Bug#297741: Trivial two year old bug not fixed and without comment
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100 Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote: I would want to know your thoughts on this. I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong. I certainly wouldn't want to patch the generated *.la files, so I was searching for an issue in the build process, and since there was nothing fancy in either case, I gave up. Now, I think this is finally fixed, but with glib 2.12.9 (in experimental); could you confirm this is the case? No unfortunately it's not fixed in experimental, the .la file still has: # The name of the static archive. old_library='' Which is incorrect. Maybe I'll have a look at it grts Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#297741: Trivial two year old bug not fixed and without comment
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:29:50 +0100 Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote: I would want to know your thoughts on this. I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong. I certainly wouldn't want to patch the generated *.la files, so I was searching for an issue in the build process, and since there was nothing fancy in either case, I gave up. Now, I think this is finally fixed, but with glib 2.12.9 (in experimental); could you confirm this is the case? Although the debs in experimental have the same issue, I just compiled glib2.0-dev myself (on a etch system) and there strangely enough, the .la file comes out just fine... grts Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#297741: Trivial two year old bug not fixed and without comment
Hi, I wonder why this trivial two year old bug is not fixed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=297741 And without comment in the BTS. This will break any package that tries to use libtool to statically link glib-2.0. I'm planning to upload one, but now I have to kludge around it because of this. I understand that now (with etchs release around the corner) is not the time to upload a new glib-2.0, but I would want to know your thoughts on this. grts Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#297741: Trivial two year old bug not fixed and without comment
Hi, On Thu, Jan 18, 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote: I would want to know your thoughts on this. I had a look twice already, and didn't have a clue of what was wrong. I certainly wouldn't want to patch the generated *.la files, so I was searching for an issue in the build process, and since there was nothing fancy in either case, I gave up. Now, I think this is finally fixed, but with glib 2.12.9 (in experimental); could you confirm this is the case? I think the bug appeared because libglib.so was wrongly linked to libgthread.so until 2.12.8 (but 2.12.8 was broken in other ways.) Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
