,
 the build fails at a later stage.
 
 Attached is my patch, and the build log. The relevant parts are here:

You missed a very relevant part:
log
checking whether C compiler accepts option -fPIC... yes
checking whether routines compiled with -fPIC can be linked with ones compiled  
without -fPIC... yes
checking whether Fortran compiler accepts option -PIC... no
checking whether Fortran compiler accepts option -fPIC... yes
checking whether routines compiled with -fPIC can be linked with ones compiled 
without -fPIC... yes
checking for argument used to indicate shared lib search dir... -Wl,-rpath -Wl,
checking whether shared libraries can be built... no
Running device-specific setup program

[snip]

ranlib libpmpi++.a
Making all in balky
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make --no-print-directory mpi-lib-test
make --no-print-directory profileliblink
Testing that MPI applications can be linked...
make --no-print-directory linktest
make overtake
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H  -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DUSE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE=1 -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES=1 -DHAVE_SIGNAL_H=1 -DHAVE_SIGACTION=1 -DHAVE_SLEEP=1 
-DHAVE_SYSCONF=1   -c /tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/examples/test/pt2pt/overtake.c
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H  -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DUSE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE=1 -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES=1 -DHAVE_SIGNAL_H=1 -DHAVE_SIGACTION=1 -DHAVE_SLEEP=1 
-DHAVE_SYSCONF=1   -c /tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/examples/test/pt2pt/test.c
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc  -o overtake overtake.o test.o 
make clean
make --no-print-directory mpi-addons
make --no-print-directory mpelib
Making MPE Profiling Libraries
/log

Compare with the -5 i386 build log:

log
checking whether C compiler accepts option -fPIC... yes
checking whether routines compiled with -fPIC can be linked with ones compiled  
without -fPIC... yes
checking whether Fortran compiler accepts option -PIC... no
checking whether Fortran compiler accepts option -fPIC... yes
checking whether routines compiled with -fPIC can be linked with ones compiled 
without -fPIC... yes
checking for argument used to indicate shared lib search dir... -Wl,-rpath -Wl,
checking whether shared libraries can be built... yes
checking whether programs remember where the shared lib is... yes
Running device-specific setup program

[snip]

ranlib libpmpi++.a
Making all in balky
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make --no-print-directory mpi-lib-test
make --no-print-directory profileliblink
Testing that MPI applications can be linked...
make --no-print-directory linktest
make overtake
/build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -fPIC -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H  -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DUSE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE=1 -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES=1 -DHAVE_SIGNAL_H=1 -DHAVE_SIGACTION=1 -DHAVE_SLEEP=1 
-DHAVE_SYSCONF=1   -c /build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/examples/test/pt2pt/overtake.c
/build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -fPIC -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H  -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DUSE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE=1 -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES=1 -DHAVE_SIGNAL_H=1 -DHAVE_SIGACTION=1 -DHAVE_SLEEP=1 
-DHAVE_SYSCONF=1   -c /build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/examples/test/pt2pt/test.c
/build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc  -o overtake overtake.o test.o 
make clean
make --no-print-directory mpi-addons
Making a shared library of libmpich.a
Successfully linked libmpich.a
Making a shared library of libpmpich.a
Successfully linked libpmpich.a
Making a shared library of libfmpich.a
Successfully linked libfmpich.a
Making a shared library of libpmpich++.a
Successfully linked libpmpich++.a
Testing that MPI applications can be linked with shared libs...
make overtake
/build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -fPIC -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H  -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 
-DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DUSE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_LONG_DOUBLE=1 -DHAVE_LONG_LONG_INT=1 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES=1 -DHAVE_SIGNAL_H=1 -DHAVE_SIGACTION=1 -DHAVE_SLEEP=1 
-DHAVE_SYSCONF=1   -c /build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/examples/test/pt2pt/overtake.c
/build/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -fPIC -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 

Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-01-30 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:24:05AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
 Dear Adam,
 
 On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:45:40PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
   However,
   the build fails at a later stage.
   
   Attached is my patch, and the build log. The relevant parts are here:
  
  You missed a very relevant part:

Er, apologies for the previous post... it failed due to getarg, in all
likelihood. I missed reading the logs properly.

I shall give it one more try when I have time.

Sorry.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#195509: Proceeding on this bug.

2008-01-29 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Hi!

Based on Tobias Burnus advice on:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.toolchain/733/focus=22611

I have been able to make a patch for mpich which sort of proceeds with
the build using gfortran (I have fixed it to gfortran-4.3). However,
the build fails at a later stage.

Attached is my patch, and the build log. The relevant parts are here:

log
Fortran subsystem:

Configuring Fortran subsystem
checking for cc... cc
checking whether the C compiler sets its return status correctly... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... no
checking for Fortran 77 compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the Fortran 77 compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... yes
checking whether gfortran-4.3 accepts -g... yes

[snip]

checking that f works as the extension for Fortran 90 program... no
checking for extension for Fortran 90 programs... unknown!

[snip]

checking for routines to access the command line from Fortran 77... searching...
checking whether gfortran-4.3   works with GETARG and IARGC... yes
checking how to get verbose linking output from gfortran-4.3 ... -v
checking for Fortran libraries of gfortran-4.3 ...  
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.0 
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../../../lib -L/lib/../lib 
-L/usr/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../.. 
-lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s
checking whether C can link with  -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.0 
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../../../lib -L/lib/../lib 
-L/usr/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.3.0/../../.. 
-lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s... yes
checking for linker for Fortran main programs... Use Fortran to link programs
checking for Fortran 77 name mangling... lower underscore
checking for which Fortran libraries are needed to link C with Fortran... none
checking whether Fortran accepts ! for comments... yes
checking for include directory flag for Fortran... -I
checking for Fortran 77 flag for library directories... -L
checking whether Fortran has pointer declaration... no
checking for size of Fortran type integer... 4
checking for size of Fortran type real... 4
checking for size of Fortran type double precision... 8

[snip]

checking for C type matching Fortran integer*1... char
checking for C type matching Fortran integer*2... short
checking for C type matching Fortran integer*4... int
checking for C type matching Fortran integer*8... long
checking for C type matching Fortran integer*16... unavailable
checking for C type matching Fortran real*4... float
checking for C type matching Fortran real*8... double
checking for C type matching Fortran integer... int
checking whether C compiler allows unaligned doubles... yes
checking for type of weak symbol support... pragma weak
checking whether __attribute__ ((weak)) allowed... yes
checking for values of Fortran logicals... True is 1 and False is 0
checking for Fortran 90 integer kind for 8-byte integers... unavailable
checking for Fortran 90 integer kind for 8-byte integers... -1 (cached)
checking for Fortran 90 integer kind for 4-byte integers... unavailable
configure: WARNING: Unable to determine the size of a simple integer
configure: WARNING: Using 4 for the Fortran 90 KIND of an MPI_Aint
configure: WARNING: Using 4 for the Fortran 90 KIND of an MPI_Offset
checking whether using gcc and g77 together... no

[snip]

Done configuring Fortran subsystem
/log

The failure step is this:
fail
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -DMPI_LINUX -DUSE_STDARG 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES  -DMPE_GRAPHICS -I.. -I/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/include 
-I../slog_api -I/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/slog_api/include   -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H -fPIC -c 
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/src/decompf.c -o decompf.lo
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -DMPI_LINUX -DUSE_STDARG 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES  -DMPE_GRAPHICS -I.. -I/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/include 
-I../slog_api -I/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/slog_api/include   -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H -fPIC -c 
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/src/mpe_seqf.c -o mpe_seqf.lo
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/bin/mpicc -DMPI_LINUX -DUSE_STDARG 
-DHAVE_PROTOTYPES  -DMPE_GRAPHICS -I.. -I/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/include 
-I../slog_api -I/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/slog_api/include   -DUSE_SOCKLEN_T 
-DUSE_U_INT_FOR_XDR -DHAVE_MPICHCONF_H -fPIC -c 
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/mpe/src/getgrankf.c -o getgrankf.lo
if [ ! -d /tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/mpe/lib/shared ]; then mkdir 
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/mpe/lib/shared; fi
cc -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-soname,libmpe.so.1.0 -o 
/tmp/buildd/mpich-1.2.7/image_mpich/mpe/lib/shared/libmpe.so.1.0 
mpe_graphics.lo xcolor.lo xframe.lo xinit.lo xwmap.lo xmouse.lo xkey.lo 
clog_sysio.lo mpe_log.lo clog.lo