Bug#281466: nautilus-cd-burner: Lack of (advanced) documentation
El vie, 03-08-2007 a las 23:30 +0200, Sven Arvidsson escribió: On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 20:40 -0500, Javier Kohen wrote: I wanted to give this package a try, but I just couldn't find out whether it supports multi session writing. I checked the bundled docs and ran a few searches on google.com but I still don't know what writing method it uses and whether multi session discs are detected, correctly processed and generated. Of course I didn't check the code, but I'd rather stick to the command line tools than read the source of a small GNOME application to find out what it does :-) Unfortunately others can't do either easily. Hi, I wonder where you feel this information belong? Putting it in the package description would mean that it would show up if you search for multi session writing (and would probably end up making people angry when they found out it's NOT supported), putting it in a README inside the package seems kinda moot as you must install it to read it. I guess this belongs on a web site, but n-c-b does not have one. (Also, do you still care about this bug?, seeing as it's almost three years old ;-) To be honest, I care insofar that I haven't used this application at all because I still don't know whether it supports multi-session or not. However, you just answered my question :) I think that maybe the documentation should be added upstream and not on the package description or the README, for the same reasons you detailed. Thanks, -- Javier Kohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Bug#281466: nautilus-cd-burner: Lack of (advanced) documentation
forwarded 281466 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464152 thanks n Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:45 +, Javier Kohen wrote: To be honest, I care insofar that I haven't used this application at all because I still don't know whether it supports multi-session or not. However, you just answered my question :) I think that maybe the documentation should be added upstream and not on the package description or the README, for the same reasons you detailed. Yeah, that's probably the best approach, I filed a bug upstream about it; http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464152 -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 760BDD22 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#281466: nautilus-cd-burner: Lack of (advanced) documentation
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 20:40 -0500, Javier Kohen wrote: I wanted to give this package a try, but I just couldn't find out whether it supports multi session writing. I checked the bundled docs and ran a few searches on google.com but I still don't know what writing method it uses and whether multi session discs are detected, correctly processed and generated. Of course I didn't check the code, but I'd rather stick to the command line tools than read the source of a small GNOME application to find out what it does :-) Unfortunately others can't do either easily. Hi, I wonder where you feel this information belong? Putting it in the package description would mean that it would show up if you search for multi session writing (and would probably end up making people angry when they found out it's NOT supported), putting it in a README inside the package seems kinda moot as you must install it to read it. I guess this belongs on a web site, but n-c-b does not have one. (Also, do you still care about this bug?, seeing as it's almost three years old ;-) -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 760BDD22 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#281466: nautilus-cd-burner: Lack of (advanced) documentation
I wanted to give this package a try, but I just couldn't find out whether it supports multi session writing. I checked the bundled docs and ran a few searches on google.com but I still don't know what writing method it uses and whether multi session discs are detected, correctly processed and generated. How can this best be dealt with? Perhaps by adding a blurb in README.Debian? -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.whiz.se PGP Key ID 760BDD22 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
