Bug#297173: possible solution: ssh srv records
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:12:14PM +0100, chrysn wrote: [srv record based solution that puts different virtualhosts on different tcp ports] andras, would this solve your problem? While it looks like a good idea, it wouldn't solve my specific problem as I can't depend on ports other than 22 being reachable by my clients. Still, thanks for taking the time to think about it! Andras -- A nation is just a society for hating foreigners. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#297173: possible solution: ssh srv records
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:40:04PM +0100, Andras Korn wrote: While it looks like a good idea, it wouldn't solve my specific problem as I can't depend on ports other than 22 being reachable by my clients. that sounds like a very exotic case, but yeah, in this case, you really need in-protocol virtual hosts. Still, thanks for taking the time to think about it! for the idea not to get lost, my last mail is now tracked as [1] in openssh's bug tracker. [1] https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2217 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
