Bug#284962: fig2sty does not cope with xfig-3.2.5-alpha5 file format

2005-03-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
[Cc: to the BTS]

* Alberto Maurizi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-02 19:20]:

  Could you please confirm that the same happens to you?
 
   Not exactly.
 
   I removed type=text and then I wrote it again in the first
   polygon. The objective was to force xfig to rewrite a new file,
   because creating my own file from scratch (with all the tag
   required, I think) didn't work and I wanted to make a minimal
   check.
 
   If you look at the differences between nopic.fig (after deletion
   and successive insertion of the same tag) and nopic.fig-orig
   (the original from doc), you may notice a difference. In
   particular, in the modified file, the tag deleted/rewritten
   appears as a last record (as it shold, I think), but with a
   different syntax:
 
 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 0. 6 150 735 4365 4050 type=text\001 (orig)
^
|--- this ...

 4 0 0 50 -1 0 12 0. 4 165 780 900 4770 type=text\001 (modif)
   ^ ^
  |--- ... and that, is the relevance difference!

  
The problem is that you created a new text object but forgot to set its
special flag (I can tell it from the 6 becoming a 4 above).  This is
well documented in the man page:

How to draw the layout definition.

[...] Tags are associated to each frame. A tag is simply a text
key=value marked as special and positioned within [...]
^

In XFig, you must choose the Edit mode (button on the left panel) and
click on the newly created text.  In the Edit pop-up panel, change the
Special Flag from Normal to Special.

Please, confirm if this indeed solve your problem.
 
-- 
Rafael




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#284962: fig2sty does not cope with xfig-3.2.5-alpha5 file format

2005-03-02 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Alberto Maurizi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-12-09 19:28]:

 Package: fig2sty
 Version: 1:0.1-4
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 
 I experienced the problem wrinting my own xfig and trying to use it to
 make an sty file format.
 
 I also checked one of the /usr/share/doc/fig2sty/example/*.fig files:
 editing it with xfig and processing with fig2sty gives an unusable sty
 file.

This bug will soon become three months old.  I already downgraded its
severity to normal and tagged it moreinfo and unreproducible.  If I do
not receive from you in the next days an example that reproduces the problem
reported above, I will close this bug report.

Thanks,

-- 
Rafael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#284962: fig2sty does not cope with xfig-3.2.5-alpha5 file format

2005-03-02 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
[Cc:ing to the BTS, such that our discussion is recorded somewhere.  Hope
you don't mind.]

* Alberto Maurizi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-02 16:08]:

   OK, I reproduced the error and I can give you an example (the
   archive in attachment)
 
   1. cp -r /usr/share/doc/fig2sty/examples/some files $HOME/bug_report
 
   2. fig2sty nopic.fig + latex example.tex + dvips example.dvi,
  gives the expected result (see example.ps-orig)
 
   3. now I open nopic.fig with xfig, delete the type=text label
   
  in the n=1 area, I write it again and save the file
 
   4. repeating procedure at point 2 gives the wrong result (see
  example.ps)
 
   If of any help, I noticed that the format of the xfig file (the
   changed label) is different from the original.

Thanks for the example, that is exactly what was needed.  I can replicate
what you are reporting above.  However, from the fig2sty man page:

[...]
Several key words are interpreted by fig2sty:

type
This tag is compulsory; a frame will not be detected as such if you
don't provide a type tag. [...]

You are not allowed to have a polygonal area without the text tag.  When I
delete also the text n=1 from that polygon, fig2sty works as expected,
i.e. an empty polygon is shown in example.ps (attached below).

Could you please confirm that the same happens to you?
 
-- 
Rafael


example.ps
Description: PostScript document