Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
Hi, On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:18:28AM +0900, Horms wrote: If you have packages that are pending in NEW, please list them here. There are no 2.6.10 kernel-packages left in NEW[1], thanks to a quick processing after this thread started the other day. with kernel-source-2.6.10 version 2.6.10-5 amd64 SMP systems got broken. I am still investigating, it currently looks like 083-x86_64_switch_mm_context_race.dpatch and 084-smp_nmi_watchdog_race.dpatch introduced the breakage. Is this still broken? I have only partial feedback from the users reporting the problem, but I think it is now fixed in 2.6.10-6 by removing 083-x86_64_switch_mm_context_race.dpatch - as discussed whith dilinger. From the amd64 point of view, current kernel-source in SVN should be released ASAP. Kind regards Frederik Schueler [1] http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:56:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Austen wrote: The package kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm is still in testing and probably should be removed. Thanks, I have CCed the maintainer for his feedback. I have also CCed the bug so it is logged there. If you have any more information, please send it here. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:13:27AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. Most kernel-image-2.6.10 packages (ppc, s390, hppa, alpha, amd64) are stuck in NEW since the beginning of the year, I personally would not call this a replacement. Well, you have to consider that the same guy going to remove the 2.6.9 kernels also has the power to do the NEW processing for the missing kernels. Yes, so lets list them here to help that person to help us. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: Hi, I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be removed. Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 kernel. Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. Yep, but not mentioned here. But they are now because you have now mentioned them below. The reason I CCed a bunch of people on my post last week was to get them to add the relevant bits that are missing. Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. Presumably only 2.6.10-3 shold go into d.o, right? The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which will obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. That sounds like an issue that needs some discussion, I take it that is what the recent discussions on debian-kernel/debian-boot about powerpc-2.4.27. Is this correct? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:23:59AM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: Hi, I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be removed. Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 kernel. Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. Yep, but not mentioned here. But they are now because you have now mentioned them below. The reason I CCed a bunch of people on my post last week was to get them to add the relevant bits that are missing. Yep, which is why i mentioned them :) Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. Presumably only 2.6.10-3 shold go into d.o, right? Yes, but the ftp-masters know how to handle this right, and will accept all three, and the two first will just vanish. The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which will obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. That sounds like an issue that needs some discussion, I take it that is what the recent discussions on debian-kernel/debian-boot about powerpc-2.4.27. Is this correct? Indeed. I uploaded the .udebs for d-i which are based on those, and which didn't need NEW. As joeyh and vorlon mentioned, these .udebs are now in unstable, but not the accompanying source they are built upon, which is a violation of the GPL as long as 2.4.27-3 remains in NEW, i think. Not all that important, but i hope that we can sort this technically in the future. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: Hi, I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be removed. Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 kernel. Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: Hi, I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be removed. Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 kernel. Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. Yep, but not mentioned here. Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which will obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
Hi, On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. Most kernel-image-2.6.10 packages (ppc, s390, hppa, alpha, amd64) are stuck in NEW since the beginning of the year, I personally would not call this a replacement. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. with kernel-source-2.6.10 version 2.6.10-5 amd64 SMP systems got broken. I am still investigating, it currently looks like 083-x86_64_switch_mm_context_race.dpatch and 084-smp_nmi_watchdog_race.dpatch introduced the breakage. Source: kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 Maintainer: Kernel Team Uploader: Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ack: none Yes, it can be dropped. As long als the NEW queue gets finally processed and all 2.6.10 packages are added to the distribution. Kind regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:06:51AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. Most kernel-image-2.6.10 packages (ppc, s390, hppa, alpha, amd64) are stuck in NEW since the beginning of the year, I personally would not call this a replacement. Well, you have to consider that the same guy going to remove the 2.6.9 kernels also has the power to do the NEW processing for the missing kernels. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
Hi, On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 09:13:27AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Well, you have to consider that the same guy going to remove the 2.6.9 kernels also has the power to do the NEW processing for the missing kernels. your point =) Kind regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
Hi, I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be removed. There is also a need to update misdn-kernel which has a Build-Depends-Indep on kernel-tree-2.6.9. I have tried to CC all interested parties so they can say yay or nay. I have spoken to AJ and he said he would be happy to act on this list if we can make it complete. Source: kernel-image-sparc-2.2 Maintainer: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ack: Josh Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: kernel-image-2.2.25-sun4cdm_9.1_sparc.deb kernel-image-2.2.25-sun4dm-smp_9.1_sparc.deb kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9.1.dsc kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9.1.tar.gz kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9woody1.dsc kernel-image-sparc-2.2_9woody1.tar.gz Source: kernel-source-2.6.9 Maintainer: Kernel Tream Uploaders: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] et al. Ack: Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64 Maintainer: Kernel Team Uploader: Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ack: none Files: kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-generic_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-9_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-generic_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-9-em64t-p4_2.6.9-4_i386.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4.dsc kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64_2.6.9-4.tar.gz Source: kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64 Maintainer: Dan Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kernel Team) Ack: Dan Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-itanium-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-itanium_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-mckinley-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-2-mckinley_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9-2_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-2-itanium-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-2-itanium_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-2-mckinley-smp_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-2-mckinley_2.6.9-4_ia64.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64_2.6.9-4.dsc kernel-image-2.6.9-ia64_2.6.9-4.tar.gz Source: kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa Maintainer: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ack: none kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa_2.6.9-1.dsc kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa_2.6.9-1.tar.gz kernel-patch-2.6.9-hppa_2.6.9-1_all.deb Source: kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9 Maintainer: Kernel Team Uploaders Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ack: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: kernel-build-2.6.9-power3-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.6.9-power3_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.6.9-power4-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.6.9-power4_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.6.9-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-build-2.6.9-powerpc_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-headers-2.6.9_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-power3-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-power3_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-power4-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-power4_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc-smp_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6.9-powerpc_2.6.9-4_powerpc.deb kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-4.dsc kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.9_2.6.9-4.tar.gz Packages that need Updating === Source: misdn-kernel Reason: Bui8ld-Depends-Indep on kernel-tree-2.6.9 Maintainer: Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ack: None -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: Hi, I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should be removed. Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 kernel. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295890: please remove old kernel-source packages
Subject: please remove old kernel-source packages Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important Hello, the following source packages are no longer being kept up to date with regards to security etc.: kernel-source-2.4.24 kernel-source-2.4.25 kernel-source-2.4.26 This also makes these packages obsolete: (binary) kernel-patch-device-mapper: only necessary for kernel versions 2.4.26. If removal will occur, I will file a bug with the maintainer. (source) kernel-headers-2.4.25-m68k: superseded by kernel-headers-2.4.27-m68k (source) kernel-headers-2.4.26-m68k: superseded by kernel-headers-2.4.27-m68k (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha (source) kernel-image-2.4.25-arm: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-arm (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-arm: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-arm (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-ia64: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64 (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-s390: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-s390 (source) kernel-image-2.4.25-hppa: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-hppa (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-hppa: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-hppa (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-i386: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 NOTE: this is a security risk, so it should definitely be removed even if nothing else in this list will. (source) kernel-image-2.4.25-mac, kernel-image-2.4.25-amiga, kernel-image-2.4.25-bvme6000, kernel-image-2.4.25-atari, kernel-image-2.4.25-mvme147, kernel-image-2.4.25-mvme16x, kernel-image-2.4.25-q40: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-m68k (source) kernel-image-2.4.26-mac, kernel-image-2.4.26-amiga, kernel-image-2.4.26-bvme6000, kernel-image-2.4.26-atari, kernel-image-2.4.26-mvme147, kernel-image-2.4.26-mvme16x, kernel-image-2.4.26-q40: superseded by kernel-image-2.4.27-m68k (source) pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386: superseded by pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-i386 (source) kernel-patch-2.4.25-apus: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus (source) kernel-patch-2.4.25-arm: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-arm (source) kernel-patch-2.4.26-arm: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-arm (source) kernel-patch-2.4.25-hppa: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-hppa (source) kernel-patch-2.4.26-hppa: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-hppa (source) kernel-patch-2.4.26-ia64: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-ia64 (source) kernel-patch-2.4.25-m68k: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-m68k (source) kernel-patch-2.4.26-m68k: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-m68k (source) kernel-patch-2.4.26-s390: superseded by kernel-patch-2.4.27-s390 Thanks! -Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (499, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
